{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"71f41f7b-f238-4185-a761-79e9fd832dc1","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"2d55ad172932216eac655ad543f8dd156bf6454690f735048a0a28094460acf6","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_economics","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"9f9226a7907fe95b72744fe4e296e53c9462c5e42d52f58263021e09743d666e","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_flow","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"36748582804908cb4964a1cd2d704e03fbe048d2ab2e902258da0bc7e273c1d5","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests","manifest","audit_math","audit_permissions","audit_economics","audit_flow"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"af3aa01159bbf354f621cafa5c0006f6169e0938a8b015be508b7377dbf165bc","skillId":"audit-judge","tools":[]},"key":"audit_judge","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"af3aa01159bbf354f621cafa5c0006f6169e0938a8b015be508b7377dbf165bc","skillId":"audit-judge","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"e04c4c4d88b8a589b15d34dedea2b846143f70f03409bf425c8420f1100d6b13","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_math","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"1bd71fc7fed644dc679251f37645fdbab9ef45022f3f313909ed6dc0a2e2a147","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_permissions","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"8375b253d2f672d51c16046e1037b065ca86145b1936ddc36a91b21948202485","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"6b8d2c2ebd3301cff2be8edb1e1cc6ba65c858c02fe7247be81722b969842265","skillId":"build-contract-project","tools":[]},"key":"build_contract_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"6b8d2c2ebd3301cff2be8edb1e1cc6ba65c858c02fe7247be81722b969842265","skillId":"build-contract-project","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"715fd49100314bd3903b31ff1dbbfcbaffe37135cb265cfd47848c65710b7f86","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"tools":[]},"key":"manifest","kind":"code","role":"integrate","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"5d1c33a89b6629269611abd770ae542def35fe62b0831043f3a62ee20faf6b41","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"73431852439ad3a343f3d2b7db1c43cd363b9f48f9bb51497374a0cf6d50b223","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","tools":[]},"key":"write_foundry_tests","kind":"code","role":"tests","skillHash":"73431852439ad3a343f3d2b7db1c43cd363b9f48f9bb51497374a0cf6d50b223","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"A custom token: AMBIDEX (AMBI).\nToken name: AMBIDEX\nToken symbol: AMBI\nToken supply: 1,000,000,000 with 18 decimals, all minted once to the deployer in the constructor.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"ebb05fc11bdf044fe045415f1f1b40c45be663b6ec0893194dc332482c5e7cf8","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"71f41f7b-f238-4185-a761-79e9fd832dc1","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-1328-ambidex"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"52596","feedbackHash":"acd83574b418c91d2e8467ddde4d81ee6cebda3a697cd601942dc29d08b0c855","nodeKey":"audit_economics","submissionHash":"2d55ad172932216eac655ad543f8dd156bf6454690f735048a0a28094460acf6","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52214","feedbackHash":"8f97aba7e577106e099e95c1a04269a465615879bf27179bf27d1828f6dc7432","nodeKey":"audit_flow","submissionHash":"9f9226a7907fe95b72744fe4e296e53c9462c5e42d52f58263021e09743d666e","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52597","feedbackHash":"b94d34b9aed62e07516391da1b269d054783dca6fb6f463f90b90e27294bf48b","nodeKey":"audit_judge","submissionHash":"36748582804908cb4964a1cd2d704e03fbe048d2ab2e902258da0bc7e273c1d5","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52268","feedbackHash":"b09dc232e25e2713b29dcb54dca5127360b13df445a3d76e8ccc325b423f1353","nodeKey":"audit_math","submissionHash":"e04c4c4d88b8a589b15d34dedea2b846143f70f03409bf425c8420f1100d6b13","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52267","feedbackHash":"05c31c2b470212e9b4af037d6f548efb48e1a7ee6f6a95757b0e1abf22743d6f","nodeKey":"audit_permissions","submissionHash":"1bd71fc7fed644dc679251f37645fdbab9ef45022f3f313909ed6dc0a2e2a147","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52171","feedbackHash":"7c47f7325a9956cb1f21d7c3bcd34fe518837570d4b5b309116597eda8805ea0","nodeKey":"build_contract_project","submissionHash":"8375b253d2f672d51c16046e1037b065ca86145b1936ddc36a91b21948202485","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52175","feedbackHash":"7fbee54e0c6a41acc1d2cc18420ff343658f3cb060486778818f15e53b0cadbe","nodeKey":"manifest","submissionHash":"715fd49100314bd3903b31ff1dbbfcbaffe37135cb265cfd47848c65710b7f86","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52258","feedbackHash":"984e8fef62e0322d01c5b7e987bad51603443dc001b4f40ea241bb2169b58466","nodeKey":"write_foundry_tests","submissionHash":"5d1c33a89b6629269611abd770ae542def35fe62b0831043f3a62ee20faf6b41","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"4895a856c9147c2d6cd388c18e0b4e13a7d9c051e7e880aa8b36728b52637acf","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"3baa2091028c32c1","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"The test's comment says it 'pins the manifest's constructorArgs to an empty list', but its only assertion is that the creation code is non-empty, which is true of every contract. A no-argument Solidity constructor never decodes its trailing initcode bytes, so creation code with ABI-encoded arguments appended still deploys and still mints the full supply to the creator. The test therefore cannot detect a manifest step that lists spurious constructorArgs for this token, and the README's claim that the suite covers this is not backed by the test. No on-chain impact: the token itself behaves correctly either way; this is a test-quality gap in the evidence the manifest step relies on. Outside the assigned access-control area; reported because it is concrete and cheap to fix (for example, assert that `type(AmbidexToken).creationCode` deployed through CREATE2 by a probe yields the address predicted from the bare creation-code hash, and that `abi.encodePacked(creationCode, abi.encode(...))