{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"e39ad163-3c3b-41fc-b88e-ab2e2a8a0e89","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"1b1929218e5d7ac4f3842fa504c751f83c98370ed5f1498e6454b539f50fab3f","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_economics","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"7db4fe00f7de7f5cec0333347d21e7e478c9e3c1c18b49f07a15603b4dc9454e","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_flow","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"d1176c45b00b3b67e7d4ce7c16b3ba71b293f142c7090f324b453e508fca6493","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests","manifest","audit_math","audit_permissions","audit_economics","audit_flow"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"3014f1ea5961918ca059453a484bf4c8bcbbfc2248dbe31d94ac7c5cdf8f50bd","skillId":"audit-judge","tools":[]},"key":"audit_judge","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"3014f1ea5961918ca059453a484bf4c8bcbbfc2248dbe31d94ac7c5cdf8f50bd","skillId":"audit-judge","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"b49ff9868fd69ffbcca2b0651d5034364928113aa759d5af1ddcf52deb604370","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_math","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"e703bbef60dc215b1b1ce6008b7eb88c799aa01e2235cefd2ddb997ed2d9279d","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_permissions","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"413e06234cfac26643fdef0975d6723a3424017a22200a149d1953427dc593a1","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"b6503de65ad02f845827887c23da4c3b56ccc5df7a459db263bae6e549d92f7f","skillId":"build-contract-project","tools":[]},"key":"build_contract_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"b6503de65ad02f845827887c23da4c3b56ccc5df7a459db263bae6e549d92f7f","skillId":"build-contract-project","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"23126d8cbc741d40bf27eca44df7a77ef1f1eea9ee9fa706b7fc021a6ed037b1","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"tools":[]},"key":"manifest","kind":"code","role":"integrate","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"9f9fd88a0c983c300830c55e75aafea07480d98b3d90543945b1b94c095a195b","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"73431852439ad3a343f3d2b7db1c43cd363b9f48f9bb51497374a0cf6d50b223","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","tools":[]},"key":"write_foundry_tests","kind":"code","role":"tests","skillHash":"73431852439ad3a343f3d2b7db1c43cd363b9f48f9bb51497374a0cf6d50b223","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"A custom token: Imd6900 (IMD6900).\nToken name: Imd6900\nToken symbol: IMD6900\nToken supply: 1,000,000,000 with 18 decimals, all minted once to the deployer in the constructor.\n\nTransfer rules: No fee","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"eddab9d151ecc7e954bf2def0131361b794d5f9dc866b6f6f5d3b0711d4983e7","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"e39ad163-3c3b-41fc-b88e-ab2e2a8a0e89","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-802-imd6900"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"51343","feedbackHash":"ee3dba8af5c07f3e77ac130ee92075e454853ea2764be3091cf71ff2a2fdd078","nodeKey":"audit_economics","submissionHash":"1b1929218e5d7ac4f3842fa504c751f83c98370ed5f1498e6454b539f50fab3f","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51435","feedbackHash":"4b957d4e93e8ceecc21dada9cf8d1e2a03625552fc8850b0af8399811fe2e20b","nodeKey":"audit_flow","submissionHash":"7db4fe00f7de7f5cec0333347d21e7e478c9e3c1c18b49f07a15603b4dc9454e","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51032","feedbackHash":"affb0d3ea7a1221099b18e5efd8ff7d13c51671bdcbdf08086202f9e266e005e","nodeKey":"audit_judge","submissionHash":"d1176c45b00b3b67e7d4ce7c16b3ba71b293f142c7090f324b453e508fca6493","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51338","feedbackHash":"26bdac67265a2d5aac72f0ffbe706a29f5990ed7c2c699a7d726334fc5180b43","nodeKey":"audit_math","submissionHash":"b49ff9868fd69ffbcca2b0651d5034364928113aa759d5af1ddcf52deb604370","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51342","feedbackHash":"f913ce67c916943b870effba32ad1bf9e90a9ae7372fe65a19246e1f9a8ca3a8","nodeKey":"audit_permissions","submissionHash":"e703bbef60dc215b1b1ce6008b7eb88c799aa01e2235cefd2ddb997ed2d9279d","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51265","feedbackHash":"e2f3d6b7257af53b5bbab8b924d6ec7f6b4634fb6a4ca173a2da7556ef76481a","nodeKey":"build_contract_project","submissionHash":"413e06234cfac26643fdef0975d6723a3424017a22200a149d1953427dc593a1","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51228","feedbackHash":"8a9d721fe86724766ef3d55db2e81cb48070d0749caca1514c3c23198e04bd04","nodeKey":"manifest","submissionHash":"23126d8cbc741d40bf27eca44df7a77ef1f1eea9ee9fa706b7fc021a6ed037b1","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51606","feedbackHash":"c2d30b1b718143359a5b9bbf1e61de2f351eabb26e441b874217b953ab928a31","nodeKey":"write_foundry_tests","submissionHash":"9f9fd88a0c983c300830c55e75aafea07480d98b3d90543945b1b94c095a195b","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"d2b94ae51d9e2b7fcd98883387433d541eca57222d483d0f36470f61cde863f6","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"feba2a869621cab2","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Imd6900 inherits OpenZeppelin v5.0.2 ERC20 unchanged. approve(spender, value) overwrites _allowances[owner][spender] (lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol:291) without reference to what has already been spent, so lowering an allowance from A to B while the spender still holds A lets the spender obtain A+B. This is the well-known ERC-20 allowance race inherent to the standard; the README ('Behavior and assumptions') already discloses it and tells holders to revoke to zero first. The token exposes no increaseAllowance/decreaseAllowance or permit helpers (OZ v5 removed them), so integrators