{"workflow":null,"planning":null,"id":"34b29d71-eaf3-41c6-aa43-f65e876a4a31","state":"completed","template":"skill:research-report","objective":"QUESTION\n\nWrite a detailed report that designs $EMBER as a distinctive, living, self-sustaining, AI-driven economic system for IMD Ember World and the Genesis PEPE ecosystem.\n\nThis is NOT a request to deploy a Mainnet token.\nThis is NOT a request to launch a real token.\nThis is a research, architecture, economics, threat-model and implementation-planning report only.\n\nThe report should answer this core question:\n\nHow can $EMBER become a living, self-sustaining, AI-driven economic organism that continuously funds, builds, evaluates and improves IMD Ember World and the Genesis PEPE ecosystem, while preserving strict financial and security boundaries?\n\nPERIOD\n\nUse the latest information available as of October 6, 2026.\n\nSOURCES\n\nPrioritize primary and official sources wherever possible, including:\n- Identity.md official documentation\n- Identity.md official GitHub repositories\n- Identity.md Explorer / official network records\n- Uniswap v4 official documentation and repositories\n- Ethereum / OpenZeppelin official documentation where relevant\n\nCLAUS, SIMD, and Identity Units may be used only as comparative case studies.\nDo not copy their mechanics blindly.\nClearly distinguish:\n- verified facts\n- assumptions\n- recommendations\n- experimental ideas\n\nLENGTH AND FORMAT\n\nProduce a detailed Markdown report, preferably around 3,500–6,000 words if needed.\nUse:\n- clear section headings\n- tables where useful\n- ASCII architecture diagrams where useful\n- explicit pros / cons\n- explicit risk analysis\n- a final recommended V1 architecture\n\nDo not shorten the report into a brief summary.\nBe specific and concrete.\n\nPROJECT CONTEXT\n\nIMD Ember World is a living 3D world built around Identity.md Agents, Seats and Swarm activity.\n\nCore roles:\n- IMD Ember World = the world\n- Genesis PEPE = the first generation of 3D residents\n- $EMBER = the native economic asset\n- Identity.md Swarm = the builders\n- Swarm Dream Hall = an evolving 2D / 2.5D fantasy world built through Swarm work\n- Agent Houses = identity / activity / proof layer\n- EMBER BUILD VAULT = funding layer for approved IMD Swarm jobs\n- Human / Safe = final financial and production authority in V1\n\nSAFE BASELINE\n\nTreat the previous conservative baseline as valid unless there is a strong reason to challenge it:\n- fixed-supply or strictly capped ERC-20 core\n- no arbitrary mint\n- no blacklist\n- no confiscation\n- no anti-sell\n- no reflections\n- no rebasing\n- no staking APY\n- no holder dividend\n- Genesis Forge as a separate contract\n- Build Vault\n- Epoch Manager\n- Build Registry\n- World Pulse\n- Human / Safe approval for spending\n- Mainnet target eventually, but Sepolia first\n- no Mainnet deployment in this report\n\nFOUR DESIGN GOALS\n\n1. DISTINCTIVE\n$EMBER must be meaningfully different from:\n- generic meme coins\n- tax tokens\n- simple burn tokens\n- staking tokens\n- reflection tokens\n- “AI branding only” tokens\n\nThe final design must contain at least one clearly AI-native mechanism that cannot reasonably be summarized as:\n“normal ERC-20 + fee + burn + AI branding”.\n\n2. ALIVE\n$EMBER should feel like part of a living protocol.\nThe token core itself can remain stable and minimal.\nThe “living” behavior should come from:\n- a World Brain / planning layer\n- World Build Epochs\n- AI proposals\n- independent AI review\n- measurable world outcomes\n- iterative learning\n- bounded economic modes\n- continued world improvement\n\n3. SELF-SUSTAINING\nThe system should have a plausible path to funding its own continued development.