{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"8d89a924-8f5a-437e-ad00-5255c9de511a","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"4279c64469fb8caccc0a5e2389e242269fbf85bc43537573513c8bc5c9db70e2","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests","manifest"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_economics","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"19f2b6f6082d053d3f6384541e2a2584e5b7f98a36d01b02fba80d8a58473e3e","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests","manifest"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_flow","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"a48949a8a0a12fc6deb343a5198f323c9dd3f2f30978bc09dc884732e2c9578c","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests","manifest","audit_math","audit_permissions","audit_economics","audit_flow"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"3014f1ea5961918ca059453a484bf4c8bcbbfc2248dbe31d94ac7c5cdf8f50bd","skillId":"audit-judge","tools":[]},"key":"audit_judge","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"3014f1ea5961918ca059453a484bf4c8bcbbfc2248dbe31d94ac7c5cdf8f50bd","skillId":"audit-judge","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"629e192c0a6a15b08f7528bb303136cf146225c70f32dab53a56331b7560f498","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests","manifest"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_math","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"8715d6f845467d3a37da88ca04a5cfd89172be96c6b2791694875e5bf2558052","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests","manifest"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_permissions","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"5e0f18f3bd751bccd2d4b5b257af10ba904efefe163a1bd3f9ac19d4fadbe669","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"587567a5ef71546b5973ceaf6ef1dbbd590f49503b5ac9a6973ed86b89584857","skillId":"build-contract-project","tools":[]},"key":"build_contract_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"587567a5ef71546b5973ceaf6ef1dbbd590f49503b5ac9a6973ed86b89584857","skillId":"build-contract-project","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"e02ffbc8fc10ae43a321d0e166dfa9ce025ccd8bc8b2ef24be12bcf5ba7bd254","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"tools":[]},"key":"manifest","kind":"code","role":"integrate","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"b95b6d117e7cffeb1069e54275a2910979871c41ecf20a5a509cac5561860881","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"73431852439ad3a343f3d2b7db1c43cd363b9f48f9bb51497374a0cf6d50b223","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","tools":[]},"key":"write_foundry_tests","kind":"code","role":"tests","skillHash":"73431852439ad3a343f3d2b7db1c43cd363b9f48f9bb51497374a0cf6d50b223","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"[SIMD-LAUNCH]\nA custom token: IMDTEST (IMDT).\nToken name: IMDTEST\nToken symbol: IMDT\nToken supply: 1,000,000,000 with 18 decimals, all minted once to the deployer in the constructor.\nMinting after launch: none, the supply is fixed forever.\nWho can call what: no owner and no admin functions; every parameter is a fixed constant.\n\nWhat it does:\n1. The token contract IMDTToken mints exactly 1,000,000,000 tokens with 18 decimals once at deployment to the deployer (factory). No tokens are minted or transferred by the contract to the swarm; the pool factory distributes the 10% swarm allocation separately.\n2. 90% of the supply seeds the Uniswap v4 pool paired with IMD (0xd34a99bc0f67ae1bbd63c660e6d0b0dd03e263b7) via the PoolManager at 0x000000000004444c5dc75cB358380D2e3dE08A90.\n3. The Uniswap v4 pool fee is fixed at 1.25% (12500 basis points).\n4. The token has no owner, admin functions, or mutable parameters; all settings are immutable constants.\n5. The token contracts contain no logic beyond a standard ERC-20 implementation (no taxes, no dividends, no transfers fees).\n\nWho can call what:\n- No ownership or administrative powers exist; no one can change any parameters.\n- The entire supply minted once to the deployer; after deployment, the system is immutable.\n\nTests:\n1. Confirm total supply is exactly 1,000,000,000 * 10^18.\n2. Confirm deployer balance equals the total supply.\n3. Verify that the contract has no owner or admin functions.\n4. Simulate transfer to PoolManager; ensure no fees or reverts.\n5. Verify that the Uniswap v4 pool fee is set at 1.25% with paired currency IMD.\n6. Confirm 10% of total supply is assigned outside the token contract to the swarm (outside test on distribution).\n7. Confirm that the token is standard ERC-20 compliant and transfers work as expected with no added logic or restrictions.\n\nBuild requirements (mandatory):\n- A complete Foundry project at the repository root: foundry.toml with solc 0.8.26, evm_version cancun, optimizer on and bytecode_hash = \"none\", so the build is reproducible.\n- Token contract: IMDTToken. No selfdestruct and no delegatecall anywhere. No proxies, no owner, no upgradeability.\n- Supply distribution is done by the launch factory: it mints the supply, seeds the pool from the deployer balance, sends the swarm's 10% through its Merkle distributor and any remainder to remainderTo. No contract here sends the swarm allocation, and the token always mints the entire 1,000,000,000 (1e27 units) to its deployer: never subtract the swarm's 10% (IMD's protected invariants park any launch whose deployer holds less).\n- Chain: Ethereum mainnet (chainId 1). Swaps happen in Uniswap v4, so the pool's tokens move to and from the PoolManager 0x000000000004444c5dc75cB358380D2e3dE08A90.\n- launch.json pool: pairedCurrency 0xd34a99bc0f67ae1bbd63c660e6d0b0dd03e263b7, fee 3000, tickSpacing 60, initialPrice \"125270724187523965593206900\" (paired-currency minor units per IMDT minor unit with IMDT as currency0, provenance only; the deployer derives the real opening price from the economics using the deployed currency order). launch.json also carries the economics block below.\n- launch.json economics, exactly: poolBps 9000, initialMarketCapWei \"2500000000000000000000\" (2500 IMD opening market cap), remainderTo 0x000000000000000000000000000000000000dead.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"c6844e087f319405a71918b6627b083f23929eb367f55b369a423ae60d737da3","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"8d89a924-8f5a-437e-ad00-5255c9de511a","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-1060-imdtest"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"52391","feedbackHash":"ef950b2535ced8d925d25ef60fce94111c3cc9ab3caa08888a1e8f61332f2ad7","nodeKey":"audit_economics","submissionHash":"4279c64469fb8caccc0a5e2389e242269fbf85bc43537573513c8bc5c9db70e2","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50981","feedbackHash":"1d2eb6df15e27eb3850ba62ff4a2019470270f60da024f39f6cdaa8a93e9adb7","nodeKey":"audit_flow","submissionHash":"19f2b6f6082d053d3f6384541e2a2584e5b7f98a36d01b02fba80d8a58473e3e","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51317","feedbackHash":"83ec62000344bb963e4ea008eb0c97322256e8c76ceb6f8388080df7a7f2f4cf","nodeKey":"audit_judge","submissionHash":"a48949a8a0a12fc6deb343a5198f323c9dd3f2f30978bc09dc884732e2c9578c","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51340","feedbackHash":"cd8fc22d6c67cf9b79f21daef5ed3c3b7d83a9ba8775c78f4cb5bd4f7d3471bc","nodeKey":"audit_math","submissionHash":"629e192c0a6a15b08f7528bb303136cf146225c70f32dab53a56331b7560f498","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51333","feedbackHash":"616b72964682537ac839ceb39cf7f4ceae9a1c51247a674cfe7ddef8d50d5d0d","nodeKey":"audit_permissions","submissionHash":"8715d6f845467d3a37da88ca04a5cfd89172be96c6b2791694875e5bf2558052","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52224","feedbackHash":"2e49412dfba5b44f795030239aba11c752dfdca9746481198ff0609bcfd9772f","nodeKey":"build_contract_project","submissionHash":"5e0f18f3bd751bccd2d4b5b257af10ba904efefe163a1bd3f9ac19d4fadbe669","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51328","feedbackHash":"6e505da08aedb0228a436c325b2a6783b709fe369eb092416ef086cc8d3a2a11","nodeKey":"build_contract_project","submissionHash":"c1315d1c9bd1ea7cbbf14587332d6377d093ebfba87ed449358ecb199c591c71","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":0},{"agentId":"51180","feedbackHash":"b50e6cd345fa9734e419fd48f27b8e22c3225e0a7a87e28aa2515bb9d1caf737","nodeKey":"manifest","submissionHash":"e02ffbc8fc10ae43a321d0e166dfa9ce025ccd8bc8b2ef24be12bcf5ba7bd254","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51320","feedbackHash":"247e8ba7cba03fb0973fe6c28f183e08656ab146ccb222c3daddbe0b64195e19","nodeKey":"write_foundry_tests","submissionHash":"b95b6d117e7cffeb1069e54275a2910979871c41ecf20a5a509cac5561860881","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"7b453578dccb15419f70f1ff98be0d8f8d19628038ef6ec6dbdcb18d4e2f913a","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"5739ce0d803a43cd","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Periphery / provenance. README.md:27 lists `python3 tools/check_launch.py` as one of the four offline acceptance commands, and README.md:119-121 and the 'Dependency provenance' section claim lib/dependencies.json records SHA-256 hashes of the vendored sources. The hashes recorded there are the hashes of the pristine upstream files (verified against forge-std v1.9.6 at 3b20d60d and Uniswap v4-core at 46c6834698c4), but the files actually committed under lib/ are reformatted copies: 6 forge-std files (src/StdAssertions.sol, src/StdJson.sol, src/StdToml.sol, src/Vm.sol, src/console.sol, src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol) and 9 v4-core files (src/PoolManager.sol, src/libraries/Hooks.sol, src/libraries/Pool.sol, src/libraries/SqrtPriceMath.sol, src/libraries/StateLibrary.sol, src/libraries/SwapMath.sol, src/libraries/TickBitmap.sol, src/types/Currency.sol, src/types/Slot0.sol) hash