` yields a different predicted address, or simply state the no-argument property in the manifest rather than in a test).","line":97,"path":"test/AmbidexToken.t.sol","reproduction":"Input: `bytes memory code = abi.encodePacked(type(AmbidexToken).creationCode, abi.encode(address(0xBEEF), uint64(7)));` then `create(0, add(code, 32), mload(code))` from a probe contract. Expected if the test's claim held: the appended arguments would be detectable or the deployment would fail. Actual: `code.length > 0` passes exactly as for the bare creation code, the CREATE succeeds, and `balanceOf(probe) == 1_000_000_000e18`. Verified with a scratch Foundry test (test/scratch/TrailingArgs.t.sol, PASS) on the current tree.","severity":"info","snippet":"        assertGt(code.length, 0);","title":"test_constructorTakesNoArguments asserts nothing about constructor arguments"}],"hash":"1bd71fc7fed644dc679251f37645fdbab9ef45022f3f313909ed6dc0a2e2a147","nodeId":"f7686a0a-5214-4576-8079-6dcfb379c472","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete. The findings file is valid, the snippet matches line 97 exactly, and the working tree is unchanged apart from the gitignored scratch tests and the findings file.\n\n**Outcome: no access-control, trust-gap or asymmetry defect found.** The token is a thin wrapper over OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 with three public entry points and no roles, and every path I traced behaves as the brief intends.\n\nWhat I checked in the assigned area:\n\n- **Permission map.** No owner, role, initializer, receive or fallback exists. The constructor mints the full supply to msg.sender and hands out no roles. Mint and burn are unreachable after deployment.\n- **Entry points.** approve writes only the caller's own allowance slot. transfer debits only the caller. transferFrom requires an allowance from the holder, and a stranger always reverts. The creator has no special pull path.\n- **Trust gap in the dependency.** The five library files that compile into the token are byte-identical to the upstream v5.4.0 tag. The other differences in the vendored library are the project's formatter settings applied to files the token never uses. No git submodules.\n- **Asymmetry.** approve and the allowance decrement mirror each other. transfer and transferFrom share the same internal path, validation and events. No admin variant of any user function exists.\n- **Dynamic check.** A scratch invariant run of 128,000 random approve, transfer and transferFrom calls held supply constant, kept balances summing to supply, and produced no unconsented balance loss.\n\n**One info finding, outside the area.** The existing test named \"constructor takes no arguments\" only asserts the creation code is non-empty, so it cannot detect the manifest listing spurious constructor arguments. I confirmed that creation code with appended arguments still deploys and mints normally. No on-chain impact.\n\nThe ERC-20 approve change race is a property of the standard the brief asked for, and the README already assigns it to holders, so I recorded it as a trust note in the coverage rather than a finding. Slither reported nothing and the aderyn large-literal note is the supply constant, which I verified equals 1e27.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":910796,"inputTokens":354,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":16255,"runtime":"claude","turns":33,"wallClockMs":266007}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"629987aaf6c7aa88","findings":[],"hash":"2d55ad172932216eac655ad543f8dd156bf6454690f735048a0a28094460acf6","nodeId":"a3c97d0d-91b3-425d-a526-d0fbc2565e8c","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and the findings file is written. No defects were found in the economics area.\n\n**Result:** `.imd-findings.json` holds an empty findings list and eight coverage rows, one for each of the three state-changing entry points plus the invariants and flows I checked. The working tree has no modified tracked files, and the scratch test directory was removed.\n\n**What I verified**\n\n- The token is OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 `ERC20` plus constants and one constructor mint. The five vendored OpenZeppelin files hash identically to upstream v5.4.0, and neither library is a git submodule.\n- The compiled ABI exposes only `approve`, `transfer` and `transferFrom` as state-changing functions. There is no mint, burn, owner, pause, blacklist, initializer, receive or fallback, and the runtime contains no DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT.\n- Conservation law: a stateful invariant run of 6400 random transfer, approve and transferFrom calls across eight actors kept the sum of balances equal to the total supply of 1e27, with no balance at the zero address.\n- Launch flows: a simulated 10/88/2 split through distributor, pool manager (both push and pull) and remainder address, then a claim and a round-trip trade, moved exactly the amounts requested with the supply unchanged. There is no tax or exemption logic that could short a hop.\n- Boundaries: 1 wei, whole supply, max uint, self-transfer, self-approval and transfers from the zero address all behave as the standard dictates.\n- The existing 27 project tests pass and `forge fmt --check` is clean.\n\n**Not covered:** the protected launch harness itself cannot run here, since it imports Uniswap v4 and launch helper contracts that are not in this tree. Static analysis reported nothing above a benign large-literal note. The only trust note recorded is the standard ERC-20 allowance race, which is a property of the interface the brief asked for rather than a defect.