{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"c8a9aafc-59ee-4438-9aae-c7bdfc3199b0","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"28eefc0f47f2256e88ed13c3992200a9740330916a63aa95206cd07ff8fa2f4f","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"mustProduce":["dist/index.html"],"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network"],"skillHash":"d85feeeba61710fcde95b6484d4ed21af1a49b2b609a1b0ea33f16d5a47ec9ca","skillId":"import-site","tools":[]},"key":"import_site","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"d85feeeba61710fcde95b6484d4ed21af1a49b2b609a1b0ea33f16d5a47ec9ca","skillId":"import-site","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"66ff18eb8e6230a9ff882e8179de68ea65fda1cb046e51846639bab062af9d5e","dependsOn":["import_site"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"8189a3059fc9bb774ad7dcee66b87f32e25d781025f0e9f82a4c75182fe0ef19","skillId":"site-content-check","tools":[]},"key":"site_content_check","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"8189a3059fc9bb774ad7dcee66b87f32e25d781025f0e9f82a4c75182fe0ef19","skillId":"site-content-check","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"Host the existing static site from https://github.com/ogclub-online/ogclub.online (commit 1377b4d or latest main) as-is. Do not change any code, contract address, ABI or Merkle list. Build with npm ci && npm run build; publish the dist/ folder to IPFS with site label \"ogclub\". The build already verifies the OGPass address 0xca9dc9064ffc695d979ea7da9a35130376bb3217 and ABI; fail the job if it errors instead of patching. Verify after publish that index.html loads, assets resolve with relative paths under the IPFS gateway, and the page shows live stats (public supply, next price, buyback reserve) at 375x812 and desktop. Return the sites.imd.fun URL and the CID.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"b2669fd5852f18c5c3563d320610811229d60af3aeb700d69caa9e19631c238b","previousHash":"f7a21ce0079b49973cb240917cca5a3b4b2933344d0308fdb6f784871345fc4a","projectId":"c8a9aafc-59ee-4438-9aae-c7bdfc3199b0","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":null},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[],"site":{"cid":"bafybeigp5zkl3qa7b65kuhawrnbxrchkzbnvq2feb6vdzlovrqgovbvoom","ensName":"og-club-members-only-priced-by-t.site.identitymd.eth","namingTransaction":"0x7d571ecc0ee6e00b03828292a92de948e32b59f2edde141fe839dd4523d7cc01"},"snapshotHash":"266f6a8379bc0599e5c4c777bbfedb28a507abd1a0c6102a9dfa9498ffbbbec4","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"20fe5f806f3d5615edff14bae73ed8937437ed5fbf0d4b71884f9636338fa6e3","device":"03332db135fe4c15","findings":[],"hash":"28eefc0f47f2256e88ed13c3992200a9740330916a63aa95206cd07ff8fa2f4f","nodeId":"7eb53277-9ee0-4e31-a79c-bff1edb94977","outcome":"completed","summary":"I built the site and committed the output to `dist/`, but I couldn't publish it to IPFS from here. So I don't have a sites.imd.fun URL or CID to give you. Publishing under the \"ogclub\" label is left to the upload step that runs after this job. I didn't compute a CID myself, because it might not match what the upload produces.\n\n**The brief's `npm ci` doesn't work for this repository.** `npm ci` failed because the repo has no package-lock.json. I didn't stop the job over it, since that rule was about the address and ABI check, which passed. I used the install the README documents, `npm install --no-package-lock`, so no lockfile was written or committed. Without a lockfile, the versions come from the `^` ranges in package.json, which today gave vite 6.4.4, viem 2.57.4 and @openzeppelin/merkle-tree 1.0.8. A later build could pick up newer versions.\n\n- **Package manager:** npm 10.9.9 on Node 22.\n- **Build command:** `npm run build` (`vite build`).\n- **Where it wrote:** `dist/` at the repository root, which is Vite's default and what the README says. It contains `dist/index.html`, four files in `dist/assets/`, `favicon.svg` and `imd-deployment.json`, 544 KB in total, well under the 8 MiB limit.\n\n**Address and ABI check:** the build read `deployment/imd-deployment.json` and passed its own check of address `0xca9d…3217`, all required functions and events, and deploy block 26171777. The repo's other two checks also passed: `npm run verify:root` printed MATCH for the founder Merkle root, and `npm run check:bundle` found no trackers or secrets.