{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"7c622b7a-74aa-4583-9332-c602641067cf","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":null,"dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_economics","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"working"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"63e3b6af63df568234285a9bca43b0bcfc75c4b1a83ecc38c8954a0abf07e2a5","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_flow","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":null,"dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests","manifest","audit_math","audit_permissions","audit_economics","audit_flow"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"3014f1ea5961918ca059453a484bf4c8bcbbfc2248dbe31d94ac7c5cdf8f50bd","skillId":"audit-judge","tools":[]},"key":"audit_judge","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"3014f1ea5961918ca059453a484bf4c8bcbbfc2248dbe31d94ac7c5cdf8f50bd","skillId":"audit-judge","state":"waiting"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"0604a7bd4552181854d4e7bcdcee0b8d32f38d2bf3246bb7df7f32a265f24198","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_math","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"883cad8f6e980f67ef66eb05dbbe159583388f32d839698f67cb50e1d794ae0f","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_permissions","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"2406a50ee43b6f0a6b9e399aea519c43fed8f4532915c7684730518868eae59c","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"587567a5ef71546b5973ceaf6ef1dbbd590f49503b5ac9a6973ed86b89584857","skillId":"build-contract-project","tools":[]},"key":"build_contract_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"587567a5ef71546b5973ceaf6ef1dbbd590f49503b5ac9a6973ed86b89584857","skillId":"build-contract-project","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":null,"dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"tools":[]},"key":"manifest","kind":"code","role":"integrate","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"failed"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":null,"dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"73431852439ad3a343f3d2b7db1c43cd363b9f48f9bb51497374a0cf6d50b223","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","tools":[]},"key":"write_foundry_tests","kind":"code","role":"tests","skillHash":"73431852439ad3a343f3d2b7db1c43cd363b9f48f9bb51497374a0cf6d50b223","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","state":"working"}],"objective":"A custom token: REPUTATION (REP).\nToken name: REPUTATION\nToken symbol: REP\nToken supply: 1,000,000,000 with 18 decimals, all minted once to the deployer in the constructor.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"409e66c357d0100ff48402bd366fc760e89cbcc6eb484176f18569bac18b5b73","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"7c622b7a-74aa-4583-9332-c602641067cf","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-1025-reputation"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"52214","feedbackHash":"74b58e83238c115f79274ba64e1c3e161598ec56c332a495a040e667cea82126","nodeKey":"audit_flow","submissionHash":"63e3b6af63df568234285a9bca43b0bcfc75c4b1a83ecc38c8954a0abf07e2a5","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52130","feedbackHash":"15ece7355da994490ad8186fb7ecb427b407e654db57af09900646e2d432d017","nodeKey":"audit_math","submissionHash":"0604a7bd4552181854d4e7bcdcee0b8d32f38d2bf3246bb7df7f32a265f24198","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52216","feedbackHash":"2b6ae35c22264f112b8e64480d45099082999fb068c7cc027da8e59637f403e9","nodeKey":"audit_permissions","submissionHash":"883cad8f6e980f67ef66eb05dbbe159583388f32d839698f67cb50e1d794ae0f","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51394","feedbackHash":"cedb50e8316cd076d73bfa120862431956f4716f712392b6ac44e99599727d5b","nodeKey":"build_contract_project","submissionHash":"2406a50ee43b6f0a6b9e399aea519c43fed8f4532915c7684730518868eae59c","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"5ca889a076d6c4a67d0d4d4e62466ac0ebe580969ac04aa5a5f5a0186ae7a66a","state":"blocked","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"1c29c7c6e4cf57eb","findings":[],"hash":"0604a7bd4552181854d4e7bcdcee0b8d32f38d2bf3246bb7df7f32a265f24198","nodeId":"2be5ca98-ebcf-4abe-b36b-ce4915541974","outcome":"completed","summary":"I found no defects in the math, boundary or numerical-gap areas, so `.imd-findings.json` has an empty findings list and five coverage rows. No source files were changed.\n\n**What's in scope.** `src/ReputationToken.sol` is a plain OpenZeppelin v5.0.2 ERC20 with an 18-decimal supply of 1e27, minted once to `msg.sender` in the constructor. I checked the vendored library files against the hashes in `VENDORED.json` and they all match, so the transfer logic is unmodified OpenZeppelin. The existing tests pass: 29 unit tests and the invariant suite, with 8,192 calls and no reverts.