{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"04415684-bed9-4c18-bed1-fc3746741138","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"43d70cc12c97f118d03ae80621a4d6c1b9f9387384f98d6ca207d6aa9c2c4dad","dependsOn":["refine_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"6b037a7b6601e883cf8a906c1520c0624817d42d8310b65c2f43679204608af3","skillId":"adversarial-review","tools":[]},"key":"adversarial_review","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"6b037a7b6601e883cf8a906c1520c0624817d42d8310b65c2f43679204608af3","skillId":"adversarial-review","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"ca8c6f53d100f6fa9c54ed95ffd5396703310975ffc991260eab3195d592ee79","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"none","requires":[],"skillHash":"99cccc7e3e2e1b515c66d54cc6d4bd9832d528aaf0ec0ba48c87a4182db4b7ca","skillId":"refine-project","tools":[]},"key":"refine_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"99cccc7e3e2e1b515c66d54cc6d4bd9832d528aaf0ec0ba48c87a4182db4b7ca","skillId":"refine-project","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"README accuracy follow-up. 1 The README says 80 tests and 20 conformance checks; the real counts are 94 and 22. Replace hard-coded counts with wording that will not go stale, or correct them. 2 The step-3 402 response row omits input; show the real 402 body fields including input. 3 Extend test/readme.test.ts so it runs the README's conformance commands and the library snippet too, not only the hand-run block. Add a CHANGELOG.md entry listing each item and what changed. Keep the existing experimental label everywhere it already appears.","parentJobId":"8d15e132-1ef6-42b5-aa2d-d0a0d7b4abbd","planHash":"32e9afd7a6fba35b7bc28ffa90ddac3a09d4cd7ee09584467c39010162c03f2e","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"fb018b04-0661-41fd-88d5-51bb90863d72","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-608-build-imd-mock-local-mock"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"51504","feedbackHash":"4ca49cfd9875c9c2ce2b9645a70eb7d7042d7f8d1b92b0613f2c572d5471c154","nodeKey":"adversarial_review","submissionHash":"43d70cc12c97f118d03ae80621a4d6c1b9f9387384f98d6ca207d6aa9c2c4dad","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51293","feedbackHash":"311c6bb3a183627f4b7bfc44f2eb8073a30a6a17348c70873aa0d6363e565c3e","nodeKey":"refine_project","submissionHash":"ca8c6f53d100f6fa9c54ed95ffd5396703310975ffc991260eab3195d592ee79","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"7884bb5214780a9ed290ad3ccdcf134a9695a54698cc8bac93115b04d9a9147b","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"0238a59bba722237","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"The paragraph this commit edited (it removed the stale '20 checks' count on line 177) still lists 'admission refusal' among the things the suite covers. None of the 22 checks in src/conformance.ts exercises admission refusal: the only admission-refusal path in the mock is the `[stale]` marker (src/server.ts:407), the string 'stale' does not appear anywhere in src/conformance.ts, and no check name or assertion mentions admission being refused. The next sentence ('the mock refuses anything the suite refuses') makes the gap material: a client author reading this expects the suite to model an admission refusal they can test against, and it does not. The same count-free sentence was the whole point of task item 1, so the stale claim survived an accuracy pass of that exact line.","line":181,"path":"README.md","reproduction":"`grep -c stale src/conformance.ts` prints 0; `grep -n -i 'admission' src/conformance.ts` matches only check 17's '200 with the admission result' and check 21's 'admission.result points at a public job'. Run `npm run conformance` and read the 22 TAP names: none is an admission refusal. A server that admitted every `[stale]` input unconditionally would pass all 22 checks, contradicting line 181. Expected: either a conformance check that pays for an input containing `[stale]`, polls, and asserts the refused admission (as test/server.test.ts:208 does outside the suite), or drop 'admission refusal' from the sentence.","severity":"medium","snippet":"payment, polling through to a completed job, admission refusal, and bearer scoping. The checks","title":"README says the conformance suite covers \"admission refusal\"; no check does"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Task item 2 added `input` to the step-3 row. The field is there, but it is `spec.prepare(body.input)` (src/server.ts:256, stored into the challenge at :309), i.e. the input with the action's defaults filled in, not the object the client posted at step 2. CHANGELOG.md line 6 correctly says 'the prepared `input` field'; the README row does not say prepared, and nothing else in the README explains that `job.open` input gains `contracts: []` and `github: false`. A client that follows step 4 ('check accepts[0] against capabilities and the quote') and also diffs the challenge's `input` against what it sent will see extra keys and may treat the challenge as tampered.","line":75,"path":"README.md","reproduction":"Run the README 'Try it by hand' block as far as `$ORDER_ID`, then `curl -sS -X POST \"$BASE_URL/requests/$ORDER_ID/submit\" -H \"Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN\"` and read `.input`. Sent at step 2: {\"objective\":\"Say hi.