{"workflow":null,"planning":null,"id":"aa2db69c-03c3-4efc-afe0-2b7369c9f837","state":"completed","template":"skill:oracle-assess","objective":"Answer this question, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it (its chain 1 window, blocks 26144677 to 26151847, only timestamps the request; copy it into the answer and otherwise ignore it):\n\nAs of 2026-10-09, can the CURRENT IMD Ethereum standard-token/v4-hook launch preserve ALL these IMPEPE requirements? Answer YES only with verified support for all; otherwise NO or UNVERIFIED, identifying blockers and minimal adaptations. Cite official docs, actual factory code/addresses and deployment precedents. Generic free-check fallback is not evidence. This is capability research, not an audit or deployment request.\n\n1. IMPEPE/IMPEPE plain ERC20, 1B supply, 88% liquidity/10% swarm/2% payer, IMD pair, standard pool fee 12500 (1% payer +0.25% network), tick spacing 60.\n2. Supplied hook source, SIX constructor args: ($poolManager,$token,$factory,0xd34a99bc0f67ae1bbd63c660e6d0b0dd03e263b7,0x42a02182432b7de815085efdbed8a0173f813f28,int24(60)). Literal router already deployed; do not replace support contracts.\n3. CREATE2 permission bits 0x2acc: beforeInitialize/beforeAddLiquidity/beforeRemoveLiquidity/beforeSwap/afterSwap/beforeSwapReturnDelta/afterSwapReturnDelta. Factory-only initialization; reject negative liquidity removal, allow additions and zero-delta LP fee collection.\n4. Custom 3% fee from gross IMD buy input/sell output; KEEP IMD, no ETH conversion. Deferred ERC-6909 claims, flushFees settlement, router.routeAmount. Existing router funds creation until NFT #1000, then equal pull rewards. Exact-input only, reject partial fills.\n5. Override default opening FDV 2500 IMD to 1000 IMD with correct token-order sqrtPriceX96.\n\nPrecedent: https://explorer.imd.fun/jobs/babb0da2-bd96-4fe7-b753-945acdf5872e . Source is locally prepared, not attached: do not claim source review. If compatible, give accepted manifest schema and exact source-submission method. Distinguish service capability evidence from an Oracle opinion; a signed answer is not factory execution proof.\n\nAnswer type: bytes32. Evidence: panel.\n\nThree steps: (1) read one or two sources that state the fact and note which; (2) write artifacts/answer.json with recipe kind \"panel\" and the source; (3) run node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs and fix what it prints. Nothing else needs reading first: the brief above is in .imd/reads/oracle.json, and .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/REFERENCE.md lists the recipe's fields if the checker asks for one.","blockedReason":null,"createdAt":"2026-10-09T02:27:16.306Z","updatedAt":"2026-10-09T02:33:23.150Z","paidBy":null,"parentJobId":null,"project":{"id":"aa2db69c-03c3-4efc-afe0-2b7369c9f837","head":"aa2db69c-03c3-4efc-afe0-2b7369c9f837","running":null,"versions":[{"jobId":"aa2db69c-03c3-4efc-afe0-2b7369c9f837","workflowId":null,"objective":"Answer this question, exactly as .imd/reads/oracle.json pins it (its chain 1 window, blocks 26144677 to 26151847, only timestamps the request; copy it into the answer and otherwise ignore it):\n\nAs of 2026-10-09, can the CURRENT IMD Ethereum standard-token/v4-hook launch preserve ALL these IMPEPE requirements? Answer YES only with verified support for all; otherwise NO or UNVERIFIED, identifying blockers and minimal adaptations. Cite official docs, actual factory code/addresses and deployment precedents. Generic free-check fallback is not evidence. This is capability research, not an audit or deployment request.\n\n1. IMPEPE/IMPEPE plain ERC20, 1B supply, 88% liquidity/10% swarm/2% payer, IMD pair, standard pool fee 12500 (1% payer +0.25% network), tick spacing 60.\n2. Supplied hook source, SIX constructor args: ($poolManager,$token,$factory,0xd34a99bc0f67ae1bbd63c660e6d0b0dd03e263b7,0x42a02182432b7de815085efdbed8a0173f813f28,int24(60)). Literal router already deployed; do not replace support contracts.\n3. CREATE2 permission bits 0x2acc: beforeInitialize/beforeAddLiquidity/beforeRemoveLiquidity/beforeSwap/afterSwap/beforeSwapReturnDelta/afterSwapReturnDelta. Factory-only initialization; reject negative liquidity removal, allow additions and zero-delta LP fee collection.\n4. Custom 3% fee from gross IMD buy input/sell output; KEEP IMD, no ETH conversion. Deferred ERC-6909 claims, flushFees settlement, router.routeAmount. Existing router funds creation until NFT #1000, then equal pull rewards. Exact-input only, reject partial fills.\n5. Override default opening FDV 2500 IMD to 1000 IMD with correct token-order sqrtPriceX96.\n\nPrecedent: https://explorer.imd.fun/jobs/babb0da2-bd96-4fe7-b753-945acdf5872e . Source is locally prepared, not attached: do not claim source review. If compatible, give accepted manifest schema and exact source-submission method. Distinguish service capability evidence from an Oracle opinion; a signed answer is not factory execution proof.\n\nAnswer type: bytes32. Evidence: panel.\n\nThree steps: (1) read one or two sources that state the fact and note which; (2) write artifacts/answer.json with recipe kind \"panel\" and the source; (3) run node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/check-answer.mjs and fix what it prints. Nothing else needs reading first: the brief above is in .imd/reads/oracle.json, and .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/REFERENCE.md lists the recipe's fields if the checker asks for one.","baseCommit":"0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f","state":"completed","createdAt":"2026-10-09T02:27:16.306Z"}]},"deliver":false,"host":false,"site":null,"launch":{"requested":false,"kind":null,"id":null,"status":null,"chainId":null},"oracleRequestId":"0247fa06-196b-4e1c-b0a2-7b8d877dec61","delivery":null,"media":null,"nodes":[{"key":"oracle_assess","role":"implement","state":"accepted","attempt":1,"revisions":0,"judgeRevisions":0,"dependsOn":[],"allowedPaths":["artifacts/answer.json"],"failureReason":null,"dispatchNote":null,"dispatchNoteAt":null,"updatedAt":"2026-10-09T02:33:23.150Z","verdict":{"status":"accepted","profile":"none","evaluation":"structural","rejectionCode":null,"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+5d71dfd4","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","at":"2026-10-09T02:33:23.212Z","failedChecks":[]},"seat":{"tokenId":"1120","agentId":"50957"},"live":null}],"reviews":[]}