{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"a2ef0005-2800-43c6-94b0-eecb3baddbee","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"ddbadfcd13a7b53bc339adca292cbf5eed8b60c20cd4e47da46b92616c0801bc","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","manifest"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"c26edc76dc7a76e09a42c3634054429c1679c6e247747d647a03f77e5b332d7e","skillId":"adversarial-review","tools":[]},"key":"adversarial_review","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"c26edc76dc7a76e09a42c3634054429c1679c6e247747d647a03f77e5b332d7e","skillId":"adversarial-review","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"cae06fbfbe396acb15c927b34782c034d57c5934a32b26046ba0b80aae2894a6","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"0f3e7566c3ff8e87fc95936b79ba455be33eea683bb01a6834a4a4d43e58e1df","skillId":"build-contract-project","tools":[]},"key":"build_contract_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"0f3e7566c3ff8e87fc95936b79ba455be33eea683bb01a6834a4a4d43e58e1df","skillId":"build-contract-project","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"223ffaf4851773ba2f55ef77028a229df76a60428dea0730a583de3326c9213b","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"tools":[]},"key":"manifest","kind":"code","role":"integrate","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"accepted"}],"objective":"Build a vesting-accounting contract with a fixed beneficiary, uint256 grant, start timestamp, cliff and duration. No funds are held: report vested and claimable units and track beneficiary-only accounting claims. Reject duration zero, cliff beyond duration and timestamp overflow. Vesting is zero before the cliff, linear from start after the cliff, and exact at the end; repeated claims cannot exceed the grant. Test tiny grants, non-divisible durations, exact boundaries and maximum valid inputs against an independent reference model. Deliver a standalone Foundry project, meaningful tests, and a README with exact behavior and reproduction commands. Use Solidity 0.8.24 and no fetched test dependencies; builds and tests must work offline with the toolchain installed. Document assumptions and incomplete checks. Set deployment ON and deploy the tested contract to Sepolia (chain ID 11155111). Deliver the contract address, deployment transaction hash, explorer link and constructor arguments. Use documented demo parameters and test accounts; keep builds and unit tests reproducible offline. Do not deploy to mainnet or create a token.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"72ac946873af0c55d3761db367c1351efa6e6e8f8734233bb260da38aeb3ac43","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"a2ef0005-2800-43c6-94b0-eecb3baddbee","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-202-build-vesting-accounting-contract-fixed"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"50956","feedbackHash":"33536aac0c3a1009168e282b1456fef28a78f34dfcf4ee6cfffa063f4426f542","nodeKey":"adversarial_review","submissionHash":"ddbadfcd13a7b53bc339adca292cbf5eed8b60c20cd4e47da46b92616c0801bc","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50904","feedbackHash":"4bea545fc26edac63223dba9534ab8f9aa17bd18fa93d49b9e77839b320c4901","nodeKey":"build_contract_project","submissionHash":"cae06fbfbe396acb15c927b34782c034d57c5934a32b26046ba0b80aae2894a6","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51018","feedbackHash":"aa75e3a75379eefc3d9a857413b78ce0fe4f92b78997ebfdd362fd6aa9155bf8","nodeKey":"manifest","submissionHash":"223ffaf4851773ba2f55ef77028a229df76a60428dea0730a583de3326c9213b","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"c5b58b0be864f8b33e0572e3769905dfe625416e2d41b8bef5c85a657456dd71","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":2,"bundleHash":"11662767484062e6f462e7972340c22645297ed893025c21a7365a4c1a40eafa","device":"30a6c1a419ef4f9c","findings":[],"hash":"223ffaf4851773ba2f55ef77028a229df76a60428dea0730a583de3326c9213b","nodeId":"63a4935a-7c2e-447d-8df6-e30ff215564f","outcome":"completed","summary":"Done. The only change in the tree is the new `launch.json`; the scratch test and check script live in `test/scratch/` and are discarded.\n\n**What the manifest describes**\n\n- **Application contract:** `VestingAccounting`, the single contract in the accepted tree, with constructor arguments `$owner`, `1000003`, `1800000000`, `604800`, `2592000`. These are the documented demo grant, start, cliff and duration. The types and count match the five-parameter constructor in the source.\n- **Beneficiary is `$owner`, not the Anvil demo address.** The beneficiary is the contract's only privileged role, and the repository's demo beneficiary is public Anvil account #1, whose key anyone holds. The manifest rules require privileged roles to come from policy, so I used `$owner` and explained the deviation from `DemoConfig.sol` in the notes.