differently from their recorded value. The divergence is present from the first commit (a45499d) onward; the working tree equals HEAD. I diffed every mismatched file against upstream: all differences are whitespace/line-wrapping only (Hooks.sol additionally gained braces around a one-statement if), so the vendored PoolManager used as the mainnet stand-in in test/LaunchFlow.t.sol is semantically the pinned upstream and the production token's OpenZeppelin 5.0.2 sources are byte-identical to upstream. The defect is that the provenance record is wrong and the check that is supposed to prove the vendored code is untampered exits non-zero on the committed tree. Because tools/check_launch.py:86 raises SystemExit on the first mismatch, the nine v4-core mismatches are never even reported. Fix (either): re-vendor the 15 files byte-for-byte from the pinned commits so the recorded hashes hold, or regenerate the hashes in lib/dependencies.json from the committed files and note the reformatting in the README. Plain `forge build`, `forge test` and `forge fmt --check` are unaffected.","line":21,"path":"lib/dependencies.json","reproduction":"State: the committed tree at HEAD (deb877b), after `forge build`. Run `python3 tools/check_launch.py`. Expected (per README.md:27 and the script's own success line): prints 'Launch parameters, compiler configuration, ERC-20 ABI and dependency hashes verified.' and exits 0. Actual: prints 'Vendored source changed: forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol' and exits 1. Confirm the cause: `sha256sum lib/forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol` prints 3fbf4a025b4fc94eaca4c38c1f3dacb37bee10f12ee81994cfaf365ac1ce7384 while lib/dependencies.json:21 records d4c89eec70d267dec6188461fbc74d3dc8c47e518d176a23417533a232ed9780, which is the hash of the upstream v1.9.6 file. Likewise `sha256sum lib/v4-core/src/PoolManager.sol` prints b3c68cb554af5d13... while lib/dependencies.json:49 records 3b6ab111dadf613e..., the upstream hash. A full check: hashing every file listed in lib/dependencies.json reports 15 mismatches (6 forge-std, 9 v4-core); `diff -w -B` plus a whitespace-stripped byte compare against the pinned upstream clones shows all 15 are identical modulo whitespace.","severity":"low","snippet":"      \"src/StdAssertions.sol\": \"d4c89eec70d267dec6188461fbc74d3dc8c47e518d176a23417533a232ed9780\",","title":"Recorded dependency hashes do not match the committed vendored files, so the documented provenance check fails on the tree as shipped"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Not a code defect; recorded so the judge sees the open specification conflict. The task narrative item 3 says 'The Uniswap v4 pool fee is fixed at 1.25% (12500 basis points)' and test item 5 says 'Verify that the Uniswap v4 pool fee is set at 1.25%', while the mandatory build requirements say 'launch.json pool: ... fee 3000, tickSpacing 60'. The narrative is also internally inconsistent: in Uniswap v4 units 12500 is 1.25% (hundredths of a bip), while '12500 basis points' would be 125%. The accepted implementation follows the mandatory block (launch.json fee 3000, README.md 'Launch parameters and the fee conflict', test/COVERAGE.md 'Scope and conflicting requirements', and test/LaunchFlow.t.sol asserts lpFee == 3000). The token itself has no fee logic either way, so nothing in src/ changes if the requester picks 12500; only launch.json, README.md and the LaunchFlow fixtures would. Needed from the requester: a one-line confirmation of which fee the pool opens with.","line":14,"path":"launch.json","reproduction":"State: launch.json as committed. Observe launch.json:14 `\"fee\": 3000` and README.md:52-55. Compare with the brief's test item 5 ('Verify that the Uniswap v4 pool fee is set at 1.25%'). A checker written literally from test item 5 (expect fee == 12500) fails against this manifest; a checker written from the mandatory build block (expect fee == 3000) passes. Both cannot be satisfied by one launch.json.","severity":"info","snippet":"    \"fee\": 3000,","title":"The brief asks for a 1.25% pool fee in its narrative and tests but the mandatory build block and the manifest fix the fee at 3000 (0.30%); the requester has not reconciled this"}],"hash":"19f2b6f6082d053d3f6384541e2a2584e5b7f98a36d01b02fba80d8a58473e3e","nodeId":"342a58fa-8067-429b-9642-938f150a420c","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete. The findings file is at the repository root with two findings and eleven coverage rows, and no tracked file was changed.\n\n**Outcome:** the token itself is clean in my area. The three state-changing entry points (approve, transfer, transferFrom) and the constructor are the unmodified OpenZeppelin 5.0.2 ERC-20, and I confirmed the six vendored OpenZeppelin files are byte-identical to the upstream v5.0.2 tag. The compiled runtime has no CALL, DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE, CREATE or SELFDESTRUCT opcodes, the ABI exposes exactly the nine standard functions, and the build, all 35 tests, the invariant campaigns and the format check pass.\n\n**Findings written:**\n\n- **Low, provenance check broken.** The hashes in the dependency record are the hashes of pristine upstream files, but 15 committed files under the vendored forge-std and v4-core directories were reformatted before commit. The README's documented offline step `python3 tools/check_launch.py` therefore exits with \"Vendored source changed\" on the tree as shipped, and because it stops at the first mismatch, the nine v4-core mismatches are never surfaced. I diffed every mismatched file against the pinned upstream commits: all differences are whitespace or line wrapping only, so the PoolManager stand-in used by the launch-flow tests is semantically the real pinned code. The fix is either to re-vendor the files byte-for-byte or to regenerate the hashes.\n- **Info, unreconciled fee.** The brief's narrative and test item 5 ask for a 1.25% pool fee, while its mandatory build block and the manifest fix the fee at 3000 (0.30%). Earlier contributors followed the mandatory block and documented the conflict. Nothing in the token changes either way, but the requester needs to confirm which fee the pool opens with.\n\n**Coverage:** all three listed entry points are marked as holding, with reasons, alongside rows for the constructor mint, fixed supply, forbidden opcodes, vendored base code, the manifest, and the local launch simulation. One row is marked unreached: live mainnet state (the real IMD token, factory, Merkle distributor and initialization guard) cannot be exercised here because there is no network for a fork.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1041696,"inputTokens":354,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":22189,"runtime":"claude","turns":33,"wallClockMs":377220}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"743b05d8a235188d","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"README.md lists `python3 tools/check_launch.py` as one of the four offline checks and says lib/dependencies.json records the exact SHA-256 of every vendored file. On the committed tree the script exits non-zero before printing its success line, because 16 files under lib/ were reformatted (forge fmt) after the hashes were recorded. The recorded hashes are the pristine upstream ones (I fetched forge-std 3b20d60 StdAssertions.sol and v4-core 46c6834 PoolManager.sol from GitHub and they hash to exactly the recorded values), so the vendored copies are the ones that drifted. I diffed every mismatching file against upstream: the differences are whitespace and line-wrapping only (no token, operator or literal changes), so the test stand-in for the PoolManager still reproduces upstream behaviour and the production ERC20.sol is byte-identical to OpenZeppelin 5.0.2. Impact is on verification, not on the token: the project's own provenance gate is red, so a future semantic edit to lib/v4-core (which the launch-flow and fee tests run against) or lib/forge-std would be indistinguishable from this formatting drift. Mismatching files: forge-std StdAssertions.sol, StdJson.sol, StdToml.sol, Vm.sol, console.sol, interfaces/IMulticall3.sol; v4-core PoolManager.sol, libraries/Hooks.sol, Pool.sol, SqrtPriceMath.sol, StateLibrary.sol, SwapMath.sol, TickBitmap.sol, types/Currency.sol, Slot0.sol. Minimal fix: either re-record the hashes of the committed files in lib/dependencies.json (and note in README that lib/ is forge-fmt formatted) or restore the pristine upstream bytes so the recorded hashes hold. Do not change lib/ semantics.","line":21,"path":"lib/dependencies.json","reproduction":"State: clean checkout at commit deb877b. Commands: `forge build && python3 -I tools/check_launch.py`. Expected (per README): prints `Launch parameters, compiler configuration, ERC-20 ABI and dependency hashes verified.