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":617796,"inputTokens":290,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":10597,"runtime":"claude","turns":23,"wallClockMs":146306}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"9f3c23750c16c22c","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"The test's comment (lines 94-95) says it 'pins the manifest's constructorArgs to an empty list', and README.md line 79 states the constructorArgs are none. The only assertion is that the creation code is non-empty, which every compilable contract satisfies. Two independent specialists (audit_permissions, audit_math) reported the same root cause; both reproductions hold on this tree, so they are merged here. The test fails neither if the constructor later gains a parameter (a mutant with `constructor(address f)` passes the identical assertion) nor if the manifest step appends spurious ABI-encoded arguments to the creation code (a no-argument constructor never reads trailing initcode bytes, so deployment succeeds and the full supply is still minted to the creator). No on-chain impact: the shipped AmbidexToken has a zero-input constructor (forge inspect abi: `constructor() nonpayable`), its creation code is 3,331 bytes and runtime 2,166 bytes, and launch.json correctly lists `\"constructorArgs\": []`. This is a test-evidence gap only. Minimal fix: assert the property the comment claims, e.g. deploy `abi.encodePacked(type(AmbidexToken).creationCode)` via CREATE2 and check the address equals vm.computeCreate2Address over keccak256 of the bare creation code (already done in test_create2DeploymentMintsToTheCreatingContract, which is the real evidence), or check the compiled ABI's constructor has zero inputs in CI, and drop or reword the misleading comment.","line":97,"path":"test/AmbidexToken.t.sol","reproduction":"Scratch test test/scratch/Vacuous.t.sol, run with `forge test --match-path test/scratch/Vacuous.t.sol -vv`, all PASS on the current tree. (1) Mutant `contract Mutant is ERC20 { address public immutable factory; constructor(address f) ERC20(\"AMBIDEX\",\"AMBI\") { factory = f; _mint(msg.sender, 1_000_000_000 ether); } }`; `bytes memory code = type(Mutant).creationCode; assertGt(code.length, 0);` Expected if the comment held: fail on a one-argument constructor. Actual: [PASS] test_vacuousAssertionPassesOnMutant. (2) `bytes memory code = abi.encodePacked(type(AmbidexToken).creationCode, abi.encode(address(0xBEEF), uint64(7)));` deployed via `create(0, add(code,32), mload(code))` from a probe contract. Expected if constructorArgs were pinned: deployment fails or is detectable. Actual: [PASS] test_trailingArgsStillDeploy, balanceOf(probe) == 1_000_000_000e18 and the deployed runtime equals `new AmbidexToken()`'s runtime byte for byte.","severity":"info","snippet":"        assertGt(code.length, 0);","title":"test_constructorTakesNoArguments is vacuous: it cannot detect a constructor argument or spurious manifest constructorArgs (merged from audit_permissions and audit_math)"}],"hash":"36748582804908cb4964a1cd2d704e03fbe048d2ab2e902258da0bc7e273c1d5","nodeId":"ee9d6f80-5a49-45e5-9dbe-af6d9b87b391","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and `.imd-findings.json` is written at the repository root. No source files were changed.\n\n**Outcome:** the AMBIDEX token has no code defects. It is an unmodified OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 ERC20 with a zero-argument constructor that mints exactly 1,000,000,000e18 to the deployer, no privileged roles, no fee or hook on transfer, and no forbidden opcodes. All 64 project tests pass, and the manifest agrees with the compiled ABI.\n\n**Specialist findings:** audit_permissions and audit_math each reported the same root cause, so I merged them into one info finding. I reproduced both claims with a scratch test under `test/scratch/`:\n\n- A mutant with a one-argument constructor passes the identical assertion in `test_constructorTakesNoArguments`.\n- Appending ABI-encoded arguments to the real token's creation code still deploys and mints the full supply, with byte-identical runtime.\n\nThe test's comment claims it pins the manifest's constructorArgs, but it only checks that the creation code is non-empty. This is a test-evidence gap, not an on-chain risk, so it stays at info severity with no proof file attached. audit_flow, audit_economics and the independent tester reported nothing, and the static analysis lines did not rise to a finding.\n\n**Coverage:** all three entry points, approve, transfer and transferFrom, are marked `holds` with traced checks and failure paths. I added three rows for the supply and constructor invariant, the absence of privileged roles and blocked opcodes, and the launch.json manifest.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":550482,"inputTokens":290,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":7839,"runtime":"claude","turns":15,"wallClockMs":175748}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"9fa3cec569beab71387e981a9220a300957310de106fec25cf82089f57b00797","device":"76f57db4177175be","findings":[],"hash":"5d1c33a89b6629269611abd770ae542def35fe62b0831043f3a62ee20faf6b41","nodeId":"8b6f1a50-8a18-475d-a954-d02d92693f5c","outcome":"completed","summary":"The work is complete. `forge build` and `forge test` pass offline with 64 tests across three suites, and only files under `test/` were added.\n\n**What I found in the implementation.** `src/AmbidexToken.sol` is a thin wrapper over OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 ERC20 with a constructor mint of 10^27 minor units to `msg.sender`, no admin, no hooks, no payable paths. I found no defect, so there is no `.imd-findings.json`. The one behaviour worth noting is standard ERC-20 semantics rather than a bug: tokens sent to the token's own address are unrecoverable because there is no admin, and a zero-amount `transferFrom` needs no allowance. Both are pinned as documented tests, not asserted as correct silently.\n\n**What I added.**\n\n- `test/AmbidexToken.invariant.t.sol`: a handler with the deployer, five users, the token itself as a sink, and seed-derived strangers. It has a raw layer with unrestricted amounts and addresses, and a clamped layer that derives inputs from state. Every token call is predicted against a model ledger and allowance ledger before it runs, and the exact ERC-6093 error with exact arguments is compared on revert. Random undefined selectors and ether sent with any call are also driven. Eight invariants check fixed supply, balances summing to supply over every touched address, model-ledger agreement, zero address holding nothing, allowance-model agreement, nobody pulling more than cumulatively approved, no ether held, and immutable metadata and code hash. Inline config sets 256 runs by depth 64 with fail-on-revert on, so a harness bug surfaces loudly.