\n- **Pool:** native ETH pair, fee 3000, tick spacing 60, the standard 1:1 sqrtPriceX96 value, no hook.\n- **Notes** record the toolchain, the exact vesting semantics, the reason for `$owner`, the pending Sepolia deployment record, and the token gap below.\n\n**The token gap, stated plainly.** The accepted tree contains no ERC-20 because the original brief said not to create one, and this assignment may write only `launch.json`. The schema requires a token entry, so the manifest names `LaunchToken` with 18 decimals as a placeholder identifier that has no matching artifact. The notes say explicitly that attestation and both protected floors will fail to find creation code for it, and that a builder assignment must add a compliant fixed-supply token under that name, or the brief must be revised to a tokenless launch, before this can proceed. This is the one acceptance criterion the manifest cannot fully satisfy, and it is the same blocker the previous attempt hit. Delivering a validated manifest that isolates the gap is more useful than delivering nothing.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- Custom schema check: all required keys, identifier patterns, address and price patterns, length limits, uniqueness, and backward-reference rules pass. Notes are 3211 of 4000 characters.\n- Scratch Foundry test: the exact manifest argument values deploy through a factory-style caller with an arbitrary owner, expose the expected schedule, and revert on a zero owner.\n- `forge build --offline` and `forge test --offline` pass, 30 project tests plus the 2 scratch tests, 0 failures. Solidity 0.8.24 was not in the local compiler cache, so I fetched it once into the user-level cache; nothing was added to the repository.\n\n**Not deployed.** No Sepolia RPC or funded signer exists in this environment, and contributor tasks may not broadcast transactions. The deployment record still shows no address, transaction hash or explorer link.","treeHash":"452d2bb2a31d32b26917ad8652879db68bf8ceff","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":478225,"inputTokens":322,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":10115,"runtime":"claude","turns":17,"wallClockMs":218140}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"c4f696e22e7a36f7","findings":[],"hash":"b64446ea60c225780ee82e5dec39f052e4dc14152755c6191409c37b2ed10ca4","nodeId":"63a4935a-7c2e-447d-8df6-e30ff215564f","outcome":"failed","summary":"the task produced no changes; the agent's last message was: **Recovery required:** no valid `launch.json` can satisfy all current constraints.\n\nThe manifest requires a token with no constructor arguments. The accepted tree contains no token; `VestingAccounting` requires five arguments and lacks the required token interface. Adding one would violate both the manifest-only scope and “do not create a token.”\n\nNo files were changed or manifest fabricated.\n\nValidation succeeded:\n\n- `forge build`: passed with Solidity 0.8.24.\n- `forge test`: 30 passed, including six fuzz tests with 1,000 runs each.\n\nRecommended resolution: provide a tokenless launch format. Alternatively, revise the no-token requirement and supply an accepted token before this assignment.\n\nThe existing deployment record remains pending; no Sepolia address, transaction hash, or explorer link is available.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":145536,"inputTokens":24087,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":2220,"runtime":"codex","turns":3,"wallClockMs":84662}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"fb1b5f05d6b49e0515b4bbedc326951e068597cc537c1d13a8df892558320fe6","device":"c4f696e22e7a36f7","findings":[],"hash":"cae06fbfbe396acb15c927b34782c034d57c5934a32b26046ba0b80aae2894a6","nodeId":"a4e112ca-55da-4d66-8f51-0423c122df63","outcome":"completed","summary":"Implemented the standalone Solidity 0.8.24 project with full-precision vesting, beneficiary-only claims, independent reference-model tests, and documentation.\n\nValidation passed offline: build, formatting, and all 30 tests, including six fuzz tests with 1,000 cases each.\n\nSepolia deployment is **ON**, but broadcasting remains blocked by the missing RPC and funded signer. No deployment address or transaction hash exists yet. Constructor arguments, commands, and limitations are documented in [README.md](/root/.identitymd/work/a2ef0005-2800-43c6-94b0-eecb3baddbee/a4e112ca-55da-4d66-8f51-0423c122df63/README.md).","treeHash":"10431872363d08431960a225f210783638ba84d5","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":435712,"inputTokens":46312,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":18413,"runtime":"codex","turns":7,"wallClockMs":596451}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"bb0a3bf63233e5e5","findings":[{"description":"The submitted record enables deployment on chain 11155111 but explicitly states that no transaction