{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"864086d9-2666-4357-bda2-3f798f3a7875","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"dfbde236ca8b164fbd58c3d1c6e12c7d6e4daf4597f692f948255e42c7bd8574","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_economics","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"7d73f8216bcf19b22be53da619cfb0cfb39ff2266b9f968cda1dea9f393757f4","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_flow","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"afd1f480595a67694b6fa49c77b61010f3c8a6e1ddc73b6612de7f994d6b0762","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests","manifest","audit_math","audit_permissions","audit_economics","audit_flow"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"3014f1ea5961918ca059453a484bf4c8bcbbfc2248dbe31d94ac7c5cdf8f50bd","skillId":"audit-judge","tools":[]},"key":"audit_judge","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"3014f1ea5961918ca059453a484bf4c8bcbbfc2248dbe31d94ac7c5cdf8f50bd","skillId":"audit-judge","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"459c8eb7b060d784b3b1eb26136a1f57a5852aa9cd661f355c45c0f733b0e555","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_math","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"e9af5e6c553cfbd596d4c90a21e97c1d068b231f3c9f014eb01dec5c215aab20","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_permissions","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"1a3fb0c1bb3efb120cdb827c09f8a99558eb6e084dcbe4a1527a056949757a31","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"b6503de65ad02f845827887c23da4c3b56ccc5df7a459db263bae6e549d92f7f","skillId":"build-contract-project","tools":[]},"key":"build_contract_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"b6503de65ad02f845827887c23da4c3b56ccc5df7a459db263bae6e549d92f7f","skillId":"build-contract-project","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"6a2006257c73fe4c5242ef813fd8b98e21ec25651bb2fcf75b93c3b1211c2479","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"tools":[]},"key":"manifest","kind":"code","role":"integrate","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"2e196b86eaca560c38c6d1ffbb496787e848f9928a079e189a10968bdd68d3a6","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"73431852439ad3a343f3d2b7db1c43cd363b9f48f9bb51497374a0cf6d50b223","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","tools":[]},"key":"write_foundry_tests","kind":"code","role":"tests","skillHash":"73431852439ad3a343f3d2b7db1c43cd363b9f48f9bb51497374a0cf6d50b223","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"A custom token: Why (WHY).\nToken name: Why\nToken symbol: WHY\nToken supply: 1,000,000,000 with 18 decimals, all minted once to the deployer in the constructor.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"11aa6d916fd6e095339860b9f5713658661cbc02257ee40b3c01d024ad68cae5","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"864086d9-2666-4357-bda2-3f798f3a7875","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-760-why"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"51883","feedbackHash":"8d57b171e81b615bddb1cb0debe317b5c19f0cd80ae8ef829683f46741f8183a","nodeKey":"audit_economics","submissionHash":"dfbde236ca8b164fbd58c3d1c6e12c7d6e4daf4597f692f948255e42c7bd8574","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51885","feedbackHash":"21b0d72c59c17aa4b5b0b4c5ce516956163f49144a42a0e8e2baf6705b33712d","nodeKey":"audit_flow","submissionHash":"7d73f8216bcf19b22be53da619cfb0cfb39ff2266b9f968cda1dea9f393757f4","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51168","feedbackHash":"2eaad4d4a7477d69bd03aa28c011ecf030c0a6f0926f22b1e43c7604f3aa670a","nodeKey":"audit_judge","submissionHash":"afd1f480595a67694b6fa49c77b61010f3c8a6e1ddc73b6612de7f994d6b0762","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51878","feedbackHash":"26e8ec9d5a5f9c8823894b00d15235981ae4b08ecc32a374e5305a74eaa79fe5","nodeKey":"audit_math","submissionHash":"459c8eb7b060d784b3b1eb26136a1f57a5852aa9cd661f355c45c0f733b0e555","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51881","feedbackHash":"99c85cf384b1b03d33513ab67519aaa3b2bab9965d2e50a5da3804b11c00f2be","nodeKey":"audit_permissions","submissionHash":"e9af5e6c553cfbd596d4c90a21e97c1d068b231f3c9f014eb01dec5c215aab20","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51302","feedbackHash":"a9c87deb48afa7e86ea883a2772006257e5b203d947f89b0a2acad3aeec87aff","nodeKey":"build_contract_project","submissionHash":"1a3fb0c1bb3efb120cdb827c09f8a99558eb6e084dcbe4a1527a056949757a31","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51167","feedbackHash":"d52dab64f3868a21d4e43fa5025e1f03de9d943cd5ba27875970c22584e4f19e","nodeKey":"manifest","submissionHash":"6a2006257c73fe4c5242ef813fd8b98e21ec25651bb2fcf75b93c3b1211c2479","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51061","feedbackHash":"f2ae628391552b81200b0b2294f1b496729d8a517df75d8adac8f01c751e4cc0","nodeKey":"write_foundry_tests","submissionHash":"2e196b86eaca560c38c6d1ffbb496787e848f9928a079e189a10968bdd68d3a6","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"d63062989004dd54cd26ce1504ea258fe85af9b09ed8260f1ddac40008e7277d","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"d86a21a8a22c88b6e3234f4605b09900b85aedb1d7d281c0166a08773cea69bc","device":"24b3b94660bddda1","findings":[],"hash":"1a3fb0c1bb3efb120cdb827c09f8a99558eb6e084dcbe4a1527a056949757a31","nodeId":"351bbc3c-8ea8-458c-ab23-dea3470b57d6","outcome":"completed","summary":"Implemented Why (WHY): 1,000,000,000 tokens with 18 decimals, minted once to the deployer.\n\nIncludes vendored dependencies, deployment documentation, and success, failure, fuzz, and invariant tests.\n\nVerified with Solidity 0.8.26:\n\n- `forge build` passed\n- `forge test` passed: 27 tests\n- `forge fmt --check` passed","treeHash":"8df5152317db0eea8289414faabaee4c7422de8c","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":362880,"inputTokens":45740,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":13555,"runtime":"codex","turns":5,"wallClockMs":321295}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"2ad20ca4ceee0fe12e56e63c0f6a7d3f7c7f80024e6a2b17e63031c25c2b7dee","device":"269d07167a05c205","findings":[],"hash":"2e196b86eaca560c38c6d1ffbb496787e848f9928a079e189a10968bdd68d3a6","nodeId":"752b74f0-e521-40ee-8611-927930fafe25","outcome":"completed","summary":"Expanded tests under `test/` for allowance boundaries, repeated spending, revocation, failure recovery, and rejected calls during random sequences.