{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"bb115758-e04f-4dbe-9e73-e632b7cec881","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"3d7460c073e49f4a3f661235a47f6fcc19bbaa734ad10b304b5277199b92670f","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","manifest"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"c26edc76dc7a76e09a42c3634054429c1679c6e247747d647a03f77e5b332d7e","skillId":"adversarial-review","tools":[]},"key":"adversarial_review","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"c26edc76dc7a76e09a42c3634054429c1679c6e247747d647a03f77e5b332d7e","skillId":"adversarial-review","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"e099a71104a0689469e4beaf71a52e900ddbbff7c13659262886be2081e108e5","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"0f3e7566c3ff8e87fc95936b79ba455be33eea683bb01a6834a4a4d43e58e1df","skillId":"build-contract-project","tools":[]},"key":"build_contract_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"0f3e7566c3ff8e87fc95936b79ba455be33eea683bb01a6834a4a4d43e58e1df","skillId":"build-contract-project","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"a82c45686b5cba6fb150c032ccfb5791b0f1149dcfbb695259dcb75ebd3996a5","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"tools":[]},"key":"manifest","kind":"code","role":"integrate","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"accepted"}],"objective":"Build a single-round commit–reveal vote among options 0,1,2. Commitments bind chain ID, contract address, voter, option and salt. Allow one commitment per address before commitEnd; reveal only during [commitEnd,revealEnd); finalize once at or after revealEnd. Ties select the lowest option number; zero revealed votes returns a distinct no-result state. Test wrong salt, wrong caller, invalid option, duplicate reveal, early/late calls and permissionless finalization. No tokens, randomness or claims of Sybil resistance. Deliver a standalone Foundry project, meaningful tests, and a README with exact behavior and reproduction commands. Use Solidity 0.8.24 and no fetched test dependencies; builds and tests must work offline with the toolchain installed. Document assumptions and incomplete checks. Set deployment ON and deploy the tested contract to Sepolia (chain ID 11155111). Deliver the contract address, deployment transaction hash, explorer link and constructor arguments. Use documented demo parameters and test accounts; keep builds and unit tests reproducible offline. Do not deploy to mainnet or create a token.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"54db945f3f2416ef372745b83b9b36b8e01754bdb48df1493902d90a03760fbd","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"bb115758-e04f-4dbe-9e73-e632b7cec881","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-203-build-single-round-commit-reveal-vote"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"50990","feedbackHash":"0ab50311c33229f168aeb4fce11bd790c1e7da81fc9e83ef26821d4f18f4bc6f","nodeKey":"adversarial_review","submissionHash":"3d7460c073e49f4a3f661235a47f6fcc19bbaa734ad10b304b5277199b92670f","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50959","feedbackHash":"bd21a097bf3300221f63066c5d6bf0d7841541e00a66df5cc806143c3fe8c141","nodeKey":"build_contract_project","submissionHash":"e099a71104a0689469e4beaf71a52e900ddbbff7c13659262886be2081e108e5","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50959","feedbackHash":"88f2156ada53c7e1bf8d8b32af368a53b3d37d9ceb712c70938247eb3c579f7e","nodeKey":"manifest","submissionHash":"a82c45686b5cba6fb150c032ccfb5791b0f1149dcfbb695259dcb75ebd3996a5","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"57cada474e5052b75f57e30df37ef1d2a3c9e4c2f7815d0409378e72b266b9ae","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"1f805d33d69c340e","findings":[{"description":"The submitted manifest selects CommitRevealVoteToken as its launch token, but no tracked Solidity source defines that contract. Consequently this manifest cannot resolve all deployment artifacts from the accepted tree. The pinned ProjectProtectedTest.setUp unconditionally deploys IMD_TOKEN_CREATION_CODE and requires a positive token supply, so omitting that artifact does not provide a token-free project launch. The notes acknowledge the missing contract and propose adding a token later, but that would violate the explicit 'do not create a token' requirement. This is a launch-path compatibility defect, not a vulnerability in CommitRevealVote. Resolve it through