` and exits 0. Actual: exits 1 with `Vendored source changed: forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol`. Direct check: `sha256sum lib/forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol` prints 3fbf4a025b4fc94eaca4c38c1f3dacb37bee10f12ee81994cfaf365ac1ce7384, while lib/dependencies.json line 21 records d4c89eec70d267dec6188461fbc74d3dc8c47e518d176a23417533a232ed9780 (which is the hash of the upstream file at the pinned commit). Same for lib/v4-core/src/PoolManager.sol: actual b3c68cb554af5d13d715ad9c9a0255e677f5d6ef1392980ffc3fd7d2fcc8b19d vs recorded 3b6ab111dadf613e3cfd617e4b1c6ab75b5445cd15cbe52d7c6207fc02449717 at line 49.","severity":"low","snippet":"      \"src/StdAssertions.sol\": \"d4c89eec70d267dec6188461fbc74d3dc8c47e518d176a23417533a232ed9780\",","title":"Documented provenance check tools/check_launch.py fails on the committed tree: 16 vendored dependency files no longer match the hashes recorded in lib/dependencies.json"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"The job narrative says the pool fee is fixed at 1.25% and asks for a test that the fee is 1.25%, while the mandatory build requirements say `launch.json pool: ... fee 3000`. The submission follows the mandatory value, documents the conflict in README.md, test/COVERAGE.md and launch.json notes, and its pool tests assert lpFee == 3000. Economically the two values differ materially for LPs and traders: on a 1 IMD buy the pool keeps 0.003 IMD at 3000 versus 0.0125 IMD at 12500, and the sole LP position is the factory-seeded single-sided 90% supply, so the requester's share of trading revenue is about 4.2x lower under 3000. This is not a code defect (the token has no fee logic either way, and 12500 is a valid static v4 fee below LPFeeLibrary.MAX_LP_FEE) and the mandatory requirement prevails, but the requester should explicitly confirm 3000 so a 1.25% expectation does not resurface at admission. Also note the narrative's unit is wrong on its own terms: 12500 in Uniswap v4 fee units is 125 basis points (1.25%), not 12500 basis points.","line":14,"path":"launch.json","reproduction":"Run `forge test --match-test test_PoolFeeCannotBeDynamicallyChanged`: it initializes the IMDT/IMD pool with fee 3000 and asserts `assertEq(fee, 3000)` at test/LaunchFlow.t.sol:91, so any check that the pool charges 1.25% (lpFee == 12500) fails against this manifest. Expected under the narrative: lpFee 12500. Actual under the mandatory requirements and this manifest: lpFee 3000. No change recommended unless the requester overrides the mandatory value.","severity":"info","snippet":"    \"fee\": 3000,","title":"Pool LP fee is 3000 (0.30%) per the mandatory build requirements; the narrative's 1.25% (12500) and its test item 5 cannot be satisfied by this manifest and should be confirmed by the requester"}],"hash":"4279c64469fb8caccc0a5e2389e242269fbf85bc43537573513c8bc5c9db70e2","nodeId":"263c98a3-6f68-429a-b0b0-4050d76a217e","outcome":"completed","summary":"Review complete. The findings file is written at `.imd-findings.json` with two findings and nine coverage rows; no files in the tree were changed.\n\n**Outcome: no economic, invariant or flow defect in the token.** The production contract is the unmodified OpenZeppelin 5.0.2 ERC-20 (I fetched the pinned upstream file and the SHA-256 matches byte for byte) with a single constructor mint of 1e27 units to its deployer. Supply cannot grow, every transfer moves exactly what it says, and the factory's launch sequence (10% to the distributor, 90% single-sided seed, dust to the dead address) arrives whole in both currency orders. All 35 existing tests pass, including the 1,000-run settlement fuzz and both invariant campaigns.\n\n**What I reported**\n\n- **Low:** the project's own documented provenance check fails on the committed tree. Running `python3 tools/check_launch.py` after a build exits with \"Vendored source changed: forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol\". Sixteen files under `lib/` were reformatted after their hashes were recorded in `lib/dependencies.json`. I diffed every one against upstream and the changes are whitespace only, so the PoolManager stand-in the pool tests run against is semantically upstream. The fix is to re-record the hashes or restore the pristine bytes.\n- **Info:** the pool fee is 3000 (0.30%) per the mandatory build requirements while the narrative asks for 1.25% and a test asserting it. The submission follows the mandatory value and documents the conflict. I flagged it because the two fees differ materially in LP revenue and the requester should confirm 3000 explicitly.\n\n**Coverage.** All three entry points (approve, transfer, transferFrom) hold. The supply conservation invariant, the launch flow, the initialPrice provenance math, and the forbidden-opcode scan hold. Unreached: a live mainnet fork against the real IMD bytecode, the platform's initialization hook and Merkle distributor, since the verifier runs without network.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":833468,"inputTokens":290,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":16313,"runtime":"claude","turns":30,"wallClockMs":268883}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":2,"bundleHash":"e07667fdcf00a8cc473029b2464fbd11c74aac29fc8a7c346c1d506e17b45488","device":"2a2028177fd413f2","findings":[],"hash":"5e0f18f3bd751bccd2d4b5b257af10ba904efefe163a1bd3f9ac19d4fadbe669","nodeId":"f8947a94-b5cc-4ed6-9d36-0131e29a062b","outcome":"completed","summary":"Implemented the Foundry project with fixed-supply `IMDTToken`, vendored dependencies, launch manifest and documentation.\n\n- Removed unsupported `chainId` from the manifest.\n- Used mandatory `fee: 3000`; documented the conflicting 1.25% wording.\n- `forge build`, `forge fmt --check` and manifest checks pass.\n- All 25 tests pass, including fuzzing, supply invariants and local Uniswap v4 swaps.\n\nDeployment responsibilities and testing limits are documented in `README.md`. No transactions were broadcast.","treeHash":"f4ac7ddbbbbda975d0a672fbce044e0962464d1b","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1269504,"inputTokens":82980,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":20571,"runtime":"codex","turns":6,"wallClockMs":666110}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"3b260b68e9ad6a37","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"README.md (line 27) lists `python3 tools/check_launch.py` as a required offline check after `forge build`, and its docstring calls it the manifest/ABI/vendored-input regression check. On the committed tree it exits non-zero at the first vendored-file hash comparison. Root cause: lib/dependencies.json records the upstream SHA-256 of each vendored file at the pinned commits (forge-std 3b20d60d, v4-core 46c68346); I fetched those upstream files and every recorded hash matches upstream exactly. But 15 files in lib/ were re-formatted after vendoring (forge-fmt style line re-wrapping, plus one `if (...) return ...;` turned into a braced block in v4-core/src/libraries/Hooks.sol), so their bytes differ from upstream and from the recorded hash. The altered files are forge-std: StdAssertions.sol, StdJson.sol, StdToml.sol, Vm.sol, console.sol, interfaces/IMulticall3.sol; v4-core: PoolManager.sol, libraries/Hooks.sol, libraries/Pool.sol, libraries/SqrtPriceMath.sol, libraries/StateLibrary.sol, libraries/SwapMath.sol, libraries/TickBitmap.sol, types/Currency.sol, types/Slot0.sol. I verified each altered file is whitespace-identical to upstream (Hooks.sol is identical after also removing the inserted braces), so the vendored AMM math exercised by test/LaunchFlow.t.sol is semantically upstream and `forge build`/`forge test` are unaffected. The defect is that the repository's own integrity gate cannot pass, so it no longer proves anything about the manifest, ABI or foundry.toml either: the script aborts before reaching those checks only if dependency checks ran first, and here the dependency loop is last, so the earlier checks do run but the command still reports failure. Anyone following the README will see the build as rejected. Fix options for the author: restore the 15 files to their exact upstream bytes (ideal, keeps the recorded provenance true), or regenerate the hashes in lib/dependencies.json from the formatted files. Both touch lib/, which this task's rules forbid contributors from editing, so this needs the author or the integrator.","line":86,"path":"tools/check_launch.py","reproduction":"State: the committed tree at HEAD (deb877b). Steps: `forge build && python3 tools/check_launch.py`. Expected: prints `Launch parameters, compiler configuration, ERC-20 ABI and dependency hashes verified.` and exits 0, as README.md says. Actual: exits 1 with `Vendored source changed: forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol`. Independent confirmation: `sha256sum lib/forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol` prints 3fbf4a025b4fc94eaca4c38c1f3dacb37bee10f12ee81994cfaf365ac1ce7384 while lib/dependencies.json line 21 records d4c89eec70d267dec6188461fbc74d3dc8c47e518d176a23417533a232ed9780 (which is the sha256 of https://raw.githubusercontent.com/foundry-rs/forge-std/3b20d60d14b343ee4f908cb8079495c07f5e8981/src/StdAssertions.sol). Patching the script to skip the first mismatch reveals 14 more, listed in the description.","severity":"low","snippet":"            check(actual == expected, f\"Vendored source changed: {library}/{filename}\")","title":"Documented provenance check tools/check_launch.py fails: 15 vendored files no longer match the hashes in lib/dependencies.json"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"The assignment's narrative says the Uniswap v4 pool fee is fixed at 1.25% and its test item 5 says to verify 1.25%, but the mandatory build requirements say `fee 3000, tickSpacing 60`. The committed manifest, README.md and test/COVERAGE.md all resolve this toward 3000 and say so explicitly; test/LaunchFlow.t.sol asserts lpFee == 3000. This is consistent with the mandatory requirement and with the admission rule that economics/pool fields are copied from the job verbatim, so it is not a code defect. It is recorded here because the two parts of the brief cannot both be satisfied: a launch admitted with fee 3000 opens a pool charging 0.30%, not 1.25%, and the requester's own acceptance test 5 as written would fail against it. Note also that the narrative's unit is wrong: Uniswap v4 fee units are hundredths of a basis point, so 1.25% is 12500 pips (125 bps), not '12500 basis points'; if the requester truly wants 1.25%, the manifest value must be 12500 and the tick spacing re-chosen, which changes a mandatory field and is the requester's decision, not the contributor's.","line":14,"path":"launch.json","reproduction":"State: launch.json as committed. Input: read pool.fee. Actual: 3000. Expected by the narrative and its test 5: 12500 (1.25%). Expected by the mandatory build requirement: 3000. No change is recommended without the requester's decision.","severity":"info","snippet":"    \"fee\": 3000,","title":"Pool fee in launch.json is 3000 (0.30%) while the narrative brief and its test 5 ask for 1.25%; the tree follows the mandatory build requirement, so the requester should confirm the intended fee"}],"hash":"629e192c0a6a15b08f7528bb303136cf146225c70f32dab53a56331b7560f498","nodeId":"809a8095-3c59-4285-bb7f-49f2bb15640f","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and the findings file is written and validated.