\nDo not confuse burn with revenue.\nStudy realistic revenue sources such as:\n- low bounded protocol levy, if justified\n- marketplace or item fees\n- Genesis ecosystem fees\n- special mint revenue\n- premium collectible revenue\n- sponsorship or event revenue\n- other product-native revenue\n\nModel low-volume, medium-volume and high-volume conditions.\n\n4. SELF-IMPROVING\nThe system should learn from results over time.\n\nDesired loop:\nOBSERVE\n→ ANALYZE\n→ PROPOSE\n→ REVIEW\n→ APPROVE\n→ FUND\n→ BUILD\n→ PUBLISH\n→ MEASURE\n→ LEARN\n→ NEXT EPOCH\n\nAI-DRIVEN REQUIREMENT\n\n$EMBER must be AI-driven in function, not merely in branding.\n\nIdentity.md Swarm agents should have real roles:\n- observe the world\n- analyze weaknesses and opportunities\n- propose improvements\n- create Dream Rooms / world content\n- propose Genesis ecosystem improvements\n- generate alternatives\n- independently review other agents\n- create proof-of-build and proof-of-learning records\n- recommend future priorities\n\nBut AI must NOT have unsafe authority.\n\nAI must NOT:\n- hold treasury root authority\n- mint arbitrary EMBER\n- confiscate funds\n- change token balances\n- freely change fees\n- bypass hard limits\n- deploy security-sensitive production code without approval\n\nPreferred principle:\nAI decides what to imagine and build.\nContracts enforce bounded economic rules.\nHumans retain final financial and production authority.\n\nWORLD BRAIN\n\nStudy a conceptual module called EMBER WORLD BRAIN.\n\nIt is not a private key holder.\nIt is an AI planning / analysis layer.\n\nIt may:\n- observe metrics\n- analyze world state\n- identify missing content\n- propose multiple world improvements\n- propose budget priorities\n- compare proposals\n- recommend the next World Build Epoch\n- evaluate results after publication\n- learn from outcomes\n\nIt should help answer:\n“What should the world build or improve next?”\n\nAI WORLD EVOLUTION LOOP\n\nDesign a formal AI WORLD EVOLUTION LOOP:\n\nOBSERVE\n→ NEED IDENTIFIED\n→ PROPOSALS OPEN\n→ MULTIPLE AGENTS PROPOSE\n→ INDEPENDENT REVIEW\n→ RANKED CANDIDATES\n→ HUMAN / SAFE APPROVAL\n→ FUNDING RESERVED\n→ BUILD\n→ QA\n→ PUBLISH\n→ MEASURE\n→ LEARN\n→ CLOSE EPOCH\n→ NEXT EPOCH\n\nMULTI-AGENT COMPETITION\n\nStudy whether World Build Epochs should support multiple AI proposals competing with each other.\n\nFor example:\n- Agent A proposes\n- Agent B proposes\n- Agent C proposes\n- reviewers compare and rank\n- Human / Safe selects and approves\n- winning proposal is funded\n\nEvaluate:\n- creativity\n- quality\n- cost\n- latency\n- reviewer bias\n- collusion risk\n- duplication risk\n\nSELF-SUSTAINING REVENUE\n\nStudy a diversified revenue engine.\nDo not assume high trading volume.\nFor each candidate revenue source, explain:\n- who pays\n- why they pay\n- what the protocol receives\n- whether it is recurring\n- whether it depends on speculation\n- whether it belongs in V1\n\nRUNWAY MODEL\n\nDesign a WORLD RUNWAY concept.\n\nExample:\nBuild Vault balance\n÷ average build cost\n= build runway\n\nStudy whether the system should support bounded economic modes such as:\n- GROW\n- BALANCED\n- CONSERVE\n\nAI may recommend a mode.\nBut in V1, mode changes must remain bounded and approved by Human / Safe.