must use the revoke-then-set pattern. Recorded at info so the judge sees the allowance surface was examined; it needs no change to the agreed design and should not block the launch. Economic scope: only an owner who voluntarily approved an untrusted spender can lose, and only up to the sum of the allowances they themselves granted; no third party, the pool, the distributor or the factory is affected.","line":8,"path":"src/Imd6900.sol","reproduction":"State: owner 0xA11CE holds 1000 units; spender 0x5EED. Calls: (1) prank(owner) token.approve(spender, 100); (2) prank(spender) token.transferFrom(owner, spender, 100) [front-runs step 3]; (3) prank(owner) token.approve(spender, 50); (4) prank(spender) token.transferFrom(owner, spender, 50). Actual: balanceOf(spender)=150, balanceOf(owner)=850. Owner's intent in step 3 was to cap total spend at 50. Verified with a scratch Foundry test against src/Imd6900.sol (test_approveReplacementRaceSpends150, passes, i.e. the 150 outcome is reproduced).","severity":"info","snippet":"contract Imd6900 is ERC20 {","title":"Inherited ERC-20 approve() replaces allowance non-atomically: a spender can consume old and new allowance (standard, documented behaviour, not a token defect)"}],"hash":"1b1929218e5d7ac4f3842fa504c751f83c98370ed5f1498e6454b539f50fab3f","nodeId":"6f2839ba-2edf-4f41-8ae0-fb45217d016d","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete. Findings and coverage are written to `.imd-findings.json`, and no project file was changed (the scratch test I used was removed, and build artifacts are gitignored).\n\n**Outcome: no economic defect found.** The token is an unmodified OpenZeppelin v5.0.2 ERC-20 with one constructor mint and no fee, hooks, owner, or admin path. One info-level note is recorded.\n\nWhat I checked, against the Economic Security, Invariant and Flow Gap guides:\n\n- **Supply and recipient.** The constructor mints exactly 10^27 units to the caller, so under CREATE2 the factory holds the whole supply. Decimals are 18. No constructor arguments.\n- **Supply cannot grow.** The ABI has only approve, transfer and transferFrom as state-changing functions. The existing invariant run and my fuzz confirmed conservation of total supply and sum of balances.\n- **Launch legs arrive whole.** I fuzzed every legal poolBps from 1 to 9000. Swarm share, pool seed and remainder always sum to the supply with zero dust, because 10^27 divides evenly by 10^4, and the factory ends at zero balance. Pulls via transferFrom are exact.\n- **No privileged powers.** No pause, blacklist, seize, burnFrom, rescue or upgrade exists. The runtime has no DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT.\n- **Vendored code integrity.** All six OpenZeppelin files hash to the digests in DEPENDENCIES.json. Build passes and all 25 existing tests pass.\n- **Static analysis lead.** The aderyn large-literal note is style only; the literal evaluates to exactly 10^27.\n\nThe single recorded item is the inherent ERC-20 allowance replacement race. A spender who front-runs a lowering of their allowance from 100 to 50 can take 150. I reproduced it in Foundry, but it is standard behaviour already disclosed in the README and affects only an owner who approved an untrusted spender. It is recorded at info severity and does not block the launch.\n\nCoverage has nine rows: the three entry points, five invariants, and one honest `unreached` row for the seed and swap through a real Uniswap v4 PoolManager. That harness needs v4-core, LaunchLiquidity and launch environment variables that are not in this repository, so I modelled the token-side flows with plain transfers instead.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":701252,"inputTokens":322,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":12428,"runtime":"claude","turns":21,"wallClockMs":216798}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"620ca46c32ecfbce6977711b7a0c6867048801df943805c3496af3221146fd91","device":"b3280f20e86b4e0d","findings":[],"hash":"23126d8cbc741d40bf27eca44df7a77ef1f1eea9ee9fa706b7fc021a6ed037b1","nodeId":"9b6f8242-3131-45b2-bd52-e5e1b81f4d07","outcome":"completed","summary":"Created [launch.json](/root/.identitymd/work/e39ad163-3c3b-41fc-b88e-ab2e2a8a0e89/9b6f8242-3131-45b2-bd52-e5e1b81f4d07/launch.json) with the exact token supply, empty constructor arguments, required paired currency, and verbatim economics.\n\nSchema and constructor checks passed. `forge build` succeeded; all 25 local tests passed. Only `launch.json` is changed for submission.","treeHash":"a6df568c5e43453f274f3c07fcbbf59d525d12ad","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":228352,"inputTokens":37290,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":4969,"runtime":"codex","turns":4,"wallClockMs":210324}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"cf92fae5c6b2930a83d2d88e2376f5a7c3391a36c49c214b81eae78d1a3eb6c4","device":"2eac007f7332b54c","findings":[],"hash":"413e06234cfac26643fdef0975d6723a3424017a22200a149d1953427dc593a1","nodeId":"77e97fe7-f443-4843-8daf-323492238a9a","outcome":"completed","summary":"Implemented [Imd6900.sol](/root/.identitymd/work/e39ad163-3c3b-41fc-b88e-ab2e2a8a0e89/77e97fe7-f443-4843-8daf-323492238a9a/src/Imd6900.sol): 1 billion IMD6900, 18 decimals, minted once to the deployer, with no transfer fees.\n\n- `forge build`, `forge test`, and `forge fmt --check` pass.\n- All 25 tests pass, including failure, fuzz, and invariant coverage.\n- Clean offline verification with an empty environment produced identical bytecode.\n- Dependencies are vendored; deployment parameters and responsibilities are documented in [README.md](/root/.identitymd/work/e39ad163-3c3b-41fc-b88e-ab2e2a8a0e89/77e97fe7-f443-4843-8daf-323492238a9a/README.md).