{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"e95490ab-9230-46d5-9311-cbfecfc3a5a7","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"77c587354ce808d21bd3df27a1abd0a0279e1057d3316557a09be3592bc56c8b","dependsOn":["refine_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"6b037a7b6601e883cf8a906c1520c0624817d42d8310b65c2f43679204608af3","skillId":"adversarial-review","tools":[]},"key":"adversarial_review","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"6b037a7b6601e883cf8a906c1520c0624817d42d8310b65c2f43679204608af3","skillId":"adversarial-review","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"c3b1201bf72f7929fd39ea355c94c9405e86fe8b2a663a2f8313a2072a52b476","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"none","requires":[],"skillHash":"99cccc7e3e2e1b515c66d54cc6d4bd9832d528aaf0ec0ba48c87a4182db4b7ca","skillId":"refine-project","tools":[]},"key":"refine_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"99cccc7e3e2e1b515c66d54cc6d4bd9832d528aaf0ec0ba48c87a4182db4b7ca","skillId":"refine-project","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"Following skill-authoring/SKILL.md and skill-authoring/REFERENCE.md in this repository, write build-chat-bot/SKILL.md (and any reference files it needs) for a new identity.md network skill: build a Telegram or Discord bot the requester hosts themselves (TypeScript), with commands from the request, secrets only from env, rate limiting, a local test harness that needs no live token, and deploy notes for a small VPS or container. Decide first whether it is runnable or a reference and say why; use the smallest writes budget that works, a judge the verifier can actually check, and acceptance criteria a person can verify from the delivered files alone. It must work under both Claude Code and Codex. Add build-chat-bot/example/ with a small worked example the skill would produce, and a README section listing it. Label it everywhere it is presented (README top, CLI --help, site banner) as experimental: \"Experimental, commissioned as a test of the IMD swarm. It may not work as described. Read the code, start with small amounts, no warranty.\"","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"b4b84c17c68ed6b94697baced600a83abfc3a32b073fd9fa8de2d6300354fc59","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"e95490ab-9230-46d5-9311-cbfecfc3a5a7","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-614-following-skill-authoring-skill-md-skill"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"50962","feedbackHash":"36a67a7edd24b6133b08d0d361e1fbe1d4a1d8da227b7ae11e1b5780b3a6399e","nodeKey":"adversarial_review","submissionHash":"77c587354ce808d21bd3df27a1abd0a0279e1057d3316557a09be3592bc56c8b","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51086","feedbackHash":"eba8e7ba580a35f116fad5bfe5814243ff7fe539abc6d0b7c2b98882a45eac69","nodeKey":"refine_project","submissionHash":"c3b1201bf72f7929fd39ea355c94c9405e86fe8b2a663a2f8313a2072a52b476","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"431ed7cc80ae62e8ce7457de88f0ba03be4ee8cdb6b486970081582d600dc6d5","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"3f6a9bdd601cb99f","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"This runnable skill produces a bot, harness, env.example, and README, but declares no mustProduce entries. check-skill.mjs therefore compiles mustProduce to [], while checks:none supplies no executable suite. A paths-only judge can validate the submitted diff without requiring any of the promised outputs. This misses the authoring guide's mustProduce requirement (lines 142-147) and leaves the selected judge without even a deliverable-presence check. Keep the honest class-2 judge, but define required output paths (or an explicit job-supplied output contract) that it can actually enforce.","line":29,"path":"build-chat-bot/SKILL.md","reproduction":"Load this file with check-skill.mjs's readSkill function: the resulting metadata is {judge:\"verifier-paths\",checks:\"none\",writes:\"any\",mustProduce:[]}. For a job requesting a Telegram /ping bot, consider a submitted tree containing only README.md and no source, harness, or env.example. Comparing that tree to the compiled mustProduce list yields no missing files and checks:none schedules no suite. Expected the absent bot/harness/env files to trigger missing_required_file; the skill declares no such checks. This reproduction inspects the actual compiled metadata; the