{
  "v": 1,
  "requestId": "2bdcd52c-1011-4967-a46a-4ec1e61eb6b1",
  "chainId": 1,
  "window": {
    "fromBlock": 26021169,
    "toBlock": 26021466,
    "toBlockHash": "0x9cc4786d81fa7b1b57212ee78a02b66c8b60d8ff0bb822825e87cafc96f917ac"
  },
  "answerType": "bool",
  "answer": false,
  "figure": "19950",
  "definitions": {
    "contract": "Beanz at 0x306b1ea3ecdf94ab739f1910bbda052ed4a9f949 on Ethereum mainnet (chain 1); confirmed on chain at the closing block: name() = \"Beanz\", symbol() = \"BEANZ\"",
    "call": "totalSupply() with no arguments, returning uint256, read with eth_call at the closing block of the pinned window (block 26021466, 0x18d0e5a) and at no other block",
    "blockTag": "the eth_call block tag is the pinned closing block number in hex, not \"latest\"; the earlier block 26021169 bounds the window but does not enter the computation, since the question asks only about the closing block",
    "units": "totalSupply() is a raw ERC-721 token count, not scaled by any decimals, so the threshold 20000 is compared to the returned integer as-is",
    "comparison": "answer is true if the returned value is greater than or equal to 20000 (op \">=\"), otherwise false; 19950 >= 20000 is false",
    "figure": "the compared value itself, the uint256 returned by totalSupply() at the closing block, as a decimal string"
  },
  "recipe": {
    "kind": "call-compare",
    "to": "0x306b1ea3ecdf94ab739f1910bbda052ed4a9f949",
    "function": "function totalSupply() view returns (uint256)",
    "args": [],
    "op": ">=",
    "threshold": 20000
  },
  "notes": "Computed with eth_call to 0x306b1ea3ecdf94ab739f1910bbda052ed4a9f949 with calldata 0x18160ddd (selector of totalSupply()) at block tag 0x18d0e5a = 26021466, the pinned closing block. Every endpoint was checked first with eth_chainId (all returned 0x1) and with eth_getBlockByNumber at 0x18d0e5a, whose hash was 0x9cc4786d81fa7b1b57212ee78a02b66c8b60d8ff0bb822825e87cafc96f917ac on all of them, matching the pinned toBlockHash exactly. Endpoints used, all from the public-rpcs Ethereum Mainnet row and belonging to four distinct operators: https://rpc.flashbots.net/fast (chain id and block hash confirmed; it refuses eth_call with \"rpc method is not whitelisted\", so no value from it), https://rpc.mevblocker.io/fast, https://ethereum-rpc.publicnode.com and https://one.valve.city/rpc/vk_demo/evm/1. The three operators that serve eth_call all returned the identical word 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000004dee = 19950, so the figure is a three-operator cross-check, not one endpoint's claim. 19950 < 20000, therefore the >= comparison is false. Sanity checks at the same block: name() = \"Beanz\" and symbol() = \"BEANZ\", confirming the pinned address is the Beanz NFT collection, whose supply has been fixed at 19950 since mint. No eth_getLogs scan was needed: this is a single state read at one block, so there was no range to halve and no truncation risk. An earlier probe of mine used the wrong hex block tag (0x18cd05a = 26005594) and was discarded once the block hash failed to match the pinned one; the figure above comes only from calls at 0x18d0e5a. The recipe is call-compare from the catalogue with exactly its five parameters; rerunning it on any archive-capable mainnet endpoint at the pinned closing block reproduces answer false with figure 19950."
}