\n\nFull network launch integration was not run locally.","treeHash":"e29ba161261714693b2e19571fe2f14f3d8682a1","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":406016,"inputTokens":57639,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":13310,"runtime":"codex","turns":5,"wallClockMs":466731}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"5fdca4f96f37a80d","findings":[],"hash":"7db4fe00f7de7f5cec0333347d21e7e478c9e3c1c18b49f07a15603b4dc9454e","nodeId":"4fb09482-4b9b-45ee-bf71-386574d3fcf2","outcome":"completed","summary":"The findings file is in place at the repository root and is excluded from git by the workspace's own exclude rule, which is the expected arrangement for a review deliverable. The scratch directory is removed and the tree is otherwise unchanged.\n\n## Review result: no defects found\n\nI audited the Imd6900 token against the Execution Trace, Periphery and First Principles guides, with the Senior Auditor's Mindset read first. The token is a 16-line contract that inherits OpenZeppelin ERC20 v5.0.2 unchanged and mints the whole supply to the deployer in its constructor. Nothing in my area produced a substantiated defect, so `.imd-findings.json` holds an empty findings list and six coverage rows.\n\n**What I verified**\n\n- **Execution Trace.** Traced all three entry points from call to final storage. Every guard sits before every write, there are no external calls, and each function writes its coupled state in one body, so no partial state or stale read is reachable. Reverts in the transfer step of transferFrom roll back the allowance write.\n- **Periphery.** Downloaded the upstream v5.0.2 archive and compared it byte for byte with the six vendored files. All are identical, and the archive hash matches the one recorded in DEPENDENCIES.json. The library is committed as plain files with no submodule.\n- **First Principles.** The constructor cannot mint to the zero address, the supply constant equals exactly 10^27, no path grows or shrinks supply after deployment, and there is no receive, fallback, owner, pause, blacklist or upgrade mechanism. The runtime contains no DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT.\n- **Launch floor.** With no fee and no exemptions, the swarm share, pool seed and both swap directions move exact amounts, which is what the protected harness requires.\n- **Static analysis lead.** The aderyn large-literal note points at a compile-time constant that evaluates correctly. Not a defect.\n\n**Behaviours confirmed by a scratch test, then discarded**\n\nSeven tests passed: factory deployment holds the whole supply, self transferFrom needs an allowance, the standard ERC-20 approve race behaves as documented, self-transfer via transferFrom consumes allowance without changing balance, tokens sent to the token's own address are stuck with supply unchanged, native currency is rejected, and no mint selector exists. The approve race and stuck-token cases are inherent ERC-20 properties the README already documents, so I recorded them as coverage notes rather than findings.\n\n**Not covered**\n\nThe protected harness's live Uniswap v4 seed and swap cannot run here because the v4 dependencies and launch addresses are not in this repository. My coverage of those flows is by trace of the token's transfer paths, not by executing the pool.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":569586,"inputTokens":258,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":11099,"runtime":"claude","turns":21,"wallClockMs":216797}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"89339e12fc1b18f5012b45817a15d4cc90b818389033a82d81b9da4eb220857e","device":"a12c1a6f9430f757","findings":[],"hash":"9f9fd88a0c983c300830c55e75aafea07480d98b3d90543945b1b94c095a195b","nodeId":"7d7d586b-60ea-4360-af31-055e0df08252","outcome":"completed","summary":"Added 12 regression/fuzz tests and strengthened invariants for balances, allowances, failure rollback, and holder transferability.\n\nOffline verification passed:\n- `forge build`\n- `forge test`: 37 passed, 0 failed\n- Invariants: 256 sequences, 16,384 calls\n\nOnly `test/` changed. No defects found.","treeHash":"4b77fbebe93d66310a693cf1447b37570a8956a2","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":554880,"inputTokens":124554,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":9247,"runtime":"codex","turns":5,"wallClockMs":377081}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"789312fc56d3f446","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Outside the assigned math area; reported because it is reproducible and the README states that DEPENDENCIES.json 'records the source archives and SHA-256 hashes of every vendored file'. The archive hash for forge-std v1.9.7 matches upstream, and all six OpenZeppelin v5.0.2 file hashes match the files in lib/, but seven forge-std files in lib/ do not hash to the recorded values: src/StdAssertions.sol, src/StdJson.sol, src/StdToml.sol, src/Vm.sol, src/console.sol, src/interfaces/IERC7540.sol, src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol. Diffing against the upstream v1.9.7 archive shows only whitespace/line-wrapping differences (forge fmt re-flowed multi-line signatures), so the test tooling is not functionally altered and the production contract (src/Imd6900.sol and its OpenZeppelin imports) is unaffected. The provenance record is nevertheless inaccurate for a reviewer who verifies vendored files by hash.","line":41,"path":"DEPENDENCIES.json","reproduction":"In the repository root run `sha256sum lib/forge-std/src/Vm.sol`. Expected (per DEPENDENCIES.json line 41): 9068805b59ac1d0ea03a8fa1f15ae49c094e0c6c852a2500e0dd112f264b2cb1. Actual: a1b1c82924aecf0f38b53192fd1e801cccc1e1fd2ecd6b2301e4f4c4ab102a15. A script hashing every entry in DEPENDENCIES.json reports 7 mismatches, all under lib/forge-std/src/, and 0 mismatches under lib/openzeppelin-contracts/. `diff` against forge-std-1.9.7/src/Vm.sol from the recorded archive shows only reflowed function signatures. Fix: either restore the upstream byte-for-byte files or re-record the hashes of the formatted files.","severity":"info","snippet":"      \"src/Vm.sol\": \"9068805b59ac1d0ea03a8fa1f15ae49c094e0c6c852a2500e0dd112f264b2cb1\",","title":"DEPENDENCIES.json records SHA-256 hashes that do not match seven vendored forge-std files (formatting-only drift)"}],"hash":"b49ff9868fd69ffbcca2b0651d5034364928113aa759d5af1ddcf52deb604370","nodeId":"0e720bd6-dcbe-462b-8a79-823290ee3a5c","outcome":"completed","summary":"The audit is complete and the findings file is written. The working tree is clean apart from `.imd-findings.json`, and the scratch tests are removed.