\n\n**Page check:** the only changes are the committed `dist/` and one line removed from `.gitignore` (`dist/`). I tested on a local copy served under an IPFS-style path (`/ipfs/<cid>/`), not on the real gateway. In headless Chromium:\n- Every asset path in `index.html` is relative (`./assets/...`, `./favicon.svg`), and no local request failed.\n- At both 375×812 and 1440×900, the page showed live mainnet data (block 26,175,098):\n  - public supply 1\n  - next pass buy price 1,010,000 OG (about 0.0208 ETH)\n  - curve reserve 1,000,000 OG\n  - founder buyback reserve 4,900,000 OG (funded)\n- There was no horizontal overflow at either size.\n\nThe only console message was the browser ignoring `frame-ancestors` in the page's meta security policy, which is harmless.\n\nOnce it's published, the same checks are worth repeating on the real gateway URL.","treeHash":"9cfd7c1e0c0dc1f149b913e122eaf1a50e92a5c2","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":295428,"inputTokens":20,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":4419,"runtime":"claude","turns":11,"wallClockMs":189063}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"fa5c50e7abe46571","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"The task says to build with `npm ci && npm run build`. `npm ci` refuses to run without a package-lock.json or npm-shrinkwrap.json, and the repository commits neither (git ls-files shows package.json only; the README's own instructions say `npm install`). The job therefore exits 1 before Vite ever runs and nothing is built or published. This is a pipeline defect, not hosted content, so it does not block hosting. Two workable paths, both without touching code: publish the committed dist/ directly (a fresh `npm install && npm run build` with today's registry, viem 2.57.4 / vite 6.4.4, reproduces every file in dist/ byte-for-byte, and the build's address/ABI check, `npm run check:bundle` and `npm run verify:root` all pass), or ask the author to commit a package-lock.json so `npm ci` can be used as written.","line":7,"path":"package.json","reproduction":"In a fresh checkout of commit aed34e6 (or 1377b4d) run `npm ci`. Expected: dependencies install. Actual: exit 1 with `npm error code EUSAGE` / `The npm ci command can only install with an existing package-lock.json or npm-shrinkwrap.json with lockfileVersion >= 1`. `ls package-lock.json npm-shrinkwrap.json` reports both missing.","severity":"medium","snippet":"  \"scripts\": {","title":"Hosting job as specified fails at step one: `npm ci` cannot run because the repository has no package-lock.json"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"The policy names the three public RPCs and then adds the scheme source `https:`, which permits fetch/XHR/WebSocket to any HTTPS origin, so the three named hosts add nothing. `ws://localhost:*` is a Vite dev-server allowance that is meaningless in a production export. `frame-ancestors` is ignored when delivered in a <meta> tag, so the clickjacking protection it suggests is not actually in force on an IPFS gateway. None of this is harmful in itself: a scan of every URL string in the three served scripts shows the only network destinations are the three RPCs, etherscan.io links, og-swarm-map.sites.imd.fun, and viem-internal defaults (ipfs.io, arweave.net, 4byte.sourcify.dev in error text, ethereum.reth.rs as viem's mainnet default) that this site never calls. The same line is in the source at index.html:10. Advisory only.","line":10,"path":"dist/index.html","reproduction":"Open dist/index.html, line 10, and read the connect-src list: the token `https:` after https://eth.drpc.org is a scheme source. Expected for an allowlist: only the three RPC hosts. Actual: any https origin passes the policy. In a browser devtools console on the hosted page, `fetch('https://example.com')` is not blocked by CSP.","severity":"low","snippet":"    <meta http-equiv=\"Content-Security-Policy\" content=\"default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; img-src 'self' data:; font-src 'self'; connect-src 'self' https://mainnet.gateway.tenderly.co https://rpc.mevblocker.io https://eth.drpc.org https: ws://localhost:*; frame-ancestors 'none'; base-uri 'self'; form-action 'none'\" />","title":"CSP connect-src ends with a bare `https:` and a dev-only `ws://localhost:*`, so the RPC allowlist in the same directive has no effect"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"The