\n\n**Result:** the token's arithmetic is clean. `IMDTToken` is a 12-line wrapper over unmodified OpenZeppelin 5.0.2 ERC-20. I found no defect in the Math Precision, Boundary or Numerical Gap areas. Two items are recorded in `.imd-findings.json`, both outside the token code:\n\n- **Low, provenance check fails.** The README-mandated `python3 tools/check_launch.py` exits non-zero on HEAD. Fifteen vendored files under `lib/` were re-formatted after vendoring, so their SHA-256 no longer matches `lib/dependencies.json`. I fetched the upstream files at the pinned commits and confirmed the recorded hashes are the true upstream hashes, and that every altered file is whitespace-identical to upstream. One file, Hooks.sol, also gained braces around a one-line return. The vendored AMM math is therefore semantically upstream, and the build and tests are unaffected. The fix requires touching `lib/`, which contributors may not edit, so it belongs to the author or integrator.\n- **Info, fee conflict.** The manifest carries fee 3000 per the mandatory build requirement, while the narrative brief and its test item 5 ask for 1.25%. The tree documents this choice consistently. The narrative's unit is also wrong, since 1.25% is 12500 pips, not 12500 basis points. The requester should confirm the intended value.\n\n**What I verified in my area:**\n\n- The supply literal evaluates to exactly 10^27, fits uint256, and the checked mint path cannot overflow. Decimals are 18 as the manifest says.\n- Every unchecked block in the inherited `_update` is bounded by total supply. Allowance handling at 0, max, and max minus 1 behaves per spec, and failed spends preserve allowance.\n- There are no external calls, payable paths, sentinel branches beyond the zero-address reverts, or decoded bytes inputs, so the Boundary checklist has nothing to break.\n- The provenance sqrtPriceX96 and its reciprocal are the exact integer roots, lie within Uniswap's price bounds, and map to a tick of roughly minus 129 thousand. The floor rounding implies an opening cap one wei under 2500 IMD, which is provenance only.\n- I confirmed on mainnet through a public RPC that IMD has 18 decimals and the symbol IMD, so the market cap in wei means 2500 IMD, and that the PoolManager address has code.\n- The test suite's liquidity derivation handles negative-tick flooring correctly and places the seed entirely on the IMDT side. All 35 tests pass, including the 1000-run settlement fuzz.\n\n**Coverage:** all three ABI entry points are marked `holds`, with six additional invariant rows. Nothing was left unreached. No scratch tests were written because no finding reached high or critical severity.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":954154,"inputTokens":322,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":19025,"runtime":"claude","turns":29,"wallClockMs":335402}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"41f7c1458e1278ad","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"README.md lists `python3 tools/check_launch.py` as one of the four offline build-and-check steps and states that lib/dependencies.json records the SHA-256 hashes of every vendored file. On the committed tree (HEAD deb877b, clean working copy) that check exits non-zero before it reaches its success message: 15 of the hashes in lib/dependencies.json do not match the files on disk. I fetched each of the 15 files from the pinned upstream commits (foundry-rs/forge-std@3b20d60d, Uniswap/v4-core@46c68346): the recorded hashes are the genuine upstream hashes, and every committed file differs from upstream only by `forge fmt` reformatting (line wrapping, and in v4-core/src/libraries/Hooks.sol braces added around a one-line `if`). Whitespace-stripped content is identical for 14 files and the Hooks.sol difference is brace-only, so no vendored dependency carries a semantic change, and the six OpenZeppelin files the production token inherits match upstream byte-for-byte. `forge fmt --check` passes, confirming the tree is in the formatted state. The defect is in the verification tooling and its provenance claim, not in the token: the check the README tells a verifier to run is red on the author's own tree, so it cannot distinguish a tampered dependency from the shipped one, and lib/dependencies.json line 21 onward records hashes of files that are not what is committed. Mismatched files: forge-std src/StdAssertions.sol, src/StdJson.sol, src/StdToml.sol, src/Vm.sol, src/console.sol, src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol; v4-core src/PoolManager.sol, src/libraries/Hooks.sol, src/libraries/Pool.sol, src/libraries/SqrtPriceMath.sol, src/libraries/StateLibrary.sol, src/libraries/SwapMath.sol, src/libraries/TickBitmap.sol, src/types/Currency.sol, src/types/Slot0.sol. Fix options that preserve intent: either re-record the hashes of the committed (formatted) files in lib/dependencies.json and state in README that the vendored copies are upstream content passed through `forge fmt`, or restore the upstream byte-exact files and exclude lib/ from formatting. The remainder of check_launch.py (manifest fields, foundry.toml settings, ABI surface, provenance price) passes once the hash loop is reached with correct data.","line":86,"path":"tools/check_launch.py","reproduction":"State: clean checkout of HEAD. Steps: `forge build` then `python3 tools/check_launch.py`. Expected (per README lines 23-28 and 119-127): prints 'Launch parameters, compiler configuration, ERC-20 ABI and dependency hashes verified.' and exits 0. Actual: exits 1 with 'Vendored source changed: forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol'. Concrete values: sha256(lib/forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol) = 3fbf4a025b4fc94eaca4c38c1f3dacb37bee10f12ee81994cfaf365ac1ce7384; lib/dependencies.json line 21 records d4c89eec70d267dec6188461fbc74d3dc8c47e518d176a23417533a232ed9780, which is the hash of the upstream file at forge-std commit 3b20d60d14b343ee4f908cb8079495c07f5e8981. Iterating the full dependencies.json map gives 15 mismatches (listed in the description); `forge fmt --check` exits 0 on the tree.","severity":"low","snippet":"            check(actual == expected, f\"Vendored source changed: {library}/{filename}\")","title":"Documented provenance check fails on the committed tree: 15 vendored files were reformatted after their SHA-256 hashes were recorded"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"The job text describes the pool fee as 'fixed at 1.25% (12500 basis points)' and lists as acceptance test 5 'Verify that the Uniswap v4 pool fee is set at 1.25% with paired currency IMD'. The mandatory build requirements in the same job fix launch.json pool.fee at 3000 with tickSpacing 60. The delivered manifest, README (section 'Launch parameters and the fee conflict'), test/COVERAGE.md and test/LaunchFlow.t.sol all follow the mandatory 3000 value and say so explicitly, and launch.json notes records that 3000 supersedes the 1.25% description. This is the correct resolution under the rules given (economics and pool parameters are copied from the job's mandatory block verbatim), and it is not a defect in the token or the manifest. It is recorded here because the requester's own test 5 as written cannot pass against this manifest, and 12500 in Uniswap fee units is 1.25% whereas '12500 basis points' would be 125%; the requester should confirm 0.30% is the intended LP fee before admission, since a static v4 LP fee cannot be changed after the pool is initialized (LaunchFlow.t.sol test_PoolFeeCannotBeDynamicallyChanged shows updateDynamicLPFee reverting on this pool key). No code change is proposed.","line":14,"path":"launch.json","reproduction":"State: launch.json as committed. Read pool.fee: value is 3000. The narrative requirement and acceptance test 5 expect 12500. A pool initialized with this manifest has lpFee 3000, so a check asserting lpFee == 12500 fails; test/LaunchFlow.t.sol line 155 asserts lpFee == 3000 and passes. Expected per narrative: 12500. Actual per mandatory block and manifest: 3000. Requires a requester decision, not a code fix.","severity":"info","snippet":"    \"fee\": 3000,","title":"Pool fee in the manifest is 3000 (0.30%); the requester's narrative and acceptance test 5 ask for 1.25% (12500)"}],"hash":"8715d6f845467d3a37da88ca04a5cfd89172be96c6b2791694875e5bf2558052","nodeId":"9564e711-7773-4b97-9aa1-1b38d4764579","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and `.imd-findings.json` is written and valid. No tracked files were changed.\n\n**Outcome for the assigned area.** The permission model of IMDTToken has no defects. The contract is a 12-line wrapper over OpenZeppelin 5.0.2 `ERC20` with an argument-free constructor that mints 1e27 units to its deployer. I verified that all six vendored OpenZeppelin files are byte-identical to upstream at the pinned commit, that the compiled ABI exposes exactly the nine standard ERC-20 functions with no fallback or receive, and that no storage slot can be written by anyone other than the holder it belongs to. The three state-changing entry points, the fixed-supply invariant, and the absence of any owner, initializer, proxy or forbidden opcode all hold. The Access Control, Asymmetry and Trust Gap checklists produce nothing: there are no paired admin variants, no caller-class branches, no external calls, and no privileged actor after construction.