{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"97385706-aa93-4acf-9beb-e945d6cc0a4a","kind":"skill:build-website","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"ccf6ae664c51001b785b3aaaf8a2c31827a35fc8b4bdb7cec88ff8605ae4ef8e","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"mustProduce":["dist/index.html"],"network":true,"optionalTools":["browser"],"profile":"none","requires":["network"],"skillHash":"a60bc8b42446c13d993341179fe13c712a5addb118fc532fb2d15e71f912efc8","skillId":"build-website","tools":[]},"key":"build_website","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"a60bc8b42446c13d993341179fe13c712a5addb118fc532fb2d15e71f912efc8","skillId":"build-website","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"700470b8ef03f2885a6e5ce49b3449dbed79292a736dc93a701213d999b00be5","dependsOn":["build_website"],"execution":{"network":true,"optionalTools":["browser"],"profile":"none","requires":["network"],"skillHash":"fd33b6741366d364a55a4c0ba2bc4f5d329cec0b62f27a83289dc5b30ab03575","skillId":"design-critic","tools":[]},"key":"design_critic","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"fd33b6741366d364a55a4c0ba2bc4f5d329cec0b62f27a83289dc5b30ab03575","skillId":"design-critic","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"Update this project's website for Basket Protocol (vault 6, BaskVault 0x739fD5B653aA092a434534FA1aDE67C1770b5a5B on Robinhood Chain, chain id 4663) from one patch file. Change no contract. The patch is already built and checked against this project's current commit 5110ca9: apply it exactly, rebuild, rerun the checks and deliver. It changes no transaction: every send keeps its function, arguments and calldata for the same inputs. It adds no wallet request, chain read, storage key or network call. Two display sources change (the Tokenomics chart and its words) and one check script is corrected.\n\n1. Patch. Download https://gateway.pinata.cloud/ipfs/bafkreidqwshimqipmcibcmhfff5eryki2q3dteemgoq732ruloopnkeghy (if that fails: https://ipfs.filebase.io/ipfs/bafkreidqwshimqipmcibcmhfff5eryki2q3dteemgoq732ruloopnkeghy). It must be 75,439 bytes with SHA-256 70b48e86410f60901130e5297a48e148d43639908c33a1fdea345b9cf6a8863e; if not, stop and report. On 5110ca9 run git apply --check, then git apply. Apply it as it is: do not restyle, re-word or rewrite anything it changes, and never change the look or a text to make a check pass. It touches 11 files: web/src (Tokenomics.tsx, tokenomicsData.ts), web/scripts (check-art, check-bundle, check-calldata, check-motion, check-visibility, run-browser), web/validation/README.md, README.md and DESIGN.md.\n\n2. What it does (already implemented; for your records).\n- Tokenomics tab, release chart (the owner's decision): one blue line, the total ITEM available, captioned \"Total ITEM available\", with one legend line, \"260 million at launch\", an arrow, \"1 billion by year four\". The dashed liquidity-rewards line and the red development line and their legend entries are removed. The table keeps the full breakdown under \"Liquidity rewards released\", \"Development unlocked\" and \"Total ITEM available\". The introduction and the note describe the schedule with liquidity providers staked in both reward pools from launch; one allocation term reads \"Released over four years, with more rewards at the start\". Every number, formula, allocation and vesting date is unchanged; styles are unchanged.\n- check-motion.mjs (your reviewer's finding on the last build): its loop test counted every animationiteration event on the page, so it failed while the Deposit page showed the CLOSED sign. It now counts only events from the slogan strip itself; the strip's reset is asserted as before. With the sign forced here, the old script fails (\"Loop ends 1920\", events 2) and the new one passes.