\n- `test/AmbidexToken.edge.t.sol`: 36 unit and fuzz tests at 1000 runs covering one wei, the whole supply, the maximum, supply plus one, the same call twice, the zero address as sender and receiver, any non-zero recipient including precompiles, approve overwrite and directionality, exact allowance decrement, infinite allowance semantics, revert precedence in `transferFrom`, strangers reusing a spender's arguments, ether on every function, undefined selectors, and truncated calldata.\n\n**How I grounded the suite.** In scratch space I ran the same handler and invariants against a token with a one percent burn-on-transfer and a public mint. The ledger and supply invariants failed within three calls, and the junk-call handler flagged the mint selector. One early failure in my own suite turned out to be the harness dealing ether to the token when it was picked as caller, which I fixed in the handler rather than weakening the property. Scratch files were removed and the final tree runs green.","treeHash":"613118d913f57dae1513d0681c61122f00b066cf","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":839077,"inputTokens":354,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":36633,"runtime":"claude","turns":23,"wallClockMs":486374}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":2,"bundleHash":"aa6f874ebe625ebced0508d3650aebab9cf0afa1991f9e4c33aa902ea83013ee","device":"b4e34f9d3c724992","findings":[],"hash":"715fd49100314bd3903b31ff1dbbfcbaffe37135cb265cfd47848c65710b7f86","nodeId":"61fd31c1-aec0-482d-a548-bbc963ea79f6","outcome":"completed","summary":"I wrote `launch.json` for the AMBIDEX launch and verified it against the accepted tree. It is the only file added or changed.\n\n**What the manifest says**\n- Kind is custom_token. The token entry names the Solidity contract AmbidexToken with name AMBIDEX, symbol AMBI, decimals 18, an empty constructorArgs list, and totalSupply of one billion tokens in minor units.\n- The contracts list is empty. The accepted tree holds only the token, so there are no application contracts to name.\n- The pool and economics objects are copied exactly from the launch reference: IMD as the paired currency, fee 12500, tick spacing 60, the one-to-one provenance price, and the requester's 8800 bps split with the stated remainder address.\n- The notes describe the token's behaviour and explain why it takes no launch placeholders: it has no transfer tax, burn or privileged role, so nothing needs exempting.\n\n**How I checked it**\n- The source constructor takes no parameters and mints the TOTAL_SUPPLY constant to the sender once. The compiled ABI confirms zero constructor inputs, so the empty constructorArgs matches the implementation.\n- A scratch script validated the manifest: only schema keys are present, every uint256 and address is a string in lowercase, fee and tickSpacing and decimals are numbers, totalSupply equals 10^27, economics and pool match the job verbatim, and notes are well under the 4000 character limit.\n- The build compiled cleanly and the full test suite passed with 27 tests and no failures.\n- Git status shows launch.json as the only new file. No configuration, library or source file was touched.\n\nThe earlier rejected attempt failed only because that environment denied reads, writes and Foundry execution. This run had all three, so the deliverable is complete.","treeHash":"ca4e20f6ea66a077e8da0a4660c76f7e1134aef4","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":229014,"inputTokens":162,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":3843,"runtime":"claude","turns":11,"wallClockMs":58452}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"5fb4dc0bd134a241237b2b2b662be84dbbb0725de6ca0d81415c8558d788f9bd","device":"2e0556e0bee1a109","findings":[],"hash":"8375b253d2f672d51c16046e1037b065ca86145b1936ddc36a91b21948202485","nodeId":"c052b307-c9f5-413e-ac84-e01dfbfcd7b2","outcome":"completed","summary":"Everything is done and verified. The project builds, all tests pass with an empty environment, and the formatter check is clean.\n\n**What was delivered** (Foundry project at the repository root):\n\n- `src/AmbidexToken.sol`: contract `AmbidexToken`, a plain fixed-supply ERC-20 on OpenZeppelin v5.4.0. Name `AMBIDEX`, symbol `AMBI`, 18 decimals, one billion tokens minted once in the constructor to the deployer. No constructor arguments, no owner, no mint, pause, blacklist, freeze, tax or proxy.\n- `test/AmbidexToken.t.sol`: 27 tests covering metadata, supply, CREATE2 deployment from a factory-like contract, exact transfers including the factory to distributor to claimant chain, a 256-run fuzz for balance conservation, every ERC-6093 failure path, allowance behaviour, absence of all privileged selectors the launch floor probes, and a bytecode scan for DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE and SELFDESTRUCT.\n- `script/DeployAmbidexToken.s.sol`: a reviewable deploy helper that reads no environment, with a `deploy()` function tests call directly.\n- `foundry.toml` pins solc 0.8.26, sets `bytecode_hash = \"none\"`, disables CBOR metadata, keeps ffi off and grants no filesystem permissions.\n- `lib/forge-std` v1.9.7 and `lib/openzeppelin-contracts` v5.4.0 vendored as ordinary files. Nested git metadata was removed, so nothing becomes a submodule.\n- `README.md` documents the token, deployment parameters for the manifest step, assumptions, an \"After launch\" section (nothing to configure) and operational responsibilities.\n\n**Check results**\n\n| Check | Result |\n| --- | --- |\n| forge build | success, 28 files, solc 0.8.26 |\n| forge test | 27 passed, 0 failed |\n| forge fmt --check | clean |\n\n**Notes for the reviewer**\n\n- Since the token has no transfer rules, it takes none of the factory, PoolManager or launchNumber exemption arguments. The manifest's constructor argument list is empty and the supply field is `1000000000000000000000000000`.\n- Slither and Mythril were not available here and did not run. Explorer verification is left to the launch deployer, as the README states.