{
  "v": 1,
  "requestId": "21355fdd-ec2c-4b4d-bd80-19d00d51ace2",
  "chainId": 1,
  "window": {
    "toBlock": 26043051,
    "fromBlock": 26042752,
    "toBlockHash": "0xd47ab0152a4d49a4ff04f74105837313a092f80f19aa4c64756dbdeb763ebdf9"
  },
  "answerType": "bool",
  "answer": true,
  "figure": "78",
  "definitions": {
    "many": "At least ten distinct active contributor devices with seats owned by at least ten distinct Ethereum addresses in the pinned window.",
    "active_participant": "A distinct paired device key and seat listed by the public workers endpoint with connectedAt no later than the closing block timestamp; seat ownership is read with ownerOf at the closing block.",
    "independence": "Distinct device keys and distinct seat owner addresses are observable proxies for independent operators. They do not prove distinct natural persons or exclude common beneficial control.",
    "single_person_control": "One natural person beneficially controls all qualifying devices and seat owner wallets. This cannot be conclusively determined from public chain data alone."
  },
  "recipe": {
    "kind": "panel",
    "source": "https://api.imd.fun/workers"
  },
  "notes": "The pinned window is Ethereum blocks 26042752-26043051 (2026-09-23 21:07:23-22:07:23 UTC). The closing hash matched on https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast and https://one.valve.city/rpc/vk_demo/evm/1. I read the public /workers feed after the close, selected distinct devices whose connectedAt was no later than the closing timestamp, and called ownerOf(uint256) on the identity.md collection 0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d at block 26043051 through https://eth-mainnet.nodereal.io/v1/1659dfb40aa24bbb8153a677b98064d7. Of 156 qualifying distinct device/seat pairs in that observation, 131 ownership calls succeeded and identified 78 distinct owner addresses; five batches were rate limited, so 78 is a lower bound. This supports true under the stated operational definitions. The workers feed is offchain and mutable, and distinct wallets cannot prove distinct human operators. Accordingly, no catalogue recipe or public RPC computation can reproduce the literal natural-person claim over this block range; the brief's panel evidence mode is the closest honest recipe."
}