\n\n**Math Precision**\n- **Overflow:** `1_000_000_000 * 10**18` is worked out at compile time to 1e27, far below 2^256. There is no way to mint after the constructor, so every balance stays at or below 1e27. That means the unchecked `_balances[to] += value` can't overflow, and the unchecked `_totalSupply -= value` can never run because nothing burns.\n- **Underflow:** the subtractions in `_update` and `_spendAllowance` both check the balance or allowance first and revert if it's too small.\n- **Rounding:** the token has no division, rounding, narrowing casts or fees. Decimals are 18, as the brief says.\n- **Static-analysis lead:** the aderyn \"large numeric literal\" warning at line 10 is a style note. The value is correct.\n\n**Boundary**\n- **Edge inputs:** I traced zero amounts, a full-balance transfer, sending to yourself, a maximum allowance (never reduced) and the zero address as receiver, sender, owner or spender. All behave as intended.\n- **Reverts:** a `transferFrom` to the zero address reverts as a whole, so it doesn't use up any allowance.\n- **No external surface:** the token makes no external calls, has no payable functions and decodes no raw byte input.\n\n**Numerical gap**\n- **Launch splits:** the 10% swarm share is exactly 1e26. The pool share, 1e27 × poolBps / 10000, comes out exact for every allowed poolBps from 1 to 9000, because 1e27 divides evenly by 10000.\n- **Transfers are exact:** with no transfer fee, the factory → distributor → claimant and pool-manager flows move exactly the stated amounts.\n\n**Coverage:** `approve`, `transfer` and `transferFrom` are each marked `holds`. The supply and decimals/split invariants have their own rows.\n\n**Not covered:** I ran no Slither or long fuzz runs beyond the existing suite. I couldn't run the protected launch test (`Token.protected.t.sol`) here because it needs the v4-core and launch helper sources and environment settings that aren't in this tree. I also didn't review a `launch.json`, since there isn't one yet.\n\nThe workspace shows some untracked entries such as `.bashrc`, `.gitmodules`, `.idea` and `.claude/agents`. They are sandbox placeholder device files that I didn't create, and I left them alone. `.imd-findings.json` itself is excluded from git through `.git/info/exclude`.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":362820,"inputTokens":16,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":4538,"runtime":"claude","turns":9,"wallClockMs":55773}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"9b0662ae59edf13ee8aa2994e43b103fec573b5f2e22c8e76c8fc4de3e51e62e","device":"3d800e8d8dc2fdc5","findings":[],"hash":"2406a50ee43b6f0a6b9e399aea519c43fed8f4532915c7684730518868eae59c","nodeId":"aa35e110-7b82-4a39-97c9-c49441326b27","outcome":"completed","summary":"Implemented REPUTATION (REP): 18 decimals, 1,000,000,000 tokens minted once to the deployer, with no later minting or administrative powers.\n\n- `forge build`, `forge test` (30 passing), and `forge fmt --check` passed with Solidity 0.8.26.\n- Fresh offline build and parallel tests passed.\n- Dependencies are vendored; deployment responsibilities are documented in `README.md`.\n- Slither 0.11.6 reported two compiler-pragma warnings, assessed in `SECURITY.md`; no confirmed vulnerability was identified.\n\nThe protected platform integration harness remains unrun because its platform contracts and launch parameters were not supplied.","treeHash":"fb442a406eda9f34aa414cd1c502e3d88f175de6","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":750848,"inputTokens":76982,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":16005,"runtime":"codex","turns":6,"wallClockMs":609313}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"6b47d1bf92391c22","findings":[],"hash":"63e3b6af63df568234285a9bca43b0bcfc75c4b1a83ecc38c8954a0abf07e2a5","nodeId":"3dfb2fb6-de7f-45cc-b2b5-932c1c27cf94","outcome":"completed","summary":"I found no defects I could back with a reproduction. `.imd-findings.json` holds `{\"findings\":[]}` plus a coverage record that answers all 3 entry points and 2 invariants.\n\n**What the token is:** `src/ReputationToken.sol` is OpenZeppelin's standard ERC-20 (v5.0.2) with only two additions: a constant `INITIAL_SUPPLY = 1_000_000_000 * 10**18` and a constructor that calls `_mint(msg.sender, INITIAL_SUPPLY)`. It doesn't override any transfer logic and has no owner, constructor arguments, admin functions, external calls, fees or exemptions.\n\n**Supporting library:** the five vendored OpenZeppelin files match their `VENDORED.json` checksums. I also downloaded the same files from the upstream commit (`dbb6104`) and they hash identically, so the library hasn't been altered.\n\n**Coverage, using the Execution Trace, Periphery and First Principles guides:**\n- **`approve`** behaves as intended: it rejects the zero address, replaces the old allowance and emits an `Approval` event.