{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"83bad12f-1e99-43f2-a623-9f4d09b0e63c","kind":"research","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":null,"dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"tools":[]},"key":"panel","kind":"research","role":"review","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"accepted"}],"objective":"Produce today's TEST EDITION of a daily crypto-discourse brief. Plain text\nonly, under 900 words total. This is a drafting rehearsal: quality of voice\nand sourcing is the entire point.\n\nFIRST: fetch and obey the house style guide at\nhttps://raw.githubusercontent.com/openinterest-ai/paper/main/style-guide.html\nIts rules are binding: declarative sentences, numbers with context, no banned\nwords (delve, landscape, game-changer, seamless, robust, unlock, tapestry,\nparadigm, \"it's worth noting\", \"ever-evolving\", emoji), at most one em dash\nin the whole edition, absolute dates only, no financial advice.\n\nSOURCES: open platforms only (Farcaster, research blogs, Mirror, Substack,\ngovernance forums, GitHub; X only via open mirrors). Prefer the last 24-48\nhours. A claim that cannot be verified against an open-platform source is\ncut, and the cut is noted in METHOD. When sources conflict on a figure,\nprefer the primary source; otherwise state the range and attribute both.\nCite with the full source URL in square brackets; for these plain-text test\neditions this overrides the style guide's numbered-citation example.\n\nSTRUCTURE (exactly):\nLEAD: a headline (short declarative sentence ending in a full stop), a\n2-sentence deck, then 150-250 words. Every factual claim carries a source\nURL in brackets.\nALSO TODAY: exactly three items: category tag, one-sentence headline with\nfull stop, 2-3 sentence summary, at least one source URL each.\nREADING LIST: 3-5 links, each with a 1-line reason.\nMETHOD: one closing paragraph: sources swept, hours covered, any items cut\nfor failed verification and any claims resting on secondary sources.\n\nACCEPTANCE: the structure above, complete; every claim sourced; under 900\nwords; no banned words; headlines are declarative sentences with full stops;\nabsolute dates only (no 'this week', 'yesterday', 'the weekend'); at most\none em dash in the whole edition.\n\nCONTINUITY: before drafting, fetch https://openinterest-ai.github.io/paper/rehearsal.html and the prior test editions linked there. Do NOT lead with a story a prior edition led with unless a material NEW development happened after that edition published; an ongoing story without a new development may appear only in ALSO TODAY, and only with the new angle stated.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"10cd58fe653932cd07ff7d18b94d09720761a128c17498334568ddccb381d779","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"83bad12f-1e99-43f2-a623-9f4d09b0e63c","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":null},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[{"answer":"LEAD: Researchers propose computation workers that keep no state. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187]\n\nTEST EDITION | 28 October 2026\n\nA research post proposes separating computation from custody of application state. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187] Its “L1.5” pattern places settlement directly on Ethereum. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187]\n\nThe proposed arrangement divides responsibility among wallets, Ethereum and replaceable computation workers. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187] Wallets retain private user data, while Ethereum stores shared state and verifies transitions. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187] Workers calculate results and produce proofs without retaining anything required for the next job. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187]\n\nThe authors specify four requirements for private settlement: replaceable workers, Ethereum verification, payment without identity linkage and submission without a persistent operator account. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187] Their distinction concerns who holds state, rather than who sequences transactions or executes them. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187] They describe an architectural pattern rather than necessarily another blockchain layer. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187]\n\nNative account abstraction and proof aggregation supply the proposed machinery for submission and verification. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187] In the authors’ order-book example, a matcher proves trades and another matcher can replace it. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187]\n\nThe authors acknowledge earlier designs that already separate some computation from state ownership. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187] Their application sketches also depend partly on Ethereum upgrades that remain proposals. [https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187]\n\nALSO TODAY:\n\n[NETWORKING] A researcher identifies a separate quantum migration problem for networking. [https://ethresear.ch/t/inventory-of-pq-p2p-migrations-in-the-consensus-layer/26183]\nNyx Foundation’s adust09 argues that replacing validator signatures leaves discovery identities and connection handshakes unchanged. [https://ethresear.ch/t/inventory-of-pq-p2p-migrations-in-the-consensus-layer/26183] The 27 October 2026 inventory selects neither an algorithm nor an activation schedule. [https://ethresear.ch/t/inventory-of-pq-p2p-migrations-in-the-consensus-layer/26183]\n\n[VOTING] Proof of One seeks scrutiny before claiming independent review. [https://ethresear.ch/t/proof-of-one-one-person-one-identity-polling-with-encrypted-ballots-design-and-reference-code-requesting-critical-review/26184]\nIts maintainer’s 27 October 2026 post describes passport-based enrolment and encrypted ballots. [https://ethresear.ch/t/proof-of-one-one-person-one-identity-polling-with-encrypted-ballots-design-and-reference-code-requesting-critical-review/26184] The maintainer says AI agents drafted most design and code, with no independent human review completed. [https://ethresear.ch/t/proof-of-one-one-person-one-identity-polling-with-encrypted-ballots-design-and-reference-code-requesting-critical-review/26184]\n\n[VERIFICATION] Researchers report proofs for Ethereum’s withdrawal-request contract. [https://ethresear.ch/t/lean-verification-of-eip-7002-system-call-success-and-fifo-requests/26180]\nThe 26 October 2026 post reports Lean proofs of system-call success and request ordering against the Jaune execution model. [https://ethresear.ch/t/lean-verification-of-eip-7002-system-call-success-and-fifo-requests/26180] Its stated system-call ceiling is 210,000 gas against a 30 million gas allowance, under the covered forks and canonical-code premise. [https://ethresear.ch/t/lean-verification-of-eip-7002-system-call-success-and-fifo-requests/26180]\n\nREADING LIST:\n\n[https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187] Read the requirements behind the proposed architecture.\n[https://ethresear.ch/t/inventory-of-pq-p2p-migrations-in-the-consensus-layer/26183] Follow the distinction between encryption and authentication.\n[https://ethresear.ch/t/proof-of-one-one-person-one-identity-polling-with-encrypted-ballots-design-and-reference-code-requesting-critical-review/26184] Examine the maintainer’s explicit trust limits.\n[https://ethresear.ch/t/lean-verification-of-eip-7002-system-call-success-and-fifo-requests/26180] Read the assumptions attached to the proof claims.\n\nMETHOD: The sweep covered Ethereum Research, the Ethereum Foundation blog and the rehearsal archive. Coverage targeted the 48-hour date span from 26 October 2026 to 28 October 2026. The rehearsal page failed to load directly; its GitHub source and both linked editions were fetched instead. Both editions led with Hoodi’s postponement. [https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openinterest-ai/paper/main/rehearsal.html] No candidate item was cut for failed verification. Technical claims remain attributed to primary authors; no included claim rests on secondary reporting. Proof code was not independently executed.","citations":[{"contentHash":"8f813a837c590c7479b36d916f6888a8f92a24462ff671d7b6be0a695ee60cbe","quote":"L1 verifies its output.","retrievedAt":"2026-10-28T09:37:41.342Z","url":"https://ethresear.ch/t/ephemeral-rollup-the-new-l1-5-of-ethereum/26187"},{"contentHash":"b8d75859890713c5bab3d89dae9730273fc6f5b306a27c74fad56ecf61a1d27f","quote":"Ethereum consensus-layer networking has no adopted post-quantum migration profile.","retrievedAt":"2026-10-28T09:37:41.814Z","url":"https://ethresear.ch/t/inventory-of-pq-p2p-migrations-in-the-consensus-layer/26183"},{"contentHash":"fc55ab0ff875d0340022025002493aca6d21d33784ee609fe42f27cb1e0521ff","quote":"None of it has been reviewed by independent humans yet.","retrievedAt":"2026-10-28T09:37:42.274Z","url":"https://ethresear.ch/t/proof-of-one-one-person-one-identity-polling-with-encrypted-ballots-design-and-reference-code-requesting-critical-review/26184"},{"contentHash":"18c94698c48dcf1f05bea2786bf5d263630df8f48c12f5fb7d5582fc44b56a12","quote":"Requests leave in exactly the order they arrived.","retrievedAt":"2026-10-28T09:37:42.740Z","url":"https://ethresear.ch/t/lean-verification-of-eip-7002-system-call-success-and-fifo-requests/26180"}],"device":"004eae350f695d24","id":"aa907d08-57c5-4104-bc56-1a32ec307de1","model":null,"nodeId":"5a2539b6-410b-44c8-8ba1-9af7d48a557b","runtime":"codex"}],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"7bebe57513194b66c77f4d52af66d023557433764eb75c8fe0d233633d78dcc1","state":"completed","submissions":[],"verification":[]}