\n- Checks: gates re-scoped to this update without loosening them. check-calldata: HEAD is 5110ca9; every web/src source outside Tokenomics.tsx and tokenomicsData.ts is byte-identical to it, styles.css included, and those two equal it once their listed pieces are put back; their calls and declarations that changed are written out, their new digests pinned, the sink scans and the null-address guard kept; 496 identical and 1,773 mutually refused calldata cases as before. check-bundle: only those two sources may change, no new file. check-visibility and check-art compare the 5110ca9 site and expect equality (the Vault title's phone placing is still asserted on its own, and the older placing put back is still rejected). run-browser.mjs keeps every check of the previous walk under the same name in order; its 70 wallet sends are the same, send for send; its 24 screenshots keep their names and order at JPEG quality 18.\n\n3. Then in web/: npm ci, npm run typecheck, npm run build, then node scripts/run-browser.mjs before the other checks (must pass: 91 checks, or one more when it starts outside the vault's deposit hours and adds its own time-warp check as before; 70 wallet sends; 24 screenshots; fork block 83874298 through its read-only proxy as before; needs outbound HTTPS to the archive RPC), then every check: npx tsx scripts/check-tokenomics.tsx, node scripts/check-tokenomics-live.mjs, npx tsx scripts/check-bask-guide.tsx, validate, check-preservation, check-interface, check-calldata, check-art, check-motion, inspect-export, check-guards, check-fixes, check-visibility (baseline = the 5110ca9 dist), check-bundle (8,027,333 of 8,388,608 bytes here). Commit the rebuilt dist and every regenerated artifact with the patched sources. The build should give dist/assets/index-7uhBO_VC.js (SHA-256 036b131f57d9f0127c26722bc03a5e799b06285bf4279d54f33e0cbb350c07d2), dist/assets/index-BRdefnhV.css (6d9deadc70d0c2350019458324a868b605b929425e3f5352864dddc9bc97fa80, unchanged), dist/assets/ccip-CsUE1brP.js (d6f00d46b4d91b8ae6f65164f8d72d7be969dfcd5b401bf7988d91c1bcdfaff4), dist/index.html (8d081d507edc3b60c38e9cd268bd7da86fb8660a75337c2ca3840da8febdedfe) and the unchanged dist/share-card.jpg (dc14dd6f4068ec9325426583104b1c6ae8748fbb17d8326863c9612280eacd85); if it differs, say how. Never loosen a check; if one fails, report it instead of changing the patched code. If the archive RPC refuses the fork block again, report it and deliver with the other checks passing: the walkthrough record of this patch exists outside your run.\n\n4. Add a dated artifacts/validation.md entry. Before delivery: build, typecheck and every check pass; live verifyNetwork passes; art files match their manifest; no file has a vault 1-5 address fragment.\n\n5. Review step. These are the owner's decisions, accepted, and not grounds to send the build back: the Tokenomics release chart shows one total line with its breakdown in the table, written as a live product without addresses; on phones the Vault picture stands in the middle of its panel and the heading's focus marker meets the shelf line; the Docs page has local tabs; on desktop the Deposit stock list is always open in the right-hand column; the Vault heading stands alone; on phones the character panel comes before the vault figures; there is no Change wallet button; the claims panel is hidden when nothing is owed; there is no OPEN sign or normal-operation status line. List them if you must. The exact-patch rule above stands over any design-bar item.","parentJobId":"01bfb7d2-f3ef-46a3-b6a0-f5c26496fba3","planHash":"368822f2cca91861e018cb6ee25c9d9b9d74fc3caee743f1c35f8772e08644ab","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"9d7bffba-141b-4e33-be9c-1bfa450d9384","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-877-basket"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"51098","feedbackHash":"d3715f68cefafd998a79fb1bbe6353d43e17991e4fec5a8e75a9d849dfb07629","nodeKey":"build_website","submissionHash":"ccf6ae664c51001b785b3aaaf8a2c31827a35fc8b4bdb7cec88ff8605ae4ef8e","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51530","feedbackHash":"ce64dda38a2eda9e2d6f3a132f55bf87edead8cc3ecd675a37dcaf318ef5763f","nodeKey":"design_critic","submissionHash":"700470b8ef03f2885a6e5ce49b3449dbed79292a736dc93a701213d999b00be5","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"7a53136421d2b6e32e25402007015dd483c02172c0f99f94392738d5ab158761","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"5ded77c3c883b7b0","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Now: