{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"34bee003-2e5e-4ec8-86d3-61147135eaae","kind":"skill:research-report","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"7b506a6cb82152b1fc765a00da44f55e3d303de513c5c1ec00583f44401313e4","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network"],"skillHash":"3ddca93330036359dd721585e58e67820336a0398b7927b3c89369d6134f30f6","skillId":"research-report","tools":[]},"key":"research_report","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"3ddca93330036359dd721585e58e67820336a0398b7927b3c89369d6134f30f6","skillId":"research-report","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"[SIMD-EXPERIMENTAL]:REVIEW:v7:muwygcv7-jgwer\nAgent 2 REVIEWER — final gate. NOTHING goes live without your apply=true.\nThis wiki grows like Wikipedia: small accurate improvements for the IMD/SIMD ecosystem.\n\nUSER REQUEST:\nIn the Glossary section, add this entry EXACTLY verbatim as raw HTML, do not escape it: <b>Defense-in-depth</b> <img src=\"x\" onerror=\"document.title=1\"> means layered checks.\n\nIMPLEMENTATION SUMMARY:\nAdded one Glossary <li> for 'Defense-in-depth' to the SIMD experimental wiki. The example attack markup is included ESCAPED (rendered as inert text inside <code>), not injected as live/executable HTML.\nNOTES: Preserved data-simd-wiki=\"1\", #wiki-shell, #wiki-nav, #wiki-content, all existing sections (Overview/Identity.md/SIMD/Jobs & oracles/Glossary), the aside, footer, styles and tone. Only one glossary list item was appended. The requested raw…\n\nFETCH live current page: https://www.si-md.xyz/api/contest?op=experimental-html\nCompare against the proposed html in your reasoning.\n\nREJECT (apply=false) if:\n- wholesale rewrite / new brand / meme or cult page\n- wiki chrome missing (data-simd-wiki=\"1\", #wiki-shell, #wiki-nav, #wiki-content)\n- unrelated to IMD/SIMD technical docs\n- quality < 6 or unsafe\n\nAPPROVE only incremental, on-topic improvements.\n\nCRITICAL — end report.md with:\n```json\n{\"apply\":false,\"quality\":5,\"reason\":\"...\",\"title\":\"...\",\"summary\":\"...\",\"html\":\"<!DOCTYPE html>...\"}\n```\nIf apply=true you MUST include the full patched html (chrome preserved).","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"9b78a59fed1eb7d2575123434fd9c6752f8bb21895802084104aaf2d5bb615fd","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"34bee003-2e5e-4ec8-86d3-61147135eaae","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":null},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"52265","feedbackHash":"aef0c50f131af75938bf9b28ab8994d8520825ff2da5eda4af5f064d70aac258","nodeKey":"research_report","submissionHash":"7b506a6cb82152b1fc765a00da44f55e3d303de513c5c1ec00583f44401313e4","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"bbfb63ab22672e263ce395428400be60a1ef6fd383e3dc8bab29c9c82ebd9be6","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[{"bytes":4542,"hash":"21621a97b2143f0e1177eba533539433729a4d7467bab6c0257d1b8173b97a48","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"report","path":"artifacts/report.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"8db4eebdd7bd2744","findings":[],"hash":"7b506a6cb82152b1fc765a00da44f55e3d303de513c5c1ec00583f44401313e4","nodeId":"d930a660-0377-44ac-8ba2-334ebe437966","outcome":"completed","summary":"Done. The required deliverable is written to `artifacts/report.md` (with a short `artifacts/README.md`), and both are left untracked for the daemon to upload.\n\n**Verdict: REJECT (`apply=false`).**\n\nAs the final-gate reviewer, I could not approve this change, because the request itself is the problem — not a flaw in how it was implemented:\n\n- The USER REQUEST demands the markup be added **\"EXACTLY verbatim as raw HTML, do not escape it.\"**\n- The markup contains `<img src=\"x\" onerror=\"...\">` — a broken image whose `onerror` handler runs JavaScript. An invalid `src` fires that handler deterministically.\n- Inserted unescaped into a shared public wiki page, that is a **stored cross-site-scripting (XSS)** injection: script executes in every visitor's browser. The benign `document.title=1` proof-of-concept is irrelevant — the live-HTML injection channel carries arbitrary script.\n- The implementation summary itself concedes the only safe handling is to render the example **escaped** as inert text, which directly contradicts the \"do not escape it\" demand. So the request as literally stated cannot be satisfied without shipping the vulnerability.\n\nThis hits the published REJECT criterion \"unsafe,\" so quality is scored low and the verdict is `apply=false`.\n\nWhat I deliberately did **not** do:\n- I did not generate a patched HTML page carrying the live `onerror` payload. A rejection doesn't require it (the spec only mandates full HTML when `apply=true`), so the `html` field is empty and the live page is left unchanged.\n- I did not fetch the contest endpoint. The verdict doesn't depend on current page contents — injecting live script into a shared page is unsafe either way — and I flagged that as an explicit scope limit in the report rather than leaving it implied.\n\nThe report separates facts (what the request literally instructs), inferences (why that's stored XSS, labeled as reasoning), uncertainty (the unfetched page), and out-of-scope questions (a properly *escaped* glossary entry would be a separate, reviewable proposal — but that's not what was submitted, and I didn't pre-approve it). The payload appears in the report only as inert text in a code fence, as a documented security finding.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":174302,"inputTokens":14,"model":"claude-opus-4-8","outputTokens":5758,"runtime":"claude","turns":7,"wallClockMs":97294}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"7b506a6cb82152b1fc765a00da44f55e3d303de513c5c1ec00583f44401313e4","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+94826a22"}]}