\n- I did not create a git commit, since the rules forbid touching the git directory. All files are in the working tree, ready for the submission step to commit.","treeHash":"51d97b4e5581ecd9da9ad1bdad238c4ae992edd3","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":622094,"inputTokens":386,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":22095,"runtime":"claude","turns":29,"wallClockMs":328777}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"6b47d1bf92391c22","findings":[],"hash":"9f9226a7907fe95b72744fe4e296e53c9462c5e42d52f58263021e09743d666e","nodeId":"671bc89c-4d2a-4b6b-a30f-83e785fff041","outcome":"completed","summary":"I found no defects, so `.imd-findings.json` has an empty findings list and five coverage rows, all marked `holds`.\n\n**What I reviewed:** `src/AmbidexToken.sol`, the OpenZeppelin 5.4.0 ERC20 code it builds on in `lib/`, the deploy script, and the protected launch test. The token is a plain ERC-20 that changes no transfer behaviour. It only fixes `decimals()` at 18 and mints 1,000,000,000 × 10^18 once, to `msg.sender`, in its constructor (no arguments). The project's own 27 tests pass. I did not run the protected launch test.\n\n**Execution Trace guide:**\n- **`transfer` and `transferFrom`** come straight from OpenZeppelin. They move exactly the amount asked, revert on a short balance, a zero sender or a zero receiver, and reverting leaves no partial changes.\n- **`transferFrom`** spends the allowance before moving tokens. An unlimited allowance is not reduced.\n- **`approve`** rejects a zero spender.\n- **No calls out:** nothing in the token calls another contract or passes control to one, so there is nowhere for reentrancy to start.\n\n**Periphery guide:** There is no fee, burn or exemption logic. So the factory's transfers to the distributor, the pool seed through the PoolManager, and trades all arrive whole. The token has no `receive` or `fallback`, and no DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT. The deploy script only creates the token.\n\n**First Principles guide:**\n- **Supply cannot grow:** the constructor is the only place tokens are minted.\n- **No privileged power:** there is no owner or admin role, so no call can move or freeze a holder's balance.\n- **Decimals** are 18, matching the brief.\n\n**Static analysis:** aderyn's one note (a large number at `src/AmbidexToken.sol:30`) is the supply constant, and its value is correct, so it is not a defect.\n\n**Not covered:** `launch.json` doesn't exist yet, so I had no manifest to check.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":206025,"inputTokens":10,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":2142,"runtime":"claude","turns":5,"wallClockMs":25979}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"99e4819277ea59fc","findings":[],"hash":"cf91c429d98063f9811475ca83c91ce2fb2c5f5628827d3b51cc2805ca4ea218","nodeId":"61fd31c1-aec0-482d-a548-bbc963ea79f6","outcome":"failed","summary":"the task produced no changes; the agent's last message was: Blocked by environment permissions: the workspace is read-only, and policy rejected file-reading commands, `forge build`, and `forge test`.\n\nNo files changed; I couldn’t create `launch.json` or `.imd-blocked.json`, or verify the token’s constructor.\n\nPlease rerun with repository reads, `launch.json` writes, and Foundry execution enabled.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":86272,"inputTokens":8141,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":823,"runtime":"codex","turns":3,"wallClockMs":29918}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"ff35db055462d2ad","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"The test's comment says it 'pins the manifest's constructorArgs to an empty list', but its only assertion is that the creation code is non-empty, which is true of every contract. It cannot detect a regression that adds a constructor parameter (for example a later edit that adds the $factory/$poolManager/$launchNumber exemption arguments), so a manifest written with constructorArgs [] would silently disagree with the ABI. This is a test-coverage gap only; the token itself is correct today (the constructor has no parameters and the creation code ends in the runtime code with nothing appended). A meaningful check would compare the deployed runtime code with the tail of the creation code, or assert that the compiled ABI's constructor has zero inputs (e.g. by checking that `new AmbidexToken()` succeeds while the creation code equals `abi.encodePacked(type(AmbidexToken).creationCode)` with no trailing 32-byte words, or by parsing `forge inspect ... abi` in CI).","line":97,"path":"test/AmbidexToken.t.sol","reproduction":"State: copy src/AmbidexToken.sol to a scratch contract and change the constructor to `constructor(address f) ERC20(NAME, SYMBOL) { factory = f; _mint(msg.sender, TOTAL_SUPPLY); }` with `address public immutable factory;`. Run the same two lines as test_constructorTakesNoArguments against it: `bytes memory code = type(Mutant).creationCode; assertGt(code.length, 0);`. Expected: a test that 'pins constructorArgs to an empty list' should fail on a contract with one constructor argument. Actual: it passes (verified with forge test on a scratch file: `[PASS] test_vacuousCheckStillPasses() (gas: 3777)`). The assertion is satisfied by any non-empty creation code.","severity":"info","snippet":"        bytes memory code = type(AmbidexToken).creationCode;\n        assertGt(code.length, 0);","title":"test_constructorTakesNoArguments does not check what its comment claims: it passes on a token whose constructor takes an argument"}],"hash":"e04c4c4d88b8a589b15d34dedea2b846143f70f03409bf425c8420f1100d6b13","nodeId":"94e5cf19-2d68-478e-93f3-382f756b2e60","outcome":"completed","summary":"The findings file is in place at the repository root and is excluded from git by the harness's own exclude rule, which is expected for a review task. The scratch directory has been removed and the working tree is unchanged.\n\n**Review outcome: the token's math holds.** No defect in the contract itself survived verification.\n\nWhat I checked, in my area:\n\n- **Math Precision.** The supply constant is a compile-time expression equal to exactly 1e27, far below the uint256 limit. The aderyn \"large numeric literal\" line is style only. There is no division, variable multiplication, scale conversion, or narrowing cast anywhere in the token or on the OpenZeppelin paths it reaches.\n- **Boundary.