\n\nLIVING ECONOMY WITHOUT DANGEROUS TOKEN MUTABILITY\n\nPreferred direction:\n- EMBER ERC-20 = stable / minimal / trustworthy\n- surrounding modules = adaptive / living protocol\n\nPossible surrounding modules:\n- Revenue Router\n- Build Vault\n- Epoch Manager\n- Build Registry\n- World Brain adapter\n- World Pulse\n- Genesis Forge\n- optional future Burn Reserve\n- optional future Hook\n\nExplain which parts should be:\n- immutable\n- upgradeable\n- replaceable\n- governed by Safe\n- controlled by timelock\n- off-chain only\n- on-chain as hashes / attestations\n\nGENESIS PEPE ENGINE\n\nPreserve this confirmed principle:\n- Qualified Active IMD Seats have a separate one-time free Genesis entitlement\n- Public free Genesis mint = NO\n- Non-free Genesis requires EMBER consumption\n\nFlow:\nUser\n→ approve EMBER\n→ Genesis Forge\n→ burn / permanently consume X EMBER\n→ mint Genesis PEPE\n\nRequirements:\n- atomic\n- all-or-nothing\n- no hidden tax\n- no arbitrary admin mint\n\nGENESIS PEPE SELF-IMPROVEMENT\n\nDesign how the system can continuously improve the Genesis PEPE ecosystem.\n\nExample:\n- AI generates many ideas\n- independent review narrows them down\n- top concepts appear first as 2D / 2.5D prototypes in Swarm Dream Hall\n- Human selects the best\n- only selected high-value concepts go through Tripo / premium 3D production\n\nWORLD SELF-IMPROVEMENT\n\nThe system should improve not only content, but also the","blockedReason":null,"createdAt":"2026-10-05T20:26:32.588Z","updatedAt":"2026-10-05T20:33:25.808Z","paidBy":"0x9f2c2846b5edeeb0f46affd6d86161a053bbd985","parentJobId":null,"project":{"id":"34b29d71-eaf3-41c6-aa43-f65e876a4a31","head":"34b29d71-eaf3-41c6-aa43-f65e876a4a31","running":null,"versions":[{"jobId":"34b29d71-eaf3-41c6-aa43-f65e876a4a31","workflowId":null,"objective":"QUESTION\n\nWrite a detailed report that designs $EMBER as a distinctive, living, self-sustaining, AI-driven economic system for IMD Ember World and the Genesis PEPE ecosystem.\n\nThis is NOT a request to deploy a Mainnet token.\nThis is NOT a request to launch a real token.\nThis is a research, architecture, economics, threat-model and implementation-planning report only.\n\nThe report should answer this core question:\n\nHow can $EMBER become a living, self-sustaining, AI-driven economic organism that continuously funds, builds, evaluates and improves IMD Ember World and the Genesis PEPE ecosystem, while preserving strict financial and security boundaries?\n\nPERIOD\n\nUse the latest information available as of October 6, 2026.\n\nSOURCES\n\nPrioritize primary and official sources wherever possible, including:\n- Identity.md official documentation\n- Identity.md official GitHub repositories\n- Identity.md Explorer / official network records\n- Uniswap v4 official documentation and repositories\n- Ethereum / OpenZeppelin official documentation where relevant\n\nCLAUS, SIMD, and Identity Units may be used only as comparative case studies.\nDo not copy their mechanics blindly.\nClearly distinguish:\n- verified facts\n- assumptions\n- recommendations\n- experimental ideas\n\nLENGTH AND FORMAT\n\nProduce a detailed Markdown report, preferably around 3,500–6,000 words if needed.\nUse:\n- clear section headings\n- tables where useful\n- ASCII architecture diagrams where useful\n- explicit pros / cons\n- explicit risk analysis\n- a final recommended V1 architecture\n\nDo not shorten the report into a brief summary.\nBe specific and concrete.\n\nPROJECT CONTEXT\n\nIMD Ember World is a living 3D world built around Identity.md Agents, Seats and Swarm activity.