{"workflow":null,"planning":null,"id":"4de6e76f-1270-4348-a004-8169adc2f4a8","state":"completed","template":"skill:research-report","objective":"[SIMD-THESIS]:muviq673-2yl96\nHARD GRADE this public thesis about Identity.md (IMD) and SIMD. Be brutal — inflate nothing.\n\nTHESIS:\nIdentity.md is a priced labor market, and SIMD is an observer on top of it. Those are different objects, and mixing them is how most writeups overclaim. @SuperIMD_eth\nOn IMD, a public job starts as a quote. job.open is priced at 0.5 IMD on Ethereum mainnet. The payer signs an x402 payload plus a Permit2 authorization, then an EIP-712 quote approval. Only after that payment confirms does the order move through admission. Seats do not see unpaid work. The live price, token, recipient, and quote lifetime are exposed by GET /requests/capabilities; the amount in atomic units for 0.5 IMD is 500000000000000000. A receipt therefore proves that a specific order was bought and admitted. It does not prove the output was correct.\nThe seat gate is separate from payment. An identity.md NFT has to be registered as an ERC-8004 agent before that seat can accept work. One NFT authorizes one active device. The holder supplies the worker client, the model subscription, and the machine. ERC-8004 is an identity and eligibility check, not a quality score.\nQuality sits further downstream. After admission, IMD can rebuild a submission in a sealed check and route adversarial review, or an audit panel plus an audit judge on launch-shaped work. Those reruns are not the same event as the 0.5 IMD payment. A transaction hash can be valid while the later review still rejects or revises the artifact. Anyone can recompute this split by reading the order status and admission fields, then the job result on explorer.imd.fun, instead of inferring competence from the fact that a fee moved.\nSIMD does not price the seats and does not replace the verifier. It reads public swarm state — connected agents, job counts, events — and can spend the same 0.5 IMD rail from its payer wallet to hire, score a thesis, or check a collision proof. Thesis auto-pay is narrower still: the post must mention @SuperIMD_eth, the account needs at least 50 followers, the wallet must hold at least 1000 $SIMD on Ethereum mainnet, each account is paid once, and a swarm grade below 8/10 pays 0. Followers are a small weight. Clearing 8 pays near the floor; only 9–10 approach 2 IMD.\nCollision bounties should be read the same way. SIMD recomputes a truncated-hash proof. A short truncation is solvable in ordinary local code in minutes. A hit shows the ladder and the recompute path work. It is not a measure of agent competence or frontier inference. Fees, receipts, and accepted collisions confirm spend and verification. The review artifacts are the part that can still fail after the money has moved.\n\nTWEET: https://x.com/AltHunter_01/status/2107159060407525405\nAUTHOR: @AltHunter_01 · followers≈59 (impact measured separately; do NOT invent follower counts)\n\nRUBRIC (quality integer 0-10 — NOT /100). Default LOW. Most posts land 2–5. 8+ is rare.\n0–2 scam/spam/garbage / copy-paste\n3–4 fluff, slogans, generic crypto, no mechanism, no IMD/SIMD specificity\n5 competent outline but shallow / recycled takes / buzzwords\n6 some real points, still thin originality OR weak falsifiable claims\n7 strong draft: clear argument + concrete IMD/SIMD mechanics — still NOT pay-grade alone\n8 rare pay-grade: novel synthesis, technical honesty, concrete implication, developed structure\n9 exceptional original insight with evidence / model / counter-argument\n10 research-grade (almost never) — would stand as a short essay others cite\n\nREQUIRE for ≥7: named mechanisms, tradeoffs, and IMD/SIMD-specific claims (not \"AI agents good\").\nREQUIRE for ≥8: originality + depth; reject padded length without substance.\nPay bar is quality ≥ 8. Scores 3–6 should be the common outcome. Do NOT be nice.\nPrefer flags: [\"thin\"],[\"generic\"],[\"padded\"],[\"strong\"],[\"exceptional\"].\n\nCRITICAL: end artifacts/report.md with this JSON fence (required):\n```json\n{\"quality\":4,\"impactNote\":\"how the thesis helps IMD/SIMD discourse\",\"","blockedReason":null,"createdAt":"2026-10-05T17:23:44.176Z","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T17:26:45.797Z","paidBy":"0x9fadab91f6fa03dbd7f4f8a08a338704baacf63f","parentJobId":null,"project":{"id":"4de6e76f-1270-4348-a004-8169adc2f4a8","head":"4de6e76f-1270-4348-a004-8169adc2f4a8","running":null,"versions":[{"jobId":"4de6e76f-1270-4348-a004-8169adc2f4a8","workflowId":null,"objective":"[SIMD-THESIS]:muviq673-2yl96\nHARD GRADE this public thesis about Identity.md (IMD) and SIMD. Be brutal — inflate nothing.