\n\nOffline `forge build` and `forge test` pass: **40 tests**, including **32,768 invariant calls**. No confirmed contract defects found. Only test files changed.","treeHash":"734913388ee3420e32c140739510ddbefa4d9d8c","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":722048,"inputTokens":81390,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":9180,"runtime":"codex","turns":5,"wallClockMs":263146}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"2a6239e0c1b8c774","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"DEPENDENCIES.json claims to record 'the exact commits and SHA-256 hashes of all vendored files' (README, Build and check). The five OpenZeppelin files match both the recorded hashes and upstream v5.4.0 byte-for-byte. Seven forge-std files do not match their recorded hash: src/StdAssertions.sol, src/StdJson.sol, src/StdToml.sol, src/Vm.sol, src/console.sol, src/interfaces/IERC7540.sol, src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol. The recorded values are the upstream v1.9.7 hashes; the committed files were reflowed by `forge fmt` (whitespace-only differences, confirmed by diffing against raw.githubusercontent.com at tag v1.9.7 with whitespace stripped). The production contract is unaffected: forge-std is test-only, and Why's runtime bytecode is derived solely from src/Why.sol and the (matching) OpenZeppelin files. This is a provenance-record defect only, outside the assigned math area, reported because an offline verifier that trusts DEPENDENCIES.json will flag the vendored tree as tampered.","line":26,"path":"DEPENDENCIES.json","reproduction":"State: the committed tree at HEAD. Input: for each entry in DEPENDENCIES.json compute sha256 of <directory>/<file> and compare with the recorded value. Expected: 0 mismatches (as the README asserts). Actual: 7 mismatches, all under lib/forge-std/src (StdAssertions.sol local sha256 starts 3fbf4a02…, recorded d4c89eec…; StdJson.sol 61bbf9b3… vs 0211b47e…; StdToml.sol 187d2f0c… vs de3fb35a…; Vm.sol a1b1c829… vs 9068805b…; console.sol a2e632dc… vs 896c5a5a…; interfaces/IERC7540.sol 3ae3eec9… vs c6a7854c…; interfaces/IMulticall3.sol 1b63ca78… vs 6620d9c5…). Command: python3 -c \"import json,hashlib,os; [print(p) for d in json.load(open('DEPENDENCIES.json')) for f,h in d['files_sha256'].items() for p in [os.path.join(d['directory'],f)] if hashlib.sha256(open(p,'rb').read()).hexdigest()!=h]\". Fix: either re-record the hashes of the committed files or restore the upstream byte-exact files; both keep behavior identical.","severity":"info","snippet":"      \"src/StdAssertions.sol\": \"d4c89eec70d267dec6188461fbc74d3dc8c47e518d176a23417533a232ed9780\",","title":"DEPENDENCIES.json records upstream forge-std hashes that do not match seven committed (reformatted) files"}],"hash":"459c8eb7b060d784b3b1eb26136a1f57a5852aa9cd661f355c45c0f733b0e555","nodeId":"1312d36d-2e7e-4fa4-b1ee-b10e80133095","outcome":"completed","summary":"Review complete. The findings file is written at `.imd-findings.json` with one info-level finding and eight coverage rows; no source file was changed.\n\n**Math result: the Why token has no arithmetic defects in the assigned area.** The contract is a constructor-only specialization of OpenZeppelin ERC20 v5.4.0. It contains no division, no scale conversion, no narrowing cast, no external call, no payable function and no bytes decoding, so most of the Math Precision, Boundary and Numerical Gap failure modes have nothing to attach to. What remained was checked concretely:\n\n- **Supply constant** is exactly 10^27 (the aderyn large-literal lead is a compile-time constant with no truncation).\n- **Transfer and transferFrom** were driven at 1 wei, full balance, self-transfer at full balance, zero amount from an empty account, and max uint. Each reverted or moved exactly what it should. Allowance at max is never decremented, at max minus one it is decremented exactly, and a failed transfer restores the allowance atomically.\n- **Launch-flow arithmetic** on this supply divides exactly for the swarm share and the contributor splits, and the maximum pool share cannot overflow an intermediate.\n- **Coverage rows** mark all three ABI entry points as holds, plus the constructor, the supply invariant, launch arithmetic, boundary enumeration, and dependency provenance.\n\n**The one finding is outside the math area and informational.** The dependency record claims SHA-256 hashes for every vendored file, but seven forge-std files were reflowed by the formatter and no longer match. The OpenZeppelin files are byte-identical to upstream v5.4.0, and forge-std is test-only, so the deployed bytecode is unaffected. An offline verifier trusting that record would still flag the tree, so the author should re-record the hashes or restore the upstream bytes.\n\nScratch tests under `test/scratch/` were run and then removed. Build, formatter check and the project's 27 tests all pass.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":613825,"inputTokens":258,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":12564,"runtime":"claude","turns":25,"wallClockMs":176239}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"26af0f68501f3b4bf61ced8a4216ab2ab79592332c320546e9f1440cd01e5580","device":"2c736d2f8963f8a5","findings":[],"hash":"6a2006257c73fe4c5242ef813fd8b98e21ec25651bb2fcf75b93c3b1211c2479","nodeId":"d03c9f79-de62-425c-9681-85345e834f1d","outcome":"completed","summary":"Created [launch.json](/opt/identitymd/worker3/.identitymd/work/864086d9-2666-4357-bda2-3f798f3a7875/d03c9f79-de62-425c-9681-85345e834f1d/launch.json) with the exact WHY supply, empty constructor arguments, requested economics and paired currency.\n\nSchema and compiled ABI checks passed. `forge build` succeeded; `forge test` passed all 27 tests.\n\nOnly `launch.json` was added; build artifacts stayed in `test/scratch/`.","treeHash":"b7742f041fdd5b778062789ba93ed3021373ebc6","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":195584,"inputTokens":33646,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":3189,"runtime":"codex","turns":3,"wallClockMs":93169}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"aca5d7170d77c721","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Periphery / provenance. README.md and DEPENDENCIES.json state that the lockfile 'records the upstream tags, exact commits, and SHA-256 hashes of all vendored files' so that an offline verifier can confirm the vendored tree is the pinned upstream code. For the openzeppelin-contracts entry this is true: all six vendored OZ files hash to the recorded values and to upstream v5.4.0 (fetched and compared). For the forge-std entry it is not: seven of the thirty vendored files (src/StdAssertions.sol line 26, src/StdJson.sol line 32, src/StdToml.sol line 36, src/Vm.sol line 39, src/console.sol line 40, src/interfaces/IERC7540.sol line 48, src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol line 50) have a different SHA-256 than the lockfile records. The recorded hashes are the genuine upstream v1.9.7 hashes; the vendored copies were re-wrapped (long function signatures joined onto one line, forge-fmt style) after the hashes were taken. A line-by-line diff against upstream v1.9.7 shows formatting-only changes (no token-level change), and the vendored Vm.sol matches no forge-std tag from v1.9.4 through v1.12.0. Impact: a verifier that follows the project's own procedure (recompute SHA-256 of each listed file and compare) reports 7 mismatches and must either reject the tree or hand-diff 