** The vendored OpenZeppelin ERC20 and Context are byte-identical to upstream v5.4.0. Transfers of the maximum uint and of supply plus one revert with the exact ERC-6093 error and no state change. The infinite-allowance sentinel is left untouched while max-minus-one decrements by exactly the spent value. Self-transfer, zero-amount, from-equals-spender and zero-address cases all behave as the standard requires. The token makes no external calls, has no payable path, and decodes no bytes.\n- **Numerical Gap.** Balance conservation holds over fuzzed eight-hop transfer sequences among three holders. The launch split of ten, eighty-eight and two percent of 1e27 divides with zero remainder, so the protected harness flows arrive whole.\n\nThe one finding is informational and sits in the test suite, not the contract. The test that claims to pin the manifest's constructor arguments to an empty list only asserts the creation code is non-empty. I reproduced that it passes unchanged on a mutant token with a constructor parameter. The author can strengthen it by asserting the ABI constructor has no inputs or by comparing the creation code tail against the runtime code.\n\nCoverage: all three listed entry points are marked `holds`, with seven additional rows for the supply and balance invariants, the launch split, the constructor, decimals, and the two guide sweeps that found nothing to exercise. Nothing in my area was left unreached.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":640666,"inputTokens":290,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":13462,"runtime":"claude","turns":23,"wallClockMs":180918}}],"verification":[{"checks":[{"durationMs":1550,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 30 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 1.45s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":9785,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 27 tests for test/AmbidexToken.t.sol:AmbidexTokenTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferConservesBalances(address,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 119646, ~: 119980)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 864824138112328631354888876\n\n[PASS] test_approveAndTransferFrom() (gas: 172032)\n[PASS] test_approveRevertsForZeroSpender() (gas: 32861)\n[PASS] test_constructorEmitsSingleMintTransfer() (gas: 8128)\n[PASS] test_constructorMintsWholeSupplyToDeployer() (gas: 23311)\n[PASS] test_constructorTakesNoArguments() (gas: 3982)\n[PASS] test_create2DeploymentMintsToTheCreatingContract() (gas: 832751)\n[PASS] test_deployScriptFunctionDeploysTheSameToken() (gas: 1532284)\n[PASS] test_infiniteAllowanceIsNotDecremented() (gas: 123323)\n[PASS] test_metadata() (gas: 58521)\n[PASS] test_noFunctionCanFreezeOrMoveAHolder() (gas: 457999)\n[PASS] test_noFunctionCanIncreaseSupply() (gas: 601461)\n[PASS] test_runtimeCodeHasNoDelegatecallCallcodeOrSelfdestruct() (gas: 2863789)\n[PASS] test_runtimeCodeIsIdenticalAcrossDeployments() (gas: 13523)\n[PASS] test_selfTransferKeepsBalance() (gas: 43838)\n[PASS] test_supplyIsOneBillionWithEighteenDecimals() (gas: 27608)\n[PASS] test_transferChainArrivesWholeAtEveryHop() (gas: 156504)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsBeyondAllowance() (gas: 107643)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsWhenOwnerBalanceTooLow() (gas: 91561)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsWithoutApproval() (gas: 45398)\n[PASS] test_transferMovesExactAmount() (gas: 96460)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsOnInsufficientBalance() (gas: 112107)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsToZeroAddress() (gas: 39619)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsWhenSenderHoldsNothing() (gas: 37703)\n[PASS] test_transferWholeBalance() (gas: 78314)\n[PASS] test_transferZeroAmountSucceeds() (gas: 47702)\n[PASS] test_unknownSelectorsRevertAndPlainEtherIsRefused() (gas: 62259)\nSuite result: ok. 27 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 82.45ms (94.00ms CPU time)\n\nRan 36 tests for test/AmbidexToken.edge.t.sol:AmbidexTokenEdgeTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_allowanceDoesNotLetAStrangerPull(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 98684, ~: 98414)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 636376289225545963963380520\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_allowancesAreDirectional(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 80763, ~: 80971)\n[PASS] testFuzz_anyNonZeroAddressCanReceiveAndForward(uint160,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 153781, ~: 153620)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 215392569020755797960954846\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_approveSetsExactlyAndEmits(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 142417, ~: 142516)\n[PASS] testFuzz_infiniteAllowanceDoesNotBypassTheBalanceCheck(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 101958, ~: 102302)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 2341936636376289225545963963380520\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_infiniteAllowanceIsNeverDecremented(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 127171, ~: 127256)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 17563207863156969921\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_noFunctionAcceptsEther(uint96,uint8) (runs: 1000, μ: 53460, ~: 53483)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 17969748242882013058735420088\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_roundTripRestoresEveryBalance(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 127298, ~: 127190)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 861\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferFromDecrementsAllowanceExactly(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 173718, ~: 175243)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 124807754033572749070421516\n  Bound result 500000000000000000000\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferFromRevertsExactlyAboveAllowance(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 128247, ~: 128702)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 5829\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129634115\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferRevertsExactlyWhenAmountExceedsBalance(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 