{
  "v": 1,
  "requestId": "ba16d0cb-0a8f-4303-ad6e-185de5dd15c0",
  "chainId": 4663,
  "window": {
    "fromBlock": 68402727,
    "toBlock": 68438373,
    "toBlockHash": "0xba6fe0f666ac1ef01687673fc2421f09934863bce13f96473a921ac9c484dba4"
  },
  "answerType": "uint256",
  "answer": "89655873270945648401",
  "figure": "89655873270945648401",
  "definitions": {
    "volume": "sum of |amount1| over every Swap event emitted by the PoolManager 0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951 whose indexed pool id is 0xaf8aa959b7e460fbbc61d25b9896a6e3f92cbf3a2bde01fa2b5ac811f2d6a986, over the pinned window inclusive of both endpoints",
    "event": "Uniswap v4 Swap(bytes32 indexed id, address indexed sender, int128 amount0, int128 amount1, uint160 sqrtPriceX96, uint128 liquidity, int24 tick, uint24 fee), topic0 0x40e9cecb9f5f1f1c5b9c97dec2917b7ee92e57ba5563708daca94dd84ad7112f; amount1 is the second non-indexed word, read as a sign-extended int128",
    "denomination": "INTC base units, 18 decimals; no price conversion and no netting. The pool's Initialize log (block 59789737, tx 0x93d5944e9d8c58bc284e913302cf23bcaeab9260426255fdfa2316f9f1969419) gives currency0 = 0x8eaa17be69ae9616cede4671e6d837bb89491e18 (CPU, 18 decimals) and currency1 = 0xc72b96e0e48ecd4dc75e1e45396e26300bc39681 (INTC, 18 decimals), so amount1 is the INTC side as the request states",
    "sides": "both swap directions count: each swap contributes the magnitude of its INTC delta, so this is one-sided volume, not net flow; 74 of the 150 logs had amount1 >= 0 and 76 had amount1 < 0",
    "scope": "only logs emitted by the pinned PoolManager with that pool id; other pools, other managers and ERC-20 Transfer events are not counted, and removed (reorged) logs are dropped",
    "window": "exactly the pinned blocks 68402727..68438373 inclusive, whose timestamps are 2026-09-21T01:26:42Z and 2026-09-21T02:26:42Z: the 'last hour' of the request, neither widened nor shortened",
    "units": "the answer is the exact integer sum in base units, 89655873270945648401 = 89.655873270945648401 INTC"
  },
  "recipe": {
    "kind": "log-sum",
    "address": "0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951",
    "event": "event Swap(bytes32 indexed id, address indexed sender, int128 amount0, int128 amount1, uint160 sqrtPriceX96, uint128 liquidity, int24 tick, uint24 fee)",
    "sumArg": "amount1",
    "abs": true,
    "filter": {
      "id": "0xaf8aa959b7e460fbbc61d25b9896a6e3f92cbf3a2bde01fa2b5ac811f2d6a986"
    }
  },
  "notes": "Scanned once, whole, with the delivered script: node .imd/reads/skills/oracle-assess/scripts/scan.mjs --rpc https://rpc.mainnet.chain.robinhood.com --from 68402727 --to 68438373 --pin 0xba6fe0f666ac1ef01687673fc2421f09934863bce13f96473a921ac9c484dba4 --address 0x8366a39cc670b4001a1121b8f6a443a643e40951 --event \"Swap(bytes32,address,int128,int128,uint160,uint128,int24,uint24)\" --topic1 0xaf8aa959b7e460fbbc61d25b9896a6e3f92cbf3a2bde01fa2b5ac811f2d6a986 --sum data:1 --signed --abs --chunk 2000 (run with NODE_USE_ENV_PROXY=1, because this machine reaches the network through an HTTP proxy that node's fetch only honours with that variable set). It reported chainId 4663, toBlockHash 0xba6fe0f666ac1ef01687673fc2421f09934863bce13f96473a921ac9c484dba4, pinned true, 150 logs in 50 blocks over 18 chunks with no chunk refused, sum 89655873270945648401. topic0 is keccak256(\"Swap(bytes32,address,int128,int128,uint160,uint128,int24,uint24)\") = 0x40e9cecb9f5f1f1c5b9c97dec2917b7ee92e57ba5563708daca94dd84ad7112f, and --sum data:1 --signed --abs is the amount1 argument summed as |int128|, which is what sumArg amount1 with abs true means in the log-sum recipe. Endpoints: https://rpc.mainnet.chain.robinhood.com for the scan (eth_chainId 0x1237 = 4663 checked before reading, closing hash confirmed in the same run) and https://rpc-robinhood.blockmachine.io, a different operator, for one eth_getBlockByNumber(0x4144965) that returned the same closing hash plus eth_chainId 0x1237; https://rpc.ordofi.network was not reachable from this machine, and blockmachine.io rate-limits at 300 cu/minute so it was used only for those two cross-check calls. Side checks over the same pinned blocks: every matching log carries exactly 6 data words and amount1 sits in word 1 as a correctly sign-extended int128 (an independent decoder that reads the low 128 bits and compares them with the full-word int256 reading found no mismatch and reproduced the same total, 89655873270945648401); the pool's Initialize log under the same manager gives fee 0x800000 = 8388608, tickSpacing 8, hooks 0x4e3468951d49f2eea976ed0d6e75ffcb44a9a544, and symbol()/decimals() at the closing block give CPU/18 for currency0 and INTC/18 for currency1, so amount1 is the INTC side. For scale, the same 150 swaps move 9954918506930644701713928 CPU base units on the amount0 side. Nothing the question left open changes the figure: the pool id, the manager, the argument and the window are all pinned, and the recipe names the same event, contract, argument and filter, so a rerun over 68402727..68438373 lands on the same integer."
}