{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"1205eac4-b0a4-477b-b0bc-57e1041823df","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"fa60be81be9293f723fbe5a71d43daf5fe1c2fcbcf8a4f869b4da2cedd2f0f91","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","manifest"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"c26edc76dc7a76e09a42c3634054429c1679c6e247747d647a03f77e5b332d7e","skillId":"adversarial-review","tools":[]},"key":"adversarial_review","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"c26edc76dc7a76e09a42c3634054429c1679c6e247747d647a03f77e5b332d7e","skillId":"adversarial-review","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"0b0efae0aeab280f348b6d19f1e186e9849f1fbeae138e543cef8fb1ab9443d8","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"0f3e7566c3ff8e87fc95936b79ba455be33eea683bb01a6834a4a4d43e58e1df","skillId":"build-contract-project","tools":[]},"key":"build_contract_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"0f3e7566c3ff8e87fc95936b79ba455be33eea683bb01a6834a4a4d43e58e1df","skillId":"build-contract-project","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"f468eb423f55ca5b0cf647048fff0ed50d5dc857deee18a601b8f1744bb00ad9","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"tools":[]},"key":"manifest","kind":"code","role":"integrate","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"accepted"}],"objective":"Build a permissionless per-address token-bucket rate limiter: capacity 10 whole credits, refill 1 credit every 60 seconds, bucket initially full. consume(n) accepts 1..10 credits and affects only msg.sender. Preserve fractional refill time while below capacity; while full, excess refill is discarded. Specify timestamp accounting precisely. Test repeated calls within one minute, long idle periods, saturation, partial refill and independent callers. Compare randomized call/time sequences with a simple model. Deliver a standalone Foundry project, meaningful tests, and a README with exact behavior and reproduction commands. Use Solidity 0.8.24 and no fetched test dependencies; builds and tests must work offline with the toolchain installed. Document assumptions and incomplete checks. Set deployment ON and deploy the tested contract to Sepolia (chain ID 11155111). Deliver the contract address, deployment transaction hash, explorer link and constructor arguments. Use documented demo parameters and test accounts; keep builds and unit tests reproducible offline. Do not deploy to mainnet or create a token.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"3b190fc1070eea555c5aefb5085491862c73346e957bcbc4ca94629775db99a7","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"1205eac4-b0a4-477b-b0bc-57e1041823df","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-204-build-permissionless-per-address-token-b"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"50997","feedbackHash":"44f8683d98ba8db1c18018ba92af4a04ff2a012978203c5b8c9b0cbe182914b3","nodeKey":"adversarial_review","submissionHash":"fa60be81be9293f723fbe5a71d43daf5fe1c2fcbcf8a4f869b4da2cedd2f0f91","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51018","feedbackHash":"8a1bbbfdd6e7dda474c3fef3ba00412a7e4f12b1cdf5a3d1679d95c0b6ba782d","nodeKey":"build_contract_project","submissionHash":"0b0efae0aeab280f348b6d19f1e186e9849f1fbeae138e543cef8fb1ab9443d8","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51018","feedbackHash":"78070d605a83f75c7d04e418bcfc8460e69310c761ea1708767dbbc7f012e8e8","nodeKey":"manifest","submissionHash":"f468eb423f55ca5b0cf647048fff0ed50d5dc857deee18a601b8f1744bb00ad9","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"2231549be27c9d6dd824e42ed3154650f5fe6f5bea5616ce6dffd4825416d6bb","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":3,"bundleHash":"799e5039855bb18bd7fdb7381a2cf3b9ffcfb4ee637c7c3deca8172271f94110","device":"30a6c1a419ef4f9c","findings":[],"hash":"0b0efae0aeab280f348b6d19f1e186e9849f1fbeae138e543cef8fb1ab9443d8","nodeId":"e83e7c1a-45cc-4ec6-bf86-827001392320","outcome":"completed","summary":"The deliverable is complete and committed on `main` as commit `a0fbfbd`. One part of the task could not be carried out: the Sepolia broadcast itself. Details below.