\n\n**Outcome: no math, boundary or numerical-gap defect in the token.** The contract is a fixed-supply OpenZeppelin v5.0.2 ERC-20 with one constructor mint and nothing else. There is no division, no scaling, no downcast, no external call, no payable path and no sentinel branch beyond OpenZeppelin's zero-address rejections. The one reproducible discrepancy I found is a provenance record, reported at `info` severity.\n\nWhat I checked, per the three assigned guides:\n\n- **Math Precision.** The only arithmetic the token adds is the compile-time constant on `src/Imd6900.sol:10`, which is exactly 10^27 and matches the brief. The inherited `_update` uses unchecked subtraction and addition, both guarded by the prior balance check and by the fixed supply, so neither can wrap. The aderyn large-literal lead is exact and intended.\n- **Boundary.** Each entry point was probed with 0, 1, full supply, supply plus one, and max uint256 for amounts, and with 0, 1, max minus one and max for allowances, plus zero-address owner and recipient and native value sent to the contract. Every case either delivered the exact amount or reverted with no state change. Eleven scratch tests confirmed this and were deleted afterwards.\n- **Numerical Gap.** The supply is divisible by 10,000, so the swarm share and any pool share derived in the launch harness are exact integers with no dust, and the largest pool share fits in uint128 for Uniswap v4 math. The existing invariant suite and all 25 project tests pass.\n\n**Reported finding (info, outside my area):** `DEPENDENCIES.json` records SHA-256 hashes that no longer match seven vendored forge-std files. Diffing against the upstream v1.9.7 archive shows only reflowed whitespace from `forge fmt`, so behaviour is unchanged, but the README claims the file records the hash of every vendored file. All OpenZeppelin hashes match. The fix is to restore the byte-for-byte upstream files or re-record the hashes.\n\n**Coverage:** all three entry points are marked `holds`, with four extra rows for the supply constant, exact launch shares, supply conservation, and the absence of external boundaries. Nothing was left unreached. Per-wallet splitting of the swarm's share lives in the distributor, not this token, and was not in scope.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":675893,"inputTokens":290,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":11869,"runtime":"claude","turns":20,"wallClockMs":228791}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"2a9662a76cb5f51d","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Merged from audit_economics (sole reporter; audit_permissions, audit_flow, audit_math and the test writer raised nothing on this surface). Imd6900 inherits OpenZeppelin v5.0.2 ERC20 unchanged. approve(spender, value) calls _approve, which writes _allowances[owner][spender] = value (lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol:291) with no reference to what the spender has already consumed. Lowering an allowance from A to B while the spender still holds A lets the spender obtain A+B by spending A before the replacement confirms. This is the ERC-20 allowance race inherent to the standard. OZ v5 does not ship increaseAllowance/decreaseAllowance, and the token adds no permit, so integrators must use the revoke-to-zero-then-set pattern, which README.md lines 105-108 already prescribe. Only an owner who voluntarily approved an untrusted spender can lose, and at most the sum of allowances they themselves granted; the factory, distributor, PoolManager and other holders are unaffected. Recorded at info so the allowance surface is on the record; it requires no change to the agreed design and does not block the launch.","line":8,"path":"src/Imd6900.sol","reproduction":"Reproduced with a scratch Foundry test against src/Imd6900.sol (test_approveReplacementRaceSpends150, passed). State: deployer transfers 1000 units to owner 0xA11CE; spender is 0x5EED. Calls: (1) prank(owner) approve(spender,100); (2) prank(spender) transferFrom(owner,spender,100), modelling a front-run of step 3; (3) prank(owner) approve(spender,50); (4) prank(spender) transferFrom(owner,spender,50). Expected by the owner's intent at step 3: total spend capped at 50. Actual: balanceOf(spender)=150, balanceOf(owner)=850, and all four calls succeed.","severity":"info","snippet":"contract Imd6900 is ERC20 {","title":"Inherited ERC-20 approve() replaces the allowance non-atomically; a spender can consume both the old and the new allowance (standard ERC-20 behaviour, disclosed in README, not a token defect)"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Merged from audit_math (sole reporter). README.md line 123 states that DEPENDENCIES.json 'records the source archives and SHA-256 hashes of every vendored file'. Re-hashing every entry shows all 6 OpenZeppelin v5.0.2 files match the recorded values (so the ERC20 the token inherits is byte-for-byte upstream), but 7 of the forge-std v1.9.7 entries do not: src/StdAssertions.sol, src/StdJson.sol, src/StdToml.sol, src/Vm.sol, src/console.sol, src/interfaces/IERC7540.sol, src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol. The specialist's diff against the recorded archive shows only reflowed signatures (forge fmt), and the full test suite (37 tests, invariants included) builds and passes with the vendored files, so the test tooling is functionally unaltered and src/Imd6900.sol is unaffected. The provenance record is nevertheless inaccurate for anyone who verifies vendored files by