{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"225cba0e-84cb-4f46-9dec-d2486733b8df","kind":"skill:research-report","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"9df308662e827ddf1f6a0cdbe9e05a1ac61983e11eea8d3a390b90c0fa5e66eb","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network"],"skillHash":"3ddca93330036359dd721585e58e67820336a0398b7927b3c89369d6134f30f6","skillId":"research-report","tools":[]},"key":"research_report","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"3ddca93330036359dd721585e58e67820336a0398b7927b3c89369d6134f30f6","skillId":"research-report","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"[SIMD-THESIS]:muxaj8e7-ul1ec\nHARD GRADE this public thesis about Identity.md (IMD) and SIMD. Be brutal — inflate nothing.\n\nTHESIS:\nIMD sells and records work, SIMD (@SuperIMD_eth) observes it, and the on-chain record cannot yet tell good work from delivered work.\n\nIMD charges 0.5 IMD per action over x402 v2 + Permit2 plus an EIP-712 QuoteApproval, and the server admits work after payment. ERC-8004 seats run it on holders' machines and model keys, and pipelines vary by job template. (imd.fun/docs)\n\nJob 53912d9d (image): the seat's own summary lists defects, including misspelled IMD badges, a Pepe that looks finished instead of half-drawn, and an oversized title. The record still reads work accepted, structural score passed, verifier 0.1.0 rebuilt and matched, \"Quality not evaluated.\" (explorer.imd.fun)\n\nSIMD reads IMD's public endpoints and labels figures IMD DERIVED or SIMD DERIVED. Its vault pays 0.5 IMD under a \"100%\" rule, but 7 of its 39 payouts were 0.25 IMD, so \"100%\" is the price when it pays, not the share of jobs it pays for. (si-md.xyz)\n\nMeasured Oct 6: five SIMD-themed jobs I chose were all paid by one wallet, 0x9fAd…f63f, the vault's largest listed recipient (8 of 27 payouts). Two unrelated jobs were paid by two other wallets. A completed-job count cannot say whose demand it is.\n\nProof has three strengths: recomputable by a stranger, reproducible by the verifier, or judged by review. A 48-bit SHA-256 collision (λ=24) took 37.6 s on one core in one run and is checked with two hashes. The image job above is the second kind: a matching rebuild shows reproducibility, not usefulness.\n\nSIMD is the layer to publish the split: per skill, the share of completed jobs a stranger can recompute in a minute. Above 50%, accepted counts carry quality information. Below 20%, they measure delivery only. In between, they cannot be read either way.\n\nOne limit is structural: payment and admission depend on IMD's server operator. (imd-x402-compat repo)\n\nTWEET: https://x.com/chidifinance_/status/2107608660096770198\nAUTHOR: @chidifinance_ · followers≈307 (impact measured separately; do NOT invent follower counts)\n\nRUBRIC (quality integer 0-10 — NOT /100). Default LOW. Most posts land 2–5. 8+ is rare.\n0–2 scam/spam/garbage / copy-paste\n3–4 fluff, slogans, generic crypto, no mechanism, no IMD/SIMD specificity\n5 competent outline but shallow / recycled takes / buzzwords\n6 some real points, still thin originality OR weak falsifiable claims\n7 strong draft: clear argument + concrete IMD/SIMD mechanics — still NOT pay-grade alone\n8 rare pay-grade: novel synthesis, technical honesty, concrete implication, developed structure\n9 exceptional original insight with evidence / model / counter-argument\n10 research-grade (almost never) — would stand as a short essay others cite\n\nREQUIRE for ≥7: named mechanisms, tradeoffs, and IMD/SIMD-specific claims (not \"AI agents good\").\nREQUIRE for ≥8: originality + depth; reject padded length without substance.\nPay bar is quality ≥ 8. Scores 3–6 should be the common outcome. Do NOT be nice.\nPrefer flags: [\"thin\"],[\"generic\"],[\"padded\"],[\"strong\"],[\"exceptional\"].\n\nCRITICAL: end artifacts/report.md with this JSON fence (required):\n```json\n{\"quality\":4,\"impactNote\":\"how the thesis helps IMD/SIMD discourse\",\"notes\":\"strengths/weaknesses\",\"flags\":[\"thin\"]}\n```\nDo not score by follower count.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"ca727db35548309ae536e151268d62d5b0622a47709636a3a94ea9ec3b5856c5","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"225cba0e-84cb-4f46-9dec-d2486733b8df","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":null},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"52306","feedbackHash":"c045d299990929c3379827d2a0870148e983a38f1c00f826f5d360c8df868158","nodeKey":"research_report","submissionHash":"9df308662e827ddf1f6a0cdbe9e05a1ac61983e11eea8d3a390b90c0fa5e66eb","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"ad00e6278a495e6cb268384e840b90c2dd87f4a675088246a7c7bb151bd9d90c","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[{"bytes":10646,"hash":"d05d6dd995eeaf288a7792cdeb30220870f7ad2be072aa9337339720a40d8c08","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"report","path":"artifacts/report.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"8daa15de069e1da9","findings":[],"hash":"9df308662e827ddf1f6a0cdbe9e05a1ac61983e11eea8d3a390b90c0fa5e66eb","nodeId":"64daa8d0-135c-49f0-bfd4-080e2b4046d8","outcome":"completed","summary":"Completed the deliverable:\n\n- [artifacts/report.md](/home/seat/.identitymd/work/225cba0e-84cb-4f46-9dec-d2486733b8df/64daa8d0-135c-49f0-bfd4-080e2b4046d8/artifacts/report.md)\n- [artifacts/README.md](/home/seat/.identitymd/work/225cba0e-84cb-4f46-9dec-d2486733b8df/64daa8d0-135c-49f0-bfd4-080e2b4046d8/artifacts/README.md)\n\nGrade: **6/10**, flagged `thin`. The report distinguishes verified facts, inferences, uncertainty, and open questions, and ends with the required JSON fence. Both files were checked for existence and non-empty content.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":197632,"inputTokens":77419,"model":null,"outputTokens":3974,"runtime":"codex","turns":3,"wallClockMs":93289}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"9df308662e827ddf1f6a0cdbe9e05a1ac61983e11eea8d3a390b90c0fa5e66eb","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+7471272e"}]}