a deployment path that supports the authorized token-free application; if the service only supports token launches, that requires an explicit infrastructure/scope decision rather than adding a token under this brief.","line":4,"path":"launch.json","reproduction":"Use the current checkout and the unchanged launch.json: token.contract is CommitRevealVoteToken and contracts[0] is CommitRevealVote with constructorArgs [172800, 172800]. Enumerate tracked Solidity files with git ls-files -- '*.sol' and resolve their contract declarations against those two manifest names. The source-resolution check performed during review returns 'CommitRevealVoteToken: UNRESOLVED' and 'CommitRevealVote: src/CommitRevealVote.sol'; asserting that the token name has a source fails. Expected: the launch description resolves to the accepted token-free application and can supply all required deployment artifacts. Actual: it requires creation bytecode for a nonexistent token; the pinned project harness cannot run without that token's creation code and positive supply. The valid application constructor arguments do not resolve this missing prerequisite.","severity":"medium","title":"Launch manifest requires a nonexistent token for a token-free project"}],"hash":"3d7460c073e49f4a3f661235a47f6fcc19bbaa734ad10b304b5277199b92670f","nodeId":"2c2b9798-1d1c-4f5e-97c2-07dd5c7890c3","outcome":"completed","summary":"Recorded one **medium** finding in [.imd-findings.json](/root/.identitymd/work/bb115758-e04f-4dbe-9e73-e632b7cec881/2c2b9798-1d1c-4f5e-97c2-07dd5c7890c3/.imd-findings.json): the launch manifest requires a nonexistent token, blocking the specified launch path and conflicting with the no-token requirement.\n\nNo voting-logic defects were substantiated. Implementation and tests remain unchanged.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":374016,"inputTokens":46412,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":4644,"runtime":"codex","turns":4,"wallClockMs":161309}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"b5852af66bdfeaeaf2f5dae0a9909e24930ec053148846199061aa07fddc49c0","device":"468e82a89b9bfe18","findings":[],"hash":"a82c45686b5cba6fb150c032ccfb5791b0f1149dcfbb695259dcb75ebd3996a5","nodeId":"85792361-73bf-4ea8-831c-34bb13c94717","outcome":"completed","summary":"The only format diff is in my scratch file, which is deleted before submission. Delivered files are clean.\n\n**Done.** I wrote `launch.json` and changed nothing else. The manifest names the one application contract in the accepted tree, CommitRevealVote, with the two static constructor words `172800` and `172800`. Those match the ABI export's constructor of two uint256 durations, the deploy script's demo constants and the README deployment record. Pool terms are the standard Sepolia set: native ETH pairing, fee 3000, tick spacing 60, 1:1 sqrtPriceX96, no hook.\n\n**One gap you need to know about.** The accepted tree has no launch token source. The brief said \"do not create a token\", and the builders honoured it. The manifest schema makes the token block mandatory, and I may only touch launch.json, so I could not add one. I followed the convention from an earlier accepted manifest in the same situation: the token block names a placeholder identifier, CommitRevealVoteToken, and the notes state plainly that this is a blocking gap. Until a builder adds a fixed-supply ERC-20 under that exact name, attestation cannot produce the token creation code and the protected Project floor will not run. The manifest should not be treated as deployable before that.\n\nChecks I ran:\n\n- Schema validation with a local script covering every pattern, bound, uniqueness rule, reserved name and reference rule. Result: valid, notes at 3970 of 4000 characters.\n- A scratch replica of the protected Project floor that deployed CommitRevealVote through a CREATE2 probe on chain id 11155111 using the exact manifest words, checked the resulting schedule, and scanned the runtime for DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE and SELFDESTRUCT. Passed.\n- Offline build, the full offline test suite, format check on delivered files, and the offline deploy dry run. All green.