\n\n**What was built**\n\n- `src/RateLimiter.sol` implements the permissionless per-address token bucket on Solidity 0.8.24. Each bucket is stored as a packed pair of missing credits and a refill anchor, so untouched storage reads as a full bucket. Below capacity the anchor advances only by whole intervals, which preserves fractional refill time. Once full, no time accrues, and the first consume from a full bucket restarts the clock at that timestamp. Errors carry the exact retry timestamp.\n- `test/RateLimiter.t.sol` holds 25 tests covering repeated calls within one minute, long idle periods, saturation, partial refill with fractional carry-over, independent callers, argument validation, error data, the overflow guard and the deploy script. Two fuzz tests replay randomized caller/delay/amount sequences against `test/BucketModel.sol`, a deliberately different \"credit-seconds\" model, comparing outcomes, `available` and `availableAt` after every step.\n- `script/DeployRateLimiter.s.sol` reads configuration from the environment in `run()` and hands it to a `deploy()` function the tests call directly. It refuses chain id 1.\n- `README.md` specifies the timestamp accounting rule by rule, lists assumptions, operational responsibilities and incomplete checks, and gives reproduction commands. `DEPLOYMENT.md` records parameters, encoded constructor arguments and the operator procedure.\n- forge-std v1.9.7 is vendored under `lib/` as ordinary files, with no submodule.\n\n**Verification**\n\n| Check | Result |\n| --- | --- |\n| `forge build --offline` (fresh clone) | passes, solc 0.8.24 |\n| `forge test --offline` | 25 passed, 0 failed |\n| `forge fmt --check` | passes |\n| `forge script ... --offline` dry run | constructor executes with (10, 60) |\n\n**How the earlier failures were avoided.** The two rejected attempts pinned solc to a path, or left the compiler absent from the offline cache. This time every file carries an exact `0.8.24` pragma, no `solc` path is set, and solc 0.8.24 and 0.8.26 were downloaded into this machine's svm cache at `~/.local/share/svm` so the offline build finds them. The protected harness files pin 0.8.26, so the compiler version is not forced in `foundry.toml`. That way they can compile alongside the project.\n\n**Not done: the on-chain Sepolia deployment.** This environment has no funded Sepolia account, RPC credential or keystore, and the contributor rules forbid a build task from using a wallet key or broadcasting. I did not fabricate an address or transaction hash. The deployment record in `DEPLOYMENT.md` has those fields marked as unfilled, with constructor arguments `10, 60`, the ABI encoding, and the exact broadcast, verify and smoke-test commands an operator needs to finish it. No token was created, as the task instructed, so the token floor test will skip rather than run.","treeHash":"e484c11f6f22bcb9ff9a3fcf63cc431875f07219","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":2757423,"inputTokens":1282,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":57180,"runtime":"claude","turns":41,"wallClockMs":798084}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":2,"bundleHash":null,"device":"35c52a5b502e847c","findings":[],"hash":"3a984d5d5eea572be8e3fb87a41401804baef7e787689c810d0ed50c8a15b352","nodeId":"e83e7c1a-45cc-4ec6-bf86-827001392320","outcome":"failed","summary":"the local build failed, so this was not submitted:\nforge build exited with 1:\nError: can't install missing solc 0.8.24 in offline mode","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":2034304,"inputTokens":122976,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":38407,"runtime":"codex","turns":15,"wallClockMs":1288505}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"bb0a3bf63233e5e5","findings":[],"hash":"5309f94b6f9786f938fb656f9bd1157203609238aa01ccd0008479ece5c276a3","nodeId":"e83e7c1a-45cc-4ec6-bf86-827001392320","outcome":"failed","summary":"refused to run the build on what the agent produced, so this was not submitted: solc: solc is pinned to a path (vendor/solc/solc-0.8.24) rather than a version","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":912384,"inputTokens":51470,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":23282,"runtime":"codex","turns":8,"wallClockMs":761164}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"9cd8181a732a065e7da50498ff0bcf76d620a07d7d5c1fe17df43ae3be7e970c","device":"30a6c1a419ef4f9c","findings":[],"hash":"f468eb423f55ca5b0cf647048fff0ed50d5dc857deee18a601b8f1744bb00ad9","nodeId":"a0fb800b-f078-429c-933c-bc8cd58ddcf2","outcome":"completed","summary":"The manifest validates against the schema and refinements. The constructor ABI confirms two uint256 inputs, matching the \"10\", \"60\" arguments. Only launch.json is new in the working tree.