{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"a7bbec23-eae9-42b4-b5cf-864a97ca02b3","kind":"skill:research-report","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"9ed0d4f1280cede8e78783aee7c77b74518c3226dc23b279eccb10c929c9b713","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network"],"skillHash":"3ddca93330036359dd721585e58e67820336a0398b7927b3c89369d6134f30f6","skillId":"research-report","tools":[]},"key":"research_report","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"3ddca93330036359dd721585e58e67820336a0398b7927b3c89369d6134f30f6","skillId":"research-report","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"[SIMD-THESIS]:muwjb4vc-0z8rn\nHARD GRADE this public thesis about Identity.md (IMD) and SIMD. Be brutal — inflate nothing.\n\nTHESIS:\n1/ Identity.md sells agent work at 0.5 IMD per paid action. Since @SuperIMD_eth's vault went live 41.6h ago, one SIMD wallet made 56.5% of those actions, and the vault refunds half of each.\n\nDoes SIMD broaden $IMD demand or recycle it? 🧵\nhttps://api.imd.fun/requests/capabilities\n\n2/ Identity.md's revenue: the payTo holds 36 IMD and sent 642 to 0x047f, owner of the POOL4 hook. POOL4 sends 85% of each trim to the burn path (33,279 IMD so far). SIMD's vault, dev and payer haven't moved IMD to or from POOL4 since launch.\nhttps://etherscan.io/address/0xc6c965bd164c483e87d0b550671798e9a3602840#readContract\n\n3/ SIMD's vault reads refundBps() = 5000, so 50%, while SIMD's dashboard says \"100%\". All 447 refunds match real payments, and 56% of the 136.75 IMD returned went to SIMD's own payer.\nhttps://etherscan.io/address/0xd60483Eb8004e3DE3e283b3efF0e67FBb57f9B21#readContract\n\n4/ Who pays Identity.md since launch: SIMD's payer 56.5%, seat holders and 0x047f payout recipients 17.7%, other wallets 25.8%. 55 of the payer's last 100 orders grade SIMD's own thesis contest.\nhttps://api.imd.fun/requests/paid-by/0x9fAdAB91f6FA03DBd7F4F8a08A338704bAAcf63f\n\n5/ Non-SIMD payments since launch: 197, inside the 31 to 263 of earlier windows. Payers look broader: 57, above the earlier 15 to 56.\n\nTest for Oct 13 to 20: non-SIMD paid actions ≥786 (pace now 795). Proofs below\nhttps://etherscan.io/token/0xd34a99bc0f67ae1bbd63c660e6d0b0dd03e263b7?a=0x4e0fA57Bde726079356537E2F34d671E9F41ADbc\n\nTWEET: https://x.com/0xdropxtor/status/2107415171983405076\nAUTHOR: @0xDropxtor · followers≈855 (impact measured separately; do NOT invent follower counts)\n\nRUBRIC (quality integer 0-10 — NOT /100). Default LOW. Most posts land 2–5. 8+ is rare.\n0–2 scam/spam/garbage / copy-paste\n3–4 fluff, slogans, generic crypto, no mechanism, no IMD/SIMD specificity\n5 competent outline but shallow / recycled takes / buzzwords\n6 some real points, still thin originality OR weak falsifiable claims\n7 strong draft: clear argument + concrete IMD/SIMD mechanics — still NOT pay-grade alone\n8 rare pay-grade: novel synthesis, technical honesty, concrete implication, developed structure\n9 exceptional original insight with evidence / model / counter-argument\n10 research-grade (almost never) — would stand as a short essay others cite\n\nREQUIRE for ≥7: named mechanisms, tradeoffs, and IMD/SIMD-specific claims (not \"AI agents good\").\nREQUIRE for ≥8: originality + depth; reject padded length without substance.\nPay bar is quality ≥ 8. Scores 3–6 should be the common outcome. Do NOT be nice.\nPrefer flags: [\"thin\"],[\"generic\"],[\"padded\"],[\"strong\"],[\"exceptional\"].\n\nCRITICAL: end artifacts/report.md with this JSON fence (required):\n```json\n{\"quality\":4,\"impactNote\":\"how the thesis helps IMD/SIMD discourse\",\"notes\":\"strengths/weaknesses\",\"flags\":[\"thin\"]}\n```\nDo not score by follower count.