3,000+ lines to establish that the test harness is unmodified. No production bytecode is affected: src/Why.sol imports only the OpenZeppelin files, which verify. Fix: either re-vendor the seven files byte-for-byte from forge-std v1.9.7 (hashes then match the lockfile as written), or regenerate the seven hash entries from the files actually committed and note in README that the copies are reformatted. The forge-std entry's `commit` field (77041d2c) should remain, since the content is semantically that revision.","line":26,"path":"DEPENDENCIES.json","reproduction":"State: the committed tree at HEAD (b3e214b). Input: for every entry in DEPENDENCIES.json compute sha256 of <directory>/<file> and compare with files_sha256[file]. Expected (per README and the lockfile's purpose): 36/36 match. Actual: 29/36 match; these 7 differ: lib/forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol actual 3fbf4a025b4fc94eaca4c38c1f3dacb37bee10f12ee81994cfaf365ac1ce7384 vs recorded d4c89eec...; src/StdJson.sol actual 61bbf9b3... vs 0211b47e...; src/StdToml.sol actual 187d2f0c... vs de3fb35a...; src/Vm.sol actual a1b1c829... vs 9068805b...; src/console.sol actual a2e632dc... vs 896c5a5a...; src/interfaces/IERC7540.sol actual 3ae3eec9... vs c6a7854c...; src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol actual 1b63ca78... vs 6620d9c5.... Cross-check: `curl https://raw.githubusercontent.com/foundry-rs/forge-std/v1.9.7/src/Vm.sol | sha256sum` gives 9068805b... (the recorded value), confirming the lockfile holds the real upstream hash and the vendored file is what diverged. `diff` of each pair shows only multi-line signatures collapsed to one line. One-liner: python3 -c \"import json,hashlib;[print(d['directory']+'/'+f) for d in json.load(open('DEPENDENCIES.json')) for f,h in d['files_sha256'].items() if hashlib.sha256(open(d['directory']+'/'+f,'rb').read()).hexdigest()!=h]\" prints the 7 paths; it should print nothing.","severity":"low","snippet":"      \"src/StdAssertions.sol\": \"d4c89eec70d267dec6188461fbc74d3dc8c47e518d176a23417533a232ed9780\",","title":"DEPENDENCIES.json records upstream SHA-256 hashes that 7 vendored forge-std files do not have, so the advertised offline hash verification fails"}],"hash":"7d73f8216bcf19b22be53da619cfb0cfb39ff2266b9f968cda1dea9f393757f4","nodeId":"611f0125-ba1b-4b85-80ea-0c1d3f360414","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete. The findings file is written, validated as JSON, the cited snippet matches line 26 of the lockfile, and the scratch directory is removed so the tree has no changes beyond the findings file.\n\n**Outcome:** the WHY token's control flow is clean. One low-severity provenance defect is reported, in the dependency lockfile rather than in the contract.\n\n**What I checked, in the assigned area**\n\n- **Execution Trace.** Traced the constructor and all three state-changing entry points through the vendored OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 code. The constructor is non-payable, mints exactly 10^27 to the immediate creator once, and hands out no roles. Transfer rejects zero addresses and reverts on insufficient balance before any write, and self-transfer preserves balance. TransferFrom spends allowance before moving tokens, and every later revert unwinds that write. The runtime bytecode contains no CALL, STATICCALL, DELEGATECALL, CREATE, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT opcodes, so there is no callback or reentrancy surface and no fallback or receive.\n- **Periphery.** Hashed every vendored file against the lockfile and against upstream. All six OpenZeppelin files are byte-identical to the v5.4.0 tag. Seven forge-std files differ from both the lockfile and upstream v1.9.7.\n- **First Principles.** Supply, name, symbol and decimals match the brief and the manifest supply string. No path can grow supply, since the only mint is in the constructor and the ABI has no other state-changing function. Probed edge cases in scratch tests: CREATE with value reverts, self-transferFrom consumes only allowance, max allowance over balance reverts without touching the allowance, zero-value transferFrom from the zero address still reverts, and unknown selectors revert.\n\n**The finding** is in `DEPENDENCIES.json`. It records genuine upstream v1.9.7 hashes, but seven vendored forge-std files were re-wrapped after hashing, so the offline verification the README advertises reports seven mismatches. The diffs are formatting only and the files are test-scoped, so production bytecode is unaffected. The fix is to re-vendor those seven files byte-for-byte or regenerate their hash entries.\n\n**Coverage record:** all three listed entry points hold, plus rows for the constructor, the fixed-supply and metadata invariants, the OpenZeppelin provenance check, the forge-std lockfile finding, and the bytecode opcode scan. The static-analysis lead about the large numeric literal was checked and is a compile-time constant equal to 10^27, not a defect. Nothing in the assigned area was left unreached.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":757478,"inputTokens":290,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":18050,"runtime":"claude","turns":31,"wallClockMs":267478}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"6208734cdf5317a1","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Merged from audit_math (info) and audit_flow (low): same root cause, one finding. README.md line 42 states the lockfile records 'the upstream tags, exact commits, and SHA-256 hashes of all vendored files' so an offline verifier can confirm the vendored tree. Reproduced: all 6 openzeppelin-contracts entries match their recorded hash (ERC20.sol sha256 9f906af4...), but 7 of 30 forge-std entries do not: src/StdAssertions.sol, src/StdJson.sol, src/StdToml.sol, src/Vm.sol, src/console.sol, src/interfaces/IERC7540.sol, src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol. The recorded values are upstream v1.9.7 hashes; the committed copies were reformatted (whitespace/line-wrapping only per both specialists' diffs). Production impact: none. src/Why.sol imports only the OpenZeppelin files, which verify, and forge-std is test-only; Why's runtime bytecode is unaffected. The whole test suite (40 tests) compiles and passes with the committed files. Severity low: a provenance-record defect that makes the project's own documented verification procedure report the vendored tree as tampered, but moves no funds and breaks no guarantee of the token. Fix (either keeps behaviour identical): re-record the 7 hash entries from the committed files, or restore the 7 files byte-for-byte from forge-std v1.9.7.","line":26,"path":"DEPENDENCIES.json","reproduction":"State: committed tree at HEAD (1f18e97). Input: for every entry in DEPENDENCIES.json compute sha256 of <directory>/<file> and compare with files_sha256[file]. Command: python3 -c \"import json,hashlib,os;[print(p) for d in json.load(open('DEPENDENCIES.json')) for f,h in d['files_sha256'].items() for p in [os.path.join(d['directory'],f)] if hashlib.sha256(open(p,'rb').read()).hexdigest()!