network verifier itself is not included in this repository.","severity":"medium","snippet":"writes: any\nobjective: \"{{objective}}\"\nacceptanceCriteria:","title":"Declare required deliverables for the paths-only judge"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"This criterion requires comparing the delivered commands to an external request, but neither the criterion nor the body requires the original command specification to be included in the delivery. Listing implemented commands in the README does not preserve the expected list or behaviors. Consequently a person holding only the delivered tree cannot determine whether a command was omitted or invented, contrary to the authoring guide's acceptance-criterion rule at lines 92-99. Require a preserved request/specification and map it to implementations and harness assertions.","line":32,"path":"build-chat-bot/SKILL.md","reproduction":"Request \"Build a Telegram bot with /ping and /uptime\", then deliver a working /ping implementation, a /ping-only harness, and a README listing only /ping. That tree is indistinguishable, to a reviewer given files alone, from a correct delivery for the request \"Build a Telegram bot with /ping\". Expected the delivered specification to expose the missing /uptime command; actual skill requirements preserve no independent record of the expected command set.","severity":"medium","snippet":"  - \"the command set is exactly the commands the request names, each implemented and listed in the README\"","title":"Preserve the requested commands so command completeness is checkable from files"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Invalid nonempty ALLOWED_CHAT_IDS entries are silently discarded. If every entry is invalid, the resulting empty set means allow every chat in Bot.handle, so a configuration typo disables the documented access restriction. Validate the configured list and fail closed. The current tests cover only valid numeric entries and an explicitly constructed Set.","line":16,"path":"build-chat-bot/example/src/config.ts","reproduction":"Call loadConfig({TELEGRAM_BOT_TOKEN:\"test-placeholder\", ALLOWED_CHAT_IDS:\"not-a-chat-id\"}), then construct Bot with that config.allowedChatIds, RateLimiter(5,60000), and ScriptedTransport([{update_id:1,message:{chat:{id:999},text:\"/ping\"}}]). After bot.poll(0), actual allowedChatIds is empty and sent is [{chatId:999,text:\"pong\"}]. Expected startup to reject the malformed nonempty allowlist, rather than allowing chat 999.","severity":"medium","snippet":"  const allowedChatIds = new Set(\n    (env.ALLOWED_CHAT_IDS ?? \"\")\n      .split(\",\")\n      .map((part) => part.trim())\n      .filter(Boolean)\n      .map(Number)\n      .filter((id) => Number.isFinite(id)),\n  );","title":"Reject malformed allowlists instead of opening access to every chat"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"The command table is an ordinary object, so inherited property names are treated as registered commands. An allowed chat can send /constructor, /toString, or /__proto__ and make command.handle throw. This aborts the entire polling batch and invokes the global five-second retry instead of giving the documented unknown-command reply. The unknown-command test uses only /nope, which does not exercise prototype properties.","line":39,"path":"build-chat-bot/example/src/bot.ts","reproduction":"Create ScriptedTransport([{update_id:1,message:{chat:{id:42},text:\"/constructor\"}}]), then new Bot(transport,new RateLimiter(5,60000),new Set()).poll(0). Actual: rejects with TypeError \"command.handle is not a function\" and records no reply. Expected: resolves and sends \"Unknown command — try /help\". /toString and /__proto__ reproduce the same failure.","severity":"medium","snippet":"    const [name, ...rest] = message.text.slice(1).split(/\\s+/);\n    const command = commands[name];\n    const text = command\n      ? command.handle({ chatId, args: rest.join(\" \") })\n      : \"Unknown command — try /help\";","title":"Limit command lookup to own properties"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"The updated offset exists only inside poll until the whole batch succeeds. If a later update throws, index.ts retains the old offset and requests the completed updates again. This duplicates replies and consumes the rate-limit allowance for already handled messages. ScriptedTransport empties its batch regardless of offset, so the