hash. Fix: re-record the hashes of the files as committed, or restore the upstream bytes.","line":41,"path":"DEPENDENCIES.json","reproduction":"In the repository root run `sha256sum lib/forge-std/src/Vm.sol`. Expected (DEPENDENCIES.json line 41): 9068805b59ac1d0ea03a8fa1f15ae49c094e0c6c852a2500e0dd112f264b2cb1. Actual: a1b1c82924aecf0f38b53192fd1e801cccc1e1fd2ecd6b2301e4f4c4ab102a15. A Python loop hashing every files_sha256 entry under lib/<name>/ reports exactly 7 mismatches, all under lib/forge-std/src/, and 0 under lib/openzeppelin-contracts/.","severity":"info","snippet":"      \"src/Vm.sol\": \"9068805b59ac1d0ea03a8fa1f15ae49c094e0c6c852a2500e0dd112f264b2cb1\",","title":"DEPENDENCIES.json records SHA-256 values that do not match seven vendored forge-std files (whitespace-only drift; production contract unaffected)"}],"hash":"d1176c45b00b3b67e7d4ce7c16b3ba71b293f142c7090f324b453e508fca6493","nodeId":"c270ee77-23bf-4efe-b68a-d3d286f105a9","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and `.imd-findings.json` is written. The only working-tree change is that file, as the task requires.\n\n**Outcome.** The token is defect-free on every entry point. Both specialist findings reproduced and are kept at info severity. Nothing new was found in my own pass.\n\n**What I verified**\n\n- **Reproduced the allowance race** from the economics specialist with a scratch Foundry test. Approving 100, spending it, re-approving 50, then spending again yields a spender balance of 150. This is standard ERC-20 behaviour that the README already discloses, so it stays at info.\n- **Reproduced the dependency hash drift** from the math specialist. Re-hashing every entry in DEPENDENCIES.json gives seven forge-std mismatches and zero OpenZeppelin mismatches. The inherited ERC20 is byte-for-byte upstream v5.0.2, and the full suite of 37 tests passes, so the drift is a provenance record inaccuracy only.\n- **No duplicates to merge.** Each finding had a single reporter in distinct areas.\n- **Own pass.** The contract is one constructor over unmodified OpenZeppelin ERC20. Supply, decimals and recipient match the manifest. A runtime opcode scan finds no DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE, SELFDESTRUCT, CALL or CREATE. There is no owner, hook, fallback or mint path. The aderyn large-literal lead is the supply constant, which equals the manifest value exactly.\n\n**Coverage record.** All three ABI entry points are marked holds, plus three invariant rows covering the constructor mint, the absence of privileged surface, and the dependency provenance finding.\n\nOne housekeeping note: an early tool call mistyped the repository path and created an empty directory outside the repo. I deleted it immediately, and the scratch test directory was removed after use.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":263330,"inputTokens":162,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":7841,"runtime":"claude","turns":11,"wallClockMs":110726}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"cbc83f8151b8340d","findings":[],"hash":"e703bbef60dc215b1b1ce6008b7eb88c799aa01e2235cefd2ddb997ed2d9279d","nodeId":"2501addb-a511-4611-98a4-da66c0de0607","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and found no defects. The findings file holds an empty list and a full coverage record. The tree is unchanged apart from that file.\n\n**What I checked, in the assigned area**\n\n- **Access control.** The compiled ABI has exactly three state-changing functions and no receive or fallback. There is no owner, minter, pauser, blacklist, upgrade path or initializer. The constructor mints the whole supply once to the immediate deployer, and after it transfers that supply away it holds only ordinary holder rights. I confirmed this with a scratch test that had the factory attempt transferFrom, transfer, admin selectors and ETH sends after distribution. All reverted.\n- **Trust gap.** No caller class gets a different economic result. The internal update path has no address-dependent branch, so factory, distributor, PoolManager and traders all move exact amounts. There is no admin setter, so nothing can redirect in-flight value.\n- **Asymmetry.** The transfer and transferFrom paths debit and credit identically. An owner acting as its own spender still needs a self-allowance. The unlimited-allowance sentinel is the documented OpenZeppelin behaviour. Allowances are only writable by their owner, which is the unmodified Context sender.\n- **Supply chain.** All five vendored OpenZeppelin files hash to the values in DEPENDENCIES.json and read identical to upstream v5.0.2. There are no submodules.\n\n**Static-analysis leads**\n\nThe aderyn large-literal note on line 10 is the supply constant, which equals the manifest's 10^27 minor units. It is not a defect.\n\n**Coverage record**\n\n| Entry point | Verdict |\n| --- | --- |\n| approve | holds |\n| transfer | holds |\n| transferFrom | holds |\n\nThree extra rows record the invariants I checked: no privileged role or mutable supply, vendored library integrity, and exact launch flows.\n\n**Limits**\n\nThe existing project suite and my scratch probes ran locally, 31 tests in total, all passing. The protected harness requires the v4 launch infrastructure that is not in this repository, so pool seeding and swap execution remain for the network's integration environment. Slither and Mythril were not run.