=h]\". Expected (per README line 42): prints nothing, 36/36 match. Actual: prints 7 paths (29/36 match): lib/forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol actual 3fbf4a02... vs recorded d4c89eec...; src/StdJson.sol 61bbf9b3... vs 0211b47e...; src/StdToml.sol 187d2f0c... vs de3fb35a...; src/Vm.sol a1b1c829... vs 9068805b...; src/console.sol a2e632dc... vs 896c5a5a...; src/interfaces/IERC7540.sol 3ae3eec9... vs c6a7854c...; src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol 1b63ca78... vs 6620d9c5....","severity":"low","snippet":"      \"src/StdAssertions.sol\": \"d4c89eec70d267dec6188461fbc74d3dc8c47e518d176a23417533a232ed9780\",","title":"DEPENDENCIES.json records upstream forge-std v1.9.7 hashes that 7 committed (reformatted) files do not have, so the advertised offline hash verification fails"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Kept from audit_economics at info, reproduced. Why inherits OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 ERC20 unchanged; approve(spender, value) (lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol line 120) overwrites _allowances[owner][spender] = value (line 280) without reading the previous value, and the token adds no increaseAllowance/decreaseAllowance or ERC-2612 permit. A spender who sees a pending approve(spender, NEW) can spend OLD first and NEW afterwards. This is the standard ERC-20 approval race, inherent to the interface the launch requires, bounded by the holder's own allowance decisions, and only exploitable by a party the holder already approved. The README instructs holders to revoke to zero before re-approving. No change to the agreed design is required; recorded so the behaviour is explicit. Optional non-breaking mitigation: add increaseAllowance/decreaseAllowance wrappers around _approve.","line":9,"path":"src/Why.sol","reproduction":"State: owner holds >= 150e18 WHY and has called approve(spender, 100e18). Owner broadcasts approve(spender, 50e18) intending to lower the allowance. Sequence: (1) spender front-runs with transferFrom(owner, spender, 100e18): succeeds, allowance 0; (2) owner's approve(spender, 50e18) lands: allowance 50e18; (3) spender calls transferFrom(owner, spender, 50e18): succeeds. Expected by the owner: spender moves at most 100e18. Actual: balanceOf(spender) == 150e18. Confirmed with a Foundry test on this tree (test/scratch/Judge.t.sol test_approvalRace passes, i.e. the sequence succeeds).","severity":"info","snippet":"contract Why is ERC20 {","title":"Allowance replacement is racy: a spender can take old + new allowance (inherited ERC-20 approve semantics; no increase/decrease or permit path). Documented trust assumption, not a defect in the reques"}],"hash":"afd1f480595a67694b6fa49c77b61010f3c8a6e1ddc73b6612de7f994d6b0762","nodeId":"3e288d23-2e54-454f-b844-d7273c8ff2a7","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and the findings file is written. The Why token itself is clean.\n\n**What I verified against the code**\n\n- The contract is OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 ERC20 with a no-argument constructor that mints exactly the manifest supply to msg.sender once. Decimals, name and symbol match launch.json.\n- All three entry points hold. I traced approve, transfer and transferFrom through the vendored OZ code and confirmed exact amounts and failure paths in a scratch Foundry test, which I then deleted.\n- The runtime bytecode has no DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT, and no mint, burn, pause, owner or fallback selectors exist. The project's 40 tests pass.\n- The protected launch test could not run here because it imports Uniswap v4-core, which is not vendored. I replicated its token-level checks in my scratch test instead.\n\n**Specialist findings settled**\n\n- The two DEPENDENCIES.json reports from audit_math and audit_flow share one root cause and are merged into one low finding. I reproduced it: seven forge-std files hash differently from the lockfile while all OpenZeppelin files match. No production bytecode is affected.\n- The audit_economics approval race reproduces but is standard ERC-20 behaviour the README already documents. Kept at info as a trust assumption, not a defect that reopens work.\n- The aderyn large-literal lead is the intended supply constant and was dropped as a defect.\n\nThe output in `.imd-findings.json` holds two findings and six coverage rows covering every listed entry point plus the invariants I checked. No repository files were changed.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":435687,"inputTokens":290,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":8752,"runtime":"claude","turns":10,"wallClockMs":130912}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"707624586655cf74","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Economic Security guide, 'Break ERC compliance' / interface guarantees. WHY inherits OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 ERC20 unchanged (lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol:120 `function approve(address spender, uint256 value)` writes `_allowances[owner][spender] = value` with no read of the previous value). OZ v5 removed increaseAllowance/decreaseAllowance and this token adds neither them nor ERC-2612 permit, so the only way a holder can change a live non-zero allowance is an absolute overwrite. A spender who observes a pending approve(spender, NEW) can spend OLD first and NEW afterwards, taking OLD + NEW instead of max(OLD, NEW). This is the well-known ERC-20 approval race and is inherent to the standard, not a bug introduced by this contract; the README already instructs users to revoke to zero first. It is recorded as a documented trust assumption on holders, not a defect in the requester's code: the victim's loss is bounded by their own allowance decisions and the spender must already be a party the victim approved. No change to the agreed design is required; if the requester wants to remove the race, the minimal addition is `increaseAllowance`/`decreaseAllowance` wrappers around `_approve`, which preserves supply, transfer and launch behaviour.","line":9,"path":"src/Why.sol","reproduction":"State: owner holds >= 150 WHY; owner has called approve(spender, 100e18). Owner then broadcasts approve(spender, 50e18) intending to lower the allowance. Sequence: (1) spender front-runs with transferFrom(owner, spender, 100e18) -> succeeds, allowance 0; (2) owner's approve(spender, 50e18) lands -> allowance 50e18; (3) spender calls transferFrom(owner, spender, 50e18) -> succeeds. Expected by the owner: spender can move at most 100e18 (the larger of the two approvals). Actual: spender moved 150e18 and balanceOf(spender) == 150e18. Confirmed with a Foundry test run against this tree (test/scratch/ApprovalRace.t.sol, test_SpenderTakesOldPlusNewAllowance passes, i.e. the race succeeds). Revoking to zero and waiting for confirmation before re-approving avoids it, as the README says.","severity":"info","snippet":"contract Why is ERC20 {","title":"Allowance replacement is racy: a spender can take old + new allowance (inherited ERC-20 approve semantics, no increase/decrease or permit path)"}],"hash":"dfbde236ca8b164fbd58c3d1c6e12c7d6e4daf4597f692f948255e42c7bd8574","nodeId":"d84baf92-7f30-4fb8-ae10-4214391d4b54","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete. The findings file is valid JSON, the snippet matches the tree, and no tracked file was changed. The scratch test lives under test/scratch/, which is gitignored and not kept.