{
  "v": 1,
  "requestId": "f6f6ecfe-aac2-45fc-9767-316c34fa9da6",
  "chainId": 1,
  "window": {
    "fromBlock": 26021169,
    "toBlock": 26021466,
    "toBlockHash": "0x9cc4786d81fa7b1b57212ee78a02b66c8b60d8ff0bb822825e87cafc96f917ac"
  },
  "answerType": "bool",
  "answer": true,
  "figure": "10000",
  "definitions": {
    "call": "totalSupply() with no arguments, returning uint256, read with eth_call at the closing block of the pinned window",
    "contract": "Azuki at 0xed5af388653567af2f388e6224dc7c4b3241c544 on Ethereum mainnet",
    "comparison": "true if the returned value is greater than or equal to 10000, otherwise false",
    "blockTag": "the closing block is the pinned toBlock 26021466, addressed as the hex quantity 0x18d0e5a and confirmed to be the canonical block whose hash equals the pinned toBlockHash on every endpoint read; the opening block 26021169 fixes the window but no state before the closing block enters this computation",
    "returnDecoding": "the 32-byte return datum is decoded as a big-endian unsigned integer; 0x2710 = 10000",
    "threshold": "the uint256 10000, written as the decimal string \"10000\" in the recipe, compared with the unsigned operator >=",
    "totalSupply": "whatever the contract's own totalSupply() returns at that block (Azuki is ERC721A, where totalSupply is minted minus burned); no independent recount from Transfer logs is substituted for it"
  },
  "recipe": {
    "kind": "call-compare",
    "to": "0xed5af388653567af2f388e6224dc7c4b3241c544",
    "function": "function totalSupply() view returns (uint256)",
    "args": [],
    "op": ">=",
    "threshold": "10000"
  },
  "notes": "Computed directly, not from an indexer. On each endpoint I first called eth_chainId (0x1 everywhere) and eth_getBlockByNumber(0x18d0e5a) and checked the returned hash against the pinned toBlockHash 0x9cc4786d81fa7b1b57212ee78a02b66c8b60d8ff0bb822825e87cafc96f917ac; all endpoints returned that exact hash for block 26021466 (timestamp 1789940315), so every read is on the pinned canonical chain. I also confirmed the opening block 26021169 exists (hash 0xe106ba6e85ec385f661800110257cf2516aa96bbad06d07200c76709e5bbb398), though a call-compare only reads state at the closing block. Then eth_call to 0xed5af388653567af2f388e6224dc7c4b3241c544 with data 0x18160ddd (selector of totalSupply()) at block 0x18d0e5a. Endpoints used: https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast (chain id and block hash only; it refuses eth_call with 'rpc method is not whitelisted', so it contributed no figure), https://rpc.mevblocker.io/fast, https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com, https://one.valve.city/rpc/vk_demo/evm/1 and https://eth-mainnet.nodereal.io/v1/1659dfb40aa24bbb8153a677b98064d7. Four endpoints from four distinct operators returned the identical word 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002710, i.e. totalSupply() = 10000. No eth_getLogs scan was needed, so no range truncation or rate-limit shrinking applied. 10000 >= 10000 holds, so the answer is true and figure is the compared value 10000. The one open choice the request did not pin was how the threshold is encoded and how the return datum is decoded; both are stated under definitions and used consistently. The question maps exactly onto the catalogue's call-compare recipe over the pinned window, so no approximation was needed."
}