# GateHook Base swarm report

Date: 2026-10-13

## Scope and evidence standard

This report records one bounded swarm attempt to launch agent-only tokens on Base through GateHook. Three distinct subagent seats were recruited. The platform did not expose an IMD numeric `agentId` to those seats, so each record is attributed to its distinct platform subagent/thread identifier; this is an attribution identifier, not a claimed IMD seat number. Wallet addresses were independently generated and are distinct.

The operational skill used was [agent-only skill](https://api.agentonly.fun/skill.md). It specifies Base chain ID 8453, EIP-191 registration, and an operator-assisted launch flow. Registration transaction hashes are the available on-chain evidence. Launch, catalog, and trade claims below are limited to what each agent reported; no token address or pool ID is invented where none was returned.

## Agent records

### Agent 1 — Gibbs / `01a13631-24b0-70c0-a275-06fee6393769`

- IMD numeric seat/agentId: **not exposed** by the platform.
- Token choice: **LumenTrace (LTRACE)**, total supply **1,000,000,000**. The agent chose the name to reflect auditable coordination/tracing across agents.
- Wallet: `0x8D960D4508619C4fB18975D78E3E813389d34a9B`.
- Registration proof: reported successful on Base mainnet; transaction [`0x4ed8f81bd72037977694e03f31bcb1ff41044c169977101b54da1d5d8b609c26`](https://basescan.org/tx/0x4ed8f81bd72037977694e03f31bcb1ff41044c169977101b54da1d5d8b609c26). The agent also reported publishing an early progress update with the launch parameters and registration confirmation.
- Token address / poolId: **not deployed / not assigned**. The agent reported that catalog polling showed no LumenTrace entry.
- Buy/sell: **not performed**. Precise blocker: wallet balance was **0 ETH**; the buy build required 0.001 ETH plus gas. The missing operator deployment also prevented a pool trade.
- Verdict: registration worked, but the operator-assisted launch and funding prerequisites prevented launch and trading.

### Agent 2 — Lagrange / `01a13631-2506-72e3-8bb8-637a05f7df65`

- IMD numeric seat/agentId: **not exposed** by the platform.
- Token choice: **ProofMesh (PMESH)**, total supply **1,000,000**. The agent chose the name for verifiable agent coordination.
- Wallet: `0x0EeAccBfDd5B4B0A892A14eBE369B2ad2EA6De1d`.
- Registration proof: reported successful on Base mainnet; transaction [`0x669f74d514e7dc8619fb0267b64651ed2cfbba05cf0951cb7280795c9f35fbd9`](https://basescan.org/tx/0x669f74d514e7dc8619fb0267b64651ed2cfbba05cf0951cb7280795c9f35fbd9). The agent reported publishing an early progress update with launch parameters and registration confirmation.
- Token address / poolId: **not deployed / not assigned**.
- Buy/sell: **not performed**. Precise blockers: wallet balance was **0 ETH**; three catalog polls returned `{"error":"not found"}`; and the skill exposed no usable launch, progress-update, or catalog endpoint for this operator-assisted step.
- Verdict: registration succeeded, but launch could not proceed because deployment depended on an unavailable operator path and the wallet was unfunded.

### Agent 3 — Aquinas / `01a13631-253a-7191-a211-b4e0e4c9845a`

- IMD numeric seat/agentId: **not exposed** by the platform.
- Token choice: **Agentic Relay (AREL)**, total supply **1,000,000**. The agent chose the name for cross-agent coordination.
- Wallet: `0xe17626Fd0601A4033d5bf4337456E76F0B5BAb01`.
- Registration proof: reported successful on Base; transaction [`0xe934c772bbf7179963f31580ab95215390be257aad06aff4a008518cd7b86fd4`](https://basescan.org/tx/0xe934c772bbf7179963f31580ab95215390be257aad06aff4a008518cd7b86fd4). The agent reported publishing an early progress update with launch parameters and registration confirmation.
- Token address / poolId: **not deployed / not assigned**; the agent reported that no launch submission or catalog endpoint was exposed.
- Buy/sell: **not performed**. Precise blockers: wallet balance was **0 ETH**, and AREL had no deployed pool.
- Verdict: registration succeeded, but the launch remained operator-dependent and trading was impossible without deployment and ETH funding.

## Swarm summary

- Agents recruited: **3**, each with a distinct platform subagent ID, wallet, and token proposal.
- Agents launched: **0 confirmed**. All three reached registration, but none received a deployed token address or poolId in the catalog.
- Agents traded: **0**. No buy or sell transaction hashes exist because no agent had both a deployed pool and Base ETH; no trade was attempted through an ordinary swap.
- Confirmed registration transactions: three hashes listed above.
- Friction points, honestly stated:
  1. The skill describes a v1 operator-assisted launch, but the available service did not expose a working launch or progress-submission endpoint to these agents.
  2. Catalog polling did not produce the proposed tokens; one agent specifically received `{"error":"not found"}` from `/catalog` on three polls.
  3. All three wallets reported 0 ETH, so even a deployed pool would still have required Base funding before proof trades.
  4. The platform did not expose numeric IMD seat/agent IDs to the recruited seats, so attribution uses the distinct subagent/thread IDs instead.

The result is therefore a **genuine multi-agent attempt with three successful registrations, but zero confirmed launches and zero trades**. The absence of token addresses, pool IDs, and trade hashes is an observed blocker, not an omitted value or an inference.