{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"aff5e45d-9f43-47c3-ac42-3c2a79f009f1","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"36c8d2a6f12ce4aa50cabc9e5c1b757e1c12033a99df228be2ac0670fa622bb9","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_economics","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"9c0cb4511053bfef45a6236fc7f25a60e7af69dbc4dbc537fdbbfb2850118981","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_flow","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"71a57c17a7959ed9adcfee1f818979d2459495ac335207d5e99b2af65d79336c","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests","manifest","audit_math","audit_permissions","audit_economics","audit_flow"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"3014f1ea5961918ca059453a484bf4c8bcbbfc2248dbe31d94ac7c5cdf8f50bd","skillId":"audit-judge","tools":[]},"key":"audit_judge","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"3014f1ea5961918ca059453a484bf4c8bcbbfc2248dbe31d94ac7c5cdf8f50bd","skillId":"audit-judge","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"a1247d39f948cfc07b72ca6f04ca91c9458baa0ebe4492f3808b46e64fcaefe2","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_math","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"4c23a20c28edc527f8b89c5c32b8ee2bf9a5dcab990d97c21b9fbb6b2b61b725","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_permissions","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"5cf301d0e7769c3746e9a2054eb82c47849c1ede03287b564852f5ee21686de9","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"b6503de65ad02f845827887c23da4c3b56ccc5df7a459db263bae6e549d92f7f","skillId":"build-contract-project","tools":[]},"key":"build_contract_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"b6503de65ad02f845827887c23da4c3b56ccc5df7a459db263bae6e549d92f7f","skillId":"build-contract-project","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"841bc84a74222172c3db839e4fadef6e0437c197d768cfbf5281cbb45f69043f","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"tools":[]},"key":"manifest","kind":"code","role":"integrate","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"f16b1116df840a96509038409637ad429fa27822a59e2267ec84d2f207c29dd0","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"73431852439ad3a343f3d2b7db1c43cd363b9f48f9bb51497374a0cf6d50b223","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","tools":[]},"key":"write_foundry_tests","kind":"code","role":"tests","skillHash":"73431852439ad3a343f3d2b7db1c43cd363b9f48f9bb51497374a0cf6d50b223","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"A custom token: Numos (NUMOS).\nToken name: Numos\nToken symbol: NUMOS\nToken supply: 1,000,000,000 with 18 decimals, all minted once to the deployer in the constructor.\nWhat it does: Token: Numos (NUMOS), fixed supply 1,000,000,000, 18 decimals, no mint.\nPurpose: a community token for @Numosimd on X (https://x.com/Numosimd).\nContracts: standard ERC-20 with plain transfers. No fees on token transfers (the launch pool's standard trading fee still applies). No owner privileges over user funds, no minting after launch, no upgradeability, no blacklist.\nLaunch: put 90% of supply into the liquidity pool, 0 tokens to the creator wallet.\nSingle job, do NOT ask clarifying questions, pick sane defaults and document them.\nEnglish only.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"56b68233f157e7f8349e699a76d387de83542f252cf5965eac3fabd8ee82e7a3","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"aff5e45d-9f43-47c3-ac42-3c2a79f009f1","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-864-numos"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"51163","feedbackHash":"f707aa48527fb2e63458d5ca1811b5f2e3d33a08e4b0e94be600b5c0b5bea412","nodeKey":"audit_economics","submissionHash":"36c8d2a6f12ce4aa50cabc9e5c1b757e1c12033a99df228be2ac0670fa622bb9","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51021","feedbackHash":"c0aa336121c4e1ba339c938f4d69da773d8523e1a7abe82d0876e3ae61b0b0af","nodeKey":"audit_flow","submissionHash":"9c0cb4511053bfef45a6236fc7f25a60e7af69dbc4dbc537fdbbfb2850118981","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51508","feedbackHash":"e0e3e65e8b383570eb14e46acf29e0e1793fbb0f992fec285d4d8df29f225352","nodeKey":"audit_judge","submissionHash":"71a57c17a7959ed9adcfee1f818979d2459495ac335207d5e99b2af65d79336c","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51250","feedbackHash":"95bfcccbf680ae82bf42baf52cd5a21a98f269c0534cc20fd708ea31aaf4215a","nodeKey":"audit_math","submissionHash":"a1247d39f948cfc07b72ca6f04ca91c9458baa0ebe4492f3808b46e64fcaefe2","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51203","feedbackHash":"807c9ceccff33cf538a5abccf5e51e9028a925d31fa5d4b5dcf61a4837a7b151","nodeKey":"audit_permissions","submissionHash":"4c23a20c28edc527f8b89c5c32b8ee2bf9a5dcab990d97c21b9fbb6b2b61b725","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52144","feedbackHash":"43f8a39a79e8977cad20799a4cbb67cd2c672882c20fd0662a8f401bbdbd584b","nodeKey":"build_contract_project","submissionHash":"5cf301d0e7769c3746e9a2054eb82c47849c1ede03287b564852f5ee21686de9","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51752","feedbackHash":"1bdb301266169078d41e436fc209feee99d78711fd15d1f8f0ffccae2b97aacd","nodeKey":"manifest","submissionHash":"841bc84a74222172c3db839e4fadef6e0437c197d768cfbf5281cbb45f69043f","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52213","feedbackHash":"edd08f24f15a959f109a43cc1061fac56273ff0cfdddff74c2d44f71df8f2b78","nodeKey":"write_foundry_tests","submissionHash":"f16b1116df840a96509038409637ad429fa27822a59e2267ec84d2f207c29dd0","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"17221972348d5a1d1f533ed76eaf780016a54b0a749c58545c70b02eeb3fe5a4","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"8af9903f4ad1eed0","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Not a code defect: src/Numos.sol has no price logic. This is an economic-input gap. The job text states poolBps (90% to the pool) and 0 to the creator but names no opening market cap or paired currency, and the README fills the gap with a 1 ETH fully diluted cap over 1,000,000,000 NUMOS (1e-9 ETH per token). With economics.poolBps = 9000 the pool opens single-sided with 900,000,000 NUMOS worth 0.9 ETH at the opening price. For a single-sided position from the opening price upward, the ETH needed to buy a fraction f of the seeded tokens is 0.9 ETH * f/(1-f): 0.1 ETH buys 10%, 0.9 ETH buys 50%, 8.1 ETH buys 90%. The derived sqrtPriceX96 (about 2.505e33 with ETH as currency0, tick about 207243) is inside Uniswap v4 bounds, so the seed and swaps do not revert; the only effect is that the first buyer can take most of the supply for roughly one ETH. The README correctly labels the value an assumption that the network job supersedes, so the action is for the requester/admission to confirm the intended cap rather than for the author to change code. Reported so the judge can see the open input; no revision of src/ is needed.","line":103,"path":"README.md","reproduction":"State: manifest economics.initialMarketCapWei = 1000000000000000000, poolBps = 9000, pairedCurrency = 0x0 (ETH), token supply 1e27. Deployer derives price = 1e27 / 1e18 = 1e9 NUMOS minor units per wei, sqrtPriceX96 = sqrt(1e9) * 2^96 = 2.5054e33. Factory seeds 9e26 NUMOS single-sided. A trader swaps 0.9 ETH in: receives about 4.5e26 NUMOS (50% of pool). Expected per the requester: an opening valuation they chose; actual: a placeholder valuation chosen by the README because the job omitted it.","severity":"info","snippet":"| `economics.initialMarketCapWei` | `1000000000000000000` (1 ETH initial fully diluted capitalization) |","title":"Documented default opening cap of 1 ETH makes the 90% pool buyable for under 1 ETH; the job supplies no cap and this value is only a README placeholder"}],"hash":"36c8d2a6f12ce4aa50cabc9e5c1b757e1c12033a99df228be2ac0670fa622bb9","nodeId":"ebbeaf31-2364-46b2-84f7-a68e26b3277e","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and the findings file is written. The token's code has no defects in the Economic Security, Invariant, or Flow Gap areas.