\n- **`transfer`** rejects zero addresses, uses a checked balance debit and credits exactly the amount sent. Because there is no fee or burn, every launch flow moves the full amount: factory to distributor, distributor to claimant, and the pool's settle and take steps.\n- **`transferFrom`** reverts when the allowance is too small and leaves an unlimited (`type(uint256).max`) allowance unchanged. It then follows the same exact-transfer path, and there is no reentrancy risk because nothing calls out to other contracts.\n- **Supply and powers:** supply can't grow after deployment, the whole supply goes to the deployer (the factory when deployed via CREATE2), and decimals are 18. Nothing privileged can pause, freeze, blacklist or move a holder's balance.\n\n**Leads I set aside:**\n- The aderyn \"large numeric literal\" warning is about style only; I checked the value and it is correct.\n- The existing test suite passes (30 tests, including invariant runs).\n\n**Not checked:**\n- I couldn't run the protected launch harness here. It needs `src/LaunchLiquidity.sol`, `PoolInitializationGuard`, `HookFlags` and `v4-core`, none of which are in this tree. They're platform files, not the token's. My conclusion that the pool seed and swaps work is reasoned from the exact-transfer behaviour, not observed in a run.\n- There's no `launch.json` yet, so no manifest review. When one exists, it should list `constructorArgs: []`, `decimals: 18` and `totalSupply: \"1000000000000000000000000000\"`.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":321131,"inputTokens":14,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":3037,"runtime":"claude","turns":7,"wallClockMs":43965}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"47f3603854a893a3","findings":[],"hash":"883cad8f6e980f67ef66eb05dbbe159583388f32d839698f67cb50e1d794ae0f","nodeId":"404d66a2-eb97-43aa-ba73-4e7c8920bfda","outcome":"completed","summary":"I found no permission defects in REPUTATION (REP), so `.imd-findings.json` holds an empty findings list. It also has a coverage row for each of the three entry points, all marked `holds`, plus two rows for invariants I checked.\n\n**What the code is:** `src/ReputationToken.sol` is a plain OpenZeppelin ERC-20 (vendored v5.0.2). Its constructor mints `1_000_000_000 * 10**18` to `msg.sender` once, and it adds nothing else on top.\n\n**Access Control:** there is no owner and no role system. There are no admin functions and no initializer or upgrade path. `approve` only sets the caller's own allowances. `transfer` only moves the caller's balance. `transferFrom` always checks and reduces the allowance before moving anything; only an unlimited allowance is left as it is. No address skips the allowance check, so neither the factory nor the deployer can move or freeze a holder's balance.\n\n**Trust Gap and Asymmetry:** the constructor gives out nothing but the token balance, so nobody holds special power once deployment ends. No caller is treated differently from another: there are no fees, exemptions, pause or blacklist. That also means the launch transfers move exact amounts: factory to distributor, distributor to claimant, and in and out of the pool.\n\n**Supply:** `_mint` is only reached from the constructor, so the supply cannot grow after launch.\n\n**Library check:** I checked the five vendored OpenZeppelin files and the licence against the SHA-256 values listed in `VENDORED.json`, and all matched. I also read the ERC-20 code paths line by line and they are the standard implementation. The matching hashes only show the files agree with that manifest; I didn't compare them against the upstream repository.\n\n**Static-analysis leads:** Aderyn flagged a \"large numeric literal\" at line 10. That's the supply constant and it's correct, so it isn't a defect. Slither reported nothing.\n\n**Other checks:** the build and the existing 30 tests pass. I wrote no Foundry proof file because there was nothing at high severity or above to prove. There's no `launch.json` yet, so I couldn't review constructor arguments against a manifest; this token's constructor takes none.\n\n**Not reported:** the familiar ERC-20 risk where a spender can use the old allowance just before it is changed exists here, as in every standard ERC-20. I left it out because it isn't a defect in this code.\n\nApart from the findings file I changed no files.