supplied harness cannot expose this retry behavior.","line":18,"path":"build-chat-bot/example/src/bot.ts","reproduction":"Use a transport whose getUpdates(offset) returns updates with IDs >= offset: update 10 is /echo first and update 11 is /echo second, both in chat 42. Make sendMessage throw once for text \"second\" and record all successful sends. Use RateLimiter(100,60000), set offset=0, execute offset=await bot.poll(offset) inside a try/catch and then retry the same assignment. Actual requested offsets are [0,0] and recorded texts are [\"first\",\"first\",\"second\"]. Expected successful update 10 to be retained as completed, yielding [\"first\",\"second\"].","severity":"medium","snippet":"  async poll(offset: number): Promise<number> {\n    for (const update of await this.transport.getUpdates(offset)) {\n      offset = Math.max(offset, update.update_id + 1);\n      await this.handle(update);\n    }\n    return offset;","title":"Preserve completed updates when a later send fails"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"TelegramTransport sends immediately with no outbound limiter. The per-chat inbound fixed-window counter permits a burst of five command replies plus a sixth denial notice, and has no global outbound cap. This contradicts SKILL.md lines 66-68 and REFERENCE.md lines 56-58 and can hit Telegram flood limits under ordinary bursts. The fake-transport tests count replies but never assert their spacing.","line":45,"path":"build-chat-bot/example/src/transport.ts","reproduction":"Stub globalThis.fetch to record performance.now() and return new Response(JSON.stringify({ok:true,result:{}})). Construct Bot(new TelegramTransport(\"placeholder\"),new RateLimiter(5,60000),new Set()) and await six handle calls for /ping in chat 42. Actual: six sendMessage requests occur within about 19 ms in the local reproduction. Expected requests to be paced per chat and globally as required by the skill, even when inbound commands arrive in a burst.","severity":"medium","snippet":"  async sendMessage(chatId: number, text: string): Promise<void> {\n    await this.call(\"sendMessage\", { chat_id: chatId, text });","title":"Implement the outbound pacing required by the skill"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"The repository README presents the new skill and example, but its top contains no experimental notice. The notice is buried in the build-chat-bot section near line 90. The task explicitly requires this label at the README top everywhere the work is presented; the example README meets that requirement but the repository entry point does not.","line":1,"path":"README.md","reproduction":"Open README.md starting at line 1. Actual first content is \"# identitymd-skill-crafting\" followed by the project introduction; the required notice appears only later in the document. Expected the exact experimental notice at the top of this README as well.","severity":"low","snippet":"# identitymd-skill-crafting\n\nHow to write a `SKILL.md` that the [identity.md](https://imd.fun) network can compile, dispatch to\ncontributors' machines, and judge. Hand this folder to your AI and ask for a skill; check the result\nwith one command.","title":"Put the experimental notice at the repository README top"}],"hash":"77c587354ce808d21bd3df27a1abd0a0279e1057d3316557a09be3592bc56c8b","nodeId":"bb608e38-e8f8-4192-aaa5-d5170eb6ce62","outcome":"completed","summary":"Recorded **7 findings: 6 medium, 1 low** in [.imd-findings.json](/home/seat/.identitymd/work/e95490ab-9230-46d5-9311-cbfecfc3a5a7/bb608e38-e8f8-4192-aaa5-d5170eb6ce62/.imd-findings.json).\n\nIssues include missing verifier-enforced deliverables, unverifiable command completeness, an allowlist that fails open, command lookup errors, duplicate replies after retries, missing outbound pacing, and README labeling.\n\nEvery finding includes concrete reproduction details and verified source locations.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":260736,"inputTokens":48324,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":7053,"runtime":"codex","turns":4,"wallClockMs":318965}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"aa6c980c21827350ceb4c9b57718476d664aac87626f8e754f6aa23831ab9d06","device":"080780b6898c2241","findings":[],"hash":"c3b1201bf72f7929fd39ea355c94c9405e86fe8b2a663a2f8313a2072a52b476","nodeId":"e41dc8e9-9f97-451c-9a00-f2e2e432fdc5","outcome":"completed","summary":"Let me look at a couple of examples for house style.Now I understand the format. Let me check the environment's Node version to decide how the example's TypeScript runs offline.The setup is clear now. Node 22.23 has type-stripping enabled by default, so a zero-dependency TypeScript example can run and be tested with no installs — ideal for an offline verifier.