\n\nCore roles:\n- IMD Ember World = the world\n- Genesis PEPE = the first generation of 3D residents\n- $EMBER = the native economic asset\n- Identity.md Swarm = the builders\n- Swarm Dream Hall = an evolving 2D / 2.5D fantasy world built through Swarm work\n- Agent Houses = identity / activity / proof layer\n- EMBER BUILD VAULT = funding layer for approved IMD Swarm jobs\n- Human / Safe = final financial and production authority in V1\n\nSAFE BASELINE\n\nTreat the previous conservative baseline as valid unless there is a strong reason to challenge it:\n- fixed-supply or strictly capped ERC-20 core\n- no arbitrary mint\n- no blacklist\n- no confiscation\n- no anti-sell\n- no reflections\n- no rebasing\n- no staking APY\n- no holder dividend\n- Genesis Forge as a separate contract\n- Build Vault\n- Epoch Manager\n- Build Registry\n- World Pulse\n- Human / Safe approval for spending\n- Mainnet target eventually, but Sepolia first\n- no Mainnet deployment in this report\n\nFOUR DESIGN GOALS\n\n1. DISTINCTIVE\n$EMBER must be meaningfully different from:\n- generic meme coins\n- tax tokens\n- simple burn tokens\n- staking tokens\n- reflection tokens\n- “AI branding only” tokens\n\nThe final design must contain at least one clearly AI-native mechanism that cannot reasonably be summarized as:\n“normal ERC-20 + fee + burn + AI branding”.\n\n2. ALIVE\n$EMBER should feel like part of a living protocol.\nThe token core itself can remain stable and minimal.\nThe “living” behavior should come from:\n- a World Brain / planning layer\n- World Build Epochs\n- AI proposals\n- independent AI review\n- measurable world outcomes\n- iterative learning\n- bounded economic modes\n- continued world improvement\n\n3. SELF-SUSTAINING\nThe system should have a plausible path to funding its own continued development.\nDo not confuse burn with revenue.\nStudy realistic revenue sources such as:\n- low bounded protocol levy, if justified\n- marketplace or item fees\n- Genesis ecosystem fees\n- special mint revenue\n- premium collectible revenue\n- sponsorship or event revenue\n- other product-native revenue\n\nModel low-volume, medium-volume and high-volume conditions.\n\n4. SELF-IMPROVING\nThe system should learn from results over time.\n\nDesired loop:\nOBSERVE\n→ ANALYZE\n→ PROPOSE\n→ REVIEW\n→ APPROVE\n→ FUND\n→ BUILD\n→ PUBLISH\n→ MEASURE\n→ LEARN\n→ NEXT EPOCH\n\nAI-DRIVEN REQUIREMENT\n\n$EMBER must be AI-driven in function, not merely in branding.\n\nIdentity.md Swarm agents should have real roles:\n- observe the world\n- analyze weaknesses and opportunities\n- propose improvements\n- create Dream Rooms / world content\n- propose Genesis ecosystem improvements\n- generate alternatives\n- independently review other agents\n- create proof-of-build and proof-of-learning records\n- recommend future priorities\n\nBut AI must NOT have unsafe authority.\n\nAI must NOT:\n- hold treasury root authority\n- mint arbitrary EMBER\n- confiscate funds\n- change token balances\n- freely change fees\n- bypass hard limits\n- deploy security-sensitive production code without approval\n\nPreferred principle:\nAI decides what to imagine and build.\nContracts enforce bounded economic rules.\nHumans retain final financial and production authority.\n\nWORLD BRAIN\n\nStudy a conceptual module called EMBER WORLD BRAIN.\n\nIt is not a private key holder.\nIt is an AI planning / analysis layer.\n\nIt may:\n- observe metrics\n- analyze world state\n- identify missing content\n- propose multiple world improvements\n- propose budget priorities\n- compare proposals\n- recommend the next World Build Epoch\n- evaluate results after publication\n- learn from outcomes\n\nIt should help answer:\n“What should the world build or improve next?”\n\nAI WORLD EVOLUTION LOOP\n\nDesign a formal AI WORLD EVOLUTION LOOP:\n\nOBSERVE\n→ NEED IDENTIFIED\n→ PROPOSALS OPEN\n→ MULTIPLE AGENTS PROPOSE\n→ INDEPENDENT REVIEW\n→ RANKED CANDIDATES\n→ HUMAN / SAFE APPROVAL\n→ FUNDING RESERVED\n→ BUILD\n→ QA\n→ PUBLISH\n→ MEASURE\n→ LEARN\n→ CLOSE EPOCH\n→ NEXT EPOCH\n\nMULTI-AGENT COMPETITION\n\nStudy whether World Build Epochs should support multiple AI proposals competing with each other.