\"}. Returned in the 402 body: {\"contracts\":[],\"github\":false,\"objective\":\"Say hi.\"}. Expected per the row: the same `input`. Fix is wording only, e.g. '`input` (as prepared by the mock, defaults filled in)'.","severity":"low","snippet":"| 3 | `POST /requests/{id}/submit`, no body, no payment | `402 {x402Version:2, accepts[], quote{id, quoteHash, action, payment{asset, amount, payTo}, expiresAt}, resource, resourceUrl, requesterScopeHash, input}`, also base64 in the `PAYMENT-REQUIRED` header |","title":"402 row documents `input` but the body carries the prepared input, not what the client sent"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"`MockState.getRequest` builds the response view first and calls `advance()` after (src/server.ts:463-468), so the read that triggers admission_pending -> admitted still answers `admission_pending`; `admitted` first appears on the read after. Line 144 ('`job.open {objective}` returns `202` and is admitted on the next read') has the same off-by-one. The second half of the row, 'a created job advances from `executing` to `completed` on a later read', describes a state a client can never observe for `job.open`: the jobId only becomes visible on the GET /requests/{id} that already completes the job, so every GET /jobs/{id} a client can make returns `completed`. Server behaviour is out of scope for this job (previous request said not to change it), so this is a documentation defect: the rows should say the transition happens after the read, and that `executing` is internal/not observable over HTTP for job.open.","line":132,"path":"README.md","reproduction":"node --input-type=module -e 'import { startMock, ImdClient, TEST_BEARER_TOKEN, TEST_PAYER_KEY } from \"imd-mock\"; const m = await startMock(0, \"127.0.0.1\"); const c = new ImdClient(m.url, TEST_BEARER_TOKEN); const { id } = await c.pay(\"job.open\", { objective: \"Say hi.\" }, TEST_PAYER_KEY); for (let i = 1; i <= 2; i++) console.log(i, (await c.getRequest(id)).body.status); const r = (await c.getRequest(id)).body.admission.result; console.log(\"job\", (await c.getJob(r.jobId)).body.state); await m.close();' (run from the repo root). Output: `1 admission_pending`, `2 admitted`, `job completed`. Expected from line 132/144: the first GET after the 202 returns `admitted`, and a first job read returns `executing`.","severity":"low","snippet":"| `admission_pending` | `admitted` | client: next `GET /requests/{id}` or `GET /jobs/{id}`; a created job advances from `executing` to `completed` on a later read |","title":"State machine says the next GET returns `admitted`; the triggering GET still returns `admission_pending`"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"The snippet imports from \"imd-mock\", which Node resolves by package self-reference through package.json `exports` -> ./dist/index.js. `npm test` compiles src+test into .test-build but never rebuilds dist/, so this test validates the README against whatever dist/ was last committed, while the other README tests in the same file run src via startMock from ../src/server.js. dist/ is in sync today (a fresh `tsc --outDir /tmp/x` diffs clean against dist/), so nothing fails now; the test can only go stale silently. It also only resolves when cwd is the package root: the same command run from /tmp fails with ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND, which is fine for npm test but is why the `cwd: ROOT` option is load-bearing. Non-blocking observation; a cheap guard is to also diff a fresh compile against dist/ in npm test, or to run the snippet with the import rewritten to ../src/index.js.","line":83,"path":"test/readme.test.ts","reproduction":"State: change src/index.ts line 17 from `export * from \"./fixtures.js\";` to an explicit list that omits TEST_BEARER_TOKEN, and do not run `npm run compile`. `npm test` still passes all 96 tests (test/server.test.ts and test/payment.test.ts import TEST_BEARER_TOKEN from ../src/fixtures.js, and this test loads dist/index.js, which still exports it), even though the README snippet `import { ..., TEST_BEARER_TOKEN, ... } from \"imd-mock\"` no longer matches src. Expected: a README test that fails when the documented library surface and the source disagree.","severity":"info","snippet":"  await execFileAsync(process.execPath, [\"--input-type=module\", \"-e\", `${match[1]}\\nif (!id || submit.status !