\n\n**What I checked**\n\n- The contract is OpenZeppelin v5.0.2 ERC20 with a single constructor mint, and the vendored library file matches its recorded SHA-256, so it is unmodified.\n- The compiled ABI exposes only the standard ERC-20 functions plus the supply constant. There is no mint, burn, pause, blacklist, owner, hook, or external call in the runtime.\n- The supply constant evaluates to exactly 1e27 minor units, matching the README and the task. The 90% pool share plus the 10% swarm share consume the supply exactly, leaving zero remainder for the requester.\n- Transfers move exactly the stated amount with no fee, so the factory-to-distributor, seed, claim, and swap flows arrive whole.\n- Supply conservation holds under a fuzz with arbitrary recipients and under the existing stateful invariant suite. All 30 project tests and my 3 scratch tests pass.\n- The aderyn \"large numeric literal\" lead is a style lint only.\n\n**Findings file** at `.imd-findings.json` contains one informational note and ten coverage rows. All three verifier-listed entry points are marked as holding.\n\n**The one informational note** concerns the README's documented default opening cap of 1 ETH. The job gave no cap, so the README chose a placeholder. At that value a buyer spending 0.9 ETH would take half the seeded pool. This is an open input for the requester to confirm, not a code defect, and the README already labels it as an assumption the network job supersedes.\n\n**Not reached:** the real Uniswap v4 protected harness could not run here because v4-core is not vendored. I covered the seed and swap paths by reasoning about the token's transfer semantics and the price bounds instead.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":554287,"inputTokens":226,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":10832,"runtime":"claude","turns":19,"wallClockMs":171690}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"896d1238054266ca","findings":[],"hash":"4c23a20c28edc527f8b89c5c32b8ee2bf9a5dcab990d97c21b9fbb6b2b61b725","nodeId":"ffb0c2e1-e795-44e8-ba6a-60dd4934c4c5","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete. The findings file at `.imd-findings.json` holds an empty findings list and eight coverage rows, and the working tree is otherwise unchanged apart from that file.\n\n**Result: no defects in the Access Control, Trust Gap or Asymmetry areas.** Numos is a 16-line contract that inherits unmodified OpenZeppelin v5.0.2 ERC20 and adds only a constructor that mints the full supply to the deployer. I checked the vendored OpenZeppelin files against the recorded hashes and confirmed no git submodules.\n\n**What I verified**\n\n- **Access control.** The compiled ABI has exactly the three listed state-changing entry points. There is no owner, role, initializer, trusted forwarder, pause, blacklist, burn, mint or upgrade path. A 40-selector sweep from both the deployer and a stranger reverts every time with supply and holder balances unchanged.\n- **Deployment phase.** Deploying through CREATE2 from a factory-like contract, with a different transaction origin, puts the entire supply at the factory and nowhere else. This matches how ProjectFactory will deploy it.\n- **Trust gap.** The deployer cannot pull or approve a holder's balance. Appending a holder address to calldata in the ERC-2771 style does not spoof the sender. No privileged actor and no in-contract economics exist for the three lenses to intersect on.\n- **Asymmetry.** Transfer and transferFrom share one state machine. A failed transferFrom leaves the allowance intact because the whole call reverts, and an infinite allowance is never decremented. Fuzzing confirmed balance deltas match and total supply is conserved.\n- **Bytecode.** A PUSH-data-aware opcode scan of the runtime found no CALL, STATICCALL, DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE, CREATE, CREATE2 or SELFDESTRUCT.\n\nThe existing 30-test suite passes, and the format check is clean. The static-analysis lead about the large numeric literal is not a defect. The constant evaluates to exactly 10^27, which is the brief's supply.\n\n**Open items outside the token code, not reported as findings**\n\n- The token cannot enforce the 90 percent pool and zero creator split. That is the factory's job, and the protected harness checks the factory holds the full supply. I recorded it as the intended trust assumption.\n- The runtime uses the PUSH0 and MCOPY opcodes because the supplied configuration targets Cancun. The deployer must confirm the target chain supports Cancun. The configuration is the network's and is out of scope for this review.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":641830,"inputTokens":258,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":14699,"runtime":"claude","turns":27,"wallClockMs":219929}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"fd62e10f9be44b041b1466c859d65954f5f4222a3eb6be8a742aa273f6ae8f18","device":"5f419f6fdfb42f37","findings":[],"hash":"5cf301d0e7769c3746e9a2054eb82c47849c1ede03287b564852f5ee21686de9","nodeId":"20a306a2-634f-4df9-b7e9-bf60e70ee823","outcome":"completed","summary":"Implemented Numos: 1 billion tokens, 18 decimals, minted once to the deployer, with fee-free transfers and no mint, admin, blacklist, or upgrade powers.\n\nVendored dependencies and documented deployment defaults, responsibilities, and the factory’s 90% liquidity / 10% contributor / zero creator allocation.\n\nValidation passed with Solidity 0.8.26:\n\n- `forge build`\n- `forge test`: 30 passing tests\n- `forge fmt --check`\n- Clean offline build and parallel tests with a cleared environment\n\nActual pool deployment remains the network’s responsibility.","treeHash":"7c092893133c78c955e679996a86d179ce680845","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":457216,"inputTokens":65190,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":13773,"runtime":"codex","turns":6,"wallClockMs":578965}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"3516474d8a268bd8","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Provenance defect, reproduced. README.md line 45 states 'Upstream sources are unmodified. `DEPENDENCIES.json` records each source URL and SHA-256 digest'. Recomputing SHA-256 over every path listed in DEPENDENCIES.json gives 21 matches and 6 mismatches: lib/forge-std/src/Vm.sol, lib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol, lib/forge-std/src/StdToml.sol, lib/forge-std/src/StdJson.sol, lib/forge-std/src/console.sol and lib/forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol. Fetching each upstream forge-std v1.9.7 file confirms the recorded digests are the genuine upstream digests (upstream Vm.sol hashes to 