\n\n**Delivered:** `launch.json` at the repo root, describing the accepted project.\n\n- **RateLimiter** is the single application contract, with constructor arguments `[\"10\", \"60\"]` for capacity and refill interval. These match the compiled ABI, the deploy script's demo config, and the README and DEPLOYMENT tables. No address arguments exist, so there are no `$owner`, `$token` or `$contract` references and no privileged wallet.\n- **Pool** pairs against native ETH with fee 3000, tick spacing 60 and the 1:1 sqrtPriceX96 opening price.\n- **Notes** describe the contract's behaviour, its lack of any admin path, and the local verification.\n\n**One gap you must know about.** The accepted tree contains no ERC-20, because the approved brief said not to create a token and the earlier builders honoured that. The evm_project schema still requires a token block, and I am restricted to writing only the manifest. I therefore named the token `RateLimiterToken` and stated plainly in the notes that no contract with that name exists in the source. The manifest is schema-valid, but attestation and deployment cannot succeed from this tree until either a builder assignment adds a fixed-supply token under that name, or the launch is re-scoped as token-less. The Token protected test skips when no token creation code is supplied, so the local floor does not catch this; the project floor would fail at the token deploy step.\n\n**Verification run locally:**\n\n```\nforge build --offline   -> Compiler run successful\nforge test --offline    -> 25 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped\n```\n\nThe schema and refinement check lived in test/scratch and is not part of the submission. No other file was changed. The Sepolia deployment record remains unfilled, as the earlier contributors documented, since no task in this chain may touch a wallet key.","treeHash":"d42a8d6a5da3dd6ffdda3ee64e1a2e1a3cca055c","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":292710,"inputTokens":194,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":6368,"runtime":"claude","turns":14,"wallClockMs":105113}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"593a9c894818e368","findings":[{"description":"The manifest selects RateLimiterToken, but the only application source is src/RateLimiter.sol and no RateLimiterToken implementation exists. Consequently, this manifest cannot be resolved to deployable creation code from the submitted tree. The pinned Project.protected.t.sol setup also requires token creation code before deploying application contracts, so omitting that artifact cannot satisfy that deployment path. The manifest notes acknowledge the gap but do not resolve it. Adding the proposed token would violate the explicit requirement not to create a token; the launch needs a deployment path compatible with the approved token-less scope, or an explicit scope decision outside this implementation.","line":4,"path":"launch.json","reproduction":"From the submitted repository, run `forge inspect RateLimiterToken bytecode --offline --no-cache`. It exits with status 1 and `Error: No contract found with the name `RateLimiterToken``. Read launch.json: token.contract is exactly RateLimiterToken. Expected: every manifest contract resolves to an existing deployable artifact and the deployment respects the no-token requirement. Actual: the required token artifact cannot be produced, blocking deployment through this manifest. This is independent of the successful unit tests of new RateLimiter(10, 60).","severity":"medium","title":"Launch manifest references a nonexistent token and cannot deploy the approved project"},{"description":"The requested deliverable includes deploying the tested RateLimiter to Sepolia, chain ID 11155111, and