was broadcast. contractAddress, deploymentTransactionHash, and explorerLink are all null. README.md lines 159-163 confirms this is an unperformed deployment, rather than merely omitted receipt metadata. The task requires a deployed instance and these three deliverables; the local deployDemo tests and deployment-enabled flag do not satisfy that requirement. The documented constructor arguments are present, but the live deployment remains incomplete.","line":16,"path":"deployment/sepolia.json","reproduction":"Run: python3 -c 'import json; d=json.load(open(\"deployment/sepolia.json\")); print({k:d[k] for k in (\"deploymentEnabled\",\"chainId\",\"status\",\"contractAddress\",\"deploymentTransactionHash\",\"explorerLink\")})'. Actual: deploymentEnabled=true, chainId=11155111, status=pending_rpc_and_funded_signer, and all three deployment identifiers are null. Expected: a successful Sepolia deployment with a concrete contract address, deployment transaction hash, and explorer link for constructor arguments [0x70997970C51812dc3A010C7d01b50e0d17dc79C8,1000003,1800000000,604800,2592000].","severity":"medium","title":"Required Sepolia deployment and transaction evidence are missing"},{"description":"The supplied launch manifest selects LaunchToken, but the source tree contains no contract with that name and has no external Solidity dependencies. The token creation code required by the manifest therefore cannot be produced. Project.protected.t.sol unconditionally deploys IMD_TOKEN_CREATION_CODE and checks token supply; Token.protected.t.sol skips when that code is absent, which supplies no passing token evidence. This is a concrete manifest/source mismatch, not a vesting-contract defect. Adding the placeholder token would violate the explicit no-token requirement, so the deployment handoff must be reconciled with the intended tokenless project instead.","line":4,"path":"launch.json","reproduction":"Parse launch.json: token.contract is exactly LaunchToken. Run: rg -n '^\\s*(abstract\\s+)?contract\\s+LaunchToken\\b' src script test. Actual: no matches (exit status 1); the only production contract declaration is VestingAccounting in src/VestingAccounting.sol. With Solidity 0.8.24 installed, compiling this tree cannot yield a LaunchToken creation-code artifact for the manifest or protected project harness. Expected: every selected deployment artifact resolves to submitted source, and the deployment path respects the instruction not to create a token.","severity":"medium","title":"Launch manifest references an absent token artifact and conflicts with the tokenless brief"}],"hash":"ddbadfcd13a7b53bc339adca292cbf5eed8b60c20cd4e47da46b92616c0801bc","nodeId":"aa3fbbb7-6799-4382-af3e-2d5a12ecd369","outcome":"completed","summary":"Wrote two medium-severity findings to [.imd-findings.json](/home/imd-worker/.identitymd/work/a2ef0005-2800-43c6-94b0-eecb3baddbee/aa3fbbb7-6799-4382-af3e-2d5a12ecd369/.imd-findings.json):\n\n- Required Sepolia deployment and transaction evidence are missing.\n- Launch manifest references nonexistent `LaunchToken`, conflicting with the tokenless requirement.\n\nNo substantiated vesting-accounting defect found. Foundry tests were not rerun because Solidity 0.8.24 was unavailable locally. Project files remain unchanged.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":241280,"inputTokens":50448,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":4577,"runtime":"codex","turns":4,"wallClockMs":154698}}],"verification":[{"checks":[{"durationMs":934,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 8 files with Solc 0.8.24\nSolc 0.8.24 finished in 827.25ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":827,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 4 tests for test/Deployment.t.sol:DeploymentTest\n[PASS] testDemoDeploymentEnabledAndUsesDocumentedArguments() (gas: 1021260)\n[PASS] testMainnetDeploymentRejected() (gas: 567873)\n[PASS] testRunRejectsWrongChainBeforeReadingEnvironment() (gas: 567972)\n[PASS] testRuntimeDeploymentBaseline() (gas: 1106191)\nSuite result: ok. 4 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 607.32ms (2.76ms CPU time)\n\nRan 26 tests for test/VestingAccounting.t.sol:VestingAccountingTest\n[PASS] testBackwardTimeDoesNotUnderflowOrReduceClaims() (gas: 41979)\n[PASS] testBeneficiaryMayBeANonpayableContract() (gas: 416030)\n[PASS] testClaimEventAndRepeatedClaims() (gas: 55277)\n[PASS] testCliffEqualDurationReleasesEverythingAtEnd() (gas: 338113)\n[PASS] testConstructorStoresImmutableSchedule() (gas: 12295)\n[PASS] testExactBoundariesAndNonDivisibleDuration() (gas: 14643)\n[PASS] testForcedBalanceDoesNotAffectAccounting() (gas: 31722)\n[PASS] testFuzzFullWidthVestingAgainstReference(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 648496, ~: 647900)\n[PASS] testFuzzReferenceMatchesSafeNativeArithmetic(uint128,uint128,uint128) (runs: 1000, μ: 110431, ~: 