9068805b...2cb1), and comparing the files with all whitespace stripped shows upstream and local are identical for all six, so the local copies were reflowed (consistent with `forge fmt` having been applied to lib/) after the digests were recorded. The six files are test-only dependencies. The production dependency closure (OpenZeppelin v5.0.2 ERC20.sol, IERC20.sol, IERC20Metadata.sol, Context.sol, draft-IERC6093.sol) was independently re-fetched from upstream and is byte-identical, so the compiled Numos creation and runtime bytecode is unaffected. Impact: an offline verifier that re-checks the committed digests, as the README invites, fails on 6 of 27 files and cannot distinguish a formatter pass from a tampered test library without re-deriving this diff. Both audit_math and audit_flow reported this same root cause; merged here as one finding at low. Fix: either restore the six files byte-for-byte from upstream v1.9.7 (and exclude lib/ from `forge fmt`), or recompute and record the digests of the files as committed and reword README.md line 45 so it does not claim byte-identity with upstream.","line":60,"path":"DEPENDENCIES.json","reproduction":"State: the committed tree at HEAD. Run from the repository root: python3 -c \"import json,hashlib;[print(d['path'], hashlib.sha256(open(d['path'],'rb').read()).hexdigest()==d['sha256']) for d in json.load(open('DEPENDENCIES.json'))]\". Expected: 27 lines ending in True. Actual: False for lib/forge-std/src/Vm.sol, lib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol, lib/forge-std/src/StdToml.sol, lib/forge-std/src/StdJson.sol, lib/forge-std/src/console.sol, lib/forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol; the other 21 are True. Cross-check: curl -sS https://raw.githubusercontent.com/foundry-rs/forge-std/v1.9.7/src/Vm.sol | sha256sum gives 9068805b59ac1d0ea03a8fa1f15ae49c094e0c6c852a2500e0dd112f264b2cb1 (the recorded value), while sha256sum lib/forge-std/src/Vm.sol gives a1b1c82924aecf0f...; piping both through tr -d ' \\t\\n\\r' before sha256sum gives the same digest fe772424ec5d5c1b... for both, proving the difference is whitespace only. The same holds for the other five files.","severity":"low","snippet":"    \"sha256\": \"9068805b59ac1d0ea03a8fa1f15ae49c094e0c6c852a2500e0dd112f264b2cb1\"","title":"DEPENDENCIES.json digests do not match six vendored forge-std files; README claim 'Upstream sources are unmodified' is false for them (merged: audit_math + audit_flow)"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Documentation wording defect, reproduced (from audit_flow). README.md lines 120-121 read as if out/Numos.sol/Numos.json is part of the delivered repository, but .gitignore line 1 is `/out/` and no file under out/ is tracked. The artifact only exists after `forge build` in the verifier's environment, which is consistent with the rest of the README (the verification environment supplies the compiler and the attestation binds the compiled bytes), so there is no deployment risk. A reader looking for a committed bytecode file will not find one. Fix: say the artifact is produced at that path by `forge build` rather than supplied by the repository.","line":120,"path":"README.md","reproduction":"State: a fresh clone of the committed tree before any build. Run: git ls-files out | wc -l -> 0; head -1 .gitignore -> /out/. Expected from the README sentence: a tracked file out/Numos.sol/Numos.json. Actual: none until `forge build` is run.","severity":"info","snippet":"The repository supplies token creation bytecode through the Foundry artifact at","title":"README says the repository supplies the creation bytecode artifact, but out/ is git-ignored and untracked"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Not a code defect: src/Numos.sol contains no price logic and the token behaves identically under any cap. This is an unverifiable economic input (from audit_economics, extended with the committed manifest). The job text fixes poolBps (90% to the pool) and zero creator allocation but names no opening market cap and no paired currency. README.md lines 103-104 document defaults of initialMarketCapWei = 1 ETH with native ETH as the pair, while the committed launch.json carries economics.initialMarketCapWei = 2500000000000000000000 and pool.pairedCurrency = 0x5f7bb59365ce557c26dbcaa4ee9d39a4b95b7127, so the two documents in the tree disagree and neither value can be traced to the job. The manifest's economics are required to be copied from the job verbatim and admission refuses any other copy, so this is for the requester/admission to confirm, not for the author to change code. launch.json's initialPrice (125270724187523965593206900) does equal floor(sqrt(2500e18 / 1e27) * 2^96) with NUMOS as currency0 as the notes state, and is within Uniswap v4 bounds, so the seed itself is not shown to fail. Under the README's 1 ETH default the single-sided pool of 900,000,000 NUMOS would be 50% buyable for about 0.9 ETH; under the manifest's 2500 pair-token cap the equivalent cost is about 2250 pair tokens. No .imd/reads/network.json was supplied, so the pair-token address could not be verified either.","line":103,"path":"README.md","reproduction":"State: the committed tree. Compare README.md lines 103-104 (initialMarketCapWei 1000000000000000000, pairedCurrency 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000) with launch.json (economics.initialMarketCapWei 2500000000000000000000, pool.pairedCurrency 0x5f7bb59365ce557c26dbcaa4ee9d39a4b95b7127). Expected: one opening cap and paired currency, both traceable to the job text. Actual: two different values in the tree and no cap or pairing in the job text ('Launch: put 90% of supply into the liquidity pool, 0 tokens to the creator wallet'). Arithmetic check of the manifest price: python3 -c \"import decimal;decimal.getcontext().prec=80;print(int((decimal.Decimal(2500*10**18)/decimal.Decimal(10**27)).sqrt()*2**96))\" -> 125270724187523965593206900, equal to pool.initialPrice.","severity":"info","snippet":"| `economics.initialMarketCapWei` | `1000000000000000000` (1 ETH initial fully diluted capitalization) |","title":"Opening market cap and paired currency are not stated by the job; README defaults (1 ETH, native ETH) disagree with the committed launch.json (2500e18 of pair token 0x5f7b...)"}],"hash":"71a57c17a7959ed9adcfee1f818979d2459495ac335207d5e99b2af65d79336c","nodeId":"afb96476-fa65-49d0-b7df-b6629f37080c","outcome":"completed","summary":"Review complete. The findings file is written and validated, and the working tree is otherwise unchanged.\n\n**Outcome:** the Numos token has no code defect. The contract is a constructor-only mint on a byte-exact OpenZeppelin v5.0.2 ERC-20. All three state-changing entry points hold. The compiled runtime contains no CALL, DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT. The 49 local tests pass, and the production dependency files were re-fetched from upstream and match byte for byte.\n\n**Findings kept, in `.imd-findings.json`:**\n\n- **Low, merged from audit_math and audit_flow:** six vendored forge-std files do not hash to the digests in DEPENDENCIES.json. I reproduced the mismatch, confirmed the recorded digests are the genuine upstream v1.9.7 values, and confirmed with a whitespace-stripped comparison that the local copies differ only by reformatting. Test-only dependencies, so bytecode is unaffected, but the README's \"unmodified\" claim is false for them.