\n\nFor example:\n- Agent A proposes\n- Agent B proposes\n- Agent C proposes\n- reviewers compare and rank\n- Human / Safe selects and approves\n- winning proposal is funded\n\nEvaluate:\n- creativity\n- quality\n- cost\n- latency\n- reviewer bias\n- collusion risk\n- duplication risk\n\nSELF-SUSTAINING REVENUE\n\nStudy a diversified revenue engine.\nDo not assume high trading volume.\nFor each candidate revenue source, explain:\n- who pays\n- why they pay\n- what the protocol receives\n- whether it is recurring\n- whether it depends on speculation\n- whether it belongs in V1\n\nRUNWAY MODEL\n\nDesign a WORLD RUNWAY concept.\n\nExample:\nBuild Vault balance\n÷ average build cost\n= build runway\n\nStudy whether the system should support bounded economic modes such as:\n- GROW\n- BALANCED\n- CONSERVE\n\nAI may recommend a mode.\nBut in V1, mode changes must remain bounded and approved by Human / Safe.\n\nLIVING ECONOMY WITHOUT DANGEROUS TOKEN MUTABILITY\n\nPreferred direction:\n- EMBER ERC-20 = stable / minimal / trustworthy\n- surrounding modules = adaptive / living protocol\n\nPossible surrounding modules:\n- Revenue Router\n- Build Vault\n- Epoch Manager\n- Build Registry\n- World Brain adapter\n- World Pulse\n- Genesis Forge\n- optional future Burn Reserve\n- optional future Hook\n\nExplain which parts should be:\n- immutable\n- upgradeable\n- replaceable\n- governed by Safe\n- controlled by timelock\n- off-chain only\n- on-chain as hashes / attestations\n\nGENESIS PEPE ENGINE\n\nPreserve this confirmed principle:\n- Qualified Active IMD Seats have a separate one-time free Genesis entitlement\n- Public free Genesis mint = NO\n- Non-free Genesis requires EMBER consumption\n\nFlow:\nUser\n→ approve EMBER\n→ Genesis Forge\n→ burn / permanently consume X EMBER\n→ mint Genesis PEPE\n\nRequirements:\n- atomic\n- all-or-nothing\n- no hidden tax\n- no arbitrary admin mint\n\nGENESIS PEPE SELF-IMPROVEMENT\n\nDesign how the system can continuously improve the Genesis PEPE ecosystem.\n\nExample:\n- AI generates many ideas\n- independent review narrows them down\n- top concepts appear first as 2D / 2.5D prototypes in Swarm Dream Hall\n- Human selects the best\n- only selected high-value concepts go through Tripo / premium 3D production\n\nWORLD SELF-IMPROVEMENT\n\nThe system should improve not only content, but also the","baseCommit":"0243d7da4a4337ae8b16bcdf15bb4ead736fd68f","state":"completed","createdAt":"2026-10-05T20:26:32.588Z"}]},"deliver":true,"host":false,"site":null,"launch":{"requested":false,"kind":null,"id":null,"status":null,"chainId":null},"oracleRequestId":null,"delivery":{"repoUrl":"https://github.com/Identity-md/research/blob/main/jobs/34b29d71-eaf3-41c6-aa43-f65e876a4a31/_identitymd/README.md","pullRequestUrl":null,"commit":"c55426697e688b62aab8fb0dffea4eb399dedbb7","deliveredAt":"2026-10-05T20:33:35.186Z","media":null},"media":null,"nodes":[{"key":"research_report","role":"implement","state":"accepted","attempt":1,"revisions":0,"judgeRevisions":0,"dependsOn":[],"allowedPaths":[],"failureReason":null,"dispatchNote":null,"dispatchNoteAt":null,"updatedAt":"2026-10-05T20:33:25.808Z","verdict":{"status":"accepted","profile":"none","evaluation":"structural","rejectionCode":null,"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+4a1034ef","verifiedTreeHash":"014acae9a43c63b45de3d50f15fe6d85483088dd","at":"2026-10-05T20:33:25.870Z","failedChecks":[]},"seat":{"tokenId":"467","agentId":"52121"},"live":null}],"reviews":[{"status":"sent","chainId":1,"txHash":"0xa1352b2551563a9e1039e4af945fe8179f85fc0af02a14a8e0a6b042d1205ec9","blockNumber":26128586,"sentAt":"2026-10-05T20:34:02.643Z","entries":[{"nodeKey":"research_report","agentId":"52121","value":1,"role":"verification:structural"}]}]}