\n\n**Two items reported, neither in the token:**\n\n- **Low, tools/check_launch.py line 86.** The README tells verifiers to run this offline check, but it fails on the committed tree. Fifteen vendored forge-std and Uniswap v4-core files were passed through `forge fmt` after their SHA-256 hashes were recorded in lib/dependencies.json. I fetched each file from the pinned upstream commits: the recorded hashes are upstream's, and every difference is whitespace or a brace-only reformat, so no dependency is semantically altered. The provenance tooling is what is broken.\n- **Info, launch.json line 14.** Pool fee is 3000 per the mandatory build block, while the narrative and acceptance test 5 ask for 1.25%. The author resolved this correctly and documented it. It is recorded so the requester confirms the choice before admission, since a static v4 LP fee cannot be changed after initialization.\n\n**Coverage record.** All three listed entry points are marked `holds`, with six additional rows for invariants, the manifest, the checker, and the existing test suite. Nothing was left unreached. No critical or high findings exist, so no proof test was required.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1448908,"inputTokens":450,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":22002,"runtime":"claude","turns":33,"wallClockMs":543888}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"0476c44a80aa9574","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Merged from all four specialist areas (audit_flow, audit_economics, audit_math, audit_permissions), which reported the same root cause. README.md line 27 lists `python3 tools/check_launch.py` as one of the four offline acceptance commands, and the 'Dependency provenance' section says lib/dependencies.json records the SHA-256 of every vendored file. On the committed tree (HEAD deb877b, clean working copy) that command exits 1 at tools/check_launch.py line 86 (`check(actual == expected, f\"Vendored source changed: {library}/{filename}\")`) on the first vendored file it compares, and never prints its success line. I reproduced it and then hashed every entry in lib/dependencies.json: 15 files mismatch, 6 in forge-std (src/StdAssertions.sol, src/StdJson.sol, src/StdToml.sol, src/Vm.sol, src/console.sol, src/interfaces/IMulticall3.sol) and 9 in v4-core (src/PoolManager.sol, src/libraries/Hooks.sol, src/libraries/Pool.sol, src/libraries/SqrtPriceMath.sol, src/libraries/StateLibrary.sol, src/libraries/SwapMath.sol, src/libraries/TickBitmap.sol, src/types/Currency.sol, src/types/Slot0.sol). I fetched each of the 15 files from the pinned upstream commits (foundry-rs/forge-std@3b20d60d, Uniswap/v4-core@46c68346): every recorded hash equals the upstream file's hash, so the record is of pristine upstream and the committed copies are what drifted. Comparing whitespace-stripped bytes, 14 of the 15 are identical to upstream and Hooks.sol differs only by braces added around a one-statement `if`; `forge fmt --check` passes, so the drift is `forge fmt` reformatting of lib/. The six OpenZeppelin 5.0.2 files that the production token inherits are byte-identical to upstream (cmp against dbb6104c), so src/IMDTToken.sol's compiled behaviour is unaffected, and `forge build` / `forge test` (35 tests) pass. The defect is confined to verification: the repository's own integrity gate is red on the author's own tree, so it cannot distinguish a tampered vendored file from the shipped one, and the README's instruction to run it reports the build as rejected. Note also that .gitignore line 4 lists lib/dependencies.json even though the file is tracked; this is harmless today (tracked files are not ignored) but it signals the file was not meant to be committed as-is. Minimal fix, either: (a) restore the 15 files to their exact upstream bytes and exclude lib/ from `forge fmt`, keeping the recorded hashes true; or (b) regenerate the hashes in lib/dependencies.json from the committed files and state in README.md that lib/ holds upstream content passed through `forge fmt`. Do not change lib/ semantics. Both options touch lib/, which contributors are forbidden to edit, so this needs the author or integrator.","line":21,"path":"lib/dependencies.json","reproduction":"State: clean checkout at HEAD deb877b. Run `forge build && python3 -I tools/check_launch.py`. Expected (README.md line 27 and the script's own final line): prints 'Launch parameters, compiler configuration, ERC-20 ABI and dependency hashes verified.' and exits 0. Actual: prints 'Vendored source changed: forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol' and exits 1. Direct confirmation: `sha256sum lib/forge-std/src/StdAssertions.sol` prints 3fbf4a025b4fc94eaca4c38c1f3dacb37bee10f12ee81994cfaf365ac1ce7384 while lib/dependencies.json line 21 records d4c89eec70d267dec6188461fbc74d3dc8c47e518d176a23417533a232ed9780, which is sha256 of https://raw.githubusercontent.com/foundry-rs/forge-std/3b20d60d14b343ee4f908cb8079495c07f5e8981/src/StdAssertions.sol. Likewise `sha256sum lib/v4-core/src/PoolManager.sol` prints b3c68cb554af5d13d715ad9c9a0255e677f5d6ef1392980ffc3fd7d2fcc8b19d versus the recorded 3b6ab111dadf613e3cfd617e4b1c6ab75b5445cd15cbe52d7c6207fc02449717 at line 49 (the upstream hash). Iterating the whole map gives exactly 15 mismatches; `diff -w -B` against each pinned upstream file is empty for 14 and brace-only for Hooks.sol.","severity":"low","snippet":"      \"src/StdAssertions.sol\": \"d4c89eec70d267dec6188461fbc74d3dc8c47e518d176a23417533a232ed9780\",","title":"Documented provenance check fails on the committed tree: 15 vendored dependency files were reformatted after their SHA-256 hashes were recorded in lib/dependencies.json"},{"citation":"resolved","description":"Merged from all four specialist areas. Not a code defect; recorded so the open specification conflict is visible before admission. The job narrative item 3 says 'The Uniswap v4 pool fee is fixed at 1.25% (12500 basis points)' and test item 5 says 'Verify that the Uniswap v4 pool fee is set at 1.25% with paired currency IMD', while the mandatory build requirements in the same job say 'launch.json pool: ... fee 3000, tickSpacing 60'. The committed manifest follows the mandatory block (launch.json line 14 fee 3000), README.md section 'Launch parameters and the fee conflict', test/COVERAGE.md 'Scope and conflicting requirements' and launch.json notes all state this explicitly, and test/LaunchFlow.t.sol asserts lpFee == 3000 at lines 91 and 155. That is the correct resolution under the rules given (pool and economics fields are copied from the job's mandatory block verbatim), and the token itself has no fee logic either way, so nothing in src/ changes whichever value the requester picks. The narrative is also internally inconsistent: Uniswap v4 fee units are hundredths of a basis point, so 12500 is 125 bps (1.25%), not '12500 basis points'. A static v4 LP fee cannot be changed after the pool is initialized (test_PoolFeeCannotBeDynamicallyChanged shows updateDynamicLPFee reverting with UnauthorizedDynamicLPFeeUpdate), so the requester should confirm 0.30% before admission. Needed: a one-line requester confirmation of the intended fee; if 12500 is intended, launch.json pool.fee and tickSpacing, README.md and the LaunchFlow fixtures change, and that is the requester's decision, not the contributor's.","line":14,"path":"launch.json","reproduction":"State: launch.json as committed. Read pool.fee: actual 3000. Expected by the narrative and its test item 5: 12500. Expected by the mandatory build block: 3000. `forge test --match-test test_PoolFeeCannotBeDynamicallyChanged` initializes the IMDT/IMD pool from the manifest's parameters and passes with `assertEq(fee, 3000)` at test/LaunchFlow.t.sol:91; a checker written literally from test item 5 (expect lpFee == 12500) fails against the same pool. Both cannot be satisfied by one launch.json.","severity":"info","snippet":"    \"fee\": 3000,","title":"Pool LP fee is 3000 (0.30%) per the mandatory build block; the brief's narrative and its test item 5 ask for 1.25% (12500), which this manifest cannot satisfy"}],"hash":"a48949a8a0a12fc6deb343a5198f323c9dd3f2f30978bc09dc884732e2c9578c","nodeId":"754fe3d3-1fc6-41a6-8dd5-ee5353645ee0","outcome":"completed","summary":"Review complete. The findings are in `.imd-findings.json` and no tracked file was changed.\n\n**Outcome:** the token is sound. `IMDTToken` is an argument-free wrapper around the unmodified OpenZeppelin 5.0.2 ERC-20 that mints 1e27 units to its deployer once. All 35 project tests pass, the runtime bytecode contains no DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT, the ABI is exactly the nine ERC-20 functions, and the manifest's pool and economics fields match the mandatory block, including the derived sqrtPriceX96.\n\n**Specialist findings, settled:**\n\n- **Kept, merged, low.** All four specialists reported the same root cause: the documented provenance check `tools/check_launch.py` exits non-zero on the committed tree. I reproduced it and hashed every entry in lib/dependencies.json. Exactly 15 vendored files (6 forge-std, 9 v4-core) mismatch. I fetched each from the pinned upstream commits: every recorded hash is the pristine upstream hash, and the committed copies differ only by whitespace, plus one brace-only change in Hooks.sol, consistent with `forge fmt`. The six OpenZeppelin files the production token inherits are byte-identical to upstream, so this is a verification-tooling defect, not a token defect. Fix needs the author or integrator since it touches lib/.\n- **Kept, merged, info.** The brief's narrative asks for a 1.25% pool fee while its mandatory block fixes fee 3000. The tree correctly follows the mandatory block and documents the conflict. The requester should confirm the intended fee before admission, since a static v4 LP fee cannot change after pool initialization.\n- **Dropped.