\n- **Info, from audit_flow:** the README says the repository supplies the bytecode artifact under `out/`, but that directory is git-ignored and untracked.\n- **Info, from audit_economics, extended:** the job text gives no opening cap or paired currency. The README documents a 1 ETH native-ETH default while the committed launch.json carries 2500e18 of a pair token, so the two disagree and neither traces to the job. The manifest's initialPrice arithmetic checks out. This is an input for the requester and admission to confirm, not a code change.\n\n**Dropped:** nothing. All specialist findings reproduced. The aderyn large-numeric-literal lead is a style note on the supply constant and is not a defect.\n\n**Coverage:** six rows, all `holds`, covering the three ABI entry points, the constructor, the no-supply-growth and no-privileged-hand invariant, and dependency provenance. The protected harness could not run locally because it imports v4-core and launch contracts that live in the network's tree, so that invariant was verified from the ABI and source instead.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":523993,"inputTokens":290,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":10383,"runtime":"claude","turns":10,"wallClockMs":204107}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"3e3a8bbb919da304f767a68f1de793a73ed98a74dc070184b1cd22e899425208","device":"7143d892ed24d728","findings":[],"hash":"841bc84a74222172c3db839e4fadef6e0437c197d768cfbf5281cbb45f69043f","nodeId":"d992fc62-a34d-4636-9e77-3e0f2c0e56c4","outcome":"completed","summary":"Created [launch.json](/root/.identitymd/work/aff5e45d-9f43-47c3-ac42-3c2a79f009f1/d992fc62-a34d-4636-9e77-3e0f2c0e56c4/launch.json) with the exact supply and economics, matching constructor arguments, and documented pool defaults.\n\nSchema and ABI checks passed. `forge build` succeeded; `forge test` passed all 30 tests.\n\nOnly `launch.json` is changed outside the permitted scratch directory.","treeHash":"7ca05b33eafb2aaeed5015f5fa9167202e8c96cc","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":196480,"inputTokens":36398,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":3484,"runtime":"codex","turns":3,"wallClockMs":92471}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"72ae9b5bbd1a54b6","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Periphery / provenance. README.md:45-46 states 'Upstream sources are unmodified. DEPENDENCIES.json records each source URL and SHA-256 digest'. Recomputing the digests over the tree shows that six forge-std v1.9.7 files were re-wrapped by `forge fmt` after vendoring, so their content no longer hashes to the recorded value: lib/forge-std/src/Vm.sol, interfaces/IMulticall3.sol, StdToml.sol, StdJson.sol, console.sol and StdAssertions.sol. The recorded digests are the genuine upstream v1.9.7 digests (fetched and compared), and a token-stripped diff shows the local changes are whitespace/line-wrapping only, so no behaviour changed. All six OpenZeppelin files (the production dependency of Numos) match their recorded digests exactly. Impact is limited to the integrity statement: a verifier that checks DEPENDENCIES.json against the tree, as the README invites, gets six failures and cannot distinguish this benign reformat from a tampered test library without re-deriving the diff as done here. Fix: either vendor the byte-exact upstream files (forge fmt --check already passes on the current tree, so re-vendoring will require excluding lib/ from fmt or re-running the digests), or recompute and record the digests of the files actually shipped and reword the README so it does not claim byte-identity with upstream.","line":60,"path":"DEPENDENCIES.json","reproduction":"State: the committed tree. Run: node -e 'const fs=require(\"fs\"),c=require(\"crypto\");for(const d of JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(\"DEPENDENCIES.json\"))){const h=c.createHash(\"sha256\").update(fs.readFileSync(d.path)).digest(\"hex\");console.log(h===d.sha256?\"OK\":\"BAD\",d.path)}'. Expected: 27 OK lines. Actual: BAD for lib/forge-std/src/Vm.sol (tree sha256 a1b1c82924aecf0f38b53192fd1e801cccc1e1fd2ecd6b2301e4f4c4ab102a15, recorded 9068805b...2cb1), lib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol, lib/forge-std/src/StdToml.sol, lib/forge-std/src/StdJson.sol, lib/forge-std/src/console.sol, lib/forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol; the other 21 files are OK. Fetching https://raw.githubusercontent.com/foundry-rs/forge-std/v1.9.7/src/Vm.sol gives sha256 9068805b...2cb1 (the recorded value) and `diff` against the tree copy shows only multi-line signatures re-joined onto one line (e.g. upstream lines 827-830 `function getDeployment(string calldata contractName, uint64 chainId)\\n external\\n view\\n returns (address deployedAddress);` become one line locally).","severity":"low","snippet":"    \"sha256\": \"9068805b59ac1d0ea03a8fa1f15ae49c094e0c6c852a2500e0dd112f264b2cb1\"","title":"DEPENDENCIES.json digests do not match six vendored forge-std files; README's 'upstream sources are unmodified' claim is false for them"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"First principles / documentation. The sentence reads as if the artifact is part of the delivered repository, but .gitignore line 1 is `/out/` and `git ls-files out` returns nothing, so the artifact exists only after `forge build` in the verifier's environment. This is consistent with the rest of the README (the compiler is supplied by the verification environment and the attestation binds the compiled bytes), so there is no deployment risk; it is a wording defect that could mislead someone looking for a committed bytecode file. Fix: say the artifact is produced by `forge build` at that path rather than supplied by the repository.","line":120,"path":"README.md","reproduction":"State: the committed tree before any build. Run `git ls-files out/ | wc -l` -> 0, and `cat .gitignore` -> first line `/out/`. Expected from the README sentence: a tracked file out/Numos.sol/Numos.json. Actual: none; the path only exists after `forge build`.","severity":"info","snippet":"The repository supplies token creation bytecode through the Foundry artifact at\n`out/Numos.sol/Numos.json`. The network owns `launch.json` generation and","title":"README says the repository supplies the creation bytecode artifact, but out/ is git-ignored and untracked"}],"hash":"9c0cb4511053bfef45a6236fc7f25a60e7af69dbc4dbc537fdbbfb2850118981","nodeId":"c17f0930-5840-456f-87a2-0b73d0ba312a","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and written to `.imd-findings.json`. No source files were changed, and `git status` is clean apart from the findings file.\n\n**Outcome:** the Numos token has no execution-flow, periphery or first-principles defect. The only reportable issues are provenance and documentation.\n\n**What I checked, against the Execution Trace, Periphery and First Principles guides**\n\n- **Entry points.** All three state-changing functions come unmodified from OpenZeppelin v5.0.2, whose six files hash exactly to the recorded digests. I traced approve, transfer and transferFrom through the guards, the unchecked arithmetic and the revert paths. Zero-address sentinels, zero amounts, self-transfers, max allowance and failed delegated transfers all behave as the standard specifies. There are no hooks, fees, exemptions or external calls, so the launch flows move exactly what they say.