supplying its address, deployment transaction hash, explorer link and constructor arguments. The delivery explicitly records that no deployment was broadcast, leaves the address and transaction hash unfilled, and supplies only a placeholder explorer URL. Constructor arguments (10, 60) and an offline dry run are documented, but they do not establish a deployed instance. This remains an incomplete deliverable even if the manifest issue is resolved or the documented direct deployment path is used.","line":77,"path":"DEPLOYMENT.md","reproduction":"Run `sed -n '72,89p' DEPLOYMENT.md` and `git ls-files 'broadcast/*/11155111/*'` against the submitted tree. The deployment table returns `not deployed from this environment` for both the contract address and transaction hash, the explorer link contains `<CONTRACT_ADDRESS>`, and there is no committed Sepolia broadcast record. Expected: a concrete Sepolia address and successful creation transaction, with an explorer link and constructor arguments 10 and 60 identifying the tested contract. Actual: no such address or transaction is supplied, so the required deployed instance cannot be verified. This reproduces the missing delivery evidence; it does not assert that no instance exists anywhere on Sepolia.","severity":"medium","title":"Required Sepolia deployment evidence is still missing"}],"hash":"fa60be81be9293f723fbe5a71d43daf5fe1c2fcbcf8a4f869b4da2cedd2f0f91","nodeId":"17e89e80-d414-4887-991e-f1145e432b42","outcome":"completed","summary":"Saved two **medium-severity** findings to [.imd-findings.json](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/1205eac4-b0a4-477b-b0bc-57e1041823df/17e89e80-d414-4887-991e-f1145e432b42/.imd-findings.json):\n\n- The launch manifest references nonexistent `RateLimiterToken`, blocking that deployment path.\n- Required Sepolia deployment evidence is missing.\n\nBoth include concrete reproductions. No limiter accounting defect was substantiated. Existing project files remain unchanged.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":326272,"inputTokens":51433,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":4630,"runtime":"codex","turns":4,"wallClockMs":162600}}],"verification":[{"checks":[{"durationMs":847,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 24 files with Solc 0.8.24\nSolc 0.8.24 finished in 781.96ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":817,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 25 tests for test/RateLimiter.t.sol:RateLimiterTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_constructorRejectsOversizedParameters(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 74608, ~: 74911)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039439137263839420088416\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_consumeAnyValidAmountFromFullBucket(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 47152, ~: 47240)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 6\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_consumeRejectsAmountsAboveCapacity(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 19624, ~: 19581)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 2328159543232969759249766445837675118445719954734350964026410305095869849\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_matchesModelWithDemoParameters(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 5765675, ~: 5765506)\n[PASS] testFuzz_matchesModelWithRandomParameters(uint256,uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 4238446, ~: 4240840)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 2348\n\n[PASS] test_availableAtRejectsInvalidAmounts() (gas: 14576)\n[PASS] test_bucketStartsFull() (gas: 21774)\n[PASS] test_bucketsAreIndependentPerCaller() (gas: 89134)\n[PASS] test_burstOfCapacityThenAnyFurtherCallFails() (gas: 46413)\n[PASS] test_constructorRejectsZeroCapacity() (gas: 36688)\n[PASS] test_constructorRejectsZeroInterval() (gas: 36806)\n[PASS] test_constructorStoresParameters() (gas: 10891)\n[PASS] test_consumeCannotBeMadeOnBehalfOfAnotherAddress() (gas: 120569)\n[PASS] test_consumeRejectsZero() (gas: 11550)\n[PASS] test_consumeRevertsWhenTheTimestampCannotBePacked() (gas: 14619)\n[PASS] test_consumingBelowCapacityDoesNotResetTheClock() (gas: 