\n\n**Outcome:** the WHY token has no economic defect I could substantiate. It is an unmodified OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 ERC-20 with a single constructor mint, and every failure mode in the Economic Security, Invariant and Flow Gap guides either does not apply or is interrupted by an inherited guard.\n\n**What I reported** in `.imd-findings.json`:\n\n- **One info-level item**, the standard ERC-20 allowance race. A spender who sees a pending replacement approval can spend the old allowance and then the new one. I confirmed it with a scratch test where the spender moved 150 tokens against a holder who believed the cap was 100. It is inherent to the standard, bounded by the holder's own approvals, and already documented in the README, so I filed it as a trust assumption rather than a defect. The optional fix is an increase/decrease allowance pair, which does not change the agreed design.\n\n**What holds**, with a coverage row each: approve, transfer and transferFrom were traced through the inherited implementation. Supply conservation, no post-construction growth, exact mint of 10^27 units to msg.sender, zero-address sentinel handling, absence of any privileged or forbidden entry point, and vendored dependency integrity all verified. The project suite, including the stateful invariant with 128 runs, passes clean. The aderyn large-literal lead is a correct compile-time constant and not a defect.\n\n**What I could not reach:** the protected Uniswap v4 seed-and-swap harness needs sources and environment inputs that are not in this tree, so it was not executed. By inspection, a hook-free ERC-20 has no path that would make a seed or swap revert or arrive short.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":597320,"inputTokens":258,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":12050,"runtime":"claude","turns":28,"wallClockMs":180402}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"1a7ecd03bd365366","findings":[],"hash":"e9af5e6c553cfbd596d4c90a21e97c1d068b231f3c9f014eb01dec5c215aab20","nodeId":"2a2eb363-9dac-4b2b-8948-248d3646aaeb","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete. The findings file holds an empty findings list and a nine-row coverage record, and the working tree is otherwise untouched.\n\n**Result: no defects substantiated.** The Why token is a seventeen-line constructor-only specialization of the vendored OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 ERC20. Its compiled ABI exposes exactly three state-changing functions, and every one of them behaves as the Access Control, Trust Gap and Asymmetry guides require.\n\nWhat I verified, and how:\n\n- **Access control surface.** No owner, role, initializer, modifier, receive or fallback exists. The constructor takes no arguments and mints the manifest supply once to msg.sender, which is the factory under CREATE2. A scratch probe confirmed that the factory, after forwarding the supply, cannot pull from a holder, the distributor or the pool manager without an allowance, and that a stranger's self-approval does not touch anyone else's allowance row.\n- **Asymmetry pairs.** Both transfer paths funnel into the same internal update with identical zero-address and balance checks. Finite allowances decrement exactly once per spend, revocation to zero is immediate, and the infinite allowance is left unchanged. There is no admin variant of any function to diverge from the user path.\n- **Trust Gap seams.** The token has no settable parameter, fee, pricing formula or in-flight accrual, so no seam between lenses exists inside it. The only trust assumption is the network's own design: the factory holds the whole supply at deployment and performs the split. The token grants it no power beyond an ordinary holder's.\n- **Launch floor.** Transfers move exactly the stated amount, totalSupply cannot grow or shrink from any caller, decimals return 18, and the runtime has no DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT.\n\nChecks run: forge build on solc 0.8.26, the project's 27 tests including the stateful invariant, ABI and storage-layout inspection, SHA-256 verification of the vendored OpenZeppelin files against DEPENDENCIES.json, and five scratch probe tests, all passing. The scratch directory was removed afterwards.\n\nStatic-analysis leads: Slither reported nothing. Aderyn's large-numeric-literal note on the supply constant is a style remark, since the value equals ten to the 27th and is asserted by tests. Not reproduced: the network's protected Uniswap v4 harness, which needs factory and PoolManager bytecode and environment variables. The token has no transfer hooks, so no exempt-address logic is needed for it.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":518842,"inputTokens":226,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":11466,"runtime":"claude","turns":26,"wallClockMs":177331}}],"verification":[{"checks":[{"durationMs":1053,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 28 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 960.80ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":2299,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 26 tests for test/Why.t.sol:WhyTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_ConstructorMintsToImmediateDeployer(address) (runs: 256, μ: 18210, ~: 18210)\n[PASS] testFuzz_SelfTransferPreservesBalance(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 55108, ~: 54846)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 158596309311\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransferAboveBalanceRevertsWithoutChanges(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 64684, ~: 64995)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639564039457584007915497316142\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransferAndTransferFromConserveSupply(uint256,uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 245711, ~: 250846)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 15614\n  Bound result 255\n  Bound result 242\n\n[PASS] test_ApprovalDoesNotRequireBalance() (gas: 71857)\n[PASS] test_ApproveEmitsEventAndCanReplaceAndRevoke() (gas: 177777)\n[PASS] test_ApproveFromZeroOwnerReverts() (gas: 30749)\n[PASS] test_ApproveZeroSpenderReverts() (gas: 30452)\n[PASS] test_ConstructorEmitsSingleMintEvent() (gas: 9637)\n[PASS] test_Create2FactoryReceivesSupplyAndLaunchTransfersArriveWhole() (gas: 