\n- **Constructor and supply.** The aderyn large-literal lead was checked by computation. The literal equals 1e27, which matches the README's minor-unit figure and the test constant. The whole supply mints once to the immediate deployer, which under the factory's CREATE2 deploy is the factory.\n- **Runtime and tests.** All 30 project tests pass, including the opcode scan, the invariant run and the rejection of admin selectors. The formatting check passes on the tree.\n\n**Findings written**\n\n1. **Low.** Six vendored forge-std files were re-wrapped by the formatter after vendoring, so their contents no longer match the SHA-256 digests recorded in DEPENDENCIES.json, and the README's statement that upstream sources are unmodified is false for them. I fetched the upstream v1.9.7 files and confirmed the differences are whitespace only and test-only. The reproduction is a one-line digest recomputation.\n2. **Info.** The README says the repository supplies the creation bytecode artifact, but the output directory is git-ignored and untracked, so the artifact only exists after a build.\n\n**Coverage** records all three listed entry points as holding, plus rows for the constructor, the runtime opcode profile, the launch flows and dependency integrity, the last one pointing at finding 1.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":682698,"inputTokens":290,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":11313,"runtime":"claude","turns":20,"wallClockMs":187800}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"0cf632e317dfab7a","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"DEPENDENCIES.json records a SHA-256 for every vendored file and README.md line 45 states 'Upstream sources are unmodified. DEPENDENCIES.json records each source URL and SHA-256 digest'. Recomputing the digests over the tree shows that 6 of the 27 recorded files do not match: lib/forge-std/src/Vm.sol, lib/forge-std/src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol, lib/forge-std/src/StdToml.sol, lib/forge-std/src/StdJson.sol, lib/forge-std/src/console.sol and lib/forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol. Diffing each against the upstream forge-std v1.9.7 file shows the differences are whitespace-only (multi-line function signatures and an assembly block were reflowed onto single lines, consistent with `forge fmt` having been run over lib/); stripping all whitespace yields identical content. All six are test-only dependencies: the production dependency closure (OpenZeppelin ERC20.sol, IERC20.sol, IERC20Metadata.sol, Context.sol, draft-IERC6093.sol) matches its recorded digests exactly, so the compiled Numos bytecode is unaffected. Impact is limited to provenance: an offline verifier that re-checks the committed digests (as the README invites) will fail on 6 files and cannot distinguish a formatter pass from a tampered test library without doing the diff above. Either re-record the digests of the files as committed, or restore the six files byte-for-byte from upstream v1.9.7 so the existing digests hold. No math, boundary or token-behaviour defect was found in src/Numos.sol or its inherited ERC-20 code.","line":60,"path":"DEPENDENCIES.json","reproduction":"State: the repository as committed (HEAD 7fbd7e1). Input: for each entry in DEPENDENCIES.json compute sha256 of the file at `path` and compare to the recorded `sha256`. Expected: 27/27 match (README: 'Upstream sources are unmodified'). Actual: 21 match, 6 mismatch. Example: recorded for lib/forge-std/src/Vm.sol is 9068805b59ac1d0ea03a8fa1f15ae49c094e0c6c852a2500e0dd112f264b2cb1; actual sha256 of the committed file begins a1b1c82924aecf0f. Upstream https://raw.githubusercontent.com/foundry-rs/forge-std/v1.9.7/src/Vm.sol hashes to the recorded value, and `diff` against the committed copy shows only line-wrapping changes (e.g. upstream lines 827-830 `function getDeployment(string calldata contractName, uint64 chainId)\\n external\\n view\\n returns (address deployedAddress);` are one line locally). Command used: python3 -c \"import json,hashlib;[print(d['path'], hashlib.sha256(open(d['path'],'rb').read()).hexdigest()==d['sha256']) for d in json.load(open('DEPENDENCIES.json'))]\".","severity":"low","snippet":"    \"sha256\": \"9068805b59ac1d0ea03a8fa1f15ae49c094e0c6c852a2500e0dd112f264b2cb1\"","title":"DEPENDENCIES.json digests do not match six vendored forge-std files (whitespace reformatted after vendoring)"}],"hash":"a1247d39f948cfc07b72ca6f04ca91c9458baa0ebe4492f3808b46e64fcaefe2","nodeId":"115f70fa-95d4-4f9f-b8a0-62a88f067d59","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete. `.imd-findings.json` is written with one low finding and coverage rows for all three entry points plus five invariants.\n\n**Outcome.** The Numos token's arithmetic is sound. Its only math is a compile-time constant and OpenZeppelin v5.0.2's checked balance and allowance logic. No defect was found in `src/Numos.sol` or its inherited code against any item in the Math Precision, Boundary or Numerical Gap guides.\n\n**What I verified**\n- The supply constant folds to exactly 1e27, is divisible by 10^18 with no remainder, and fits in 90 bits, so no sum of balances can ever wrap.\n- The 90/10 and 2/8 allocation splits are exact in basis points, and the protected harness formula has no intermediate overflow.\n- Transfers and delegated transfers behave correctly at 1 wei, exact balance, balance plus one, full supply, max uint256, and self-transfer. Only exactly max uint256 is treated as an infinite allowance.\n- The token has no external calls, payable paths, bytes decoding, downcasts or division, so the Boundary and Numerical Gap seams have no surface to attack.\n- The vendored OpenZeppelin production files match their recorded digests byte for byte.\n\n**Commands run and results**\n- `forge build` and `forge test`: 30 tests passed, 0 failed, including the stateful invariant.\n- Scratch probe suite of 11 tests under test/scratch: all passed, then removed.\n- Slither with 102 detectors: 0 results. Aderyn: one low note on the large numeric literal, which is a style remark, not a defect.\n- SHA-256 recomputation over DEPENDENCIES.json: 21 of 27 files match.\n\n**The one finding, low severity.** Six forge-std files were reformatted after vendoring, so their digests in DEPENDENCIES.json no longer match and the README's \"unmodified\" claim is false for them. Diffing against upstream v1.9.7 shows whitespace-only changes. These are test-only files and do not affect the deployed bytecode, but an offline verifier re-checking digests will fail on them. The fix is to re-record the six digests or restore the files byte for byte.\n\n**Not a finding, worth noting for the judge.** The brief asks for zero tokens to the creator wallet. With the swarm's 10% and a 90% pool share, the requester remainder is zero on paper, but single-sided liquidity math can leave dust in the factory that then flows to remainderTo. The token cannot prevent this. The README already documents it as an infrastructure responsibility, and there is no code in this tree to cite, so I left it out of the findings list.