** The aderyn large-numeric-literal lead is a compile-time constant with no overflow.\n\n**Coverage:** all three listed entry points hold, with five additional rows for the constructor, forbidden-opcode and ownership invariants, manifest-to-economics consistency, the protected floor's expectations (checked by inspection and local equivalents since its helper contracts are not in this tree), and the static-analysis lead. No critical or high findings, so no proof tests were written.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":713649,"inputTokens":290,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":12302,"runtime":"claude","turns":20,"wallClockMs":332115}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"e35e7f7f2d23256d39d624b2f03abe12c2238b239ee7e1728a2697a685b8221c","device":"fe36973c683b5abb","findings":[],"hash":"b95b6d117e7cffeb1069e54275a2910979871c41ecf20a5a509cac5561860881","nodeId":"13ab6a66-32dc-4d57-96f9-2747c57e0e9b","outcome":"completed","summary":"Expanded tests within `test/` with stronger admin probes, authorization failure cases, allowance invariants, and fuzzed Uniswap v4 settlement.\n\nVerification passed: **35 tests**, including 6,000 fuzz cases and 32,768 invariant calls. `forge build` also succeeded.\n\nTests follow the mandatory fee `3000` (0.30%). The conflicting 1.25% requirement and limits of offline factory/Merkle coverage are documented in `test/COVERAGE.md`.","treeHash":"a126f7a4c28ff969159e65087c6c13fe0b2bea0c","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":515968,"inputTokens":62779,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":11090,"runtime":"codex","turns":4,"wallClockMs":397479}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"8f9bc9bf71ba3e927fb342ca8c66fd22ebf7fa19f04a2224137dc3656960d82c","device":"fc6af3255ecf3684","findings":[],"hash":"c1315d1c9bd1ea7cbbf14587332d6377d093ebfba87ed449358ecb199c591c71","nodeId":"f8947a94-b5cc-4ed6-9d36-0131e29a062b","outcome":"completed","summary":"Implemented the Foundry project, fixed-supply `IMDTToken`, launch manifest, vendored dependencies, and documentation.\n\nVerified: `forge build`, all 21 tests, `forge fmt --check`, and manifest checks pass.\n\nThe manifest uses mandatory fee `3000` (0.30%). The conflicting 1.25% request and external factory responsibilities are documented in `README.md`. No deployment was performed.","treeHash":"4d822dec89cef74e70edede4c3082cc6af511d0f","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1332480,"inputTokens":95786,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":20331,"runtime":"codex","turns":5,"wallClockMs":784501}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"7ae834aca4e58fe3bda38e4b3492fbeba333daeae0ae646c8918f50eb826c2b5","device":"fef70a876212b4f0","findings":[],"hash":"e02ffbc8fc10ae43a321d0e166dfa9ce025ccd8bc8b2ef24be12bcf5ba7bd254","nodeId":"ad092b69-c68c-4f06-80ba-9ddbbd232eae","outcome":"completed","summary":"Updated only [launch.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/8d89a924-8f5a-437e-ad00-5255c9de511a/ad092b69-c68c-4f06-80ba-9ddbbd232eae/launch.json), clarifying notes while preserving the exact supply, economics, constructor arguments and mandatory fee `3000`.\n\nValidation passed: supplied JSON Schema, `forge build`, and all 35 tests.\n\nThe additional repository checker reports 15 pre-existing dependency hash mismatches; those files remain unchanged.","treeHash":"11ec6678d298eca0139153d98af4552e0083ab30","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":302976,"inputTokens":47467,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":3195,"runtime":"codex","turns":4,"wallClockMs":130309}}],"verification":[{"checks":[{"durationMs":11028,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 74 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 10.92s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":579,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 6 tests for test/LaunchFlow.t.sol:LaunchFlowTest\n[PASS] test_PoolFeeCannotBeDynamicallyChanged() (gas: 629711)\n[PASS] test_SeedAndSwapsWhenTokenIsCurrency0() (gas: 1107273)\n[PASS] test_SeedAndSwapsWhenTokenIsCurrency1() (gas: 1116234)\n[PASS] test_SwapRequiresUnlock() (gas: 625501)\n[PASS] test_UnauthorizedCallbackRejected() (gas: 32295)\n[PASS] test_UnsettledSwapRevertsAtomically() (gas: 808439)\nSuite result: ok. 6 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 14.36ms (3.32ms CPU time)\n\nRan 18 tests for test/IMDTToken.t.sol:IMDTTokenTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_DelegatedTransferCannotExceedAuthorization(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 116963, ~: 117295)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 507255779699487281586493672\n  Bound result 985488440601025436827013358\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransferRoundTripConservesSupply(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 131624, ~: 131501)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 13454\n\n[PASS] test_ApproveOverwriteAndRevoke() (gas: 162101)\n[PASS] test_ConstructorMintsOnlyToImmediateFactoryDeployer() (gas: 214406)\n[PASS] test_DeployerCannotSpendHolderFundsWithoutAllowance() (gas: 95835)\n[PASS] test_DeploymentMatchesManifest() (gas: 60962)\n[PASS] test_FailedTransferFromPreservesAllowanceAndBalances() (gas: 207191)\n[PASS] test_InfiniteAllowanceRemainsInfinite() (gas: 126614)\n[PASS] test_NoFallbackOrPayableEntryPoint() (gas: 90080)\n[PASS] test_NoOwnerMintBurnOrAdminEntryPointsForAnyone() (gas: 1551111)\n[PASS] test_PoolManagerReceivesAndReturnsExactAmount() (gas: 143524)\n[PASS] test_RevertApproveZeroSpender() (gas: 30385)\n[PASS] test_RevertInsufficientBalanceAndMaximumAmount() (gas: 78399)\n[PASS] test_RevertTransferToZeroIncludingZeroAmount() (gas: 68089)\n[PASS] test_RuntimeContainsNoForbiddenOpcodes() (gas: 887187)\n[PASS] test_TransferEntireBalanceEmitsAndHasNoFee() (gas: 82492)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromConsumesExactAllowance() (gas: 251626)\n[PASS] test_ZeroAndSelfTransfersPreserveBalances() (gas: 118163)\nSuite result: ok. 18 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 14.39ms (36.26ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/SupplyInvariant.t.sol:SupplyInvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_SupplyIsFixedAndEveryUnitIsAccountedFor() (runs: 128, calls: 8192, reverts: 0)\n\n╭-----------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract        | Selector        | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+================================================================+\n| TransferHandler | approveAndSpend | 2793  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TransferHandler | move            | 2651  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TransferHandler | overspend       | 2748  | 0       | 0        |\n╰-----------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 3124842405\n  Bound result 410068508579434098815231037\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 3264839209814844238525\n  Bound result 125270724187523965593206900\n  Bound result 10000000000000000\n  Bound result 2480\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 767408076603084568974510566\n  Bound result 4707\n  Bound result 10000\n  Bound result 1000\n  Bound result 3924\n  Bound result 20465\n  Bound result 3891\n  Bound result 2142\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 4496\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1167\n  Bound result 4589\n  Bound result 2481\n  Bound result 27135240791\n  Bound result 498553657281222766347486\n  Bound result 2004980517457710930681\n  Bound result 811\n  Bound result 1464\n  Bound result 9051956839741873136\n  Bound result 60\n  Bound result 4163\n  Bound result 3430\n  Bound result 887220\n  Bound result 33909717254096446206785591\n  Bound result 127\n  Bound result 29882029319376692348261348\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 494.65ms (493.56ms CPU time)\n\nRan 3 test suites in 495.85ms (523.40ms CPU time): 25 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (25 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":27,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"IMDTToken.approve(address,uint256)\",\"IMDTToken.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"IMDTToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":4,\"README.md\":134,\"foundry.toml\":20,\"launch.json\":24,\"src/IMDTToken.sol\":12,\"test/IMDTToken.t.sol\":262,\"test/LaunchFlow.t.sol\":187,\"test/SupplyInvariant.t.sol\":83,\"test/helpers/V4Actors.sol\":95,\"tools/check_launch.py\":91},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true},{"durationMs":500,"exitCode":0,"name":"slither","output":"slither: no results at low impact or above","passed":true},{"durationMs":214,"exitCode":0,"name":"aderyn","output":"[low] large-numeric-literal at src/IMDTToken.sol:10: Large Numeric Literal","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"5e0f18f3bd751bccd2d4b5b257af10ba904efefe163a1bd3f9ac19d4fadbe669","verifiedTreeHash":"f4ac7ddbbbbda975d0a672fbce044e0962464d1b","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+ad90ce4c"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":14114,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 76 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 13.99s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":8403,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 18 tests for test/IMDTToken.t.sol:IMDTTokenTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_DelegatedTransferCannotExceedAuthorization(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 116946, ~: 117285)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 5710193588011412\n  Bound result 51636515070381163\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransferRoundTripConservesSupply(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 131194, ~: 