46059)\n[PASS] test_deployScriptRefusesMainnet() (gas: 827544)\n[PASS] test_deployScriptUsesDocumentedDemoParameters() (gas: 1321960)\n[PASS] test_longIdleRefillsToCapacityAndNoMore() (gas: 50785)\n[PASS] test_partialRefillPreservesFractionalProgress() (gas: 58725)\n[PASS] test_reachingCapacityDiscardsFractionalProgress() (gas: 51985)\n[PASS] test_requestingMoreThanAvailableReportsTheRightRetryTime() (gas: 51952)\n[PASS] test_sameBlockCallsShareOneTimestamp() (gas: 44715)\n[PASS] test_saturatedBucketDiscardsIdleTime() (gas: 47282)\n[PASS] test_tenSingleCreditCallsWithinOneMinuteThenExhausted() (gas: 134671)\nSuite result: ok. 25 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 748.29ms (1.29s CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test suite in 749.20ms (748.29ms CPU time): 25 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (25 total tests)\n","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"0b0efae0aeab280f348b6d19f1e186e9849f1fbeae138e543cef8fb1ab9443d8","verifiedTreeHash":"e484c11f6f22bcb9ff9a3fcf63cc431875f07219","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+bb39ded9"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":853,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 24 files with Solc 0.8.24\nSolc 0.8.24 finished in 789.84ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":912,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 25 tests for test/RateLimiter.t.sol:RateLimiterTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_constructorRejectsOversizedParameters(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 74593, ~: 74911)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039439137263839420088324\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_consumeAnyValidAmountFromFullBucket(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 47149, ~: 47240)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 4\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_consumeRejectsAmountsAboveCapacity(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 19628, ~: 19581)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639929\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_matchesModelWithDemoParameters(uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 5767121, ~: 5766530)\n[PASS] testFuzz_matchesModelWithRandomParameters(uint256,uint256,uint256) (runs: 256, μ: 4237722, ~: 4239189)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 3430\n\n[PASS] test_availableAtRejectsInvalidAmounts() (gas: 14576)\n[PASS] test_bucketStartsFull() (gas: 21774)\n[PASS] test_bucketsAreIndependentPerCaller() (gas: 89134)\n[PASS] test_burstOfCapacityThenAnyFurtherCallFails() (gas: 46413)\n[PASS] test_constructorRejectsZeroCapacity() (gas: 36688)\n[PASS] test_constructorRejectsZeroInterval() (gas: 36806)\n[PASS] test_constructorStoresParameters() (gas: 10891)\n[PASS] test_consumeCannotBeMadeOnBehalfOfAnotherAddress() (gas: 120569)\n[PASS] test_consumeRejectsZero() (gas: 11550)\n[PASS] test_consumeRevertsWhenTheTimestampCannotBePacked() (gas: 14619)\n[PASS] test_consumingBelowCapacityDoesNotResetTheClock() (gas: 46059)\n[PASS] test_deployScriptRefusesMainnet() (gas: 827544)\n[PASS] test_deployScriptUsesDocumentedDemoParameters() (gas: 1321960)\n[PASS] test_longIdleRefillsToCapacityAndNoMore() (gas: 50785)\n[PASS] test_partialRefillPreservesFractionalProgress() (gas: 58725)\n[PASS] test_reachingCapacityDiscardsFractionalProgress() (gas: 51985)\n[PASS] test_requestingMoreThanAvailableReportsTheRightRetryTime() (gas: 51952)\n[PASS] test_sameBlockCallsShareOneTimestamp() (gas: 44715)\n[PASS] test_saturatedBucketDiscardsIdleTime() (gas: 47282)\n[PASS] test_tenSingleCreditCallsWithinOneMinuteThenExhausted() (gas: 134671)\nSuite result: ok. 25 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 843.26ms (1.49s CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test suite in 844.11ms (843.26ms CPU time): 25 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (25 total tests)\n","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"f468eb423f55ca5b0cf647048fff0ed50d5dc857deee18a601b8f1744bb00ad9","verifiedTreeHash":"d42a8d6a5da3dd6ffdda3ee64e1a2e1a3cca055c","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+bb39ded9"}]}