120051, ~: 120633)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 6466215392569020755797960954846\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferSucceedsForAnyAmountUpToBalance(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 146454, ~: 147975)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 2\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_twoTransfersEqualTheirSum(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 147600, ~: 148236)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 5829\n  Bound result 9\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_undefinedSelectorsAreRejected(bytes4,bytes) (runs: 1000, μ: 52728, ~: 52485)\n[PASS] testFuzz_whoeverCreatesTheTokenHoldsTheSupply(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 29075, ~: 29075)\n[PASS] test_anyoneMayApproveMoreThanTheyHold() (gas: 106092)\n[PASS] test_approveOverwritesInsteadOfAccumulating() (gas: 95952)\n[PASS] test_approveZeroClearsAllowance() (gas: 128436)\n[PASS] test_onlyOneHolderAfterDeployment() (gas: 51530)\n[PASS] test_ownerCannotTransferFromItselfWithoutSelfApproval() (gas: 160447)\n[PASS] test_sameTransferTwiceMovesTwice() (gas: 118276)\n[PASS] test_selfTransferOfMoreThanHeldReverts() (gas: 36180)\n[PASS] test_supplyIsExactlyOneBillionWholeTokensAtReportedDecimals() (gas: 47880)\n[PASS] test_tokensSentToTheContractItselfAreStrandedByDesign() (gas: 188344)\n[PASS] test_transferAfterEmptyingRevertsEvenForOneWei() (gas: 117160)\n[PASS] test_transferFromCheckOrderIsAllowanceThenReceiverThenBalance() (gas: 154782)\n[PASS] test_transferFromExactAllowanceLeavesZero() (gas: 159609)\n[PASS] test_transferFromOneWeiDecrementsAllowanceByOne() (gas: 139103)\n[PASS] test_transferFromTheZeroAddressIsImpossible() (gas: 33089)\n[PASS] test_transferFromWholeSupplyWithInfiniteAllowance() (gas: 146539)\n[PASS] test_transferMaxUintRevertsWithoutOverflow() (gas: 38311)\n[PASS] test_transferOneWei() (gas: 83075)\n[PASS] test_transferOneWeiMoreThanBalanceReverts() (gas: 45134)\n[PASS] test_truncatedCalldataForDefinedFunctionsReverts() (gas: 41031)\n[PASS] test_zeroAmountTransferFromNeedsNoAllowance() (gas: 81471)\n[PASS] test_zeroAmountTransferToZeroAddressStillReverts() (gas: 32931)\nSuite result: ok. 36 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 82.60ms (1.20s CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/AmbidexToken.invariant.t.sol:AmbidexTokenInvariantTest\n[PASS]\nAmbidexTokenInvariantTest invariants:\n[PASS] invariant_allowancesMatchTheModel\n[PASS] invariant_balancesMatchTheModelLedger\n[PASS] invariant_balancesSumToSupply\n[PASS] invariant_metadataAndCodeAreImmutable\n[PASS] invariant_nobodyPullsMoreThanApproved\n[PASS] invariant_tokenHoldsNoEther\n[PASS] invariant_totalSupplyNeverChanges\n[PASS] invariant_zeroAddressHoldsNothing\n AmbidexTokenInvariantTest invariants (runs: 256, calls: 16384, reverts: 0)\n\n╭----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract       | Selector            | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+===================================================================+\n| AmbidexHandler | approveBounded      | 1352  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AmbidexHandler | approveMax          | 1377  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AmbidexHandler | approveRaw          | 1412  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AmbidexHandler | junkCall            | 1316  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AmbidexHandler | transferBounded     | 1349  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AmbidexHandler | transferFromBounded | 1385  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AmbidexHandler | transferFromFull    | 1314  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AmbidexHandler | transferFromRaw     | 1312  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AmbidexHandler | transferFull        | 1374  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AmbidexHandler | transferOneWei      | 1358  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AmbidexHandler | transferRaw         | 1348  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AmbidexHandler | valueCall           | 1487  | 0       | 0        |\n╰----------------+---------------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 255\n  Bound result 1016\n  Bound result 10000\n  Bound result 1257\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1762\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 500000000000000000000\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 8\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 11\n  Bound result 1416\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 22\n  Bound result 1000000000\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 7717\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 9.70s (9.70s CPU time)\n\nRan 3 test suites in 9.71s (9.87s CPU time): 64 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (64 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":29,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"AmbidexToken.approve(address,uint256)\",\"AmbidexToken.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"AmbidexToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":11,\"README.md\":148,\"foundry.toml\":26,\"remappings.txt\":2,\"script/DeployAmbidexToken.s.sol\":28,\"src/AmbidexToken.sol\":43,\"test/AmbidexToken.edge.t.sol\":478,\"test/AmbidexToken.invariant.t.sol\":452,\"test/AmbidexToken.t.sol\":353},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"5d1c33a89b6629269611abd770ae542def35fe62b0831043f3a62ee20faf6b41","verifiedTreeHash":"613118d913f57dae1513d0681c61122f00b066cf","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+fb8278c5"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":826,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 28 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 732.85ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":78,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 27 tests for test/AmbidexToken.t.sol:AmbidexTokenTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferConservesBalances(address,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 