log scanner in src/chain/logs.js starts at DEPLOY_BLOCK, which is read from the deployment handoff at build time, but the two user-facing sentences in the ledger section (line 444 and line 464 'Read from OGPass logs since block 26,171,777.') are literal strings. For the current handoff the value is correct (deployBlock 26171777, confirmed against the deploy transaction receipt on mainnet), so the hosted page is accurate today. If the site is ever rebuilt against a different handoff the two sentences would silently disagree with the scan. Cosmetic; does not affect hosting.","line":444,"path":"src/ui/render.js","reproduction":"Build with a handoff whose deployBlock is anything other than 26171777 (for example `IMD_DEPLOYMENT=/path/to/other.json npm run build`). Expected: the ledger says it scans from the handoff block. Actual: the ledger still prints 'Scanning logs from block 26,171,777…' and 'since block 26,171,777' while scanLogs() starts at the other block.","severity":"info","snippet":"  if (!s.act) return `<div class=\"wrap\">${head}<div class=\"card pad\">${s.actErr ? `<p class=\"err\">${esc(s.actErr)}</p>` : `<p class=\"muted\">Scanning logs from block ${'26,171,777'}…</p>`}</div></div>`;","title":"Ledger text hardcodes the deploy block '26,171,777' instead of using DEPLOY_BLOCK from the handoff"}],"hash":"66ff18eb8e6230a9ff882e8179de68ea65fda1cb046e51846639bab062af9d5e","nodeId":"7c209dba-e7be-4566-9b18-3f08828773de","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and `.imd-findings.json` holds three findings, none of them critical or high. The site can be hosted.\n\n**What was read.** Every file that will be served (dist/index.html, the three JS chunks, the CSS, favicon, dist/imd-deployment.json) and all of the source it was built from: index.html, vite.config.js, every module under src/, both scripts, the deployment handoff, README and .env.example. A fresh `npm install && npm run build` in a scratch copy reproduced the committed dist byte-for-byte, so the source I read is exactly what will be pinned.\n\n**What the scripts do.** The only network destinations in the bundle are the three public RPCs, Etherscan links, the Swarm map link, and unused viem-internal defaults. There is no analytics, no remote code loading, no eval or dynamic Function, no iframe, no redirect. Wallet access uses EIP-6963 discovery plus eth_requestAccounts only. The buy flow approves exactly the quoted amount, never unlimited, and calls buy with maxPrice equal to the quote and a ten-minute deadline. Sell passes minOut equal to the quoted payout. Nothing asks for seed phrases or keys. The disclaimer is shown twice and must be ticked before buying, and it states the passes are not an investment, that the price can fall, and that the owner is the largest OG holder.\n\n**Live verification.** I read the contract at the OGPass address through the public RPCs. MAX_SUPPLY 1000, founderCount 49, SELL_BPS 9250, FOUNDER_BUYBACK 100,000 OG, a 30-day claim window and the founder Merkle root all match what the page says, and the 49-address list rebuilds the on-chain root. Rendering the sections in Node with those live values produced the public supply, next price and buyback reserve figures the hosting job must check for.\n\n**Findings written:**\n- **Medium, package.json:** the job as specified fails at `npm ci` because the repo has no lockfile. Publishing the committed dist, or using `npm install`, both work and reproduce the same files.\n- **Low, dist/index.html line 10:** the CSP connect-src ends with a bare `https:` and a dev-only localhost websocket, so the RPC allowlist is ineffective. The shipped code still only talks to the three RPCs.\n- **Info, src/ui/render.js lines 444 and 464:** the ledger hardcodes the deploy block as text instead of using the handoff value. It is correct for the current handoff.\n\n**Not done.** No headless browser exists on this machine, so the 375x812 and desktop screenshot check remains for the hosting job itself.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1051834,"inputTokens":354,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":19358,"runtime":"claude","turns":36,"wallClockMs":351047}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"28eefc0f47f2256e88ed13c3992200a9740330916a63aa95206cd07ff8fa2f4f","verifiedTreeHash":"9cfd7c1e0c0dc1f149b913e122eaf1a50e92a5c2","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+fb8278c5"}]}