== 202) throw new Error(\"library example did not submit a job\");`], {","title":"README library-example test exercises committed dist/, not the src/ the rest of npm test checks"}],"hash":"43d70cc12c97f118d03ae80621a4d6c1b9f9387384f98d6ca207d6aa9c2c4dad","nodeId":"0dff9a2b-ad2a-4a1a-88c7-3bc5468544de","outcome":"completed","summary":"Review complete. `.imd-findings.json` holds 4 findings; no project files were changed (`git status` shows only the untracked findings file).\n\n## What I ran and confirmed\n\nEvery README command, against the committed `dist/`:\n\n- `npm ci --offline` → installs from `vendor/npm`, no network. `npm test` → 96 pass (94 before this commit + the 2 new README tests), no hard-coded count left anywhere in README/src/dist.\n- `npm start` on 8402, then the whole \"Try it by hand\" block verbatim via `bash -eu -o pipefail` → exits 0, submit returns 402, order moves to `payment_pending`.\n- `npm run conformance`, `… --flaky`, `… --url http://127.0.0.1:8402` → each prints `1..22`, `# pass 22`, `# fail 0`.\n- The \"Use as a library\" snippet → `id` set, `submit.status === 202`.\n- `node dist/cli.js vectors | diff - fixtures/vectors.json` → identical. Bearer token, payer key/address and payTo in the README match `src/fixtures.ts`. `--help`, `/`, `openapi.json` and `package.json` all still carry the experimental notice.\n- Real 402 body: top-level keys are exactly `x402Version, resource, accepts, quote, requesterScopeHash, resourceUrl, input` — the row now matches. Rows 1–2 (`201`/`200`/`409`/`422`/`401`/`403`/`404`), the check-response keys, `/requests/import` and `x-imd-actions` all match the README. A fresh `tsc` of `src/` diffs clean against `dist/`.\n\n## Findings, by severity\n\n1. **medium — README.md:181** claims the conformance suite covers \"admission refusal\". No check does: `stale` does not appear in `src/conformance.ts`, and none of the 22 TAP names is an admission refusal. The sentence was edited by this commit (count removed) and still carries the stale claim.\n2. **low — README.md:75** the 402 row says `input`, but the body carries the *prepared* input (`{\"contracts\":[],\"github\":false,\"objective\":\"Say hi.\"}` for a client that sent `{\"objective\":\"Say hi.\"}`). The CHANGELOG says \"prepared\"; the README doesn't.\n3. **low — README.md:132 (and :144)** \"next GET → `admitted`\" is off by one: `getRequest` builds the view before `advance()`, so the triggering GET still returns `admission_pending`. The `executing` job state is never observable over HTTP for `job.open`. Doc wording only — server behaviour is out of scope.\n4. **info — test/readme.test.ts:83** the library-example test resolves `\"imd-mock\"` to committed `dist/` via package self-reference, while the sibling tests run `src/`; `npm test` never rebuilds `dist/`, so this test can go stale silently. In sync today.\n\nNothing in the task's three items is broken as delivered; the defects are leftover inaccuracies in the paragraph and table this job was meant to make accurate.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":874555,"inputTokens":456,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":27303,"runtime":"claude","turns":39,"wallClockMs":345396}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"ca7b464561e13b7ebcc352d4a64eb97063b5594a72946008f15e74cf97ce9a59","device":"0db9dd6ea32a69f2","findings":[],"hash":"ca8c6f53d100f6fa9c54ed95ffd5396703310975ffc991260eab3195d592ee79","nodeId":"097b03a3-9310-47be-b392-780757cd027b","outcome":"completed","summary":"Updated the [README](/home/imdworker/.identitymd/work/04415684-bed9-4c18-bed1-fc3746741138/097b03a3-9310-47be-b392-780757cd027b/README.md) to remove hard-coded test counts, include `input` in the 402 response, and use the test bearer token in the library example. The [README test](/home/imdworker/.identitymd/work/04415684-bed9-4c18-bed1-fc3746741138/097b03a3-9310-47be-b392-780757cd027b/test/readme.test.ts) now runs all three conformance commands and the library snippet. Each change is recorded in the [changelog](/home/imdworker/.identitymd/work/04415684-bed9-4c18-bed1-fc3746741138/097b03a3-9310-47be-b392-780757cd027b/CHANGELOG.md). The experimental label remains in place.\n\n`npm test` passed: 96 tests, 0 failures.","treeHash":"af0f999ef193c3b63f332f667d9bb2fb8adf0c62","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":503936,"inputTokens":47738,"model":"gpt-6-sol","outputTokens":6923,"runtime":"codex","turns":5,"wallClockMs":200701}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"ca8c6f53d100f6fa9c54ed95ffd5396703310975ffc991260eab3195d592ee79","verifiedTreeHash":"af0f999ef193c3b63f332f667d9bb2fb8adf0c62","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+b537d296"}]}