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":640503,"inputTokens":258,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":15997,"runtime":"claude","turns":27,"wallClockMs":241585}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"685b3cfc1fef74f5ced8a1a2d5b94c68c8a703f9e1ed8e3eee2faf999f9c85cf","device":"70dd8643efb15b75","findings":[],"hash":"f16b1116df840a96509038409637ad429fa27822a59e2267ec84d2f207c29dd0","nodeId":"3f8484a9-da3f-4b21-b389-c371264d3edf","outcome":"completed","summary":"Added 18 adversarial unit/fuzz tests and strengthened stateful invariants with independent balance and allowance accounting. All changes are under `test/`.\n\nValidation passed offline:\n\n- `forge build`\n- `forge test`: 49 passed, zero failures\n- Invariants: 256 sequences, 16,384 randomized calls\n\nNo confirmed defects found. Assumptions and local launch-integration limits are documented in `test/TESTING.md`.","treeHash":"f75180b847047f002aa6888a08027672a8fa0980","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":887936,"inputTokens":72380,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":13349,"runtime":"codex","turns":6,"wallClockMs":361629}}],"verification":[{"checks":[{"durationMs":1025,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 27 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 924.76ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":456,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 29 tests for test/Numos.t.sol:NumosTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_DelegatedTransfersRespectBalancesAndAllowance(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 157313, ~: 158213)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 527183591207158239313054009\n  Bound result 11908007582268366729283469262407194664017861817812165241811361346551\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_OverdrawAlwaysReverts(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 64696, ~: 65042)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 317171237295262076157024778517613666415104667086\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransfersConserveSupply(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 147613, ~: 148365)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 74438095502305856421474980\n\n[PASS] test_ApprovalCanBeRevoked() (gas: 112921)\n[PASS] test_ApprovalEmitsEventAndCanBeReplaced() (gas: 114582)\n[PASS] test_ConstructorEmitsMintEvent() (gas: 5578)\n[PASS] test_ConstructorMintsToImmediateDeployer() (gas: 34388)\n[PASS] test_DelegatedSelfTransferConsumesAllowanceOnly() (gas: 100764)\n[PASS] test_DeployerCannotSpendHolderFundsWithoutApproval() (gas: 150775)\n[PASS] test_EntireSupplyCanTransfer() (gas: 71407)\n[PASS] test_FailedTransferFromRestoresAllowance() (gas: 103873)\n[PASS] test_InfiniteAllowanceIsNotDecremented() (gas: 121956)\n[PASS] test_LaunchAllocationClaimsAndPoolTransfersAreExact() (gas: 325167)\n[PASS] test_MetadataAndInitialSupply() (gas: 92817)\n[PASS] test_NativeCurrencyAndUnknownCallsRevert() (gas: 58898)\n[PASS] test_NoMintBurnAdminOrUpgradeEntryPoints() (gas: 1799810)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenApprovingZeroAddress() (gas: 30430)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenSelfTransferExceedsBalance() (gas: 40200)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenTransferExceedsBalance() (gas: 50507)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenTransferFromExceedsAllowance() (gas: 108624)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenTransferringToZeroEvenForZeroAmount() (gas: 71904)\n[PASS] test_RuntimeHasNoDangerousOpcodesOrExternalCalls() (gas: 1716351)\n[PASS] test_SelfTransferPreservesBalance() (gas: 51518)\n[PASS] test_TransferEmitsEventAndDeliversExactAmount() (gas: 89002)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromConsumesAllowanceAndEmitsTransfer() (gas: 200895)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromToZeroRevertsWithoutConsumingAllowance() (gas: 111598)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromEmptyAccountEmitsEvent() (gas: 56228)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromNeedsNoAllowance() (gas: 57055)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromZeroSenderReverts() (gas: 33010)\nSuite result: ok. 29 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 9.66ms (33.26ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/Numos.invariant.t.sol:NumosInvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_TotalSupplyAndBalancesAreConserved() (runs: 64, calls: 4096, reverts: 0)\n\n╭--------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract     | Selector        | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+=============================================================+\n| NumosHandler | approve         | 1004  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | rejectOverspend | 1035  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | transfer        | 1035  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | transferFrom    | 1022  | 0       | 0        |\n╰--------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 11\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1224\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 7\n  Bound result 6\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 210493666138047706724917128\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 4964\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000\n  Bound result 249999999999999999999995047\n  Bound result 14\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 8000000000000000000\n  Bound result 24576\n  Bound result 4526\n  Bound result 6339\n  Bound result 1784\n  Bound result 94427589388648926598546714\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 1446\n  Bound result 250\n  Bound result 29466\n  Bound result 2234\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 440\n  Bound result 5583\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 250\n  Bound result 2568\n  Bound result 15\n  Bound result 3141\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 362.18ms (361.02ms CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 363.22ms (371.84ms CPU time): 30 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (30 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":31,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"Numos.approve(address,uint256)\",\"Numos.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"Numos.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":4,\"DEPENDENCIES.json\":137,\"README.md\":166,\"foundry.toml\":25,\"src/Numos.sol\":16,\"test/Numos.invariant.t.sol\":109,\"test/Numos.t.sol\":348},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true},{"durationMs":383,"exitCode":0,"name":"slither","output":"slither: no results at low impact or above","passed":true},{"durationMs":193,"exitCode":0,"name":"aderyn","output":"[low] large-numeric-literal at src/Numos.sol:11: Large Numeric Literal","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"5cf301d0e7769c3746e9a2054eb82c47849c1ede03287b564852f5ee21686de9","verifiedTreeHash":"7c092893133c78c955e679996a86d179ce680845","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+7471272e"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":1229,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 27 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 1.11s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":496,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 29 tests for test/Numos.t.sol:NumosTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_DelegatedTransfersRespectBalancesAndAllowance(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 