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":533370,"inputTokens":226,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":8779,"runtime":"claude","turns":24,"wallClockMs":144766}}],"verification":[{"checks":[{"durationMs":1031,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 27 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 936.70ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":798,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 24 tests for test/Imd6900.t.sol:Imd6900Test\n[PASS] testFuzz_selfTransferPreservesBalance(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 55083, ~: 54833)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 414645760154537559364985553\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferAboveBalanceRevertsWithoutChanges(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 116265, ~: 116486)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 578661966556618431244864551\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferFromAboveAllowanceRevertsWithoutChanges(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 112121, ~: 112332)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 9969\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferFromDeliversExactAmountAndConsumesAllowance(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 158867, ~: 160706)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 13678\n  Bound result 10\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferIsExactAndConservesSupply(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 160790, ~: 161316)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 266985034984119380256945078\n\n[PASS] test_approveEmitsEventAndCanBeReplacedOrRevoked() (gas: 177897)\n[PASS] test_approveZeroSpenderReverts() (gas: 37618)\n[PASS] test_commonMintBurnAndAdminCallsRevertForDeployerAndStranger() (gas: 1980351)\n[PASS] test_constructorEmitsMintTransfer() (gas: 5536)\n[PASS] test_contractRecipientReceivesWithoutCallback() (gas: 172121)\n[PASS] test_create2MintsToFactoryAndLaunchTransfersArriveWhole() (gas: 562330)\n[PASS] test_deployerCannotSpendHolderTokensWithoutApproval() (gas: 176749)\n[PASS] test_directDeploymentMintsToEOA() (gas: 17844)\n[PASS] test_fullSupplyCanBeTransferred() (gas: 71308)\n[PASS] test_maximumApprovalIsNotReducedByTransferFrom() (gas: 122344)\n[PASS] test_metadataAndInitialSupply() (gas: 92888)\n[PASS] test_runtimeHasNoForbiddenOpcodes() (gas: 784825)\n[PASS] test_singleSmallestUnitArrivesWhole() (gas: 76077)\n[PASS] test_spentAllowanceCannotBeReused() (gas: 141286)\n[PASS] test_transferFromInsufficientBalanceRollsBackAllowance() (gas: 114404)\n[PASS] test_transferFromSelfConsumesAllowanceWithoutChangingBalance() (gas: 100743)\n[PASS] test_transferFromToZeroRollsBackAllowance() (gas: 111520)\n[PASS] test_transferToZeroRevertsEvenForZeroAmount() (gas: 71970)\n[PASS] test_zeroTransfersSucceedWithoutBalanceOrAllowance() (gas: 110313)\nSuite result: ok. 24 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 32.57ms (172.37ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/Imd6900.invariant.t.sol:Imd6900InvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_supplyAndBalancesAreConserved() (runs: 128, calls: 8192, reverts: 0)\n\n╭--------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract     | Selector     | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+==========================================================+\n| TokenHandler | approve      | 2751  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | transfer     | 2731  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | transferFrom | 2710  | 0       | 0        |\n╰--------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000000000000\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 20000000000000000000\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 144221953375831750504642906\n  Bound result 195\n  Bound result 8162\n  Bound result 4601\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 878\n  Bound result 308\n  Bound result 195716804621570293\n  Bound result 7\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 23\n  Bound result 5546\n  Bound result 659918\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 711.12ms (710.19ms CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 712.40ms (743.69ms CPU time): 25 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (25 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":42,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"Imd6900.approve(address,uint256)\",\"Imd6900.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"Imd6900.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":3,\"DEPENDENCIES.json\":56,\"LICENSE\":21,\"README.md\":125,\"foundry.toml\":20,\"launch.json\":20,\"remappings.txt\":2,\"src/Imd6900.sol\":16,\"test/Imd6900.invariant.t.sol\":94,\"test/Imd6900.t.sol\":343},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"23126d8cbc741d40bf27eca44df7a77ef1f1eea9ee9fa706b7fc021a6ed037b1","verifiedTreeHash":"a6df568c5e43453f274f3c07fcbbf59d525d12ad","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+e6140b7a"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":1007,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 27 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 908.48ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":792,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 24 tests for test/Imd6900.t.sol:Imd6900Test\n[PASS] testFuzz_selfTransferPreservesBalance(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 55116, ~: 54845)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 338000735912218885385411285\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferAboveBalanceRevertsWithoutChanges(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 116357, ~: 116510)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 504831394389432162152792929\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferFromAboveAllowanceRevertsWithoutChanges(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 112142, ~: 112350)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 338000735912218885878656550\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferFromDeliversExactAmountAndConsumesAllowance(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 158842, ~: 160698)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 575644413879734182047125447\n  Bound result 63657702299207251711\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferIsExactAndConservesSupply(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 