119748, ~: 119980)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1120576961\n\n[PASS] test_approveAndTransferFrom() (gas: 172032)\n[PASS] test_approveRevertsForZeroSpender() (gas: 32861)\n[PASS] test_constructorEmitsSingleMintTransfer() (gas: 8128)\n[PASS] test_constructorMintsWholeSupplyToDeployer() (gas: 23311)\n[PASS] test_constructorTakesNoArguments() (gas: 3982)\n[PASS] test_create2DeploymentMintsToTheCreatingContract() (gas: 832751)\n[PASS] test_deployScriptFunctionDeploysTheSameToken() (gas: 1532284)\n[PASS] test_infiniteAllowanceIsNotDecremented() (gas: 123323)\n[PASS] test_metadata() (gas: 58521)\n[PASS] test_noFunctionCanFreezeOrMoveAHolder() (gas: 457999)\n[PASS] test_noFunctionCanIncreaseSupply() (gas: 601461)\n[PASS] test_runtimeCodeHasNoDelegatecallCallcodeOrSelfdestruct() (gas: 2863789)\n[PASS] test_runtimeCodeIsIdenticalAcrossDeployments() (gas: 13523)\n[PASS] test_selfTransferKeepsBalance() (gas: 43838)\n[PASS] test_supplyIsOneBillionWithEighteenDecimals() (gas: 27608)\n[PASS] test_transferChainArrivesWholeAtEveryHop() (gas: 156504)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsBeyondAllowance() (gas: 107643)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsWhenOwnerBalanceTooLow() (gas: 91561)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsWithoutApproval() (gas: 45398)\n[PASS] test_transferMovesExactAmount() (gas: 96460)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsOnInsufficientBalance() (gas: 112107)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsToZeroAddress() (gas: 39619)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsWhenSenderHoldsNothing() (gas: 37703)\n[PASS] test_transferWholeBalance() (gas: 78314)\n[PASS] test_transferZeroAmountSucceeds() (gas: 47702)\n[PASS] test_unknownSelectorsRevertAndPlainEtherIsRefused() (gas: 62259)\nSuite result: ok. 27 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 7.10ms (13.20ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test suite in 7.92ms (7.10ms CPU time): 27 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (27 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":30,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"AmbidexToken.approve(address,uint256)\",\"AmbidexToken.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"AmbidexToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":11,\"README.md\":148,\"foundry.toml\":26,\"launch.json\":24,\"remappings.txt\":2,\"script/DeployAmbidexToken.s.sol\":28,\"src/AmbidexToken.sol\":43,\"test/AmbidexToken.t.sol\":353},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"715fd49100314bd3903b31ff1dbbfcbaffe37135cb265cfd47848c65710b7f86","verifiedTreeHash":"ca4e20f6ea66a077e8da0a4660c76f7e1134aef4","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+fb8278c5"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":807,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 28 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 708.43ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":104,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 27 tests for test/AmbidexToken.t.sol:AmbidexTokenTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_transferConservesBalances(address,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 119649, ~: 119998)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 4078\n\n[PASS] test_approveAndTransferFrom() (gas: 172032)\n[PASS] test_approveRevertsForZeroSpender() (gas: 32861)\n[PASS] test_constructorEmitsSingleMintTransfer() (gas: 8128)\n[PASS] test_constructorMintsWholeSupplyToDeployer() (gas: 23311)\n[PASS] test_constructorTakesNoArguments() (gas: 3982)\n[PASS] test_create2DeploymentMintsToTheCreatingContract() (gas: 832751)\n[PASS] test_deployScriptFunctionDeploysTheSameToken() (gas: 1532284)\n[PASS] test_infiniteAllowanceIsNotDecremented() (gas: 123323)\n[PASS] test_metadata() (gas: 58521)\n[PASS] test_noFunctionCanFreezeOrMoveAHolder() (gas: 457999)\n[PASS] test_noFunctionCanIncreaseSupply() (gas: 601461)\n[PASS] test_runtimeCodeHasNoDelegatecallCallcodeOrSelfdestruct() (gas: 2863789)\n[PASS] test_runtimeCodeIsIdenticalAcrossDeployments() (gas: 13523)\n[PASS] test_selfTransferKeepsBalance() (gas: 43838)\n[PASS] test_supplyIsOneBillionWithEighteenDecimals() (gas: 27608)\n[PASS] test_transferChainArrivesWholeAtEveryHop() (gas: 156504)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsBeyondAllowance() (gas: 107643)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsWhenOwnerBalanceTooLow() (gas: 91561)\n[PASS] test_transferFromRevertsWithoutApproval() (gas: 45398)\n[PASS] test_transferMovesExactAmount() (gas: 96460)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsOnInsufficientBalance() (gas: 112107)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsToZeroAddress() (gas: 39619)\n[PASS] test_transferRevertsWhenSenderHoldsNothing() (gas: 37703)\n[PASS] test_transferWholeBalance() (gas: 78314)\n[PASS] test_transferZeroAmountSucceeds() (gas: 47702)\n[PASS] test_unknownSelectorsRevertAndPlainEtherIsRefused() (gas: 62259)\nSuite result: ok. 27 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 8.05ms (18.41ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test suite in 8.77ms (8.05ms CPU time): 27 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (27 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":34,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"AmbidexToken.approve(address,uint256)\",\"AmbidexToken.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"AmbidexToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":11,\"README.md\":148,\"foundry.toml\":26,\"remappings.txt\":2,\"script/DeployAmbidexToken.s.sol\":28,\"src/AmbidexToken.sol\":43,\"test/AmbidexToken.t.sol\":353},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true},{"durationMs":551,"exitCode":0,"name":"slither","output":"slither: no results at low impact or above","passed":true},{"durationMs":275,"exitCode":0,"name":"aderyn","output":"[low] large-numeric-literal at src/AmbidexToken.sol:30: Large Numeric Literal","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"8375b253d2f672d51c16046e1037b065ca86145b1936ddc36a91b21948202485","verifiedTreeHash":"51d97b4e5581ecd9da9ad1bdad238c4ae992edd3","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+fb8278c5"}]}