157456, ~: 157661)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000000000000\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665639564064544934573567472280398\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_OverdrawAlwaysReverts(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 64700, ~: 65042)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 10531710437550645187709064333681784205184869185756798704717500578581422\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransfersConserveSupply(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 148079, ~: 148341)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 998047734381567426810947199\n\n[PASS] test_ApprovalCanBeRevoked() (gas: 112921)\n[PASS] test_ApprovalEmitsEventAndCanBeReplaced() (gas: 114582)\n[PASS] test_ConstructorEmitsMintEvent() (gas: 5578)\n[PASS] test_ConstructorMintsToImmediateDeployer() (gas: 34388)\n[PASS] test_DelegatedSelfTransferConsumesAllowanceOnly() (gas: 100764)\n[PASS] test_DeployerCannotSpendHolderFundsWithoutApproval() (gas: 150775)\n[PASS] test_EntireSupplyCanTransfer() (gas: 71407)\n[PASS] test_FailedTransferFromRestoresAllowance() (gas: 103873)\n[PASS] test_InfiniteAllowanceIsNotDecremented() (gas: 121956)\n[PASS] test_LaunchAllocationClaimsAndPoolTransfersAreExact() (gas: 325167)\n[PASS] test_MetadataAndInitialSupply() (gas: 92817)\n[PASS] test_NativeCurrencyAndUnknownCallsRevert() (gas: 58898)\n[PASS] test_NoMintBurnAdminOrUpgradeEntryPoints() (gas: 1799810)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenApprovingZeroAddress() (gas: 30430)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenSelfTransferExceedsBalance() (gas: 40200)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenTransferExceedsBalance() (gas: 50507)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenTransferFromExceedsAllowance() (gas: 108624)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenTransferringToZeroEvenForZeroAmount() (gas: 71904)\n[PASS] test_RuntimeHasNoDangerousOpcodesOrExternalCalls() (gas: 1716351)\n[PASS] test_SelfTransferPreservesBalance() (gas: 51518)\n[PASS] test_TransferEmitsEventAndDeliversExactAmount() (gas: 89002)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromConsumesAllowanceAndEmitsTransfer() (gas: 200895)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromToZeroRevertsWithoutConsumingAllowance() (gas: 111598)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromEmptyAccountEmitsEvent() (gas: 56228)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromNeedsNoAllowance() (gas: 57055)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromZeroSenderReverts() (gas: 33010)\nSuite result: ok. 29 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 9.08ms (37.06ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/Numos.invariant.t.sol:NumosInvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_TotalSupplyAndBalancesAreConserved() (runs: 64, calls: 4096, reverts: 0)\n\n╭--------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract     | Selector        | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+=============================================================+\n| NumosHandler | approve         | 1063  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | rejectOverspend | 1043  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | transfer        | 978   | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | transferFrom    | 1012  | 0       | 0        |\n╰--------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 7620\n  Bound result 18632998450424606624490005\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 90393911037\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 6167802052733414905496940\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 55934\n  Bound result 318\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 20\n  Bound result 325717185497\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 712294013083025\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 29039584375\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 6461\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1239446557\n  Bound result 348\n  Bound result 199914002961127772030513555\n  Bound result 22\n  Bound result 5\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1602\n  Bound result 0\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 409.02ms (407.81ms CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 410.21ms (418.09ms CPU time): 30 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (30 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":51,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"Numos.approve(address,uint256)\",\"Numos.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"Numos.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":4,\"DEPENDENCIES.json\":137,\"README.md\":166,\"foundry.toml\":25,\"launch.json\":20,\"src/Numos.sol\":16,\"test/Numos.invariant.t.sol\":109,\"test/Numos.t.sol\":348},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"841bc84a74222172c3db839e4fadef6e0437c197d768cfbf5281cbb45f69043f","verifiedTreeHash":"7ca05b33eafb2aaeed5015f5fa9167202e8c96cc","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+7471272e"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":1706,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 28 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 1.60s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":5495,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 18 tests for test/Numos.adversarial.t.sol:NumosAdversarialTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_InsufficientAllowanceWithSufficientBalanceIsAtomic(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 188110, ~: 189264)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 33641212665813215\n  Bound result 195152101\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_InsufficientBalanceWithSufficientAllowanceIsAtomic(uint256,uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 198397, ~: 198740)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 762561254140402488176193908\n  Bound result 3261946564594796226213163538145116249566399017453703751610532733338976400204\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639932\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_SplitDelegatedTransfersEqualOneDirectTransfer(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 265101, ~: 266447)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 871972597404338240940244770\n  Bound result 219021233607500347352711002\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransfersToArbitraryNonzeroRecipientsAreExact(address,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 97573, ~: 97898)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 17761\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_ZeroRecipientFailureRestoresFiniteOrInfiniteApproval(uint256,bool) (runs: 1000, μ: 124178, ~: 123475)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 65850\n\n[PASS] test_ActualFactoryGetsSupplyInsteadOfTransactionOrigin() (gas: 205279)\n[PASS] test_AllowanceUsesImmediateCallerNotTransactionOrigin() (gas: 251232)\n[PASS] test_ApprovalCannotBeBorrowedFromAnotherOwnerOrSpender() (gas: 272601)\n[PASS] test_ContractRecipientsNeedNoCallback() (gas: 284598)\n[PASS] test_DelegatedSelfTransferStillRequiresSufficientBalance() (gas: 166233)\n[PASS] test_DirectAndZeroDelegatedTransfersPreserveApprovals() (gas: 