160936, ~: 161340)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 489581181995357992128710230\n\n[PASS] test_approveEmitsEventAndCanBeReplacedOrRevoked() (gas: 177897)\n[PASS] test_approveZeroSpenderReverts() (gas: 37618)\n[PASS] test_commonMintBurnAndAdminCallsRevertForDeployerAndStranger() (gas: 1980351)\n[PASS] test_constructorEmitsMintTransfer() (gas: 5536)\n[PASS] test_contractRecipientReceivesWithoutCallback() (gas: 172121)\n[PASS] test_create2MintsToFactoryAndLaunchTransfersArriveWhole() (gas: 562330)\n[PASS] test_deployerCannotSpendHolderTokensWithoutApproval() (gas: 176749)\n[PASS] test_directDeploymentMintsToEOA() (gas: 17844)\n[PASS] test_fullSupplyCanBeTransferred() (gas: 71308)\n[PASS] test_maximumApprovalIsNotReducedByTransferFrom() (gas: 122344)\n[PASS] test_metadataAndInitialSupply() (gas: 92888)\n[PASS] test_runtimeHasNoForbiddenOpcodes() (gas: 784825)\n[PASS] test_singleSmallestUnitArrivesWhole() (gas: 76077)\n[PASS] test_spentAllowanceCannotBeReused() (gas: 141286)\n[PASS] test_transferFromInsufficientBalanceRollsBackAllowance() (gas: 114404)\n[PASS] test_transferFromSelfConsumesAllowanceWithoutChangingBalance() (gas: 100743)\n[PASS] test_transferFromToZeroRollsBackAllowance() (gas: 111520)\n[PASS] test_transferToZeroRevertsEvenForZeroAmount() (gas: 71970)\n[PASS] test_zeroTransfersSucceedWithoutBalanceOrAllowance() (gas: 110313)\nSuite result: ok. 24 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 34.92ms (169.68ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/Imd6900.invariant.t.sol:Imd6900InvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_supplyAndBalancesAreConserved() (runs: 128, calls: 8192, reverts: 0)\n\n╭--------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract     | Selector     | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+==========================================================+\n| TokenHandler | approve      | 2720  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | transfer     | 2709  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | transferFrom | 2763  | 0       | 0        |\n╰--------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1737\n  Bound result 880277787171030111623584541\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 642678674445094429121214443\n  Bound result 72698976778303415000547757\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 255\n  Bound result 96276325457701282366167252\n  Bound result 237599112725935682502371577\n  Bound result 828417\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 7586\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 764\n  Bound result 300640099867549509909289036\n  Bound result 4228666475\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1692\n  Bound result 434417193843628385841766434\n  Bound result 3415\n  Bound result 69109612845005724609326\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 0\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 717.25ms (716.40ms CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 718.39ms (752.17ms CPU time): 25 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (25 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":32,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"Imd6900.approve(address,uint256)\",\"Imd6900.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"Imd6900.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":3,\"DEPENDENCIES.json\":56,\"LICENSE\":21,\"README.md\":125,\"foundry.toml\":20,\"remappings.txt\":2,\"src/Imd6900.sol\":16,\"test/Imd6900.invariant.t.sol\":94,\"test/Imd6900.t.sol\":343},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true},{"durationMs":373,"exitCode":0,"name":"slither","output":"slither: no results at low impact or above","passed":true},{"durationMs":199,"exitCode":0,"name":"aderyn","output":"[low] large-numeric-literal at src/Imd6900.sol:10: Large Numeric Literal","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"413e06234cfac26643fdef0975d6723a3424017a22200a149d1953427dc593a1","verifiedTreeHash":"e29ba161261714693b2e19571fe2f14f3d8682a1","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+e6140b7a"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":1449,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 28 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 1.34s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":4903,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 12 tests for test/Imd6900.edge.t.sol:Imd6900EdgeTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_failedTransferFromCanUsePreservedAllowanceAfterFunding(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 321104, ~: 321404)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 9014969746092\n  Bound result 873818994363651833098301884\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_splitTransferAndRoundTripHaveNoFee(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 284970, ~: 285430)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 960502620521\n  Bound result 198425630549\n\n[PASS] test_allowancesAreIsolatedByOwnerAndSpender() (gas: 498166)\n[PASS] test_approvalBelongsToImmediateCallerNotTransactionOrigin() (gas: 474556)\n[PASS] test_infiniteApprovalCanBeRevokedAndReplaced() (gas: 294168)\n[PASS] test_largestFiniteApprovalIsConsumed() (gas: 150821)\n[PASS] test_maximumDelegatedTransferRevertsEvenWithInfiniteApproval() (gas: 121956)\n[PASS] test_maximumTransferRevertsWithoutWrappingBalances() (gas: 60927)\n[PASS] test_ownerCallingTransferFromStillNeedsSelfApproval() (gas: 230620)\n[PASS] test_selfTransferStillRequiresEnoughBalance() (gas: 50548)\n[PASS] test_zeroSpenderRejectsZeroAndMaximumApprovals() (gas: 72711)\n[PASS] test_zeroTransferFromToZeroRevertsWithoutAnApproval() (gas: 72258)\nSuite result: ok. 12 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 58.24ms (107.58ms CPU time)\n\nRan 24 tests for test/Imd6900.t.sol:Imd6900Test\n[PASS] testFuzz_selfTransferPreservesBalance(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 