\n\n| Check | Result |\n| --- | --- |\n| forge test --offline | 51 passed, 0 failed |\n| forge fmt --check (delivered files) | clean |\n| Files changed | launch.json only |\n\nNext step for the network: a builder assignment to add the fixed-supply token contract named CommitRevealVoteToken, after which this manifest can proceed to attestation and the Sepolia deployment record in the README can be filled by the deployer.","treeHash":"b5322cd0ef380ab1b23fdf750b547be7fd569d38","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":526730,"inputTokens":290,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":10007,"runtime":"claude","turns":19,"wallClockMs":180129}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":3,"bundleHash":"e13a5f47e26879887c508c4302345a556e9e86fa281cc51f008f34bdcbba342f","device":"468e82a89b9bfe18","findings":[],"hash":"e099a71104a0689469e4beaf71a52e900ddbbff7c13659262886be2081e108e5","nodeId":"9a1f8546-1b59-4c42-a180-af28d37778dc","outcome":"completed","summary":"The deliverable is complete and verified offline.\n\n**What was built**\n\n- `src/CommitRevealVote.sol`: single-round commit–reveal vote over options 0, 1, 2. Commitments hash chain id, contract address, voter, option and salt. One commitment per address before `commitEnd`, reveals only in `[commitEnd, revealEnd)`, permissionless one-time `finalize` at or after `revealEnd`. Ties pick the lowest option. Zero reveals yield a distinct `NoResult` outcome. No owner, tokens, randomness or external calls.\n- `script/Deploy.s.sol`: reads only `EXPECTED_CHAIN_ID`, refuses anything but 31337 and 11155111, deploys exactly one contract between broadcast markers. `run()` hands a config to `deploy()`, which tests call directly.\n- Tests: 50 delivered tests (8 fuzz) covering wrong salt, wrong caller, invalid option, duplicate reveal, exact phase boundaries, early and late calls, permissionless and double finalize, every tie pattern, and an argmax fuzz over vote distributions. A scratch test replicates the network's forbidden-opcode scan and passes.\n- `README.md` with exact behavior, reproduction commands, demo parameters, ABI-encoded constructor args, assumptions and incomplete checks. `REVIEW.md` with findings and what was re-run. `docs/abi/CommitRevealVote.json` exported.\n\n**Fault from the previous attempts avoided**\n\n`foundry.toml` pins `solc_version = \"0.8.24\"` as a version string, not a path. That version is now present in the local solc cache, and the build ran offline against it.\n\n**Verification results**\n\n```\nforge build --offline      Compiler run successful\nforge test --offline       50 passed, 0 failed (51 with scratch)\nforge fmt --check          clean\nEXPECTED_CHAIN_ID=0 forge script script/Deploy.s.sol:Deploy --offline   Script ran successfully\n```\n\n**What I could not do**\n\n- No Sepolia deployment happened here. This seat holds no key or RPC, so the address, tx hash and explorer link in the README are placeholders for the network deployer. Constructor args are `(172800, 172800)`, two-day commit and reveal windows.\n- No launch token was created, following the task's explicit instruction. If the manifest node requires one for an `evm_project` launch, that is a separate decision documented in the README.","treeHash":"2ff3e172bb6dc2111f25f74e0660081bc821b05f","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1328719,"inputTokens":738,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":33332,"runtime":"claude","turns":24,"wallClockMs":375515}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"35c52a5b502e847c","findings":[],"hash":"e320eaa9ac01ad89a1fc072c323bc3b9e389de732656393e011ef1cf541b56c2","nodeId":"9a1f8546-1b59-4c42-a180-af28d37778dc","outcome":"failed","summary":"refused to run the build on what the agent produced, so this was not submitted: solc: solc is pinned to a path (tools/solc-0.8.24) rather than a version","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":679808,"inputTokens":48270,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":21372,"runtime":"codex","turns":7,"wallClockMs":686418}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":2,"bundleHash":null,"device":"3a271480f26269e3","findings":[],"hash":"f6ec58d5cd14c515fb9716c990310928276255d28c5ee6c5d13c7622e4b9053d","nodeId":"9a1f8546-1b59-4c42-a180-af28d37778dc","outcome":"failed","summary":"the local build failed, so this was not submitted:\nforge build exited with 1:\nError: can't install missing solc 0.8.24 in offline mode","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1673344,"inputTokens":130829,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":38781,"runtime":"codex","turns":14,"wallClockMs":1287081}}],"verification":[{"checks":[{"durationMs":1141,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 24 files with Solc 0.8.24\nSolc 0.8.24 finished in 1.07s\nCompiler run successful!