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"f4c05021950aa71f24d2a24826fb2b0b9b4f6e9a564e570cc8752891411a26c3","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"a7bbec23-eae9-42b4-b5cf-864a97ca02b3","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":null},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"52232","feedbackHash":"0a601c98514151b25733d1d8e99730029a8d9171c39c1b8c85a2faa285d66c8c","nodeKey":"research_report","submissionHash":"9ed0d4f1280cede8e78783aee7c77b74518c3226dc23b279eccb10c929c9b713","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"e8392f86798ae066634376d2ae88e16468fd8ccafcc82ca59af635e07d9acecf","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"820ba900755d37ad","findings":[],"hash":"7911f5aa39e2fb9bb2af0322a34c33ca9ecad661a061c3b36e76e68ae089b386","nodeId":"d1527ebb-bebd-438e-b28f-7b5355034d31","outcome":"failed","summary":"required outputs are missing or invalid:\nartifacts/report.md: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd/work/a7bbec23-eae9-42b4-b5cf-864a97ca02b3/d1527ebb-bebd-438e-b28f-7b5355034d31/artifacts'\n\nthe agent stopped (completed, 6 turns); its last message:\n**Grade: 6/10 — below the pay bar.** Concrete mechanisms, but the thesis establishes neither incremental demand nor a recycling loop. Its ≥786 weekly test is below the stated current pace, and wallet counts do not establish independent buyers. Direct source retrieval failed, leaving historical counts unverified.\n\n**Delivery is blocked:** shell commands fail with `bwrap: setting up uid map: Permission denied`, and patch writes also fail. I could not create `artifacts/report.md`; the task remains incomplete.\n\n```json\n{\"quality\":6,\"impactNote\":\"Distinguishes subsidized IMD activity from independent adoption.\",\"notes\":\"Specific mechanisms, but unverified counts, undefined comparison windows, unresolved refund accounting and weak causal evidence. Follower count excluded.\",\"flags\":[\"thin\"]}\n```","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":197248,"inputTokens":43304,"model":null,"outputTokens":6116,"runtime":"codex","turns":6,"wallClockMs":191277}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":6959,"hash":"7fcdf12fac67657f891029e960b7daa799ecf25ffca894fb6d2db0791007f4eb","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"report","path":"artifacts/report.md"}],"attempt":2,"bundleHash":null,"device":"82692ab5f7f7e54e","findings":[],"hash":"9ed0d4f1280cede8e78783aee7c77b74518c3226dc23b279eccb10c929c9b713","nodeId":"d1527ebb-bebd-438e-b28f-7b5355034d31","outcome":"completed","summary":"I graded the thread **6/10**, below the pay bar of 8. The report is in `artifacts/report.md`, with a short `artifacts/README.md` describing the question and limits. The closing JSON block parses correctly, and the files are untracked as required.\n\n**What I confirmed on-chain and from the IMD API (2026-10-06):**\n- Every paid action costs 0.5 IMD, sent to the same payTo address (the address that receives Identity.md's payments).\n- The SIMD vault's `refundBps()` returns 5000, so the 50% refund claim is true.\n- The payTo address holds 40 IMD, versus 36 in the thread. The balance changes with every payment, so 36 is plausible for when it was posted.\n- The SIMD payer placed 100 paid orders in about 27 hours, all of them `job.open`.\n\n**Why it scores 6 and not higher:**\n- **No answer:** the thread asks whether SIMD broadens or recycles IMD demand, then never answers. It gives no net-demand model and no counter-argument.\n- **Weak test:** it predicts at least 786 non-SIMD paid actions for Oct 13–20 while saying the current pace is 795. The prediction passes if nothing changes.\n- **Undefined baseline:** the \"earlier windows\" it compares against are never defined.\n- **Numbers don't add up:** 447 refunds at half of 0.5 IMD would be about 111.75 IMD, not the 136.75 IMD it reports.\n\n**Not verified:** the 56.5% payer share, the payment and payer counts, the 642 IMD transfer to 0x047f, the POOL4 owner and burn figures, SIMD's dashboard claim of \"100%\" refunds, and the \"55 of the last 100 orders\" claim. The report marks each of these as unverified. I did not open the tweet itself, so I graded the text given in the brief.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":194422,"inputTokens":12,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":5790,"runtime":"claude","turns":7,"wallClockMs":65090}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"9ed0d4f1280cede8e78783aee7c77b74518c3226dc23b279eccb10c929c9b713","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+e6140b7a"}]}