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":315182,"inputTokens":14,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":3019,"runtime":"claude","turns":7,"wallClockMs":48880}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"6407a9ab49278517","findings":[],"hash":"c1b43bd2ee36901afb6cacfb207e320187e978d3129b0d5ea3fc62a23018689d","nodeId":"f202d4e8-d5c8-4471-b719-c08691098e71","outcome":"failed","summary":"needs input: The brief does not select pool.fee or pool.tickSpacing, or supply pool.initialPrice (the provenance decimal sqrtPriceX96). The missing-input rule prohibits guessing requester choices, and these fields do not support launch placeholders. — Which pool fee tier (500, 3000, or 10000), tickSpacing, and provenance initialPrice (decimal sqrtPriceX96) should launch.json use?","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":160000,"inputTokens":33174,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":1994,"runtime":"codex","turns":3,"wallClockMs":91007}}],"verification":[{"checks":[{"durationMs":373,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 9 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 322.12ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":2242,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 29 tests for test/ReputationToken.t.sol:ReputationTokenTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_finiteAllowanceAccounting(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 136620, ~: 138951)\n[PASS] testFuzz_insufficientBalanceIsAtomic(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 52291, ~: 52259)\n[PASS] testFuzz_transfersConserveSupply(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 146868, ~: 147912)\n[PASS] test_approveReplacesAndRevokesAllowance() (gas: 163673)\n[PASS] test_approveZeroSpenderReverts() (gas: 34619)\n[PASS] test_constructorEmitsMintEvent() (gas: 5534)\n[PASS] test_create2MintsToFactoryRatherThanTransactionOrigin() (gas: 203934)\n[PASS] test_deployerCannotSpendHolderTokensWithoutApproval() (gas: 89287)\n[PASS] test_distributionAndPoolStyleTransferPathsDeliverInFull() (gas: 350501)\n[PASS] test_metadataAndEntireSupplyBelongToDeployer() (gas: 58167)\n[PASS] test_mintAndAdministrativeEntrypointsAreAbsent() (gas: 942999)\n[PASS] test_runtimeHasNoForbiddenOpcodes() (gas: 460841)\n[PASS] test_selfTransferOverBalanceStillReverts() (gas: 33269)\n[PASS] test_selfTransferPreservesBalance() (gas: 42707)\n[PASS] test_transferDeliversExactAmountAndEmitsEvent() (gas: 79838)\n[PASS] test_transferEntireBalance() (gas: 62669)\n[PASS] test_transferFromInfiniteAllowanceIsNotDecremented() (gas: 115795)\n[PASS] test_transferFromOverAllowanceRevertsWithoutChanges() (gas: 99883)\n[PASS] test_transferFromOverBalanceRollsBackAllowance() (gas: 98106)\n[PASS] test_transferFromSelfStillSpendsAllowance() (gas: 94541)\n[PASS] test_transferFromSpendsAllowanceAndEmitsTransfer() (gas: 180675)\n[PASS] test_transferFromToZeroRollsBackAllowance() (gas: 95447)\n[PASS] test_transferFromZeroSenderRevertsEvenForZeroAmount() (gas: 44338)\n[PASS] test_transferOverBalanceReverts() (gas: 44695)\n[PASS] test_transferToZeroReverts() (gas: 41715)\n[PASS] test_wrongSpenderCannotUseSomeoneElsesApproval() (gas: 92276)\n[PASS] test_zeroTransferFromDoesNotNeedAllowance() (gas: 58525)\n[PASS] test_zeroTransferFromEmptyAccountEmitsEvent() (gas: 50003)\n[PASS] test_zeroTransferToZeroAlsoReverts() (gas: 30316)\nSuite result: ok. 29 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 20.47ms (82.50ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/ReputationToken.invariant.t.sol:ReputationTokenInvariantTest\n[PASS]\nReputationTokenInvariantTest invariants:\n[PASS] invariant_allowancesMatchModel\n[PASS] invariant_supplyAndBalancesMatchModel\n ReputationTokenInvariantTest invariants (runs: 128, calls: 8192, reverts: 0)\n\n╭-------------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract          | Selector     | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+===============================================================+\n| ReputationHandler | approve      | 2722  | 0       | 0        |\n|-------------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| ReputationHandler | transfer     | 2775  | 0       | 0        |\n|-------------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| ReputationHandler | transferFrom | 2695  | 0       | 0        |\n╰-------------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 2.19s (2.19s CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 2.20s (2.21s CPU time): 30 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (30 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":34,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"ReputationToken.approve(address,uint256)\",\"ReputationToken.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"ReputationToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":3,\"README.md\":80,\"SECURITY.md\":86,\"foundry.toml\":21,\"src/ReputationToken.sol\":15,\"test/ReputationToken.invariant.t.sol\":93,\"test/ReputationToken.t.sol\":323,\"test/helpers/TestSupport.sol\":26},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true},{"durationMs":443,"exitCode":0,"name":"slither","output":"slither: no results at low impact or above","passed":true},{"durationMs":242,"exitCode":0,"name":"aderyn","output":"[low] large-numeric-literal at src/ReputationToken.sol:10: Large Numeric Literal","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"2406a50ee43b6f0a6b9e399aea519c43fed8f4532915c7684730518868eae59c","verifiedTreeHash":"fb442a406eda9f34aa414cd1c502e3d88f175de6","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+ad90ce4c"}]}