551169)\n[PASS] test_EntireSupplyCanBeTransferred() (gas: 71285)\n[PASS] test_MetadataAndEntireInitialSupply() (gas: 103382)\n[PASS] test_NoMintBurnFreezeOrUpgradeEntryPoints() (gas: 1720899)\n[PASS] test_RejectsNativeCurrency() (gas: 36821)\n[PASS] test_RuntimeContainsNoForbiddenOpcodes() (gas: 1039907)\n[PASS] test_TransferEmitsEventAndMovesExactAmount() (gas: 88914)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromAboveAllowanceRevertsWithoutChanges() (gas: 109067)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromAboveBalanceRestoresAllowance() (gas: 114735)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromConsumesExactAllowanceAndEmitsTransfer() (gas: 148577)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromPreservesInfiniteAllowance() (gas: 127103)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromToZeroRestoresAllowance() (gas: 112001)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromZeroSenderReverts() (gas: 30761)\n[PASS] test_TransferToZeroRevertsIncludingZeroAmount() (gas: 71927)\n[PASS] test_UnapprovedTransferFromRevertsEvenForDeployer() (gas: 102921)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromEmptyAccountEmitsEvent() (gas: 66448)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromNeedsNoAllowance() (gas: 67570)\nSuite result: ok. 26 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 11.33ms (37.18ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/Why.invariant.t.sol:WhyInvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_FixedSupplyBalancesAndAllowancesMatchModel() (runs: 128, calls: 8192, reverts: 0)\n\n╭------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract   | Selector     | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+========================================================+\n| WhyHandler | approve      | 2732  | 0       | 0        |\n|------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| WhyHandler | transfer     | 2739  | 0       | 0        |\n|------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| WhyHandler | transferFrom | 2721  | 0       | 0        |\n╰------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 107477463\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 11863918772381606250827\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1774\n  Bound result 24576\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1130\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 4879763878111430909\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 53261\n  Bound result 4\n  Bound result 1360\n  Bound result 242\n  Bound result 659918\n  Bound result 5017\n  Bound result 244\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 172\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 2.20s (2.20s CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 2.21s (2.22s CPU time): 27 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (27 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":41,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"Why.approve(address,uint256)\",\"Why.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"Why.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":4,\"DEPENDENCIES.json\":54,\"LICENSE\":21,\"README.md\":111,\"SECURITY.md\":27,\"foundry.toml\":21,\"remappings.txt\":2,\"src/Why.sol\":16,\"test/Why.invariant.t.sol\":89,\"test/Why.t.sol\":346,\"test/helpers/TokenFactory.sol\":11},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true},{"durationMs":437,"exitCode":0,"name":"slither","output":"slither: no results at low impact or above","passed":true},{"durationMs":236,"exitCode":0,"name":"aderyn","output":"[low] large-numeric-literal at src/Why.sol:10: Large Numeric Literal","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"1a3fb0c1bb3efb120cdb827c09f8a99558eb6e084dcbe4a1527a056949757a31","verifiedTreeHash":"8df5152317db0eea8289414faabaee4c7422de8c","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+f8d984f2"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":1378,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 29 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 1.26s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":7338,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 26 tests for test/Why.t.sol:WhyTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_ConstructorMintsToImmediateDeployer(address) (runs: 256, μ: 18210, ~: 18210)\n[PASS] testFuzz_SelfTransferPreservesBalance(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 55137, ~: 54870)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 999999999999999999999999998\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransferAboveBalanceRevertsWithoutChanges(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 64655, ~: 64995)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639933\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransferAndTransferFromConserveSupply(uint256,uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 246194, ~: 250907)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 743766592981238171841586583\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n\n[PASS] test_ApprovalDoesNotRequireBalance() (gas: 71857)\n[PASS] test_ApproveEmitsEventAndCanReplaceAndRevoke() (gas: 177777)\n[PASS] test_ApproveFromZeroOwnerReverts() (gas: 30749)\n[PASS] test_ApproveZeroSpenderReverts() (gas: 30452)\n[PASS] test_ConstructorEmitsSingleMintEvent() (gas: 9637)\n[PASS] test_Create2FactoryReceivesSupplyAndLaunchTransfersArriveWhole() (gas: 551169)\n[PASS] test_EntireSupplyCanBeTransferred() (gas: 71285)\n[PASS] test_MetadataAndEntireInitialSupply() (gas: 103382)\n[PASS] test_NoMintBurnFreezeOrUpgradeEntryPoints() (gas: 1720899)\n[PASS] test_RejectsNativeCurrency() (gas: 36821)\n[PASS] test_RuntimeContainsNoForbiddenOpcodes() (gas: 1039907)\n[PASS] test_TransferEmitsEventAndMovesExactAmount() (gas: 88914)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromAboveAllowanceRevertsWithoutChanges() (gas: 109067)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromAboveBalanceRestoresAllowance() (gas: 114735)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromConsumesExactAllowanceAndEmitsTransfer() (gas: 148577)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromPreservesInfiniteAllowance() (gas: 127103)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromToZeroRestoresAllowance() (gas: 112001)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromZeroSenderReverts() (gas: 30761)\n[PASS] test_TransferToZeroRevertsIncludingZeroAmount() (gas: 71927)\n[PASS] test_UnapprovedTransferFromRevertsEvenForDeployer() (gas: 102921)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromEmptyAccountEmitsEvent() (gas: 66448)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromNeedsNoAllowance() (gas: 67570)\nSuite result: ok. 26 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 62.18ms (106.61ms CPU time)\n\nRan 12 tests for test/Why.allowance.t.sol:WhyAllowanceTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_ApprovalIsSpecificToOwnerAndSpender(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 