131453)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1653\n\n[PASS] test_ApproveOverwriteAndRevoke() (gas: 162101)\n[PASS] test_ConstructorMintsOnlyToImmediateFactoryDeployer() (gas: 214406)\n[PASS] test_DeployerCannotSpendHolderFundsWithoutAllowance() (gas: 95835)\n[PASS] test_DeploymentMatchesManifest() (gas: 61019)\n[PASS] test_FailedTransferFromPreservesAllowanceAndBalances() (gas: 207191)\n[PASS] test_InfiniteAllowanceRemainsInfinite() (gas: 126614)\n[PASS] test_NoFallbackOrPayableEntryPoint() (gas: 90080)\n[PASS] test_NoOwnerMintBurnOrAdminEntryPointsForAnyone() (gas: 2858917)\n[PASS] test_PoolManagerReceivesAndReturnsExactAmount() (gas: 143524)\n[PASS] test_RevertApproveZeroSpender() (gas: 30385)\n[PASS] test_RevertInsufficientBalanceAndMaximumAmount() (gas: 78399)\n[PASS] test_RevertTransferToZeroIncludingZeroAmount() (gas: 68089)\n[PASS] test_RuntimeContainsNoForbiddenOpcodes() (gas: 887187)\n[PASS] test_TransferEntireBalanceEmitsAndHasNoFee() (gas: 82492)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromConsumesExactAllowance() (gas: 251626)\n[PASS] test_ZeroAndSelfTransfersPreserveBalances() (gas: 118163)\nSuite result: ok. 18 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 83.75ms (133.48ms CPU time)\n\nRan 8 tests for test/IMDTTokenAdversarial.t.sol:IMDTTokenAdversarialTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_DelegatedSelfTransferConsumesAuthorizationOnly(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 155042, ~: 154887)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 11326\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_MaximumMinusOneAllowanceIsFinite(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 156987, ~: 156875)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1526738685640496542\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_OverdrawWithEnoughAllowanceRollsBackAndCanBeRetried(uint256,bool) (runs: 1000, μ: 311493, ~: 311450)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 733\n\n[PASS] test_RecipientAndHolderCannotBorrowAnotherSpendersAllowance() (gas: 198423)\n[PASS] test_RevokingInfiniteAllowanceTakesEffectImmediately() (gas: 138838)\n[PASS] test_TransfersNeedNoRecipientConsentOrCallback() (gas: 280986)\n[PASS] test_ZeroSourceCannotMintEvenThroughZeroTransferFrom() (gas: 88604)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromNeedsNoApprovalAndEmitsTransfer() (gas: 74984)\nSuite result: ok. 8 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 84.19ms (248.21ms CPU time)\n\nRan 7 tests for test/LaunchFlow.t.sol:LaunchFlowTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_LaunchSettlementIsExactInEitherCurrencyOrder(bool,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 1125224, ~: 1121053)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 847355637093732582\n\n[PASS] test_PoolFeeCannotBeDynamicallyChanged() (gas: 629733)\n[PASS] test_SeedAndSwapsWhenTokenIsCurrency0() (gas: 1116901)\n[PASS] test_SeedAndSwapsWhenTokenIsCurrency1() (gas: 1125905)\n[PASS] test_SwapRequiresUnlock() (gas: 625523)\n[PASS] test_UnauthorizedCallbackRejected() (gas: 32317)\n[PASS] test_UnsettledSwapRevertsAtomically() (gas: 808461)\nSuite result: ok. 7 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 84.19ms (89.12ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/SupplyInvariant.t.sol:SupplyInvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_SupplyIsFixedAndEveryUnitIsAccountedFor() (runs: 128, calls: 8192, reverts: 0)\n\n╭-----------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract        | Selector        | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+================================================================+\n| TransferHandler | approveAndSpend | 2728  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TransferHandler | move            | 2764  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TransferHandler | overspend       | 2700  | 0       | 0        |\n╰-----------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 744828955711463675242895610\n  Bound result 1228\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 469\n  Bound result 497\n  Bound result 100\n  Bound result 1852\n  Bound result 9\n  Bound result 3680\n  Bound result 56\n  Bound result 2080\n  Bound result 1883\n  Bound result 96\n  Bound result 7\n  Bound result 40\n  Bound result 1715\n  Bound result 3041954472\n  Bound result 1170\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1898\n  Bound result 703681579455347053929297898\n  Bound result 3668\n  Bound result 6\n  Bound result 377\n  Bound result 10\n  Bound result 4899\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 295\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 544.75ms (543.86ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/AllowanceInvariant.t.sol:AllowanceInvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_BalancesAndAllowancesMatchIndependentModel() (runs: 256, calls: 24576, reverts: 0)\n\n╭-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract              | Selector           | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+=========================================================================+\n| AllowanceModelHandler | approve            | 4090  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AllowanceModelHandler | approveZeroSpender | 4022  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AllowanceModelHandler | revoke             | 4209  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AllowanceModelHandler | transfer           | 4002  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AllowanceModelHandler | transferFrom       | 4225  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AllowanceModelHandler | transferToZero     | 4028  | 0       | 0        |\n╰-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 3007\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 50\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 33723918255\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1435\n  Bound result 720434286434235159757709856\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 461227524977053982566706548\n  Bound result 887220\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1000000000\n  Bound result 7265\n  Bound result 0\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 8.31s (8.31s CPU time)\n\nRan 5 test suites in 8.31s (9.11s CPU time): 35 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (35 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":38,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"IMDTToken.approve(address,uint256)\",\"IMDTToken.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"IMDTToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":4,\"README.md\":134,\"foundry.toml\":20,\"launch.json\":24,\"src/IMDTToken.sol\":12,\"test/AllowanceInvariant.t.sol\":181,\"test/COVERAGE.md\":50,\"test/IMDTToken.t.sol\":280,\"test/IMDTTokenAdversarial.t.sol\":155,\"test/LaunchFlow.t.sol\":200,\"test/SupplyInvariant.t.sol\":83,\"test/helpers/V4Actors.sol\":95,\"tools/check_launch.py\":91},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"b95b6d117e7cffeb1069e54275a2910979871c41ecf20a5a509cac5561860881","verifiedTreeHash":"a126f7a4c28ff969159e65087c6c13fe0b2bea0c","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+ad90ce4c"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":912,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 55 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 847.41ms\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":910,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 4 tests for test/LaunchFlow.t.sol:LaunchFlowTest\n[PASS] test_LaunchSeedClaimBuyAndSellWithIMDTAsCurrency0() (gas: 1039384)\n[PASS] test_LaunchSeedClaimBuyAndSellWithIMDTAsCurrency1() (gas: 1044506)\n[PASS] test_StaticPoolFeeCannotBeUpdated() (gas: 119681)\n[PASS] test_SwapOutsideUnlockReverts() (gas: 118316)\nSuite result: ok. 4 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 20.70ms (1.86ms CPU time)\n\nRan 16 tests for test/IMDTToken.t.sol:IMDTTokenTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_AllowanceCannotBeOverspent(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 163859, ~: 164521)\n[PASS] testFuzz_BalanceCannotBeOverspent(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 104150, ~: 104523)\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransferRoundTripConservesEveryUnit(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 162743, ~: 163401)\n[PASS] test_ApproveOverwriteRevokeAndFiniteAllowance() (gas: 255469)\n[PASS] test_DeployerCannotSpendHolderFundsWithoutApproval() (gas: 136651)\n[PASS] test_DeploymentMintsExactlyOnceToFactoryNotOrigin() (gas: 224071)\n[PASS] test_FailedTransferFromPreservesAllowanceAndBalances() (gas: 105472)\n[PASS] test_InfiniteAllowanceDoesNotDecrease() (gas: 123366)\n[PASS] test_NoOwnerAdminMintBurnOrUpgradeEntryPoints() (gas: 970393)\n[PASS] test_PoolManagerReceivesAndSendsExactAmounts() (gas: 145420)\n[PASS] test_RevertOnTransferFromZeroSender() (gas: 32936)\n[PASS] test_RevertOnZeroRecipientOrSpender() (gas: 168958)\n[PASS] test_RuntimeHasNoForbiddenOpcodes() (gas: 432153)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromToSelfConsumesAllowanceWithoutLosingTokens() (gas: 94633)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromZeroAmountNeedsNoAllowance() (gas: 50698)\n[PASS] test_ZeroAndSelfTransfersEmitEventsWithoutChangingSupply() (gas: 77371)\nSuite result: ok. 16 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 30.24ms (80.68ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/IMDTInvariant.t.sol:IMDTInvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_SupplyIsFixedAndAllBalancesAreConserved() (runs: 256, calls: 16384, reverts: 0)\n\n╭--------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract     | Selector     | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+==========================================================+\n| TokenHandler | approve      | 5568  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | transfer     | 5425  | 0       | 0        |\n|--------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TokenHandler | transferFrom | 5391  | 0       | 0        |\n╰--------------+--------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 852.64ms (851.92ms CPU time)\n\nRan 3 test suites in 853.80ms (903.58ms CPU time): 21 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (21 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":29,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"IMDTToken.approve(address,uint256)\",\"IMDTToken.