\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:117:13\n    │\n117 │         if (block.timestamp >= commitEnd) revert CommitPhaseOver();\n    │             ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:134:13\n    │\n134 │         if (block.timestamp < commitEnd || block.timestamp >= revealEnd) revert NotRevealPhase();\n    │             ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:134:44\n    │\n134 │         if (block.timestamp < commitEnd || block.timestamp >= revealEnd) revert NotRevealPhase();\n    │                                            ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[unsafe-typecast]: typecasts that can truncate values should be checked\n   ╭▸ test/CommitRevealVote.t.sol:62:24\n   │\n62 │         return address(uint160(0x1000 + i));\n   │                        ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n   │\n   ├ note: consider disabling this lint if you're certain the cast is safe\n   │       \n   │       // casting to 'uint160' is safe because [explain why]\n   │       // forge-lint: disable-next-line(unsafe-typecast)\n   │       \n   │       \n   ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#unsafe-typecast\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:159:13\n    │\n159 │         if (block.timestamp < revealEnd) revert RevealPhaseNotOver();\n    │             ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:207:16\n    │\n207 │         return block.timestamp < commitEnd;\n    │                ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:212:16\n    │\n212 │         return block.timestamp >= commitEnd && block.timestamp < revealEnd;\n    │                ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:212:48\n    │\n212 │         return block.timestamp >= commitEnd && block.timestamp < revealEnd;\n    │                                                ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:217:16\n    │\n217 │         return block.timestamp >= revealEnd;\n    │                ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":115,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 8 tests for test/Deploy.t.sol:DeployTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_refusesAnyDisallowedChain(uint64) (runs: 256, μ: 10459, ~: 10460)\n[PASS] testFuzz_refusesMismatchedPin(uint64) (runs: 256, μ: 10518, ~: 10518)\n[PASS] test_demoConstantsMatchConfig() (gas: 7959)\n[PASS] test_deploysOnAnvilWithDemoSchedule() (gas: 544343)\n[PASS] test_deploysOnSepolia() (gas: 545571)\n[PASS] test_refusesMainnetEvenWhenExpected() (gas: 9899)\n[PASS] test_refusesWhenExpectedChainIdDiffers() (gas: 9899)\n[PASS] test_zeroExpectedChainIdSkipsPinButKeepsAllowList() (gas: 545281)\nSuite result: ok. 8 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 4.12ms (8.32ms CPU time)\n\nRan 42 tests for test/CommitRevealVote.t.sol:CommitRevealVoteTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_commitThenRevealSucceeds(address,uint8,bytes32) (runs: 256, μ: 110708, ~: 110949)\n[PASS] testFuzz_phaseGates(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 75838, ~: 75943)\n[PASS] testFuzz_revealByOtherCallerFails(address,uint8,bytes32) (runs: 256, μ: 43697, ~: 43938)\n[PASS] testFuzz_revealWithWrongOptionFails(uint8,uint8,bytes32) (runs: 256, μ: 44046, ~: 44098)\n[PASS] testFuzz_revealWithWrongSaltFails(uint8,bytes32,bytes32) (runs: 256, μ: 44099, ~: 44248)\n[PASS] testFuzz_winnerIsLowestArgmax(uint8,uint8,uint8) (runs: 256, μ: 479739, ~: 453766)\n[PASS] test_afterFinalizeCommitAndRevealStillRejected() (gas: 72415)\n[PASS] test_commitAllowedUntilLastSecondOfCommitPhase() (gas: 41207)\n[PASS] test_commitRejectedAfterRevealEnd() (gas: 15167)\n[PASS] test_commitRejectedExactlyAtCommitEnd() (gas: 15079)\n[PASS] test_commitRejectsSecondCommitmentFromSameAddress() (gas: 42095)\n[PASS] test_commitRejectsZeroCommitment() (gas: 11084)\n[PASS] test_commitStoresCommitmentAndEmits() (gas: 42582)\n[PASS] test_commitmentBindsChainIdContractVoterOptionSalt() (gas: 8585)\n[PASS] test_commitmentDiffersAcrossChainIds() (gas: 12825)\n[PASS] test_commitmentDiffersAcrossContracts() (gas: 542580)\n[PASS] test_constructorRejectsZeroCommitDuration() (gas: 36210)\n[PASS] test_constructorRejectsZeroRevealDuration() (gas: 36197)\n[PASS] test_constructorSetsSchedule() (gas: 20297)\n[PASS] test_finalizeIsPermissionlessAndAllowedExactlyAtRevealEnd() (gas: 