389203, ~: 388942)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 4541\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_BalanceFailurePreservesApprovalForRetry(uint256,uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 320378, ~: 321038)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1428\n  Bound result 306166319584128040257899841\n  Bound result 306166319584128040257899841\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_DelegatedSelfTransferConsumesPermissionWithoutCreatingValue(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 215780, ~: 215569)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 839374166853303853371086259\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransferRoundTripRestoresBalancesAndLeavesApprovalUntouched(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 199901, ~: 200000)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 3073034386256405276011330\n\n[PASS] test_FullSupplyDelegatedTransferThenEmptyOwnerCannotSpendAgain() (gas: 179236)\n[PASS] test_MaximumFiniteApprovalIsConsumedUnlikeInfiniteApproval() (gas: 220534)\n[PASS] test_MaximumTransferFromRevertsDespiteInfiniteApproval() (gas: 122340)\n[PASS] test_OneWeiApprovalCannotBeSpentTwice() (gas: 173300)\n[PASS] test_RevokingInfiniteApprovalBlocksTheNextSpendAndCanBeReapproved() (gas: 355389)\n[PASS] test_SelfTransferStillRequiresSufficientBalance() (gas: 102804)\n[PASS] test_ZeroDelegatedTransferEmitsEventAndPreservesExistingApproval() (gas: 117238)\n[PASS] test_ZeroDelegatedTransferToZeroStillReverts() (gas: 119553)\nSuite result: ok. 12 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 62.28ms (244.65ms CPU time)\n\nRan 2 tests for test/Why.invariant.t.sol:WhyInvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_FixedSupplyBalancesAndAllowancesMatchModel() (runs: 256, calls: 32768, reverts: 0)\n\n╭------------+----------------------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract   | Selector                   | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+======================================================================+\n| WhyHandler | approve                    | 3588  | 0       | 0        |\n|------------+----------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| WhyHandler | approveBoundary            | 3668  | 0       | 0        |\n|------------+----------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| WhyHandler | rejectAllowanceOverspend   | 3643  | 0       | 0        |\n|------------+----------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| WhyHandler | rejectBalanceOverspend     | 3684  | 0       | 0        |\n|------------+----------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| WhyHandler | rejectTransferAboveBalance | 3571  | 0       | 0        |\n|------------+----------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| WhyHandler | rejectZeroReceiver         | 3590  | 0       | 0        |\n|------------+----------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| WhyHandler | revokeAndAttemptSpend      | 3689  | 0       | 0        |\n|------------+----------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| WhyHandler | transfer                   | 3724  | 0       | 0        |\n|------------+----------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| WhyHandler | transferFrom               | 3611  | 0       | 0        |\n╰------------+----------------------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 999999999999999999999999998\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 8141\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 31\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 18\n  Bound result 230\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 244\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 752889072052632149904460971\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639811150389323195321597869971\n  Bound result 790\n  Bound result 52045233643435864555589036534658481369700928630109612684880286456825146\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 7834769151788\n  Bound result 68371058196039136881934772\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639632410518780047050011574709\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639632410515780047050011577052\n  Bound result 11152455612024599587298287539424987791587779100936\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 36865\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 56750864629174884956936\n  Bound result 813\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 10000000000000000000\n  Bound result 5151\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 8139\n  Bound result 23387571027415208557139\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 83\n  Bound result 10111767484511767590132099\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639632410525780047050011580113\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639933\n  Bound result 439\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639855\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 8\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640553927680099496145539507935\n  Bound result 24301\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 161604484457560533974063\n  Bound result 826074470\n  Bound result 801\n  Bound result 9310\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639632410525780047050011574718\n  Bound result 9452774522964888724469815106612974238730366061130\n  Bound result 255\n  Bound result 7515\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129632662\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639632410518780047050011574708\n  Bound result 572903322383035561838728\n  Bound result 4430076576666703611315076\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640558519361160620409684797795\n  Bound result 7310\n  Bound result 2592286112\n  Bound result 4150\n  Bound result 9381065386365816246236757\n  Bound result 3718\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639627980449203380348992534798\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 244\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640558519361160620409684798115\n  Bound result 836423946\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640563877853099550351759241136\n  Bound result 7443\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 53261\n  Bound result 68336177201107732126961567368196013462646\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640563877853099550351759244877\n  Bound result 863\n  Bound result 9424\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640558519361160620409684798024\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639627980452203380348992534717\n  Bound result 931628931803960863118065226\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639627980449203380348993194635\n  Bound result 10000000000000000000\n  Bound result 1726\n  Bound result 6710\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129638565\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 8\n  Bound result 161604484457561370399056\n  Bound result 161604484457561370399058\n  Bound result 18\n\n[PASS] test_HandlerRejectionsInterleavedWithSuccessfulSpending() (gas: 8947335)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 100\n  Bound result 20\n  Bound result 81\n  Bound result 30\n  Bound result 31\n  Bound result 81\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639935\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 80\n\nSuite result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 7.26s (7.26s CPU time)\n\nRan 3 test suites in 7.26s (7.38s CPU time): 40 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (40 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":38,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"Why.approve(address,uint256)\",\"Why.