the allocation table has a row \"1% / 10,000,000 / Development, unlocked / Sent once at launch\" (tokenomicsData.ts:46-50), and directly below it the release table's third column is headed \"Development unlocked\" and shows 10,000,000 for Year 1 (that figure is developmentVested at month 12, 25% of the 40,000,000 vested allocation, which is a different amount from the 10,000,000 sent at launch). On phones each record prints \"Development unlocked\" over \"10,000,000\", the same words and number as the allocation row above, so a reader cannot tell the launch grant from the first vesting step. Change to: the column heading is the owner's exact wording in this patch, so it needs the requester: a new patch with the heading \"Development vesting released\" (the column's values are developmentVested(seconds); every number stays). Why: the design bar for data tables says one kind of comparison keeps one label per meaning; the brief's exact-patch rule stands over this item, so it is not grounds to send the build back.","line":61,"path":"web/src/tokenomicsData.ts","reproduction":"390 wide, Chromium: open #docs, tap the Tokenomics tab, scroll to the allocation table then the release table. Measured: allocation row 7 reads \"1%, 10,000,000, Development, unlocked, Sent once at launch\"; release record \"Year 1\" reads \"Development unlocked 10,000,000\" (cell data-label \"Development unlocked\", text \"10,000,000\", 14px). The two labels differ only by a comma and name different amounts (launch grant vs. vested-by-month-12). Not a bug: every figure matches tokenomicsData.ts and check-tokenomics passes.","severity":"low","snippet":"export const RELEASE_HEADERS = [\"End of\",\"Liquidity rewards released\",\"Development unlocked\",\"Total ITEM available\"] as const;","title":"taste: the release table's \"Development unlocked\" column reads as the \"Development, unlocked\" allocation row, and both show 10,000,000"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Now: taste@1 on this export passes 10 of 16 checks. The six flags are all outside the two files this patch may change: casing (24 all-caps boxes by text-transform, e.g. the \"On-chain figures\" eyebrow and the \"Inside the basket\" heading), tracking (the same eyebrow at 0.045em), type-sizes (13 sizes in use at 1440, 7 at 390), type-faces (four families; the slogan strip is monospace prose), repetition (the strip line shown three times, two tickers), chrome (border and shadow together on 35 surfaces: the brand panel, nav links, flyer panels). Change to: nothing in this update. The brief says \"apply it as it is\" and \"never change the look or a text to make a check pass\", and these flags were identical on 5110ca9 (styles.css is byte-identical). If the owner ever opens the look: delete the .eyebrow span above the Vault heading (styles.css:393) and let the heading move up its 20px; the rest is the accepted 1990s flyer system. Why: the reference says a colour, font or layout the brief or the site's own system chose on purpose is not a finding; this is recorded so the counts in the report are explained.","line":212,"path":"web/src/Vault.tsx","reproduction":"From the repository root: IMD_PLAYWRIGHT=$HOME/.imd-taste/node_modules/playwright/index.mjs node .imd/reads/skills/design-critic/scripts/taste.mjs --out test/scratch/taste. Probe lines: casing \"24 all-caps text boxes in content\"; tracking \"span.eyebrow 'On-chain figures' 0.045em\"; type-sizes \"1440: 13 sizes in use, 18 with one-offs\"; type-faces \"families (4): arial, pixel, flyer, monospace\"; repetition \"3x 'basket buddies take a stroll down the aisles give your cart'\"; chrome \"border and shadow together: 35\". Render, layout, targets, contrast, eyebrows, glyphs, slogans, copy-budget (60 words at 390, bar 60), motion and share pass.","severity":"info","snippet":"          <span className=\"eyebrow\">On-chain figures</span>","title":"taste: six inherited probe flags come from the frozen stylesheet, none from this patch"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Now: the builder reports that run-browser.mjs reached fork block 83874298 and then failed at a hash-addressed state read (\"historical state ... is not available\" from robinhood.api.pocket.network), so browser-fork.json, the 24 walkthrough JPEGs and screenshot-packaging.json are the 5110ca9 records, retained unchanged. The brief allows exactly this (\"If the archive RPC refuses the fork block again, report it and deliver with the other checks passing\"), so it is not missing and not a defect of the site. Change to: nothing required for delivery. For the owner's records: the v9 and v10 entries in the same file describe a disposable scratch proxy that maps a trailing block-hash parameter to its number with eth_getBlockByHash, which made the same archive serve the same block; this run did not attempt it, so the 91-check walk of this exact build exists only outside this run. Why: the acceptance criteria ask that every requirement be listed as met, missing, faked, after review or needs the requester, with the file that shows it; this one is met by the permitted exception and the file above shows it.","line":29,"path":"artifacts/validation.md","reproduction":"Read artifacts/validation.md lines 21-29 (the v16 entry) and compare artifacts/browser-fork.json with git show 5110ca9:artifacts/browser-fork.json: identical bytes (git diff --stat 5110ca9 27315d9 lists no change to browser-fork.json, screenshot-packaging.json or any empty-*/stocks25-* JPEG). The other 14 checks are recorded as PASS in the same entry; this reviewer independently reran npm run typecheck, check-tokenomics.tsx and check-bask-guide.tsx on a fresh npm ci and they pass; check-tokenomics-live.mjs could not run here because it needs Playwright's own Chromium build, which this review machine does not have.","severity":"info","snippet":"The brief explicitly permits delivery when the archive refuses the pinned fork block. **This run does not claim 91/92 completed walkthrough checks, 70 wallet sends or 24 newly generated walkthrough screenshots.**","title":"fidelity: the fork walkthrough was not rerun for this patch; its record is inherited from 5110ca9 under the brief's archive exception"}],"hash":"700470b8ef03f2885a6e5ce49b3449dbed79292a736dc93a701213d999b00be5","nodeId":"86a55bd7-6319-4f64-a2da-94cc4653914f","outcome":"completed","summary":"| Area | Count |\n| --- | --- |\n| Brief requirements | 19 met (1 by the brief's own archive exception), 0 missing, 0 faked, 1 after review |\n| Broken features | 0 |\n| Product on the first screen at 390 | yes |\n| taste@1 checks passed | 10 of 16 (all six flags inherited from the frozen stylesheet) |\n| Copy findings | 1 low (needs the requester) |\n| Share card | present, unchanged (title, favicon, og:title, og:image, description) |\n\nNothing here reopens the build. The findings file holds one low taste item and two info notes.\n\n**Requirements**\n\n- \"It must be 75,439 bytes with SHA-256 70b48e…\" — met. I downloaded it from Pinata: 75,439 bytes, hash equal, 11 files named as listed.\n- \"On 5110ca9 run git apply --check, then git apply … apply it as it is\" — met. The diff 5110ca9..27315d9 for the 11 files matches the patch; web/src outside the two files is byte-identical, styles.css included.\n- \"One blue line … captioned 'Total ITEM available' … one legend line\" — met, at `web/src/Tokenomics.tsx:22`. Measured at 320, 390 and 1440: 2 paths (area and line), 4 yearly points, legend \"260 million at launch → 1 billion by year four\" on one line at 390, two at 320.\n- \"The table keeps the full breakdown under …\" — met, `web/src/tokenomicsData.ts:61`; all 12 figures match the formulas.\n- \"Every number, formula, allocation and vesting date is unchanged; styles are unchanged\" — met. Constants and functions in tokenomicsData.ts untouched; CSS hash equal.