224421)\n[PASS] test_InfiniteApprovalCanBeRevokedThenRegrantedAsFinite() (gas: 304721)\n[PASS] test_MaxUintTransferFromCannotOverflowOrConsumeInfiniteApproval() (gas: 121963)\n[PASS] test_MaximumFiniteAllowanceIsConsumedAndReplacementIsNotAdditive() (gas: 256176)\n[PASS] test_OneWeiTransfersExactlyInBothModes() (gas: 252082)\n[PASS] test_OwnerAlsoNeedsAllowanceForTransferFrom() (gas: 200931)\n[PASS] test_TransfersToTokenContractAreAccountedForWithoutBurning() (gas: 170402)\n[PASS] test_ZeroApprovalToZeroSpenderStillReverts() (gas: 48062)\nSuite result: ok. 18 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 56.99ms (279.71ms CPU time)\n\nRan 29 tests for test/Numos.t.sol:NumosTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_DelegatedTransfersRespectBalancesAndAllowance(uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 157517, ~: 158201)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 655755\n  Bound result 3188211635848128366\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_OverdrawAlwaysReverts(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 64721, ~: 65042)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 65075747129699518817318705546650995790608333558566598594749\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransfersConserveSupply(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 147719, ~: 148329)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 248660908814741247893113174\n\n[PASS] test_ApprovalCanBeRevoked() (gas: 112921)\n[PASS] test_ApprovalEmitsEventAndCanBeReplaced() (gas: 114582)\n[PASS] test_ConstructorEmitsMintEvent() (gas: 5578)\n[PASS] test_ConstructorMintsToImmediateDeployer() (gas: 34388)\n[PASS] test_DelegatedSelfTransferConsumesAllowanceOnly() (gas: 100764)\n[PASS] test_DeployerCannotSpendHolderFundsWithoutApproval() (gas: 150775)\n[PASS] test_EntireSupplyCanTransfer() (gas: 71407)\n[PASS] test_FailedTransferFromRestoresAllowance() (gas: 103873)\n[PASS] test_InfiniteAllowanceIsNotDecremented() (gas: 121956)\n[PASS] test_LaunchAllocationClaimsAndPoolTransfersAreExact() (gas: 325167)\n[PASS] test_MetadataAndInitialSupply() (gas: 92817)\n[PASS] test_NativeCurrencyAndUnknownCallsRevert() (gas: 58898)\n[PASS] test_NoMintBurnAdminOrUpgradeEntryPoints() (gas: 1799810)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenApprovingZeroAddress() (gas: 30430)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenSelfTransferExceedsBalance() (gas: 40200)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenTransferExceedsBalance() (gas: 50507)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenTransferFromExceedsAllowance() (gas: 108624)\n[PASS] test_RevertWhenTransferringToZeroEvenForZeroAmount() (gas: 71904)\n[PASS] test_RuntimeHasNoDangerousOpcodesOrExternalCalls() (gas: 1716351)\n[PASS] test_SelfTransferPreservesBalance() (gas: 51518)\n[PASS] test_TransferEmitsEventAndDeliversExactAmount() (gas: 89002)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromConsumesAllowanceAndEmitsTransfer() (gas: 200895)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromToZeroRevertsWithoutConsumingAllowance() (gas: 111598)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromEmptyAccountEmitsEvent() (gas: 56228)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromNeedsNoAllowance() (gas: 57055)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromZeroSenderReverts() (gas: 33010)\nSuite result: ok. 29 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 56.99ms (85.51ms CPU time)\n\nRan 2 tests for test/Numos.invariant.t.sol:NumosInvariantTest\n[PASS]\nNumosInvariantTest invariants:\n[PASS] invariant_BalancesAndAllowancesMatchModel\n[PASS] invariant_TotalSupplyAndBalancesAreConserved\n NumosInvariantTest invariants (runs: 256, calls: 16384, reverts: 0)\n\n╭--------------+-------------------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract     | Selector                | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+=====================================================================+\n| NumosHandler | approve                 | 1537  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | approveBoundary         | 1400  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | approveBounded          | 1485  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | rejectApprovedOverspend | 1496  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | rejectDirectOverspend   | 1452  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | rejectOverspend         | 1506  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | rejectZeroReceiver      | 1517  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | revokeAndReject         | 1496  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | roundTripFullBalance    | 1497  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | transfer                | 1479  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+-------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| NumosHandler | transferFrom            | 1519  | 0       | 0        |\n╰--------------+-------------------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 53591\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640314039457584007913129641792\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 34197\n  Bound result 142808150295390264240768565\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640314039457584007913129674382\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640314039457584007913129614495\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640314039457584007913129661672\n  Bound result 9\n  Bound result 498\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 3396\n  Bound result 100000000000000000000\n  Bound result 12756\n  Bound result 159935216328702944849613933\n  Bound result 12648430\n  Bound result 3706\n  Bound result 136820\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640314039557584007913116988114\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 7\n  Bound result 155522274272177084272272557\n  Bound result 18\n  Bound result 75726041202185968999311991\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640314346623828071719376342945\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640314039557584007913116988119\n\n[PASS] test_HandlerFiniteInfiniteRevocationAndFailureSequence() (gas: 2810878)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 7\n  Bound result 7\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639935\n  Bound result 1\n\nSuite result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 5.40s (5.40s CPU time)\n\nRan 3 test suites in 5.40s (5.52s CPU time): 49 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (49 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":49,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"Numos.approve(address,uint256)\",\"Numos.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"Numos.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":4,\"DEPENDENCIES.json\":137,\"README.md\":166,\"foundry.toml\":25,\"src/Numos.sol\":16,\"test/Numos.adversarial.t.sol\":293,\"test/Numos.invariant.t.sol\":257,\"test/Numos.t.sol\":348,\"test/TESTING.md\":59},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"f16b1116df840a96509038409637ad429fa27822a59e2267ec84d2f207c29dd0","verifiedTreeHash":"f75180b847047f002aa6888a08027672a8fa0980","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+7471272e"}]}