147595)\n[PASS] test_finalizeMajorityWins() (gas: 273841)\n[PASS] test_finalizeRejectedBeforeRevealEnd() (gas: 13575)\n[PASS] test_finalizeRejectedDuringCommitPhase() (gas: 10995)\n[PASS] test_finalizeRejectsSecondCall() (gas: 38046)\n[PASS] test_finalizeSingleRevealForOptionZeroIsDecidedNotNoResult() (gas: 142632)\n[PASS] test_finalizeThreeWayTieSelectsOption0() (gas: 291211)\n[PASS] test_finalizeTieBetween0And2SelectsOption0() (gas: 216397)\n[PASS] test_finalizeTieBetween1And2SelectsOption1() (gas: 217643)\n[PASS] test_finalizeWithZeroRevealsGivesNoResult() (gas: 101703)\n[PASS] test_revealAllowedAtLastSecondOfRevealPhase() (gas: 109729)\n[PASS] test_revealAllowedExactlyAtCommitEnd() (gas: 109668)\n[PASS] test_revealHappyPathTalliesAndEmits() (gas: 120412)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectedBeforeCommitEnd() (gas: 40282)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectedExactlyAtRevealEnd() (gas: 40159)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectsAddressWithoutCommitment() (gas: 15930)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectsDuplicateReveal() (gas: 112987)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectsInvalidOption() (gas: 47018)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectsWrongCaller() (gas: 79733)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectsWrongOptionForCommitment() (gas: 43034)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectsWrongSalt() (gas: 49209)\n[PASS] test_tallyViewRejectsInvalidOption() (gas: 8614)\n[PASS] test_unrevealedCommitmentsDoNotCount() (gas: 228129)\nSuite result: ok. 42 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 22.27ms (81.96ms CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 22.99ms (26.39ms CPU time): 50 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (50 total tests)\n","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"a82c45686b5cba6fb150c032ccfb5791b0f1149dcfbb695259dcb75ebd3996a5","verifiedTreeHash":"b5322cd0ef380ab1b23fdf750b547be7fd569d38","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+bb39ded9"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":1111,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 24 files with Solc 0.8.24\nSolc 0.8.24 finished in 1.05s\nCompiler run successful!\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:117:13\n    │\n117 │         if (block.timestamp >= commitEnd) revert CommitPhaseOver();\n    │             ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:134:13\n    │\n134 │         if (block.timestamp < commitEnd || block.timestamp >= revealEnd) revert NotRevealPhase();\n    │             ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:134:44\n    │\n134 │         if (block.timestamp < commitEnd || block.timestamp >= revealEnd) revert NotRevealPhase();\n    │                                            ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:159:13\n    │\n159 │         if (block.timestamp < revealEnd) revert RevealPhaseNotOver();\n    │             ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:207:16\n    │\n207 │         return block.timestamp < commitEnd;\n    │                ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:212:16\n    │\n212 │         return block.timestamp >= commitEnd && block.timestamp < revealEnd;\n    │                ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:212:48\n    │\n212 │         return block.timestamp >= commitEnd && block.timestamp < revealEnd;\n    │                                                ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\nwarning[unsafe-typecast]: typecasts that can truncate values should be checked\n   ╭▸ test/CommitRevealVote.t.sol:62:24\n   │\n62 │         return address(uint160(0x1000 + i));\n   │                        ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n   │\n   ├ note: consider disabling this lint if you're certain the cast is safe\n   │       \n   │       // casting to 'uint160' is safe because [explain why]\n   │       // forge-lint: disable-next-line(unsafe-typecast)\n   │       \n   │       \n   ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#unsafe-typecast\n\nwarning[block-timestamp]: usage of `block.timestamp` in a comparison may be manipulated by validators\n    ╭▸ src/CommitRevealVote.sol:217:16\n    │\n217 │         return block.timestamp >= revealEnd;\n    │                ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━\n    │\n    ╰ help: https://book.getfoundry.sh/reference/forge/forge-lint#block-timestamp\n\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":99,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 8 tests for test/Deploy.t.sol:DeployTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_refusesAnyDisallowedChain(uint64) (runs: 256, μ: 10459, ~: 10460)\n[PASS] testFuzz_refusesMismatchedPin(uint64) (runs: 256, μ: 10518, ~: 10518)\n[PASS] test_demoConstantsMatchConfig() (gas: 7959)\n[PASS] test_deploysOnAnvilWithDemoSchedule() (gas: 544343)\n[PASS] test_deploysOnSepolia() (gas: 545571)\n[PASS] test_refusesMainnetEvenWhenExpected() (gas: 9899)\n[PASS] test_refusesWhenExpectedChainIdDiffers() (gas: 9899)\n[PASS] test_zeroExpectedChainIdSkipsPinButKeepsAllowList() (gas: 545281)\nSuite result: ok. 8 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 4.73ms (10.07ms CPU time)\n\nRan 42 tests for test/CommitRevealVote.t.sol:CommitRevealVoteTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_commitThenRevealSucceeds(address,uint8,bytes32) (runs: 256, μ: 110664, ~: 110798)\n[PASS] testFuzz_phaseGates(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 75945, ~: 75945)\n[PASS] testFuzz_revealByOtherCallerFails(address,uint8,bytes32) (runs: 256, μ: 43653, ~: 43787)\n[PASS] testFuzz_revealWithWrongOptionFails(uint8,uint8,bytes32) (runs: 256, μ: 44051, ~: 44249)\n[PASS] testFuzz_revealWithWrongSaltFails(uint8,bytes32,bytes32) (runs: 256, μ: 44088, ~: 44248)\n[PASS] testFuzz_winnerIsLowestArgmax(uint8,uint8,uint8) (runs: 256, μ: 502871, ~: 506480)\n[PASS] test_afterFinalizeCommitAndRevealStillRejected() (gas: 72415)\n[PASS] test_commitAllowedUntilLastSecondOfCommitPhase() (gas: 41207)\n[PASS] test_commitRejectedAfterRevealEnd() (gas: 15167)\n[PASS] test_commitRejectedExactlyAtCommitEnd() (gas: 15079)\n[PASS] test_commitRejectsSecondCommitmentFromSameAddress() (gas: 42095)\n[PASS] test_commitRejectsZeroCommitment() (gas: 11084)\n[PASS] test_commitStoresCommitmentAndEmits() (gas: 42582)\n[PASS] test_commitmentBindsChainIdContractVoterOptionSalt() (gas: 8585)\n[PASS] test_commitmentDiffersAcrossChainIds() (gas: 12825)\n[PASS] test_commitmentDiffersAcrossContracts() (gas: 542580)\n[PASS] test_constructorRejectsZeroCommitDuration() (gas: 36210)\n[PASS] test_constructorRejectsZeroRevealDuration() (gas: 36197)\n[PASS] test_constructorSetsSchedule() (gas: 20297)\n[PASS] test_finalizeIsPermissionlessAndAllowedExactlyAtRevealEnd() (gas: 147595)\n[PASS] test_finalizeMajorityWins() (gas: 273841)\n[PASS] test_finalizeRejectedBeforeRevealEnd() (gas: 13575)\n[PASS] test_finalizeRejectedDuringCommitPhase() (gas: 10995)\n[PASS] test_finalizeRejectsSecondCall() (gas: 38046)\n[PASS] test_finalizeSingleRevealForOptionZeroIsDecidedNotNoResult() (gas: 142632)\n[PASS] test_finalizeThreeWayTieSelectsOption0() (gas: 291211)\n[PASS] test_finalizeTieBetween0And2SelectsOption0() (gas: 216397)\n[PASS] test_finalizeTieBetween1And2SelectsOption1() (gas: 217643)\n[PASS] test_finalizeWithZeroRevealsGivesNoResult() (gas: 101703)\n[PASS] test_revealAllowedAtLastSecondOfRevealPhase() (gas: 109729)\n[PASS] test_revealAllowedExactlyAtCommitEnd() (gas: 109668)\n[PASS] test_revealHappyPathTalliesAndEmits() (gas: 120412)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectedBeforeCommitEnd() (gas: 40282)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectedExactlyAtRevealEnd() (gas: 40159)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectsAddressWithoutCommitment() (gas: 15930)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectsDuplicateReveal() (gas: 112987)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectsInvalidOption() (gas: 47018)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectsWrongCaller() (gas: 79733)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectsWrongOptionForCommitment() (gas: 43034)\n[PASS] test_revealRejectsWrongSalt() (gas: 49209)\n[PASS] test_tallyViewRejectsInvalidOption() (gas: 8614)\n[PASS] test_unrevealedCommitmentsDoNotCount() (gas: 228129)\nSuite result: ok. 42 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 22.81ms (83.18ms CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 23.50ms (27.54ms CPU time): 50 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (50 total tests)\n","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"e099a71104a0689469e4beaf71a52e900ddbbff7c13659262886be2081e108e5","verifiedTreeHash":"2ff3e172bb6dc2111f25f74e0660081bc821b05f","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+bb39ded9"}]}