106874)\n[PASS] testFuzzRejectsAnyCliffBeyondDuration(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 37055, ~: 37055)\n[PASS] testFuzzRejectsAnyTimestampOverflow(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 36933, ~: 36934)\n[PASS] testFuzzRepeatedClaimsConserveGrant(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 1826720, ~: 1737985)\n[PASS] testFuzzUnauthorizedCaller(address,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 13220, ~: 13220)\n[PASS] testMaximumCliffAndPowerOfTwoDuration() (gas: 838967)\n[PASS] testMaximumGrantDurationAndTimestampAgainstReference() (gas: 1429570)\n[PASS] testMaximumValidStartAndEnd() (gas: 789830)\n[PASS] testOneUnitCannotBeClaimedUntilEnd() (gas: 309336)\n[PASS] testRejectsCliffBeyondDuration() (gas: 36389)\n[PASS] testRejectsEndAndCliffTimestampOverflow() (gas: 103805)\n[PASS] testRejectsEtherAndUnknownCalls() (gas: 23365)\n[PASS] testRejectsZeroBeneficiary() (gas: 36384)\n[PASS] testRejectsZeroDuration() (gas: 36406)\n[PASS] testTinyGrantsAgainstReferenceAtEverySecond() (gas: 6124062)\n[PASS] testUnauthorizedBeforeCliffAndAfterVesting() (gas: 16986)\n[PASS] testZeroCliffStillLinearFromStart() (gas: 311223)\n[PASS] testZeroGrantAllowsNoOpClaims() (gas: 315317)\nSuite result: ok. 26 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 726.64ms (1.96s CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 730.58ms (1.33s CPU time): 30 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (30 total tests)\n","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"223ffaf4851773ba2f55ef77028a229df76a60428dea0730a583de3326c9213b","verifiedTreeHash":"452d2bb2a31d32b26917ad8652879db68bf8ceff","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+bb39ded9"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":367,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 8 files with Solc 0.8.24\nSolc 0.8.24 finished in 321.65ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":384,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 4 tests for test/Deployment.t.sol:DeploymentTest\n[PASS] testDemoDeploymentEnabledAndUsesDocumentedArguments() (gas: 1021260)\n[PASS] testMainnetDeploymentRejected() (gas: 567873)\n[PASS] testRunRejectsWrongChainBeforeReadingEnvironment() (gas: 567972)\n[PASS] testRuntimeDeploymentBaseline() (gas: 1106191)\nSuite result: ok. 4 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 299.76ms (1.41ms CPU time)\n\nRan 26 tests for test/VestingAccounting.t.sol:VestingAccountingTest\n[PASS] testBackwardTimeDoesNotUnderflowOrReduceClaims() (gas: 41979)\n[PASS] testBeneficiaryMayBeANonpayableContract() (gas: 416030)\n[PASS] testClaimEventAndRepeatedClaims() (gas: 55277)\n[PASS] testCliffEqualDurationReleasesEverythingAtEnd() (gas: 338113)\n[PASS] testConstructorStoresImmutableSchedule() (gas: 12295)\n[PASS] testExactBoundariesAndNonDivisibleDuration() (gas: 14643)\n[PASS] testForcedBalanceDoesNotAffectAccounting() (gas: 31722)\n[PASS] testFuzzFullWidthVestingAgainstReference(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 648496, ~: 647900)\n[PASS] testFuzzReferenceMatchesSafeNativeArithmetic(uint128,uint128,uint128) (runs: 1000, μ: 110431, ~: 106874)\n[PASS] testFuzzRejectsAnyCliffBeyondDuration(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 37055, ~: 37055)\n[PASS] testFuzzRejectsAnyTimestampOverflow(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 36933, ~: 36934)\n[PASS] testFuzzRepeatedClaimsConserveGrant(uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 1826720, ~: 1737985)\n[PASS] testFuzzUnauthorizedCaller(address,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 13220, ~: 13220)\n[PASS] testMaximumCliffAndPowerOfTwoDuration() (gas: 838967)\n[PASS] testMaximumGrantDurationAndTimestampAgainstReference() (gas: 1429570)\n[PASS] testMaximumValidStartAndEnd() (gas: 789830)\n[PASS] testOneUnitCannotBeClaimedUntilEnd() (gas: 309336)\n[PASS] testRejectsCliffBeyondDuration() (gas: 36389)\n[PASS] testRejectsEndAndCliffTimestampOverflow() (gas: 103805)\n[PASS] testRejectsEtherAndUnknownCalls() (gas: 23365)\n[PASS] testRejectsZeroBeneficiary() (gas: 36384)\n[PASS] testRejectsZeroDuration() (gas: 36406)\n[PASS] testTinyGrantsAgainstReferenceAtEverySecond() (gas: 6124062)\n[PASS] testUnauthorizedBeforeCliffAndAfterVesting() (gas: 16986)\n[PASS] testZeroCliffStillLinearFromStart() (gas: 311223)\n[PASS] testZeroGrantAllowsNoOpClaims() (gas: 315317)\nSuite result: ok. 26 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 313.86ms (1.61s CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 314.62ms (613.62ms CPU time): 30 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (30 total tests)\n","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"cae06fbfbe396acb15c927b34782c034d57c5934a32b26046ba0b80aae2894a6","verifiedTreeHash":"10431872363d08431960a225f210783638ba84d5","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+bb39ded9"}]}