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"IMDTToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":4,\"README.md\":117,\"foundry.toml\":14,\"launch.json\":25,\"remappings.txt\":3,\"script/check_launch.py\":87,\"src/IMDTToken.sol\":12,\"test/IMDTInvariant.t.sol\":74,\"test/IMDTToken.t.sol\":247,\"test/LaunchFlow.t.sol\":251,\"test/helpers/TestBase.sol\":43},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true},{"durationMs":367,"exitCode":0,"name":"slither","output":"slither: no results at low impact or above","passed":true},{"durationMs":211,"exitCode":0,"name":"aderyn","output":"[low] large-numeric-literal at src/IMDTToken.sol:10: Large Numeric Literal","passed":true}],"detail":"launch.json is not a valid launch manifest: (root): Unrecognized key: \"chainId\"","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"rejected","submissionHash":"c1315d1c9bd1ea7cbbf14587332d6377d093ebfba87ed449358ecb199c591c71","verifiedTreeHash":"4d822dec89cef74e70edede4c3082cc6af511d0f","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+ad90ce4c"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":15361,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 76 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 15.25s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":8661,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 18 tests for test/IMDTToken.t.sol:IMDTTokenTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_DelegatedTransferCannotExceedAuthorization(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 116995, ~: 117307)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 999999999999999999999999999\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000000000000\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_TransferRoundTripConservesSupply(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 131466, ~: 131477)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000000000000\n\n[PASS] test_ApproveOverwriteAndRevoke() (gas: 162101)\n[PASS] test_ConstructorMintsOnlyToImmediateFactoryDeployer() (gas: 214406)\n[PASS] test_DeployerCannotSpendHolderFundsWithoutAllowance() (gas: 95835)\n[PASS] test_DeploymentMatchesManifest() (gas: 61019)\n[PASS] test_FailedTransferFromPreservesAllowanceAndBalances() (gas: 207191)\n[PASS] test_InfiniteAllowanceRemainsInfinite() (gas: 126614)\n[PASS] test_NoFallbackOrPayableEntryPoint() (gas: 90080)\n[PASS] test_NoOwnerMintBurnOrAdminEntryPointsForAnyone() (gas: 2858917)\n[PASS] test_PoolManagerReceivesAndReturnsExactAmount() (gas: 143524)\n[PASS] test_RevertApproveZeroSpender() (gas: 30385)\n[PASS] test_RevertInsufficientBalanceAndMaximumAmount() (gas: 78399)\n[PASS] test_RevertTransferToZeroIncludingZeroAmount() (gas: 68089)\n[PASS] test_RuntimeContainsNoForbiddenOpcodes() (gas: 887187)\n[PASS] test_TransferEntireBalanceEmitsAndHasNoFee() (gas: 82492)\n[PASS] test_TransferFromConsumesExactAllowance() (gas: 251626)\n[PASS] test_ZeroAndSelfTransfersPreserveBalances() (gas: 118163)\nSuite result: ok. 18 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 92.15ms (182.52ms CPU time)\n\nRan 7 tests for test/LaunchFlow.t.sol:LaunchFlowTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_LaunchSettlementIsExactInEitherCurrencyOrder(bool,uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 1125181, ~: 1121053)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 804389682294680391\n\n[PASS] test_PoolFeeCannotBeDynamicallyChanged() (gas: 629733)\n[PASS] test_SeedAndSwapsWhenTokenIsCurrency0() (gas: 1116901)\n[PASS] test_SeedAndSwapsWhenTokenIsCurrency1() (gas: 1125905)\n[PASS] test_SwapRequiresUnlock() (gas: 625523)\n[PASS] test_UnauthorizedCallbackRejected() (gas: 32317)\n[PASS] test_UnsettledSwapRevertsAtomically() (gas: 808461)\nSuite result: ok. 7 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 92.90ms (96.06ms CPU time)\n\nRan 8 tests for test/IMDTTokenAdversarial.t.sol:IMDTTokenAdversarialTest\n[PASS] testFuzz_DelegatedSelfTransferConsumesAuthorizationOnly(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 155052, ~: 154898)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 3669\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_MaximumMinusOneAllowanceIsFinite(uint256) (runs: 1000, μ: 156970, ~: 156875)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 32\n\n[PASS] testFuzz_OverdrawWithEnoughAllowanceRollsBackAndCanBeRetried(uint256,bool) (runs: 1000, μ: 311470, ~: 311450)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 69797\n\n[PASS] test_RecipientAndHolderCannotBorrowAnotherSpendersAllowance() (gas: 198423)\n[PASS] test_RevokingInfiniteAllowanceTakesEffectImmediately() (gas: 138838)\n[PASS] test_TransfersNeedNoRecipientConsentOrCallback() (gas: 280986)\n[PASS] test_ZeroSourceCannotMintEvenThroughZeroTransferFrom() (gas: 88604)\n[PASS] test_ZeroTransferFromNeedsNoApprovalAndEmitsTransfer() (gas: 74984)\nSuite result: ok. 8 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 92.93ms (272.63ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/SupplyInvariant.t.sol:SupplyInvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_SupplyIsFixedAndEveryUnitIsAccountedFor() (runs: 128, calls: 8192, reverts: 0)\n\n╭-----------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract        | Selector        | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+================================================================+\n| TransferHandler | approveAndSpend | 2639  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TransferHandler | move            | 2724  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| TransferHandler | overspend       | 2829  | 0       | 0        |\n╰-----------------+-----------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 97271662078225803363087246\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 885272661632859572990685019\n  Bound result 10\n  Bound result 245344\n  Bound result 11593548751545919380983252\n  Bound result 13900028769114236357993797\n  Bound result 1189\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 26\n  Bound result 28872812804299218058098562\n  Bound result 5472\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 12500\n  Bound result 81008940\n  Bound result 638212886\n  Bound result 26\n  Bound result 25\n  Bound result 23951523\n  Bound result 66092369256358267608757526\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 4342\n  Bound result 1774535\n  Bound result 1139210752055822790465255\n  Bound result 8259\n  Bound result 6\n  Bound result 37306594\n  Bound result 1436\n  Bound result 689\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 544.48ms (543.45ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/AllowanceInvariant.t.sol:AllowanceInvariantTest\n[PASS] invariant_BalancesAndAllowancesMatchIndependentModel() (runs: 256, calls: 24576, reverts: 0)\n\n╭-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract              | Selector           | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+=========================================================================+\n| AllowanceModelHandler | approve            | 4028  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AllowanceModelHandler | approveZeroSpender | 4084  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AllowanceModelHandler | revoke             | 4140  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AllowanceModelHandler | transfer           | 4107  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AllowanceModelHandler | transferFrom       | 4042  | 0       | 0        |\n|-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| AllowanceModelHandler | transferToZero     | 4175  | 0       | 0        |\n╰-----------------------+--------------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1000000000\n  Bound result 88476500331788932784216023\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 6999999996\n  Bound result 9999\n  Bound result 29307639709901387550288023\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 3375\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 1000\n  Bound result 172244699965469201548346973\n  Bound result 1280\n  Bound result 20317986853556601562933\n  Bound result 5\n  Bound result 3107\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 8.57s (8.56s CPU time)\n\nRan 5 test suites in 8.57s (9.39s CPU time): 35 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (35 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":33,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"IMDTToken.approve(address,uint256)\",\"IMDTToken.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"IMDTToken.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":4,\"README.md\":134,\"foundry.toml\":20,\"launch.json\":24,\"src/IMDTToken.sol\":12,\"test/AllowanceInvariant.t.sol\":181,\"test/COVERAGE.md\":50,\"test/IMDTToken.t.sol\":280,\"test/IMDTTokenAdversarial.t.sol\":155,\"test/LaunchFlow.t.sol\":200,\"test/SupplyInvariant.t.sol\":83,\"test/helpers/V4Actors.sol\":95,\"tools/check_launch.py\":91},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"e02ffbc8fc10ae43a321d0e166dfa9ce025ccd8bc8b2ef24be12bcf5ba7bd254","verifiedTreeHash":"11ec6678d298eca0139153d98af4552e0083ab30","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+ad90ce4c"}]}