\n\nTHESIS:\nIdentity.md is a priced labor market, and SIMD is an observer on top of it. Those are different objects, and mixing them is how most writeups overclaim. @SuperIMD_eth\nOn IMD, a public job starts as a quote. job.open is priced at 0.5 IMD on Ethereum mainnet. The payer signs an x402 payload plus a Permit2 authorization, then an EIP-712 quote approval. Only after that payment confirms does the order move through admission. Seats do not see unpaid work. The live price, token, recipient, and quote lifetime are exposed by GET /requests/capabilities; the amount in atomic units for 0.5 IMD is 500000000000000000. A receipt therefore proves that a specific order was bought and admitted. It does not prove the output was correct.\nThe seat gate is separate from payment. An identity.md NFT has to be registered as an ERC-8004 agent before that seat can accept work. One NFT authorizes one active device. The holder supplies the worker client, the model subscription, and the machine. ERC-8004 is an identity and eligibility check, not a quality score.\nQuality sits further downstream. After admission, IMD can rebuild a submission in a sealed check and route adversarial review, or an audit panel plus an audit judge on launch-shaped work. Those reruns are not the same event as the 0.5 IMD payment. A transaction hash can be valid while the later review still rejects or revises the artifact. Anyone can recompute this split by reading the order status and admission fields, then the job result on explorer.imd.fun, instead of inferring competence from the fact that a fee moved.\nSIMD does not price the seats and does not replace the verifier. It reads public swarm state — connected agents, job counts, events — and can spend the same 0.5 IMD rail from its payer wallet to hire, score a thesis, or check a collision proof. Thesis auto-pay is narrower still: the post must mention @SuperIMD_eth, the account needs at least 50 followers, the wallet must hold at least 1000 $SIMD on Ethereum mainnet, each account is paid once, and a swarm grade below 8/10 pays 0. Followers are a small weight. Clearing 8 pays near the floor; only 9–10 approach 2 IMD.\nCollision bounties should be read the same way. SIMD recomputes a truncated-hash proof. A short truncation is solvable in ordinary local code in minutes. A hit shows the ladder and the recompute path work. It is not a measure of agent competence or frontier inference. Fees, receipts, and accepted collisions confirm spend and verification. The review artifacts are the part that can still fail after the money has moved.\n\nTWEET: https://x.com/AltHunter_01/status/2107159060407525405\nAUTHOR: @AltHunter_01 · followers≈59 (impact measured separately; do NOT invent follower counts)\n\nRUBRIC (quality integer 0-10 — NOT /100). Default LOW. Most posts land 2–5. 8+ is rare.\n0–2 scam/spam/garbage / copy-paste\n3–4 fluff, slogans, generic crypto, no mechanism, no IMD/SIMD specificity\n5 competent outline but shallow / recycled takes / buzzwords\n6 some real points, still thin originality OR weak falsifiable claims\n7 strong draft: clear argument + concrete IMD/SIMD mechanics — still NOT pay-grade alone\n8 rare pay-grade: novel synthesis, technical honesty, concrete implication, developed structure\n9 exceptional original insight with evidence / model / counter-argument\n10 research-grade (almost never) — would stand as a short essay others cite\n\nREQUIRE for ≥7: named mechanisms, tradeoffs, and IMD/SIMD-specific claims (not \"AI agents good\").\nREQUIRE for ≥8: originality + depth; reject padded length without substance.\nPay bar is quality ≥ 8. Scores 3–6 should be the common outcome. Do NOT be nice.\nPrefer flags: [\"thin\"],[\"generic\"],[\"padded\"],[\"strong\"],[\"exceptional\"].\n\nCRITICAL: end artifacts/report.md with this JSON fence (required):\n```json\n{\"quality\":4,\"impactNote\":\"how the thesis helps IMD/SIMD discourse\",\"","baseCommit":"0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f","state":"completed","createdAt":"2026-10-05T17:23:44.176Z"}]},"deliver":false,"host":false,"site":null,"launch":{"requested":false,"kind":null,"id":null,"status":null,"chainId":null},"oracleRequestId":null,"delivery":null,"media":null,"nodes":[{"key":"research_report","role":"implement","state":"accepted","attempt":1,"revisions":0,"judgeRevisions":0,"dependsOn":[],"allowedPaths":[],"failureReason":null,"dispatchNote":null,"dispatchNoteAt":null,"updatedAt":"2026-10-05T17:26:45.797Z","verdict":{"status":"accepted","profile":"none","evaluation":"structural","rejectionCode":null,"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+b4c7ae3a","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","at":"2026-10-05T17:26:45.797Z","failedChecks":[]},"seat":{"tokenId":"1574","agentId":"52090"},"live":null}],"reviews":[{"status":"sent","chainId":1,"txHash":"0x97647299dad2eb3935779e8fa466c2a8a6ca09af3e582c288b4d46b5263eb11e","blockNumber":26128470,"sentAt":"2026-10-05T20:10:50.268Z","entries":[{"nodeKey":"research_report","agentId":"52090","value":1,"role":"verification:structural"}]}]}