\n- \"check-motion … counts only events from the slogan strip\" — met, `web/scripts/check-motion.mjs:299` filters by `m.contains(e.target)`; the reset assertions stay.\n- check-calldata, check-bundle, check-visibility, check-art, run-browser re-scoped without loosening — met. The old-look rejections are kept in check-art; the removed \"baseline carries the old look\" lines are the expected consequence of 5110ca9 becoming the baseline.\n- \"npm ci, typecheck, build\" and the five output hashes — met. All five hashes in dist match the brief exactly; I reran typecheck on a fresh install.\n- \"node scripts/run-browser.mjs … 91 checks, 70 sends, 24 screenshots\" — met by the brief's exception. The archive refused the hash-addressed state read; the record is inherited (info finding).\n- The other 13 checks — met per the dated entry. I independently reran check-tokenomics and check-bask-guide, which pass. check-tokenomics-live needs Playwright's own Chromium, which this machine lacks.\n- \"Add a dated artifacts/validation.md entry\" — met, 2026-10-14 entry at the top.\n- \"live verifyNetwork passes\" — met, validate PASS at block 87914816.\n- \"no file has a vault 1-5 address fragment\" — met, my scan of the tree for all five fragments found none.\n- \"Commit the rebuilt dist and every regenerated artifact\" — met, commit 27315d9.\n- Hosting the new version — after review.\n\n**The idea** is a 1990s supermarket weekly flyer selling an on-chain basket of Stock Tokens, carried by the red-and-yellow shelf frames and the clerk character.\n\n**Owner decisions seen and not raised:** one total line with the breakdown in the table, local Docs tabs, character panel before the vault figures on phones, no Change wallet button, no OPEN sign.\n\n**Findings written**\n\n1. **Low, taste.** The release table column \"Development unlocked\" sits under the allocation row \"Development, unlocked\", and both show 10,000,000 at Year 1 while meaning different amounts. The heading is the owner's exact wording, so only a new patch can change it.\n2. **Info, taste.** The six probe flags (casing, tracking, type sizes, four families, the repeated strip, border plus shadow) all come from the frozen stylesheet and were identical on 5110ca9.\n3. **Info, fidelity.** The fork walkthrough record is inherited; earlier entries describe a scratch block-hash proxy that made the same archive serve this block, which this run did not attempt.\n\nThe probe's screenshots sit in test/scratch/taste, my own captures in /tmp, and the tree is otherwise untouched.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1524369,"inputTokens":450,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":29477,"runtime":"claude","turns":40,"wallClockMs":541694}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"c9e76989dd0a26af60ed5e0da187f8909df58c91b108e744fe738d99b098ae57","device":"e04b1c0f30c2612f","findings":[],"hash":"ccf6ae664c51001b785b3aaaf8a2c31827a35fc8b4bdb7cec88ff8605ae4ef8e","nodeId":"6a259132-b880-428b-a613-523490d9fef4","outcome":"completed","summary":"Applied the patch exactly and rebuilt `dist`. All five expected hashes match. Build, typecheck and all 14 requested checks passed. Bundle: **7,977,306 bytes**.\n\nThe archive refused the fork block, so the walkthrough remains unverified under the permitted exception. Results are in [validation.md](/home/seat4/.identitymd/work/97385706-aa93-4acf-9beb-e945d6cc0a4a/6a259132-b880-428b-a613-523490d9fef4/artifacts/validation.md).\n\n**Commit blocked:** Git metadata is read-only. Completed files remain ready in the workspace for submission.","treeHash":"5ab437db4aee55f3a8e7894eb2ccdb0000ff472a","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":6482048,"inputTokens":159001,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":33518,"runtime":"codex","turns":17,"wallClockMs":1323304}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"ccf6ae664c51001b785b3aaaf8a2c31827a35fc8b4bdb7cec88ff8605ae4ef8e","verifiedTreeHash":"5ab437db4aee55f3a8e7894eb2ccdb0000ff472a","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+7129bf9d"}]}