55097, ~: 54833)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 321234248196664322162559814\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferAboveBalanceRevertsWithoutChanges(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 116250, ~: 116486)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 11716\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferFromAboveAllowanceRevertsWithoutChanges(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 112175, ~: 112332)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 321234248196664322174787413\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferFromDeliversExactAmountAndConsumesAllowance(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 159086, ~: 160698)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 7850\n  Bound result 2\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferIsExactAndConservesSupply(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 160739, ~: 161316)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1968816660138592408\n\n[PASS] test_approveEmitsEventAndCanBeReplacedOrRevoked() (gas: 177897)\n[PASS] test_approveZeroSpenderReverts() (gas: 37618)\n[PASS] test_commonMintBurnAndAdminCallsRevertForDeployerAndStranger() (gas: 1980351)\n[PASS] test_constructorEmitsMintTransfer() (gas: 5536)\n[PASS] test_contractRecipientReceivesWithoutCallback() (gas: 172121)\n[PASS] test_create2MintsToFactoryAndLaunchTransfersArriveWhole() (gas: 562330)\n[PASS] test_deployerCannotSpendHolderTokensWithoutApproval() (gas: 176749)\n[PASS] test_directDeploymentMintsToEOA() (gas: 17844)\n[PASS] test_fullSupplyCanBeTransferred() (gas: 71308)\n[PASS] test_maximumApprovalIsNotReducedByTransferFrom() (gas: 122344)\n[PASS] test_metadataAndInitialSupply() (gas: 92888)\n[PASS] test_runtimeHasNoForbiddenOpcodes() (gas: 784825)\n[PASS] test_singleSmallestUnitArrivesWhole() (gas: 76077)\n[PASS] test_spentAllowanceCannotBeReused() (gas: 141286)\n[PASS] test_transferFromInsufficientBalanceRollsBackAllowance() (gas: 114404)\n[PASS] test_transferFromSelfConsumesAllowanceWithoutChangingBalance() (gas: 100743)\n[PASS] test_transferFromToZeroRollsBackAllowance() (gas: 111520)\n[PASS] test_transferToZeroRevertsEvenForZeroAmount() (gas: 71970)\n[PASS] test_zeroTransfersSucceedWithoutBalanceOrAllowance() (gas: 110313)\nSuite result: ok. 24 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 58.27ms (271.10ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/Imd6900.invariant.t.sol:Imd6900InvariantTest\n[PASS]\nImd6900InvariantTest invariants:\n[PASS] invariant_balancesAndAllowancesMatchHistory\n[PASS] invariant_supplyAndBalancesAreConserved\n Imd6900InvariantTest invariants (runs: 256, calls: 16384, reverts: 0)\n\n╭--------------+--------------------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract     | Selector                 | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+======================================================================+\n| TokenHandler | approve                  | 1799  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | approveBoundary          | 1798  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | approveZeroSpender       | 1840  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | transfer                 | 1856  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | transferAboveBalance     | 1792  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | transferFrom             | 1838  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | transferFromAboveBalance | 1866  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | transferFromToZero       | 1796  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | transferToZero           | 1799  | 0       | 0        |\n╰--------------+--------------------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 100000000000000000000\n  Bound result 999999999999999999999999998\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639934\n  Bound result 4770186593575279656114757570248536886\n  Bound result 4990\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 999999999999999999999999997\n  Bound result 549612381783355334203695173819033940636790\n  Bound result 999999999999999999999999995\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000000000000\n  Bound result 521956267517053991072554064803347911512085126703471571226\n  Bound result 791\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639251\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 2616\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 386071789\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639243\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 38940348803508828962157131783187358443898\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 30\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 4\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 24\n  Bound result 18\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639564039477584007913129640728\n  Bound result 200\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 4.82s (4.82s CPU time)\n\nRan 3 test suites in 4.82s (4.93s CPU time): 37 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (37 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":58,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"Imd6900.approve(address,uint256)\",\"Imd6900.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"Imd6900.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":3,\"DEPENDENCIES.json\":56,\"LICENSE\":21,\"README.md\":125,\"foundry.toml\":20,\"remappings.txt\":2,\"src/Imd6900.sol\":16,\"test/Imd6900.edge.t.sol\":232,\"test/Imd6900.invariant.t.sol\":210,\"test/Imd6900.t.sol\":343},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"9f9fd88a0c983c300830c55e75aafea07480d98b3d90543945b1b94c095a195b","verifiedTreeHash":"4b77fbebe93d66310a693cf1447b37570a8956a2","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+e6140b7a"}]}