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"Why.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":4,\"DEPENDENCIES.json\":54,\"LICENSE\":21,\"README.md\":111,\"SECURITY.md\":27,\"foundry.toml\":21,\"remappings.txt\":2,\"src/Why.sol\":16,\"test/Why.allowance.t.sol\":227,\"test/Why.invariant.t.sol\":231,\"test/Why.t.sol\":346,\"test/helpers/TokenFactory.sol\":11},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"2e196b86eaca560c38c6d1ffbb496787e848f9928a079e189a10968bdd68d3a6","verifiedTreeHash":"734913388ee3420e32c140739510ddbefa4d9d8c","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+f8d984f2"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":1158,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 28 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 1.05s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":2351,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 26 tests for test/Why.t.sol:WhyTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_ConstructorMintsToImmediateDeployer(address) (runs: 256, μ: 18210, ~: 18210)\n[PASS] testFuzz_SelfTransferPreservesBalance(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 55118, ~: 54858)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1837\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransferAboveBalanceRevertsWithoutChanges(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 64680, ~: 64995)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639564039457584007913130299853\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransferAndTransferFromConserveSupply(uint256,uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 245687, ~: 250771)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 0\n\n[PASS] test_ApprovalDoesNotRequireBalance() (gas: 71857)\n[PASS] test_ApproveEmitsEventAndCanReplaceAndRevoke() (gas: 177777)\n[PASS] test_ApproveFromZeroOwnerReverts() (gas: 30749)\n[PASS] test_ApproveZeroSpenderReverts() (gas: 30452)\n[PASS] test_ConstructorEmitsSingleMintEvent() (gas: 9637)\n[PASS] test_Create2FactoryReceivesSupplyAndLaunchTransfersArriveWhole() (gas: 551169)\n[PASS] test_EntireSupplyCanBeTransferred() (gas: 71285)\n[PASS] test_MetadataAndEntireInitialSupply() (gas: 103382)\n[PASS] test_NoMintBurnFreezeOrUpgradeEntryPoints() (gas: 1720899)\n[PASS] test_RejectsNativeCurrency() (gas: 36821)\n[PASS] test_RuntimeContainsNoForbiddenOpcodes() (gas: 1039907)\n[PASS] test_TransferEmitsEventAndMovesExactAmount() (gas: 88914)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromAboveAllowanceRevertsWithoutChanges() (gas: 109067)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromAboveBalanceRestoresAllowance() (gas: 114735)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromConsumesExactAllowanceAndEmitsTransfer() (gas: 148577)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromPreservesInfiniteAllowance() (gas: 127103)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromToZeroRestoresAllowance() (gas: 112001)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromZeroSenderReverts() (gas: 30761)\n[PASS] test_TransferToZeroRevertsIncludingZeroAmount() (gas: 71927)\n[PASS] test_UnapprovedTransferFromRevertsEvenForDeployer() (gas: 102921)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromEmptyAccountEmitsEvent() (gas: 66448)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromNeedsNoAllowance() (gas: 67570)\nSuite result: ok. 26 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 10.70ms (39.67ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/Why.invariant.t.sol:WhyInvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_FixedSupplyBalancesAndAllowancesMatchModel() (runs: 128, calls: 8192, reverts: 0)\n\n╭------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract   | Selector     | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+========================================================+\n| WhyHandler | approve      | 2784  | 0       | 0        |\n|------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| WhyHandler | transfer     | 2687  | 0       | 0        |\n|------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| WhyHandler | transferFrom | 2721  | 0       | 0        |\n╰------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 24301\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 7958\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 242\n  Bound result 581\n  Bound result 53591\n  Bound result 439\n  Bound result 16782\n  Bound result 952\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 50\n  Bound result 68\n  Bound result 207\n  Bound result 4\n  Bound result 578\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 167\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 5693\n  Bound result 244\n  Bound result 36865\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 24301\n  Bound result 244\n  Bound result 30422\n  Bound result 2827\n  Bound result 95\n  Bound result 1308\n  Bound result 53261\n  Bound result 281\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1670\n  Bound result 2992\n  Bound result 29440\n  Bound result 377\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 388\n  Bound result 0\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 2.25s (2.25s CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 2.26s (2.26s CPU time): 27 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (27 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":38,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"Why.approve(address,uint256)\",\"Why.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"Why.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":4,\"DEPENDENCIES.json\":54,\"LICENSE\":21,\"README.md\":111,\"SECURITY.md\":27,\"foundry.toml\":21,\"launch.json\":20,\"remappings.txt\":2,\"src/Why.sol\":16,\"test/Why.invariant.t.sol\":89,\"test/Why.t.sol\":346,\"test/helpers/TokenFactory.sol\":11},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"6a2006257c73fe4c5242ef813fd8b98e21ec25651bb2fcf75b93c3b1211c2479","verifiedTreeHash":"b7742f041fdd5b778062789ba93ed3021373ebc6","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+f8d984f2"}]}