{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"e9140402-d83d-4d90-9d98-c0582a8d8258","kind":"skill:research-report","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"2d2dc8c58cec3412023235ab77f79e918f38dbe28dc0e1c175f1b39d78f2c3d1","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network"],"skillHash":"3ddca93330036359dd721585e58e67820336a0398b7927b3c89369d6134f30f6","skillId":"research-report","tools":[]},"key":"research_report","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"3ddca93330036359dd721585e58e67820336a0398b7927b3c89369d6134f30f6","skillId":"research-report","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"A short report comparing how three live Uniswap v4 hooks set dynamic LP fees: the rule each uses, what it protects against, and its known weaknesses, with sources.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"db8c586c5551c90140765cb64a48572deb87e5815f7ba00c0241068827bca33c","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"e9140402-d83d-4d90-9d98-c0582a8d8258","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":null},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"51486","feedbackHash":"cdcde3517774a3dec255099ab1c51dae9c431d7f8f3680faa86e2bfe2a553b60","nodeKey":"research_report","submissionHash":"2d2dc8c58cec3412023235ab77f79e918f38dbe28dc0e1c175f1b39d78f2c3d1","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"13b5c94ab28611dd0fb194a693c24215b2f3c4980e5cffacffef7537deab19de","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[{"bytes":18254,"hash":"900386f752881e49abe3ebfc9a36b66b19030e40544f444cb3d63ed3c48ada71","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"report","path":"artifacts/report.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"0e78515c4d95885a","findings":[],"hash":"2d2dc8c58cec3412023235ab77f79e918f38dbe28dc0e1c175f1b39d78f2c3d1","nodeId":"0933cb7d-b070-4672-88a1-e03996c29773","outcome":"completed","summary":"Good — `artifacts/` is already excluded via `.git/info/exclude`, confirming the deliverable is correctly untracked (as instructed, the daemon uploads it separately) while still being written as real files. The report and README are complete.\n\nThe report compares three currently-live Uniswap v4 hooks — **Arrakis Pro Hook** (volatility + inventory-based fee), the **Uniswap StablePair Hook** (reference-rate deviation + Dutch auction), and **Angstrom** (block-level arbitrage/batch auction or priority-fee tax) — each with its rule, protection rationale, and sourced weaknesses, plus a comparison table. It also documents two things found during research and handled transparently: Bunni v2's exploit/shutdown (excluded from the \"live three\" but included as a directly relevant cautionary case) and an unverifiable \"Atrium Dynamic Fee\" claim that was investigated and rejected rather than used.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1165338,"inputTokens":38,"model":"claude-sonnet-5","outputTokens":20028,"runtime":"claude","turns":34,"wallClockMs":400550}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"2d2dc8c58cec3412023235ab77f79e918f38dbe28dc0e1c175f1b39d78f2c3d1","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+9f8ef295"}]}