\n\n**Decision up front:** this is a runnable skill (`role: implement`), not a reference. The task only makes sense as \"do this, and here's how we know you did\" — it demands a delivered bot, acceptance criteria, a write budget, and a judge. It'll be `checks: none` + `verifier-paths` since no verifier suite installs npm packages and runs a TypeScript harness.\n\nLet me plan and write the files.Now the worked example — a zero-dependency TypeScript Telegram bot that runs under Node's built-in type stripping, so the harness needs no token, no network, and no installs. Careful: type stripping requires erasable-only syntax (no constructor parameter properties, `import type` for interfaces).Now the source files.Now the README section listing it, plus a row in the \"What is here\" table.Checker passes and all 8 harness tests pass. Let me verify `--help` shows the notice and do a final self-review of the SKILL.md for subtle checker rules.One nit: the criterion requires the notice \"verbatim at the top of the README\" — in the example README I wrapped it across two lines, which a literal-minded check would miss. Make it one line.Done. `node check-skill.mjs build-chat-bot` reports `ok` and the example's own harness passes 8/8 with no token, no network, no installs.\n\n## Decision\n\n**Runnable `implement`, not a reference.** The task only makes sense as \"do this, and here is how we will know you did\" — it demands a delivered bot, criteria, a budget and a judge. Nothing in it would still be true with no job in front of it, which is the guide's test. It's `checks: none` + `judge: verifier-paths` (class 2): no suite in the verifier's closed set installs npm packages and runs a TypeScript harness, so claiming `verifier-rerun` would pretend a suite exists that doesn't. `writes: any`, because the work is a new project whose layout the request decides — no fixed path list can name it in advance. Each frontmatter field carries a `#` comment justifying it.\n\n## What I wrote\n\n- `build-chat-bot/SKILL.md` — objective passes `{{objective}}` through; five acceptance criteria a person can check from the delivered tree (exact command set, documented harness passing token-free, env-only secrets with `env.example`, the experimental notice verbatim on README top/`--help`/every served page, followable deploy notes). Body is one screen: first moves, bold-led rules, what failure looks like.\n- `build-chat-bot/REFERENCE.md` — platform transport notes (Telegram long-poll vs webhook, Discord Gateway vs Interactions endpoint), secrets hygiene, the fake-transport harness pattern, rate-limiting defaults, deploy-note content. Reached via `reads: [skill:build-chat-bot]`.\n- `build-chat-bot/example/` — a zero-dependency Telegram bot that is the smallest output satisfying the criteria: `src/` (env-validating entrypoint, command registry, injected-clock rate limiter, `Transport` interface with live `TelegramTransport` and `ScriptedTransport`, status server carrying the notice), `test/bot.test.ts` (8 `node --test` cases covering every command, the limiter including window reset, the allowlist, and env loading), `env.example`, `Dockerfile`, and a README ending in systemd + container deploy notes. It runs on Node ≥22.18's built-in type stripping, so nothing needs installing — I avoided non-erasable TS (e.g. constructor parameter properties) deliberately.\n- `README.md` — a row in \"What is here\" and a short section describing the skill and its example, quoting the experimental label.\n\n## Notes\n\n- The label appears verbatim at `example/README.md` top, in `--help` output, in `package.json` description, and on the status page. I did not ","treeHash":"ed76d6460a90d0c05efd9b683fa6a6aab3011374","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":0,"inputTokens":0,"model":"swe-2-high","outputTokens":0,"runtime":"codex","turns":1,"wallClockMs":500940}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"c3b1201bf72f7929fd39ea355c94c9405e86fe8b2a663a2f8313a2072a52b476","verifiedTreeHash":"ed76d6460a90d0c05efd9b683fa6a6aab3011374","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+68ddf5e4"}]}